Skip to main content
Log in

End-systolic and end-diastolic left atrial volume assessment by two-dimensional echocardiography: a comparison study with magnetic resonance imaging

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Journal of Echocardiography Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The left atrial volume (LAV) is an important indicator of the severity of certain diseases, and measuring LAV through the cardiac cycle may enable the evaluation of various left atrium (LA) functional parameters. The results of two-dimensional (2D) echocardiographic LAV measurement methods vary, and no technique is accepted as being optimal.

Objective

This study compared the accuracy of end-systolic and end-diastolic LAV measurements by 2D echocardiography with those obtained by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Methods

Fifty consecutive patients who underwent both echocardiography and MRI due to clinical reasons with nonselective cardiac disease were studied. LAVs by 2D echocardiography were obtained with the prolate ellipsoid (PE), biplane area-length (AL), and modified Simpson’s (MS) methods.

Results

End-systolic and end-diastolic LAVs calculated by each method correlated significantly with MRI results (P < 0.0001). The prolate ellipsoid method provided LAVs that most correlated with MRI results, and the biplane area-length and modified Simpson’s methods provided LAVs with small mean differences (<5 ml) compared to MRI results.

Conclusion

All three methods of 2D echocardiographic LAV measurement provide valuable LAV data, suggesting the possibility of evaluating various LA functional parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Takemoto Y, Barnes ME, Seward JB, Lester SJ, Appleton CA, Gersh BJ, et al. Usefulness of left atrial volume in predicting first congestive heart failure in patients > or =65 years of age with well-preserved left ventricular systolic function. Am J Cardiol. 2005;96:832–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ristow B, Ali S, Whooley MA, Schiller NB. Usefulness of left atrial volume index to predict heart failure hospitalization and mortality in ambulatory patients with coronary heart disease and comparison to left ventricular ejection fraction (from the Heart and Soul Study). Am J Cardiol. 2008;102:70–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tsutsui H, Tsuchihashi M, Takeshita A. Mortality and readmission of hospitalized patients with congestive heart failure and preserved versus depressed systolic function. Am J Cardiol. 2001;88:530–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Persson H, Lonn E, Edner M, Baruch L, Lang CC, Morton JJ, et al. Diastolic dysfunction in heart failure with preserved systolic function: need for objective evidence: results from the CHARM Echocardiographic Substudy-CHARMES. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:687–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Melenovsky V, Borlaug BA, Rosen B, Hay I, Ferruci L, Morell CH, et al. Cardiovascular features of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction versus nonfailing hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy in the urban Baltimore community: the role of atrial remodeling/dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:198–207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rossi A, Cicoira M, Zanolla L, Sandrini R, Golia G, Zardini P, et al. Determinants and prognostic value of left atrial volume in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40:1425–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Murata M, Iwanaga S, Tamura Y, Kondo M, Kouyama K, Murata M, et al. A real-time three-dimensional echocardiographic quantitative analysis of left atrial function in left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. Am J Cardiol. 2008;102:1097–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stefanadis C, Dernellis J, Lambrou S, Toutouzas P. Left atrial energy in normal subjects, in patients with symptomatic mitral stenosis, and in patients with advanced heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 1998;82:1220–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Leung DY, Boyd A, Ng AA, Chi C, Thomas L. Echocardiographic evaluation of left atrial size and function: current understanding, pathophysiologic correlates, and prognostic implications. Am Heart J. 2008;156:1056–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lester SJ, Ryan EW, Schiller NB, Foster E. Best method in clinical practice and in research studies to determine left atrial size. Am J Cardiol. 1999;84:829–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Pellikka PA, et al. Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography’s Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005;18:1440–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ujino K, Barnes ME, Cha SS, Langins AP, Bailey KR, Seward JB, et al. Two-dimensional echocardiographic methods for assessment of left atrial volume. Am J Cardiol. 2006;98:1185–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bowman AW, Kovács SJ. Left atrial conduit volume is generated by deviation from the constant-volume state of the left heart: a combined MRI–echocardiographic study. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004;286:H2416–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rodevan O, Bjornerheim R, Ljosland M, Maehle J, Smith HJ, Ihlen H. Left atrial volumes assessed by three- and two-dimensional echocardiography compared to MRI estimates. Int J Card Imaging. 1999;15:397–410.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1(8476):307–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vaziri SM, Larson MG, Benjamin EJ, Levy D. Echocardiographic predictors of nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 1994;89:724–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Benjamin EJ, D’Agostino RB, Belanger AJ, Wolf PA, Levy D. Left atrial size and the risk of stroke and death. The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 1995;92:835–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Li F, Wang Q, Yao GH, Zhang PF, Ge ZM, Zhang M, et al. Impact of the number of image planes of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography on the accuracy of left atrial and ventricular volume measurements. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2008;34:40–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hudsmith LE, Petersen SE, Francis JM, Robson MD, Neubauer S. Normal human left and right ventricular and left atrial dimensions using steady state free precession magnetic resonance imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2005;7:775–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sievers B, Kirchberg S, Addo M, Bakan A, Brandts B, Trappe HJ. Assessment of left atrial volumes in sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation using the biplane area-length method and cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging with TrueFISP. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2004;6:855–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Therkelsen SK, Groenning BA, Svendsen JH, Jensen GB. Atrial and ventricular volume and function in persistent and permanent atrial fibrillation, a magnetic resonance imaging study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2005;7:465–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tirrito SJ, Augustine DR, Kerut EK. How to measure left atrial volume. Echocardiography. 2004;21:569–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Järvinen V, Kupari M, Hekali P, Poutanen VP. Assessment of left atrial volumes and phasic function using cine magnetic resonance imaging in normal subjects. Am J Cardiol. 1994;73:1135–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshihiro Seo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Uno, K., Seo, Y., Ishizu, T. et al. End-systolic and end-diastolic left atrial volume assessment by two-dimensional echocardiography: a comparison study with magnetic resonance imaging. J Echocardiogr 8, 52–58 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12574-010-0035-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12574-010-0035-z

Keywords

Navigation