Skip to main content
Log in

Accuracy of three-dimensional echocardiography in patients with prior anteroseptal myocardial infarction

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Journal of Echocardiography Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Echocardiography is the most feasible modality for monitoring cardiac volume and function. However, conventional two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE) is frequently not accurate in measuring cardiac performance in cases of abnormal left ventricular wall motion, because of the geometric assumptions. Quantitative gated scintigraphy and magnetic resonance imaging are reliable modalities, but are expensive and not feasible for repetitive use. Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE) has been proved to be applicable in daily practice. The purpose of this study was to confirm the superiority of RT3DE to 2DE in assessing cardiac volume and function in patients with abnormal wall motion.

Methods

The subjects were 41 patients with old anteroseptal myocardial infarction who underwent left ventricular volume and functional measurement by RT3DE, 2DE, and left ventriculography (LVG). End-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), and ejection fraction (EF) from RT3DE and 2DE were measured and compared with results from LVG.

Results

RT3DE correlated well with LVG in measurements of EDV, ESV, and EF (r = 0.815, 0.940, and 0.812, respectively; P < 0.001 each). Likewise, 2DE correlated with LVG, but underestimated left ventricular volume, particularly EDV (r = 0.652, 0.909, and 0.761, respectively; P < 0.001 each).

Conclusion

Values derived from RT3DE were closer to those from LVG than were values derived from 2DE. RT3DE provides important information on cardiac function in patients with prior anteroseptal myocardial infarction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guerci AD, Ross RS. TIMI 2 and the role of angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shiota T, McCarthy PM, White RD, et al. Initial clinical experience of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography in patients with ischemic and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 1999;84:1068–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Teichholz LE, Kreulen T, Herman MV, Gorlin R. Problems in echocardiographic volume determinations echocardiographic–angiographic correlations in the presence or absence of asynergy. Am J Cardiol. 1976;37:7–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sapin PM, Gopal AS, Clarke GB, Smith MD, King DL. Three-dimensional echocardiography compared to two-dimensional echocardiography for measurement of left ventricular mass anatomic validation in an open chest canine model. Am J Hypertens. 1996;9:467–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Arai K, Hozumi T, Matsumura Y, et al. Accuracy of measurement of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction by new real-time three-dimensional echocardiography in patients with wall motion abnormalities secondary to myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2004;94:552–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M, et al. Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on quantitation of two-dimensional echocardiograms. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1989;2:358–67.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Schiller NB, Acquatella H, Ports TA, et al. Left ventricular volume from paired biplane two-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation. 1979;60:547–55.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Myerson SG, Montgomery HE, World MJ, Pennell DJ. Left ventricular mass: reliability of M-mode and 2-dimensional echocardiographic formulas. Hypertension. 2002;40:673–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chuang ML, Beaudin RA, Riley MF, et al. Three-dimensional echocardiographic measurement of left ventricular mass: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and two-dimensional echocardiographic determinations in man. Int J Card Imaging. 2000;16:347–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Faber TL, Vansant JP, Pettigrew RI, et al. Evaluation of left ventricular endocardial volumes and ejection fractions computed from gated perfusion SPECT with magnetic resonance imaging comparison of two methods. J Nucl Cardiol. 2001;8:645–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kawai J, Tanabe K, Morioka S, Shiotani H. Rapid freehand scanning three-dimensional echocardiography accurate measurement of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction compared with quantitative gated scintigraphy. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2003;16:110–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shirai N, Yamagishi H, Yoshiyama M, et al. Incremental value of assessment of regional wall motion for detection of multivessel coronary artery disease in exercise 201-Tl gated myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:443–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee D, Fuisz AR, Fan PH, Hsu TL, Liu CP, Chiang HT. Real-time 3-dimensional echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular volume: correlation with magnetic resonance imaging—a validation study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2001;14:1001–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mannaerts HF, Van Der Heide JA, Kamp O, et al. Quantification of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction using freehand transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiography comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2003;16:101–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pini R, Giannazzo G, Bari MD, et al. Transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiographic reconstruction of left and right ventricles: in vitro validation and comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Am Heart J. 1997;133:221–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Haruna Y, Mitsuoka H, Ooba M, et al. Quantitative analysis of regional ventricular motion by real-time 3D echocardiography: comparative study to semi-quantifications by conventional 2D-echo measurements and LVG. Circ J. 2004;68 Suppl 1:296.

  18. Fleming SM, Cumberledge B, Kiesewetter C, Parry G, Kenny A. Usefulness of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography for reliable measurement of cardiac output in patients with ischemic or idiopathic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 2005;95:308–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Takuma S, Ota T, Muro T, et al. Assessment of left ventricular function by real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography compared with conventional noninvasive methods. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2001;14:275–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tanabe K, Belohlavek M, Jakrapanichakul D, Bae RY, Greenleaf JF, Seward JB. Three-dimensional echocardiography precision and accuracy of left ventricular volume measurement using rotational geometry with variable numbers of slice resolution. Echocardiography. 1998;15:575–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Buck T, Hunold P, Wentz KU, Tkalec W, Nesser HJ, Erbel R. Tomographic three-dimensional echocardiographic determination of chamber size and systolic function in patients with left ventricular aneurysm comparison to magnetic resonance imaging, cineventriculography, and two-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation. 1997;96:4286–97.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Teupe C, Takeuchi M, Ram SP, Pandian NG. Three-dimensional echocardiography in-vitro validation of a new, voxel-based method for rapid quantification of ventricular volume in normal and aneurysmal left ventricles. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2001;17:99–105.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gutierrez-Chico JL, Zamorano JL, de Isla LP, et al. Comparison of left ventricular volumes and ejection fractions measured by three-dimensional echocardiography versus by two-dimensional echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with various cardiomyopathies. Am J Cardiol. 2005;95:809–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nosir YF, Fioretti PM, Vletter WB, et al. Accurate measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction by three-dimensional echocardiography. A comparison with radionuclide angiography. Circulation. 1996;94:460–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim WY, Sogaard P, Egeblad H, Andersen NT, Kristensen B. Three-dimensional echocardiography with tissue harmonic imaging shows excellent reproducibility in assessment of left ventricular volumes. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2001;14:612–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Yamagishi H, Shirai N, Yoshiyama M, et al. Incremental value of left ventricular ejection fraction for detection of multivessel coronary artery disease in exercise 201-Tl gated myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:131–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Shiota T. Clinical application of 3-dimensional echocardiography. J Echocardiogr. 2005;3:93–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshiaki Maruyama.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maruyama, Y., Toyama, K., Sato, S. et al. Accuracy of three-dimensional echocardiography in patients with prior anteroseptal myocardial infarction. J Echocardiogr 7, 9–15 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12574-008-0002-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12574-008-0002-0

Keywords

Navigation