Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical significance of anterior mitral leaflet fibrillation in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: comparison with blood flow and wall motion of the left atrial appendage

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Journal of Echocardiography Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and purpose

Diastolic fibrillation of the anterior mitral leaflet (AML) is seen in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, its clinical significance has been unclear. On the other hand, reduced blood flow velocity in the left atrial appendage (LAA) may be associated with LA thrombus formation. In this study, we investigate the relationship between the flow velocity and the wall motion velocity of the LAA and diastolic fibrillation of the AML in patients with nonvalvular AF.

Methods

We performed transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in 45 consecutive patients with chronic nonvalvular AF. The LAA flow velocity was measured by pulsed Doppler echocardiography with the sample volume positioned at the center of the LAA. The LAA wall motion velocity was measured by pulsed Doppler tissue imaging (DTI) with the sample volume at the medial wall of the LAA. The AML fibrillation velocity was measured by pulsed DTI with the sample volume at the AML tip.

Results

The AML fibrillation velocity could be measured in 44 patients (97.8%), and the LAA flow and wall motion velocities were measurable in 35 (77.8%) and 42 (93.3%) patients, respectively. The AML fibrillation velocity had a range from 4 to 21 cm/s and showed significant positive correlation with the LAA flow velocity (r = 0.82, P < 0.001) and the wall motion velocity (r = 0.80, P < 0.001) of the LAA. An AML fibrillation velocity of ≤7 cm/s predicted patients having a tendency to LA thrombus formation (LAA flow velocity ≤20 cm/s) with high sensitivity (87.5%) and specificity (88.9%).

Conclusion

The AML fibrillation velocity seems to be a viable substitute for the LAA flow velocity in the detection of flow stagnation in the LA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yamanouchi H, Tomonaga M, Shimada H, et al. Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation as a cause of fatal massive cerebral infarction in the elderly. Stroke. 1989;12:1653–6.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mohr JP, Caplan LR, Melski JW, et al. The Harvard Cooperative Stroke Registry: a prospective registry. Neurology. 1978;8:754–62.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chan K.-L, Richard WA, Joseph LB, et al. Transesophageal echocardiographic correlates of thromboembolism in high-risk patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. The Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Investigators Committee on Echocardiography. Ann Intern Med. 1998;128:639–47.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Igarashi Y, Kasai H, Yamashita F, et al. Lipoprotein(a), left atrial appendage function and thromboembolic risk in patients with chronic nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Jpn Circ J. 2000;64:93–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fatkin D, Kelly RP, Feneley MP. Relations between left atrial appendage blood flow velocity, spontaneous echocardiographic contrast and thromboembolic risk in vivo. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:961–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. García-Fernández MA, Torrecilla EG, San Román D, et al. Left atrial appendage Doppler flow patterns: implications on thrombus formation. Am Heart J. 1992;124:955–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mügge A, Kühn H, Nikutta P, et al. Assessment of left atrial appendage function by biplane transesophageal echocardiography in patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation: identification of a subgroup of patients at increased embolic risk. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:599–607.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fukuda N, Shinohara H, Sakabe K, et al. Transthoracic Doppler echocardiographic measurement of left atrial appendage blood flow velocity: comparison with transoesophageal measurement. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2003;4:191–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Suetsugu M, Matsuzaki M, Toma Y, et al. Detection of mural thrombi and analysis of blood flow velocities in the left atrial appendage using transesophageal two-dimensional echocardiography and pulsed Doppler flowmetry. J Cardiol. 1988;18:385–94.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Manabe K, Oki T, Tabata T, et al. Transesophageal echocardiographic prediction of initially successful electrical cardioversion of isolated atrial fibrillation. Effects of left atrial appendage function. Jpn Heart J. 1997;38:487–95.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Oki T, Oishi Y, Tanaka H, et al. Renewed interest in left atrial function: what do we need to evaluate clinically? J Echocardiogr. 2005;3:60–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Verhorst PM, Kamp O, Welling RC, et al. Transesophageal echocardiographic predictors for maintenance of sinus rhythm after electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 1997;79:1355–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Omran H, Jung W, Schimpf R, et al. Echocardiographic parameters for predicting maintenance of sinus rhythm after internal atrial defibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 1998;81:1446–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Antonielli E, Pizzuti A, Pálinkás A, et al. Clinical value of left atrial appendage flow for prediction of long-term sinus rhythm maintenance in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:1443–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tabata T, Oki T, Iuchi A, et al. Evaluation of left atrial appendage function by measurement of changes in flow velocity patterns after electrical cardioversion in patients with isolated atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 1997;79:615–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Carerj S, Trifiró MP, Granata A, et al. Comparison between transesophageal echocardiography and transthoracic echocardiography with harmonic tissue imaging for left atrial appendage assessment. Clin Cardiol. 2002;25:268–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pozzoli M, Selva A, Skouse D, et al. Visualization of left atrial appendage and assessment of its function by transthoracic second harmonic imaging and contrast-enhanced pulsed Doppler. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2002;3:13–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ito T, Suwa M, Hirota Y, et al. Influence of left atrial function on Doppler transmitral and pulmonary venous flow patterns in dilated and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: evaluation of left atrial appendage function by transesophageal echocardiography. Am Heart J. 1996;131:122–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nagueh SF, Middleton KJ, Kopelen HA, et al. Doppler tissue imaging: a noninvasive technique for evaluation of left ventricular relaxation and estimation of filling pressures. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:1527–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Oki T. The role of tissue Doppler imaging as a new diagnostic option in evaluating left ventricular function. J Echocardiogr. 2003;1:29–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sohn DW, Song JM, Zo JH, et al. Mitral annulus velocity in the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function in atrial fibrillation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1999;12:927–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Winsberg F, Gabor GE, Hernberg JG, et al. Fluttering of the mitral valve in aortic insufficiency. Circulation. 1970;41:225–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nobuo Fukuda.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fukuda, Y., Fukuda, N., Sakabe, K. et al. Clinical significance of anterior mitral leaflet fibrillation in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: comparison with blood flow and wall motion of the left atrial appendage. J Echocardiogr 7, 19–24 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12574-009-0005-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12574-009-0005-5

Keywords

Navigation