Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Interpretation of intensity attenuation relation of 1905 Kangra earthquake with epicentral distance and magnitude in the Northwest Himalayan region

  • Published:
Journal of the Geological Society of India

Abstract

Seismic intensity information of historical earthquake of NW Himalayas has been utilized for evaluating the attenuation of the intensity with the epicentral distance. Purposefully, the observed intensity of big historical earthquake may implicitly incorporate some site effects arising due to the near surface geology or deposited soil. The isoseismal map of the 1905 Kangra earthquake yields an area of perceptibility defined by the intensity VII (RF Scale), which is mainly elongated in the NNW-SSE direction. However, the higher isoseismals of intensity VIII and IX are more symmetrical and elongated in the SE direction. These isoseismals are more compressed in the northeast and northwest direction indicating fast attenuation characteristics, which may be either due to the presence of any transverse geotectonic feature or change in lithology. In the present study the regression relation has been derived to incorporate the attenuation of intensity with variable magnitudes at different epicentral distances. The derived attenuation relation is useful for assessing damage of a potential future earthquake (earthquake scenario-based planning purposes) for the Kangra region, Northwest Himalaya. The derived relation is mentioned below:

$I(R,Ms) = 2.856 + 1.31*Ms - 0.0017 * R - 0.9598*\ln (R)$

The decrease in intensity with distance has been used to calculate the PGA using the relation of Atkinson and Sonley (2000). The calculated values are quite in agreement with the values obtained by others around its epicentral zone. Another derived relation is used to calculate the size of the Kangra earthquake (Mw = 8.4) using intensity attenuation characteristic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambrasey, N. and Bilham, R. (2000) A note on the Kangra Ms=7.8 earthquake of 4 April, 1905. Curr. Sci., v.79(1), pp.45–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J.G. (1978) On the attenuation of modified Mercalli intensity with distance in the United States. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer., v.68, pp.1147–1179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, G.M. and Sonley, E. (2000) Empirical Relationship between Modified Mercalli Intensity and Response Spectra. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer., v.90, pp.537–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakun, W.H. (1999) Erratum to estimating earthquake location and magnitude from seismic intensity data. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer., v.79, p.557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakun, W.H., Johnston, A.C. and Hopper, M.G. (2003) Estimating locations and magnitudes of earthquakes in eastern North America from modified Mercalli intensities. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer., v.93, no.1, pp.190–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakun W.H. and Wentworth C.M. 1997 Estimating earthquake location and magnitude from seismic intensity data. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer. v. 876 pp.1502–1521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilham, R. (2004) Earthquakes in India and the Himalaya: tectonics, geodesy and history. Annals of Geophysics, v.47(2), pp.839–858.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bindi, D., Parolai, S., Grosser, H., Milkereit, C. and Karakisa, S. (2006) Crustal Attenuation Characteristics in Northwestern Turkey in the Range from 1 to 10 Hz. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer., v.96(1), pp.200–214, February doi: 10.1785/0120050038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollinger, G.A. (1977) Reinterpretation of intensity for the 1886 Charleton, South Carolina earthquake in studies related to the Charleston South Carolina earthquake of (1886) - A preliminary report. USGS Prof. Paper, 1028-B, 32p.

  • Brazee, R.J. (1976) An analysis of earthquake intensities with respect to attenuation, magnitude, and rate of recurrence, NOAA Technical Memorandum EDS-NGSCD-2, Boulder, Colorado.

  • Brazee, R.J. (1979) Reevaluation of Modified Mercalli Intensity scale for earthquake using distance as a determinant. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer, v.69, pp.911–924.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandra, U., Mcwhorter, J.G. and Nowroozi, A.A. (1979) Attenuation of intensity in Iran. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer., v.69(1), pp.237–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandra, U. (1978) Seismicity, earthquake mechanism and tectonics along the Himalayan mountain range and vicinity. Physics Earth Planet. Interior, v.16, pp.109–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra, U. (1979) Attenuation of intensities in the United States. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer, v.69, pp.2003–2024.

    Google Scholar 

  • GSI (2001) Seismotectonic atlas of India, Geol. Surv. India Spec. Publ.

  • Gupta, I.N. and Nuttli, O.W. (1976) Spatial attenuation of intensities for central U.S. earthquakes. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer., v.66, pp.743–751.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, I.N. (1976) Attenuation of Intensities base on isoseismal of earthquake in Central united States. Earthquake Notes, v.47, pp.13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutenberg, B. and Richter, C.F. (1956) Earthquake magnitude, intensity, energy and acceleration (special paper), Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer., v.46, pp.105–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanks, T.C., Hileman, J.A. and Thatcher, W. (1975) Seismic moments of the larger earthquakes of the southern California region. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer., v.86, pp.1131–1139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howel, B.J. Jr. and Schultz, T.R. (1975) Attenuation of Modified Marcalli intensity with distance from the epicenter. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer., v.65, pp.651–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • ILWIS 3.1 (2002) GIS Software, ITC, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayal, J.R., Sagina Ram, Singh, O.P., Chakraborty, P.K. and Karunakar, G. (2003) Aftershocks of the March, 1999 Chamoli Earthquake and Seismotectonic Structure of the Garhwal Himalaya. Bull. Seism. Soc. Amer, v.93(1), pp.109–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, A., Jain R. and Gupta, S.C. (2004) Seismic hazard estimation from the isoseismals of three great Indian earthquakes. Proc. 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B.C. Canada, Paper no.2362, Aug. 1–6.

  • Kumar, D., Khattri, K.N., Teotia, S.S. and Rai, S.S. (1997) Modelling of accelerograms of two Himalayan earthquakes using a novel semi-empirical method and estimation of accelerogram for a hypothetical great earthquake in the Himalaya. Curr. Sci., v.73, pp.543–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, D., Teotia, S.S. and Khattri, K.N. (1997) The representability of attenuation characteristics observed in the 1986 Dharamshala and 1991 Uttarkashi earthquakes by available empirical relations. Curr. Sci., v.73(6), pp.543–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, N., Parvez, I.A. and Virk, H.S. (2005) Estimation of Coda wave attenuation for NW Himalayan region using local earthquakes. Physics Earth Planet. Interior, v.151, pp.243–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, S. and Mahajan, A.K. (1990) Studies of Intensities of 26th April, 1986 Dharamsala Earthquake and associated tectonics. Jour. Geol. Soc. India, v.35, pp.213–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, S. and Mahajan, A.K. (1991) Dharmashla seismotectonics zone, Neotectonic and state of stress in the area. Jour. Himalayan Geol., v.21, pp.53–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, S. and Mahajan, A.K. (2001) Seismotectonics of Kangra region, Northwest Himalaya. Tectonophysics, v.331(4), pp.359–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan, A.K. (1997) A report of 29th July 1997 Sundarnagar earthquake field observations and seismotectonics. Wadia Institute report.

  • Mahajan, A.K. (1997) The 24th March 1995 Chamba earthquake (NW Himalaya), field observation and seismotectonics. Jour. Geol. Soc. India, v.51, pp.227–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan, A.K., Thakur, V.C., Sharma, M.L. and Chauhan, M. (2010) Probabilistic seismic hazard map of NW Himalaya and its adjoining area, India. Nat. Hazards, v.53, pp.443–457. DOI 10.1007/s11069-009-9439-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S. and Szeliga, W. (2010) A Catalog of Felt Intensity Data for 570 Earthquakes in India from 1636 to 2009. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer., v.100(2), pp.562–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miao, Q. and Langston, C.A. (2008) Comparative study of distance attenuation in central United States and Western India. Seismol. Res. Lett., v.79(3), pp.446–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middlemiss, C.S. (1910) The Kangra Earthquake of 4 April, 1905. Mem. Geol. Surv. India, v.37, pp.1–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narula, R.L., Shom, S.K., Kumar, S. and Panday, P. (1995) Damage pattern and delineation of isoseismal of Uttarkashi earthquake of 19th October 1991. Mem. Geol. Soc. India, no.30, pp.1–17.

  • Pantea, A. (1994) Macroseismic intensity attenuation for crustal sources on Romanian territory and adjacent areas. Natural Hazards, v.10(1–2), September, DOI: 10.1007/BF00643442.

  • Rastogi, B.K. (2000) Chamoli earthquake of magnitude 6.6 on 29 March 1999. Jour. Geol. Soc. India, v.55, pp.505–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, C.F. (1958) Elementary Seismology. W.H. Freeman and Co. San Francisco, 768p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sbar, L.M and Dubois, M.S. (1984) Attenuation of Intensity for the 1887 Northern Sonara, Mexico earthquake. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer., v.74(6): 2613–2628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S., Jain, A.K., Sinha, P., Singh, V.N. and Srivastava, I.S. (1996) The Kinnaur earthquake of January 19, 1976: A field report. Bull. Seism. Soc. Amer., v.66(3), pp.887–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, H.N., Dubey, R.K. and Hans Raj (1987) Space and time variation in the seismicity pattern preceding two earthquakes in the Himachal Pradesh, India. Tentonophysics, v.138, pp.69–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szeliga, W., Hough, S., Martin and Bilham, R. (2010) Intensity, Magnitude, Location, and Attenuation in India for Felt Earthquakes since 1762. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer, v.100(2), pp.570–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilford, N.R., Chandra, U. Amick, D.C., Moran, R. and Snider, F. (1985) Attenuation of intensities and effect of local site conditions observed intensities during the Corinth Greece earthquakes of 24 and 25 February and 4 March, 1981. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer., v.75(4), pp.923–937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trifunac, M.D. and Todorovska, M.I. (1989) Attenuation of seismic intensity in Albania and Yugoslavia. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, v.18, pp.617–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trifunac, M.D., Lee, V.W., Cao, H. and Todorovska, M.I. (1988) Attenuation of seismic intensity in Balkan countries. Department of Civil Engineering Report No. 88-01, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaré, M. and Memarian, H. (2003) Macroseismic Intensity and Attenuation laws: A Study on the Intensities of the Iranian Earthquakes of 1975–2000. Fourth International Conference of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology 12–14 May 2003 Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Oil India Limited, Duliajan, Assam, 786 602, India

    G. K. Ghosh

  2. Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, 33, GMS Road, Dehradun, 248 001, India

    A. K. Mahajan

Authors
  1. G. K. Ghosh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. K. Mahajan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. K. Ghosh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ghosh, G.K., Mahajan, A.K. Interpretation of intensity attenuation relation of 1905 Kangra earthquake with epicentral distance and magnitude in the Northwest Himalayan region. J Geol Soc India 77, 511–520 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-011-0058-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-011-0058-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation