Skip to main content
Log in

Ediacaran fossils in meso- and paleoproterozoic rocks in peninsular India extend Darwin by Abhijit Basu. Jour. Geol. Soc. India, v.73, April 2009, pp.528–536

  • Discussion
  • Published:
Journal of the Geological Society of India

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Banerjee, S., Sarkar, S., Eriksson, P.G. and Samanta, P. (2009; in press) Microbially related structures in siliciclastic sediment resembling Ediacaran fossils: examples from India, ancient and modern: In: J. Sechback (Ed.), Microbial Mats. Berlin, Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu, A. (2009a) Ediacaran fossils in Meso- and Paleoproterozoic rocks in peninsular India extend Darwin: Jour. Geol. Soc. India, v.73, pp.528–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu, A. (2009b) A working hypothesis on the Mesoproterozoic ages in India and its impact on some global concepts. Jour. Appd. Geochem., v.11, pp.43–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengtson, S., Belivanova, V., Rasmussen, B. and Whitehouse, M. (2009) The controversial “Cambrian” fossils of the Vindhyan are real but more than a billion years older: Proc. National Acad. Sci. (PNAS USA), v.106, pp.7729–7734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarti, R., Basu, A.R. and Chakrabarti, A. (2007) Trace element and Nd-isotopic evidence for sediment sources in the mid-Proterozoic Vindhyan Basin, central India: Precambrian Res., v.159, pp.260–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Alan, S. and Psarevsky, Sergei, A. (2005) Amalgamating eastern Gondwana: the evolution of the circum-Indian orogens. Earth-Science Rev., v.71, pp.229–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway-morris, S., Jensen, S. and Butterfield, N.J. (1998) Fossil Discoveries in India: Continued. Science, v.282, pp.1265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhana Raju, R., Kumar, M.K., Babu, E.V.S.S.K. and Pandit, S.A. (2002) Uranium mineralisation in the Neoproterozoic Bhima Basin at Gogi and near Ukinal: an ore petrological study. Jour. Geol. Soc. India, v.59, pp.299–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairchild, I.J. and Kennedy, M.J. (2007) Neoproterozoic glaciation in the Earth System: Jour. Geol. Soc. London, v.164, pp.895–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, H. J. (2005). Palaeoproterozoic dubiofossils from India revisited — Vindhyan triploblastic animal burrows or pseudofossils?: Jour. Palaeont. Soc. India, v.50, pp.113–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopalan, K. and Kumar, A. (2008). Phlogopite K-Ca dating of Narayanpet kimberlites, south India: implications to the discordance between their Rb-Sr and Ar/Ar ages. Precambrian Res. v.167, pp.377–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goutham, M.R., Patil, S.K., Seena, M.S. and Anoop, E.T. (2008) Preliminary rock and paleomagnetic results from the (Neoproterozoic) Bhima Basin, India. Jour. Indian Geophys. Union, v.12, No.2, pp.59–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goutham, M.R., Raghubabu, K., Prasad, C.V.R.K., Subbarao, K.V. and Damodara Reddy, V. (2006) A Neoproterozoic geomagnetic field reversal from the Kurnool Group, India: implications for stratigraphic correlation and formation of Gondwana. Jour. Geol. Soc. India, v.67, pp.221–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gururaja, M.N., Ashok Kumar, P., Rao, C.V. and Chauhan, R.H. (2000) Precambrian-Cambrian boundary strata in Cuddapah Basin, Andhra Pradesh. Geol. Surv. India, Spec. Publ. 55, pp.155–162.

  • Kale, V.S. and Peshwa, V.V. (1995) Bhima Basin. Geological Society of India Monograph, 132p.

  • Kulkarni, K.G., Borkar, V.D. and Bhattacharjee, S. (2004). Restudy of type specimens of trace fossils from Vindhyan Supergroup of Chambal Valley: Gondwana Geol. Mag., v.19, pp.71–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melezhik, V.A., Pokrovsky, B.G., Fallick, A.E., Kuznetsov, A.B. and Bujakaite, M.I. (2009). Constraints on 87Sr/86Sr of Late Ediacaran seawater: insight from Siberian high-Sr limestones: Jour. Geol. Soc. London, v.166, pp. 183–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagaraja Rao, B.K., Rajurkar, S.T., Ramalingaswamy, G. and Ravindra Babu, G. (1987) Stratigraphy, structure and evolution of the Cuddapah Basin. Mem. Geol. Soc. India, No.6, pp.33–86.

  • Nayak, S.S., Rao, K.R.P., Kudari, S.A.D. and Ravi, S. (2001) Geology and tectonic setting of the kimberlites and lamproites of Southern India. Geol. Surv. India, Spec. Publ. No.58, pp.567–575.

  • Padmakumari, V.M. and Dayal, A.M. (1987) Geochronological studies of some mafic dykes around the Cuddapah Basin, South India. Mem. Geol. Soc. India, No.6, pp.369–373.

  • Pandey, B.K., Natarajan, V., Krishna V. and Pandit, S.A. (2008) U-Pb and Sm-Nd isotopic studies on uraniferous brecciated limestone from Bhima Basin: evidence for a Mesoproterozoic U-mineralisation event in southern peninsular India (Abstract). In: National Symposium on Significant Milestones in the Growth of Geochemistry in India during the 50 year period: 1958–2008, February, 2008, Hyderabad, pp.24–25.

  • Pandit, S.A., Natarajan, V. and Dhana Raju, R. (2002) Exploration for uranium in the Bhima Basin in parts of Karnataka, India. EARFAM, AMD, Hyderabad, v.14, pp.59–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan, Vimal, R., Pandit, Manoj, K. and Meert, Joseph, G. (2008) A Cautionary Note on the age of the Paleomagnetic Pole Obtained from the Harohalli Dyke Swarms, Dharwar Craton, Southern India. In: Rajesh K. Srivastava, Ch. Sivaji and N.V. Chalapathi Rao (Eds.), Indian Dykes: Geochemistry, Geophysics and Geochronology, Narosa Publishing House Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India, pp.339–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarangi, S., Gopalan, K. and Kumar, S. (2004). Pb-Pb age of earliest megascopic, eukaryotic alga bearing Rohtas Formation, Vindhyan Supergroup, India: implications for Precambrian atmospheric oxygen evolution: Precambrian Research, v.132, pp.107–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott Smith, Barbara, H. (2007) Lamproites and kimberlites in India. Jour. Geol. Soc. India, v.69, pp.443–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, M., Shukla, M. and Venkatachala, B.S. (1992). Metaphyte and metazoan fossils from Precambrian sediments of India: a critique: The Palaeobotanist, v.40, pp.8–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, R.M. (1997) Lambapur Uranium Deposit and its Significance on the Uranium Potential of Srisailam Sub-Basin, Cuddapah Basin, Andhra Pradesh. In: Rajendra Singh and K.K. Dwivedy (Eds.), Exploration of Atomic Minerals, Part-III, AMD Training Course Handbook, AMD, Hyderabad, v.3, pp.26–42.

  • Viswanathiah, M.N. and Venkatachalapathy, V. (1987) Palynology of Precambrian formations of India. Geol. Surv. India, Spec. Publ., No.11, v.I, pp.45–61.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sabot, H. Ediacaran fossils in meso- and paleoproterozoic rocks in peninsular India extend Darwin by Abhijit Basu. Jour. Geol. Soc. India, v.73, April 2009, pp.528–536. J Geol Soc India 74, 654–656 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-009-0164-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-009-0164-z

Keywords

Navigation