Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cooperative membership and coffee productivity in Rwanda’s specialty coffee sector

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Food Security Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study uses data from 1,024 coffee producing households to address two critical questions regarding the role of cooperatives in Rwanda’s coffee sector: Does cooperative membership increase adoption of best practices and coffee productivity? and do cooperatives improve farm household welfare? Using a propensity score matching technique to account for selection bias, we find that cooperatives are a critical institution for building farmer capacity, promoting adoption of improved technologies and inputs, and increasing productivity. We discuss the role that cooperatives can play in increasing farmer welfare and reestablishing the coffee sector as a pillar of growth in the country.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Our use of the term specialty coffee refers to fully-washed Arabica coffee. We note that while all of the specialty coffee comes through the fully washed channel, some lower quality, ordinary coffees are fully washed and never make the specialty grade.

  2. Coffee productivity in Rwanda is reported per tree instead of per unit of land (acre or hectare). Reasons for this include the number of coffee trees that farmers plant per hectare (density) can vary significantly from one farmer to the next, even across fields. Farmers typically have 2–4 coffee fields in different locations, making the area measure more difficult and problematic.

  3. Mean bias before and after matching was 18.9 and 2.9, respectively. P-values of LR test before and after matching are <0.01 and 0.99, respectively.

  4. Abadie and Imbens standard errors were calculated for the nearest neighbor

    PSM matching estimators (Abadie and Imbens 2006, 2016).

  5. The studies by Verhofstadt and Maertens (2015) were conducted in the Muhanga district in the Southern province, mainly on maize and horticulture cooperatives, and the study by Ma and Abdulai was focused on apple production.

  6. Results from additional PSM estimators such as Kernel and local linear estimators are available from the authors upon request.

References

  • Aakvik, A. (2001). Bounding a matching estimator: The case of a Norwegian training program. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 63(1), 115–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abadie, A., & Imbens, G. (2006). Large sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects. Econometrica, 74(1), 235–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abadie, A., & Imbens, G. W. (2016). Matching on the estimated propensity score. Econometrica, 84(2), 781–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abate, G. T., Francesconi, G. N., & Getnet, K. (2014). Impact of agricultural cooperatives on smallholders’ technical efficiency: Empirical evidence from Ethiopia. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 85(2), 257–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abebaw, D., & Haile, M. G. (2013). The impact of cooperatives on agricultural technology adoption: Empirical evidence from Ethiopia. Food Policy, 38, 82–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansoms, A. (2010). Views from below on the pro-poor growth challenge: The case of rural Rwanda. African Studies Review, 53(2), 97–123.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Attwood, D. M., & Baviskar, B. S. (1987). Why do some co-operatives work but not others? A comparative analysis of sugar co-operatives in India. Economic and Political Weekly, A38–A56.

  • Becker, S. O., & Caliendo, M. (2007). Mhbounds-sensitivity analysis for average treatment effects.

  • Becker, S. O., & Ichino, A. (2002). Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores. The Stata Journal, 2(4), 358–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, T., & Spielman, D. J. (2009). Reaching the rural poor through rural producer organizations? A study of agricultural marketing cooperatives in Ethiopia. Food Policy, 34(1), 60–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bizoza, A. R. (2011). Farmers, institutions and land conservation: institutional economic analysis of bench terraces in the highlands of Rwanda. PhD Thesis.

  • Boudreaux, K. C. (2011). Economic liberalization in Rwanda’s coffee sector: A better brew for success. Yes Africa Can (pp. 185–199). Success Stories from a Dynamic Continent.

  • Bro, A. S., Clay, D. C., Ortega, D. L., & Lopez, M. C. (2017). Determinants of adoption of sustainable production practices among smallholder coffee producers in Nicaragua (pp. 1–21). Environment, Development and Sustainability.

  • Bucagu, C., Vanlauwe, B., & Giller, K. E. (2013). Managing Tephrosia mulch and fertilizer to enhance coffee productivity on smallholder farms in the eastern African highlands. European Journal of Agronomy, 48, 19–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caliendo, M. (2006). Microeconometric evaluation of labour market policies (Vol. 568). Springer Science & Business Media.

  • Caliendo, M., Hujer, R., & Thomsen, S. L. (2008). The employment effects of job-creation schemes in Germany: A microeconometric evaluation. In Modelling and evaluating treatment effects in econometrics (pp. 381–428). Emerald Group publishing limited.

  • Cantore, N. (2011). The crop intensification program in Rwanda: A sustainability analysis. Overseas Development Institute.

  • Chagwiza, C., Muradian, R., & Ruben, R. (2016). Cooperative membership and dairy performance among smallholders in Ethiopia. Food Policy, 59, 165–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiputwa, B., Spielman, D. J., & Qaim, M. (2015). Food standards, certification, and poverty among coffee farmers in Uganda. World Development, 66, 400–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clay, D. C., Bro, A.S., Church, R.A., Bizoza, A., Ortega, D.L. (2016). “Determinants of farmer Investment in Coffee Production: Finding a path to sustainable growth in Rwanda’s coffee sector.” Research report. Feed the future Africa Great Lakes region coffee support program. Food security policy – Innovation lab. August, 2016. Kigali, Rwanda.

  • Clay, D. C., Bro, A. S., Church, R. A., Ortega, D. L., & Bizoza, A. R. (2018). Farmer incentives and value chain governance: Critical elements to sustainable growth in Rwanda's coffee sector. Journal of Rural Studies, 63, 200–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehejia, R. H., & Wahba, S. (2002). Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(1), 151–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Develtere, P., Pollet, I., & Wanyama, F. (Eds.). (2008). Cooperating out of poverty: The renaissance of the African cooperative movement. International Labour Organisation: Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diao, X., Fan, S., Kanyarukiga, S., & Yu, B. (2010). Agricultural growth and investment options for poverty reduction in Rwanda (Vol. 166). Intl food policy res Inst.

  • Dillon, A. (2011). The effect of irrigation on poverty reduction, asset accumulation, and informal insurance: Evidence from northern Mali. World Development, 39(12), 2165–2175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiPrete, T. A., & Gangl, M. (2004). Assessing bias in the estimation of causal effects: Rosenbaum bounds on matching estimators and instrumental variables estimation with imperfect instruments. Sociological Methodology, 34(1), 271–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elder, S. D., Zerriffi, H., & Le Billon, P. (2012). Effects of fair trade certification on social capital: The case of Rwandan coffee producers. World Development, 40(11), 2355–2367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, G. (2016). Rwanda: an agrarian developmental state? Third World Quarterly, 37(2), 354–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellin, J., Lundy, M., & Meijer, M. (2009). Farmer organization, collective action and market access in Meso-America. Food Policy, 34(1), 16–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, G., Nicholson, C., Delgado, C., Staal, S., & Ehui, S. (2000). Agroindustrialization through institutional innovation transaction costs, cooperatives and milk-market development in the east-African highlands. Agricultural Economics, 23(3), 279–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ikeno, J. (2007). The declining coffee economy and low population growth in Mwanga District, Tanzania. African Study Monographs, 35(supplementary issue), 3–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imbens, G. W. (2015). Matching methods in practice: Three examples. Journal of Human Resources, 50(2), 373–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Coffee Organization (ICO) (2015). Sustainability of the coffee sector in Africa. http://www.ico.org/documents/cy2014-15/icc-114-5e-overview-coffee-sector-africa.pdf. Accessed July 2019.

  • Kodama, Y. (2007). New role of cooperatives in Ethiopia: The case of Ethiopian coffee farmers cooperatives. African Study Monographs 35 (Suppl.), 87-108.

  • Liverpool-Tasie, L. S. O. (2014). Do vouchers improve government fertilizer distribution? Evidence from Nigeria. Agricultural Economics, 45(4), 393–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loevinsohn, M. E., Mugarura, J., & Nkusi, A. (1994). Cooperation and innovation by farmer groups: Scale in the development of Rwandan valley farming systems. Agricultural Systems, 46(2), 141–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, W., & Abdulai, A. (2016). Does cooperative membership improve household welfare? Evidence from apple farmers in China. Food Policy, 58, 94–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macchiavello, R., Morjaria, A. (2015). Competition and Relational Contracts: Evidence from Rwanda’s Coffee Mills. Working Paper.

  • Markelova, H., Meinzen-Dick, R., Hellin, J., & Dohrn, S. (2009). Collective action for smallholder market access. Food Policy, 34(1), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Commerce, Industry, Investment Promotion, Tourism and Cooperatives (MINICOM). (2006). Sector strategies document: Cooperatives sector. Kigali: Republic of Rwanda.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mojo, D., Fischer, C., & Degefa, T. (2016). Collective action and aspirations: The impact of cooperatives on Ethiopian coffee farmers’ aspirations. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 87(2), 217–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mujawamariya, G., D’Haese, M., & Speelman, S. (2013). Exploring double side-selling in cooperatives, case study of four coffee cooperatives in Rwanda. Food Policy, 39, 72–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nabahungu, N. L., & Visser, S. M. (2011). Contribution of wetland agriculture to Farmers' livelihood in Rwanda. Ecological Economics, 71(15), 4–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narrod, C., Roy, D., Okello, J., Avendaño, B., Rich, K., & Thorat, A. (2009). Public–private partnerships and collective action in high value fruit and vegetable supply chains. Food Policy, 34(1), 8–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Agricultural Export Development Board (NAEB) (2016). National Coffee Census 2015.

  • Neven, D., Reardon, T., & Hopkins, R. (2005). Case studies of farmer linking to dynamic markets in southern Africa: The fort hare farmers group. Mimeo: Michigan State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office des Cultures Industrielles du Rwanda (OCIR). (2005). Horizon 2010 action plan for the revival of the coffee industry in Rwanda. Kigali: Republic of Rwanda.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfecto, I., Armbrecht, I., Philpott, S. M., Soto-Pinto, L., & Dietsch, T. V. (2007). Shaded coffee and the stability of rainforest margins in northern Latin America. In Stability of tropical rainforest margins (pp. 225–261) Berlin: Springer.

  • Poole, N., & de Frece, A. (2010). A review of existing Organisational forms of smallholder farmers’ associations and their contractual relationships with other market participants in the east and southern African ACP region.

  • Poole, N., & Donovan, J. (2014). Building cooperative capacity: The specialty coffee sector in Nicaragua. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, 4(2), 133–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, P. R. (2002). Observational studies. In Observational Studies (pp. 1–17). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). Assessing sensitivity to an unobserved binary covariate in an observational study with binary outcome. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 45(2), 212–218.

  • Smith, J. A., & Todd, P. E. (2005). Does matching overcome LaLonde's critique of nonexperimental estimators? Journal of Econometrics, 125(1), 305–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tendler, J. (1983). What to think about cooperatives: A guide from Bolivia. Washington: Inter-American Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uphoff, N. (1993). Grassroots organizations and NGOs in rural development: Opportunities with diminishing states and expanding markets. World Development, 21(4), 607–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varangis, P., Siegel, P., Giovannucci, D., & Lewin, B. (2003). Dealing with the coffee crisis in Central America: Impacts and strategies,” The World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper No. 2993.

  • Verhofstadt, E., & Maertens, M. (2014). Smallholder cooperatives and agricultural performance in Rwanda: Do organizational differences matter? Agricultural Economics, 45(S1), 39–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhofstadt, E., & Maertens, M. (2015). Can agricultural cooperatives reduce poverty? Heterogeneous impact of cooperative membership on farmers' welfare in Rwanda. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 37(1), 86–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wintgens, J. N. (2004). Coffee: Growing, processing, sustainable production. In A guidebook for growers, processors, traders, and researchers. WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.

  • World Bank. (2008). World development report 2008. Washington, DC.: Agriculture for Development. World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Youkhana, A., & Idol, T. (2009). Tree pruning mulch increases soil C and N in a shaded coffee agroecosystem in Hawaii. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 41(12), 2527–2534.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was undertaken by the Feed the Future Africa Great Lakes Region Coffee Support Program (AGLC) as an associate award under the Innovation Lab for Food Security Policy, implemented by Michigan State University and partners. The authors gratefully acknowledge support for this research from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Bureau of Food Security. The views expressed in this document do not necessarily reflect those of USAID or the U.S. Government.

The authors wish to acknowledge the contributions of the AGLC public and private sector partners as well at the dedication of the IPAR-Rwanda research and field teams led by Roger Mugisha, Lillian Mutesi, Paul Kayira, and Linda Uwamahoro.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David L. Ortega.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ortega, D.L., Bro, A.S., Clay, D.C. et al. Cooperative membership and coffee productivity in Rwanda’s specialty coffee sector. Food Sec. 11, 967–979 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-019-00952-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-019-00952-9

Keywords

Navigation