Skip to main content

True amplitude extraction technology and its application in pre-stack seismic data

Abstract

Common-reflection-point (CRP) gather is a bridge that connects seismic data and petrophysical parameters. Pre-stack attributes extraction and pre-stack inversion, both of them are important means of reservoir prediction. Quality of CRP gather usually has great impact on the accuracy of seismic exploration. Therefore, pre-stack CRP gathers noise suppression technology becomes a major research direction. Based on the vector decomposition principle, here we propose a method to suppress noise. This method estimates optimal unit vectors by searching in various directions and then suppresses noise through vector angle smoothing and restriction. Model tests indicate that the proposed method can separate effective signal from noise very well and suppress random noise effectively in single wavenumber case. Application of our method to real data shows that the method can recover effective signal with good amplitude preserved from pre-stack noisy seismic data even in the case of low signal to noise ratio (SNR).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References Cited

  1. Cao, S. Y., Liu, H. W., Sa, L. M., 2002. A Study on the Restoration of the Original Fracture Information. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 29: 103–105 (in Chinese with English Abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Canales, L. L., 1984. Random Noise Reduction. SEG International Exposition and 54th Annual Meeting, Atlanta. 525–527

    Google Scholar 

  3. Foster, D. J., Mosher, C. C., 1992. Suppression of Multiple Reflectors Using the Radon Transform. Geophysics, 57(3): 386–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hampson, D., 1986. Inverse Velocity Stacking for Multiples Estimation. Journal of Canadian Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 22(1): 44–55

    Google Scholar 

  5. He, Y. J., 2010. The Research of Noise Elimination Methods for Three-Component Seismic Pre-Stack Data: [Dissertation]. China University of Geosciences, Beijing (in Chinese with English Abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hu, T., White, R. E., 1998. Robust Multiple Suppression Using Adaptive Beam Forming. Geophysical Prospecting, 46: 227–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kabir, M. M. N., Marfurt, K. J., 1999. Toward True Amplitude Multiples Removal. The Leading Edge, 18(1): 66–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu, G. C., Chen, X. H., Li, J. Y., et al., 2011. Seismic Noise Attenuation Using Nonstationary Polynomial Fitting. Applied Geophysics, 8(1): 18–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lu, W. K., 2011. Seismic Random Noise Suppression Based on the Discrete Cosine Transform. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 46(2): 202–206 (in Chinese with English Abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ma, Z. X., Sun, Z. D., Bai, H. J., et al., 2010. Comparative Studies on 3D3C VSP Multiple Wave Field Separation Methods. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 45(2): 219–224 (in Chinese with English Abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Özbek, A., 2000. Adaptive Beam Forming with Generalized Linear Constraints. SEG International Exposition and 70th Annual Meeting, Calgary. 2081–2084

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sheriff, R. E., Geldart, L. P., 1995. Exploration Seismology, 2nd Ed.. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Thorson, J. R., Claerbout, J. F., 1985. Velocity-Stack and Slant-Stack Stochastic Inversion. Geophysics, 50(12): 2727–2741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, H. W., 1989. Noise Suppression Using Vector Resolution Method. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 24(1): 16–29 (in Chinese with English Abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wang, H. W., 1990. Noise Elimination by the Use of Vector Resolution. Geophysics, 55(9): 1191–1201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wu, A. D., Cao, S. Y., 2002. Random Noise Suppression of Seismic Signal Using Orthogonal Multiwavelets. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 37(5): 473–476 (in Chinese with English Abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Xia, H. R., Chen, D. G., Zhou, K. M., et al., 2001. Noise Elimination with Median-Constrained Vector Resolution. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 40(3): 29–33 (in Chinese with English Abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yu, S. P., Cai, X. L., Su, Y. C., 1988. Improvent of Signal-to-Noise Ratio of Stack Section Using Polynomial Fitting of Seismic Signals. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 23(2): 131–139 (in Chinese with English Abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhou, B., Greenhalgh, S. A., 1996. Multiple Suppression by 2D Filtering in the Parabolic t-p Domain: A Wave-Equation-Based Approach. Geophysical Prospecting, 44(1): 375–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Siyuan Cao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, X., Cao, S. & Yuan, D. True amplitude extraction technology and its application in pre-stack seismic data. J. Earth Sci. 26, 522–529 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-015-0567-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • vector decomposition
  • noise suppression
  • angle smooth
  • spline function