Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of left ventricular rotation by two-dimensional speckle tracking method and real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with MRI tagging method

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Journal of Echocardiography Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Recently, it has become possible to evaluate left ventricular (LV) torsion by two-dimensional (2D) speckle tracking images. However, LV torsion is a three-dimensional (3D) performance, which per se cannot be assessed by the 2D speckle tracking method. The present study investigated the accuracy of the 2D speckle tracking method and real-time 3D echocardiography in measuring LV rotation, comparing with the MRI tagging method.

Methods

We assessed LV apical rotation using the 2D speckle tracking method, real-time 3D echocardiography, and MRI tagging method in 26 normal subjects, and compared the results of these three methods. LV apical rotation was measured just before the level in which the posterior papillary muscle was absorbed into the free wall.

Results

The degree of LV apical rotation evaluated by the 2D speckle tracking method (Δθ 2D) was significantly smaller than that evaluated by 3D echocardiography (Δθ 3D) and the MRI tagging method (Δθ MRI) (Δθ 2D 7.3 ± 2.8°; Δθ 3D 8.8 ± 3.4°; Δθ MRI 9.0 ± 3.4°; Δθ 2D vs. Δθ 3D, p = 0.0001; Δθ 2D vs. Δθ MRI, p < 0.0001). There were good correlations among Δθ 2D, Δθ 3D, and Δθ MRI, but agreement between Δθ 3D and Δθ MRI (mean difference 0.14 ± 1.43°) was better than that between Δθ 2D and Δθ MRI (mean difference 1.68 ± 1.89°).

Conclusion

The degree of LV apical rotation was underestimated with the 2D speckle tracking method compared with the MRI tagging method, whereas it could be precisely measured by 3D echocardiography.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Streeter DD Jr, Spotnitz HM, Patel D, Ross J Jr, Sonnenblick EH. Fiber orientation in the canine left ventricle during diastole and systole. Circ Res. 1969;24:339–47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sengupta PP, Khandheria BK, Korinek J, Wang J, Belohlavek M. Biphasic tissue Doppler waveforms during isovolumic phases are associated with asynchronous deformation of subendocardial and subepicardial layers. J Appl Physiol. 2005;99:1104–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sallin EA. Fiber orientation and ejection fraction in the human left ventricle. Biophys J. 1969;9:954–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hansen DE, Daughters GT II, Alderman EL, Ingels NB Jr, Stinson EB, Miller DC. Effect of volume loading, pressure loading, and inotropic stimulation on left ventricular torsion in humans. Circulation. 1991;83:1315–26.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ingels NB Jr, Daughters GT 2nd, Stinson EB, Alderman EL. Measurement of midwall myocardial dynamics in intact man by radiography of surgically implanted markers. Circulation. 1975;52:859–67.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Waldman LK, Fung YC, Covell JW. Transmural myocardial deformation in the canine left ventricle: normal in vivo three-dimensional finite strains. Cir Res. 1985;57:152–63.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ingels NB Jr, Daughters GT, Stinson EB, Alderman EL, Miller DC. Three-dimensional left ventricular midwall dynamics in the transplanted human heart. Circulation. 1990;81:1837–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zerhouni EA, Parish DM, Rogers WJ, Yang A, Shapiro EP. Human heart: tagging with MR imaging: a method for noninvasive assessment of myocardial motion. Radiology. 1988;169:59–63.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Clark NR, Reichek N, Bergey P, Hoffman E, Brownson D, Palmon L, et al. Circumferential myocardial shortening in the normal human left ventricle. Circulation. 1991;84:67–74.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Moore CC, Lugo-Olivieri CH, McVeigh ER, Zerhouni EA. Three-dimensional systolic strain patterns in the normal human left ventricle; characterization with tagged MR imaging. Radiology. 2000;214:453–66.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Notomi Y, Lysyansky P, Setser RM, Shiota T, Popovic ZB, Martin-Miklovic MG, et al. Measurement of ventricular torsion by two-dimensional ultrasound speckle tracking imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:2034–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Helle-Valle T, Crosby J, Edvardsen T, Lyseggen E, Amundsen BH, Smith HJ, et al. New noninvasive method for assessment of left ventricular rotation. Circulation. 2005;112:3149–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Takeuchi M, Nakai H, Kokumai M, Nishikage T, Otani S, Lang RM. Age related changes in left ventricular twist assessed by two-dimensional speckle tracking imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2006;19:1077–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nakai H, Takeuchi M, Nishikage T, Kokumai M, Otani S, Lang RM. Effect of aging on twist-displacement loop by 2-dimensional speckle tracking imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2006;19:880–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Saito M, Okayama H, Nishimura K, Ogimoto A, Ohtsuka T, Inoue K, et al. Determinants of left ventricular untwisting behaviour in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy: analysis by two-dimensional speckle tracking. Heart. 2009;95:290–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bland JM, Altman D. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;327:307–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Park SJ, Miyazaki C, Bruce CJ, Ommen S, Miller FA, Oh JK. Left ventricular torsion by two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography in patients with diastolic dysfunction and normal ejection fraction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008;21:1129–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Goffinet C, Chenot F, Robert A, Pouleur AC, le Polain de Waroux JB, Vancrayenest D, et al. Assessment of subendocardial vs. subepicardial left ventricular rotation and twist using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography: comparison with tagged cardiac magnetic resonance. Eur Heart J. 2009;30:608–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Young AA, Kramer CM, Ferrari VA, Axel L, Reichek N. Three-dimensional left ventricular deformation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 1994;90:854–67.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. van Dalen BM, Vletter WB, Soliman OI, ten Cate FJ, Geleijnse ML. Importance of transducer position in the assessment of apical rotation by speckle tracking echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008;21:895–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

We disclose no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hidetaka Hayashi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hayashi, H., Izumi, C., Takahashi, S. et al. Evaluation of left ventricular rotation by two-dimensional speckle tracking method and real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with MRI tagging method. J Echocardiogr 9, 83–89 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12574-010-0077-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12574-010-0077-2

Keywords

Navigation