Management of Iatrogenic Ulnar Nerve Transection
- 98 Downloads
A case of iatrogenic ulnar nerve laceration at the elbow is presented. Five subsequent surgeries over the course of the ensuing 20 months were performed to address this complication. The article examines the scientific basis for the various decisions needed to formulate a strategy that effectively addresses the problem. Emphasis is placed on the microsurgery of nerve topics: direct nerve repair, autogenous cable nerve grafting, biodegradable conduits, decellularized nerve allograft, and transfer of the anterior interosseous nerve to the ulnar motor branch. The discussion covers the relationship between choices made at the level of the original injury at the cubital tunnel to the timing and selection of distal reconstructive efforts, with specific attention to the distinction between end-to-end anterior interosseous to ulnar motor branch transfer as opposed to the supercharged end-to-side variation of this procedure.
KeywordsGrafting Laceration Nerve Release Ulnar
- 2.Murovic JA (2009) Upper-extremity peripheral nerve injuries: a Louisiana state university health sciences center literature review with comparison of the operative outcomes of 1837 Louisiana state university health sciences center median, radial, and ulnar nerve lesions. Neurosurgery 65:A11–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Brooks DN, Weber RV, Chao JD, Rinker BD, Zoldos J, Robichaux MR, Ruggeri SB, Anderson KA, Bonatz EE, Wisotsky SM, Cho MS, Wilson C, Cooper EO, Ingari JV, Safa B, Parrett BM, Buncke GM (2012) Processed nerve allografts for peripheral nerve reconstruction: a multicenter study of utilization and outcomes in sensory, mixed and motor nerve reconstructions. Microsurgery 32(1):1–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Chiriac S, Facca S, Diaconu M, Gouzou S, Liverneaux P (2012) Experience of using the bioresorbable copolyester poly (DL-lactide-E-caprolactone) nerve conduit guide NeurolacTM for nerve repair in peripheral nerve defects: report on a series of 28 lesions. J Hand Surg Eu 37(4):342–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar