Advertisement

Journal of Earth Science

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 117–122 | Cite as

River management and flooding: The lesson of December 2015–January 2016, central USA

  • Robert E. Criss
  • Mingming Luo
Article

Abstract

The huge winter storm of December 23–29, 2015 delivered heavy rainfall in a broad swath across the USA, deluging East-Central Missouri. Record high river levels were set at many sites, but damages were most pronounced in developed floodplain areas, particularly where high levees were built or river channels greatly narrowed. An average of 20 cm of rain that mostly fell in three days impacted the entire 10 300 km2 Meramec Basin. Compared to the prior record flood of 1982, the highest relative stage (+1.3 m) on Meramec River occurred at Valley Park proximal to (1) a new levee, (2) a landfill in the floodway, (3) large floodplain construction fills, and (4) tributary creek basins impacted by suburban sprawl. Even though only a small fraction of the 1.8 million km2 Mississippi River watershed above St. Louis received extraordinary rainfall during this event, the huge channelized river near and below St. Louis rapidly rose to set the 3rd-highest to the highest stages ever, exhibiting the flashy response typical of a much smaller river.

Key Words

floods Mississippi River levees floodplain development 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Belt, C. B., 1975. The 1973 Flood and Man’s Constriction of the Mississippi River. Science, 189(4204): 681–684. doi:10.1126/science.189.4204.681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Criss, R. E., 2016. Statistics of Evolving Populations and Their Relevance to Flood Risk. Journal of Earth Science, 27(1): 2–8. doi:10.1007/s12583-015-0641-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Criss, R. E., Shock, E. L., 2001. Flood Enhancement through Flood Control. Geology, 29: 875–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Criss, R. E., Wilson, D. A., 2003. Rivers of the St. Louis Confluence Region. In: At the Confluence: Rivers, Floods, and Water Quality in the St. Louis Region. MBG Press, St. Louis. 10–29Google Scholar
  5. Ehlmann, B. L., Criss, R. E., 2006. Enhanced Stage and Stage Variability on the Lower Missouri River Benchmarked by Lewis and Clark. Geology, 34(11): 977–981. doi:10.1130/g22754a.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. FEMA, 1995. FIRM: Flood Insurance Rate Map, Panels 29189C0286H and 29189C0267H. August 2, 1995, St. Louis Co., MissouriGoogle Scholar
  7. Frederickson, G. C., Criss, R. E., 1999. Isotope Hydrology and Residence Times of the Unimpounded Meramec River Basin, Missouri. Chemical Geology, 157(3/4): 303–317. doi:10.1016/s0009-2541(99)00008-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Funk, J. L., Robinson, J. W., 1974. Changes in the Channel of the Lower Missouri River and Effects on Fish and Wildlife. Missouri Department of Conservation, Aquatic Series 11, Jefferson City. 52Google Scholar
  9. GAO, 1995. Midwest Flood: Information on the Performance, Effects and Control of Levees. GAO/RCED 95-125.81, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  10. Hasenmueller, E. A., Criss, R. E., 2013. Water Balance Estimates of Evapotranspiration Rates in Areas with Varying Land Use. In: Alexandris, S. G., ed., Evapotranspiration—An Overview. 1–21. [2016-1-12]. http://www.intechopen.com/articles/show/title/water-balance-estimates-ofevapotranspiration-rates-in-areas-with-varying-land-useGoogle Scholar
  11. Jackson, J. P., 1984. Passages of a Stream: A Chronicle of the Meramec. University of Missouri Press, ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  12. NOAA, 2013. Atlas 14. Precipitation-Frequency Atlas of the United States. Volume 8 Version 2.0: Midwestern States. [2016-1-9]. http://www.nws.noaa.gov/oh/hdsc/PF_documents/ Atlas14_Volume8.pdf, and http://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds_map_cont.html?bkmrk=moGoogle Scholar
  13. NWS, 2016a. National Weather Service Forecast Office St. Louis, MO. [2016-1-9]. http://www.weather.gov/lsxGoogle Scholar
  14. NWS, 2016b. National Weather Service “Advanced Hydrologic Prediction Service”. [2016-1-9]. http://water.weather.gov/ahpsGoogle Scholar
  15. Pan, Z. T., Zhang, Y. J., Liu, X. D., et al., 2016. Current and Future Precipitation Extremes over Mississippi and Yangtze River Basins as Simulated in CMIP5 Models. Journal of Earth Science, 27(1): 22–36. doi:10.1007/s12583-016-0627-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pinter, N., 2005. ENVIRONMENT: One Step Forward, Two Steps back on U.S. Floodplains. Science, 308(5719): 207–208. doi:10.1126/science.1108411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pinter, N., Jemberie, A. A., Remo, J. W. F., et al., 2008. Flood Trends and River Engineering on the Mississippi River System. Geophysical Research Letters, 35(23). doi:10.1029/2008gl035987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. USGS, 1983. Water Resources Data Missouri Water Year 1983. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Data Report MO-83-1.292, RollaGoogle Scholar
  19. USGS, 2016. Water Data for the Nation. [2016-1-9]. http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/rtGoogle Scholar
  20. Walker, B., 2016. Comparison of the Birds Point-New Madrid Floodway, Mississippi River and the Yolo Bypass, Sacramento River. Journal of Earth Science, 27(1): 47–54. doi:10.1007/s12583-016-0628-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Winston, W. E., Criss, R. E., 2002. Geochemical Variations during Flash Flooding, Meramec River Basin, May 2000. Journal of Hydrology, 265(1–4): 149–163. doi:10.1016/s0022-1694(02)00105-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Yang, Y., Endreny, T. A., Nowak, D. J., 2016. Application of Advection-Diffusion Routing Model to Flood Wave Propagation: A Case Study on Big Piney River, Missouri USA. Journal of Earth Science, 27(1): 9–14. doi:10.1007/s12583-016-0626-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© China University of Geosciences and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Earth and Planetary SciencesWashington University in St. LouisSt. LouisUSA
  2. 2.School of Environmental StudiesChina University of GeosciencesWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations