Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Is speckle tracking actually helpful for cardiac resynchronization therapy?

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Journal of Echocardiography Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

What is the specific role of echocardiography in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)? CRT has proven to be highly effective for improving symptoms and survival of patients with advanced heart failure (HF) and wide QRS. However, a significant minority of patients do not respond favorably to CRT on the basis of standard clinical selection criteria, including the electrocardiographic QRS width. Subsequently, echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony has been considered useful for CRT for selected responders, but findings by multicenter studies suggest that its predictive value was not sufficiently robust to replace routine selection criteria for CRT. A more recent approach, however, using speckle-tracking echocardiography yields more accurate quantification of regional wall contraction. Speckle-tracking approaches have therefore generated a great deal of interest about their clinical applications for CRT. Although reports on speckle tracking have not been included in any recommendations as to whether patients should undergo CRT based on the current guidelines, speckle tracking can play an important supplementary part in CRT on the basis of a case-by-case clinical decision for challenging cases. Here, we review the strengths of speckle-tracking methods, and their current potential for clinical use in CRT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abraham WT, Fisher WG, Smith AL, et al. Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1845–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bristow MR, Saxon LA, Boehmer J, et al. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2140–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cleland JG, Daubert JC, Erdmann E, et al. The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1539–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chung ES, Leon AR, Tavazzi L, et al. Results of the predictors of response to CRT (PROSPECT) trial. Circulation. 2008;117:2608–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Suffoletto MS, Dohi K, Cannesson M, et al. Novel speckle-tracking radial strain from routine black-and-white echocardiographic images to quantify dyssynchrony and predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circulation. 2006;113:960–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tops LF, Suffoletto MS, Bleeker GB, et al. Speckle-tracking radial strain reveals left ventricular dyssynchrony in patients with permanent right ventricular pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:1180–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Delgado V, Ypenburg C, van Bommel RJ, et al. Assessment of left ventricular dyssynchrony by speckle tracking strain imaging comparison between longitudinal, circumferential, and radial strain in cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:1944–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tanaka H, Hara H, Saba S, et al. Prediction of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy by speckle tracking echocardiography using different software approaches. J Am Soc Echocardiogr: Off Publ Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009;22:677–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gorcsan J 3rd, Oyenuga O, Habib PJ, et al. Relationship of echocardiographic dyssynchrony to long-term survival after cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circulation. 2010;122:1910–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Oyenuga O, Hara H, Tanaka H, et al. Usefulness of echocardiographic dyssynchrony in patients with borderline QRS duration to assist with selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3:132–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tanaka H, Nesser HJ, Buck T, et al. Dyssynchrony by speckle-tracking echocardiography and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: results of the Speckle Tracking and Resynchronization (STAR) study. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:1690–700.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Risum N, Tayal B, Hansen TF, et al. Identification of typical left bundle branch block contraction by strain echocardiography is additive to electrocardiography in prediction of long-term outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:631–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Maruo T, Seo Y, Yamada S, et al. The Speckle Tracking Imaging for the Assessment of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (START) study. Circ J: Off J Japanese Circ Soc. 2015;79:613–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dickstein K, Vardas PE, Auricchio A, et al. Focused Update of ESC Guidelines on device therapy in heart failure: an update of the 2008 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure and the 2007 ESC guidelines for cardiac and resynchronization therapy. Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association and the European Heart Rhythm Association. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:2677–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, Ellenbogen KA, et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused update incorporated into the ACCF/AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2013;127:e283–352.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hara H, Oyenuga OA, Tanaka H, et al. The relationship of QRS morphology and mechanical dyssynchrony to long-term outcome following cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2680–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. van Bommel RJ, Tanaka H, Delgado V, et al. Association of intraventricular mechanical dyssynchrony with response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients with a narrow QRS complex. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:3054–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Bleeker GB, Holman ER, Steendijk P, et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with a narrow QRS complex. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:2243–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dohi K, Suffoletto M, Murali S, et al. Benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy to a patient with a narrow QRS complex and ventricular dyssynchrony identified by tissue synchronization imaging. Eur J Echocardiogr: J Work Group Echocardiogr Eur Soc Cardiol. 2005;6:455–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ruschitzka F, Abraham WT, Singh JP, et al. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy in heart failure with a narrow QRS complex. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1395–405.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lim P, Buakhamsri A, Popovic ZB, et al. Longitudinal strain delay index by speckle tracking imaging: a new marker of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circulation. 2008;118:1130–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mochizuki Y, Tanaka H, Tatsumi K, et al. Easy-to-use comprehensive speckle-tracking approach for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circ J: Off J Japanese Cir Soc. 2014;78:2250–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bleeker GB, Kaandorp TA, Lamb HJ, et al. Effect of posterolateral scar tissue on clinical and echocardiographic improvement after cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circulation. 2006;113:969–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hummel JP, Lindner JR, Belcik JT, et al. Extent of myocardial viability predicts response to biventricular pacing in ischemic cardiomyopathy. Heart Rhythm. 2005;2:1211–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ypenburg C, Schalij MJ, Bleeker GB, et al. Impact of viability and scar tissue on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in ischaemic heart failure patients. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:33–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Norisada K, Kawai H, Tanaka H, et al. Myocardial contractile function in the region of the left ventricular pacing lead predicts the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy assessed by two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010;23:181–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Foley PW, Chalil S, Ratib K, et al. Fluoroscopic left ventricular lead position and the long-term clinical outcome of cardiac resynchronization therapy. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011;34:785–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Butter C, Auricchio A, Stellbrink C, et al. Effect of resynchronization therapy stimulation site on the systolic function of heart failure patients. Circulation. 2001;104:3026–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ypenburg C, van Bommel RJ, Borleffs CJ, et al. Long-term prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy is related to the extent of left ventricular reverse remodeling at midterm follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:483–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Murphy RT, Sigurdsson G, Mulamalla S, et al. Tissue synchronization imaging and optimal left ventricular pacing site in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97:1615–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Saba S, Marek J, Schwartzman D, et al. Echocardiography-guided left ventricular lead placement for cardiac resynchronization therapy: results of the Speckle Tracking Assisted Resynchronization Therapy for Electrode Region trial. Circ Heart Fail. 2013;6:427–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Khan FZ, Virdee MS, Palmer CR, et al. Targeted left ventricular lead placement to guide cardiac resynchronization therapy: the TARGET study: a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:1509–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tanaka H, Hara H, Adelstein EC, et al. Comparative mechanical activation mapping of RV pacing to LBBB by 2D and 3D speckle tracking and association with response to resynchronization therapy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3:461–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Tanaka H, Hara H, Saba S, et al. Usefulness of three-dimensional speckle tracking strain to quantify dyssynchrony and the site of latest mechanical activation. Am J Cardiol. 2010;105:235–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Tanaka H, Tatsumi K, Matsumoto K, et al. Emerging role of three-dimensional speckle tracking strain for accurate quantification of left ventricular dyssynchrony. Echocardiography. 2013;30:E292–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Seo Y, Ishizu T, Enomoto Y, et al. Endocardial surface area tracking for assessment of regional LV wall deformation with 3D speckle tracking imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4:358–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Tatsumi K, Tanaka H, Tsuji T, et al. Strain dyssynchrony index determined by three-dimensional speckle area tracking can predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2011;9:11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Tatsumi K, Tanaka H, Matsumoto K, et al. Mechanical left ventricular dyssynchrony in heart failure patients with narrow QRS duration as assessed by three-dimensional speckle area tracking strain. Am J Cardiol. 2011;108:867–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Seo Y, Yamasaki H, Kawamura R, et al. Left ventricular activation imaging by 3-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography. Comparison with electrical activation mapping. Circ J. 2013;77:2481–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Seo Y, Ishizu T, Kawamura R, et al. Three-dimensional propagation imaging of left ventricular activation by speckle-tracking echocardiography to predict responses to cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28:606–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan

    Hidekazu Tanaka & Ken-ichi Hirata

Authors
  1. Hidekazu Tanaka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ken-ichi Hirata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hidekazu Tanaka.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Hidekazu Tanaka and Ken-ichi Hirata declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tanaka, H., Hirata, Ki. Is speckle tracking actually helpful for cardiac resynchronization therapy?. J Echocardiogr 14, 53–60 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12574-016-0275-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12574-016-0275-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation