Recognizing farmer-generated innovations through contests: insights from four African countries
Despite the recognition that farmers are an important source of agricultural innovations, farmer-generated innovations have received little attention from researchers. This paper presents the experiences and outcomes of applying contests to elicit farmer-generated innovations and to reward outstanding farmer innovators in selected districts in Ethiopia, Kenya, Malawi and Zambia. The contests attracted 349 eligible entries, most of which were submitted by male innovators. The identified innovations were mainly technically-oriented practices, and only very few institutional innovations were recognized. The most common domains of innovations were related to livestock, crop management, and soil and water management. In particular, many of the innovators were using local resources to develop plant-based biopesticides and ethnoveterinary medicines in order to reduce production costs and improve food production. The findings of this study suggest that farmers are active experimenters who continuously generate remarkable and locally adapted innovations, which can indirectly contribute to efforts to achieve sustainable agricultural intensification or to make agriculture climate smart. The study concludes that farmers possess valuable ethnobotanical knowledge and innovation-generating potential that need to be harnessed and supported; and contest is an effective means to scout and acknowledge farmer innovators while simultaneously raising awareness of the farmer innovation approach among relevant stakeholders.
KeywordsContest Prize rewards Farmer-generated innovations Sustainable intensification Africa
This research was financially supported by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) through the research project “Program of Accompanying Research for Agricultural Innovation (PARI). The author gratefully acknowledges project partners from EDRI, KALRO, DARS, ZARI, the Forum for Agricultural Research in Africa (FARA), and stakeholders who supported the implementation of the contests in the four study countries. The author also thanks the PARI project team members at ZEF for the helpful discussions, and Evelyn Baraké and Sougrynoma Zainatou Sore for their excellent research assistance, as well as the four anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
- Bragdon, S. H., & Smith, C. (2015). Small-scale farmer innovation. Geneva: Quaker United Nations Office.Google Scholar
- Davis, L., & Davis, J. (2004). How effective are prizes as incentives to innovation? Evidence from three 20th century contests. Elsinore: DRUID summer conference.Google Scholar
- Find Your Feet. (2012). Recognising the unrecognised: Farmer innovation in northern Malawi. London: Find Your Feet.Google Scholar
- Gupta, A. K. (2016). Grassroots innovation. India: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
- Kalil, T. (2006). Prizes for technological innovation. Discussion paper 2006–08. Washington, DC: The Hamilton Project, Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
- Letty, B., Noordin, Q., Magagi, M., & Waters-Bayer, A. (2011). Farmers take the lead in research and development. In The Worldwatch Institute (2011). State of the world: Innovations that nourish the planet. Washington, DC: The Worldwatch Institute.Google Scholar
- Masters, W. A., & Delbecq, B. (2008). Accelerating innovation with prize rewards: History and typology of technology prizes and a new contest design for innovation in African agriculture. IFPRI Discussion Paper 00835, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Reij, C., & Waters-Bayer, A. (Eds.). (2001). Farmer innovation in Africa: A source of inspiration for agricultural development. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
- Reij, C., Tappan, G., & Smale, M. (2009). Re-greening the Sahel: Farmer-led innovation in Burkina Faso and Niger. In D. J. Spielman & R. Pandya-Lorch (Eds.), Millions fed: Proven successes in agricultural development (pp. 53–58). Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
- Scotchmer, S. (2004). Innovation and incentives. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Sumberg, J., & Okali, C. (1997). Farmers’ experiments: Creating local knowledge. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers Inc..Google Scholar
- Waters-Bayer, A., van Veldhuizen, L., Wongtschowski, M., & Wettasinha, C. (2009a). Recognizing and enhancing processes of local innovation. In Sanginga et al. (Eds.), Innovation Africa: Enriching farmers; livelihoods (pp. 239–254). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
- Waters-Bayer, A., Wettasinha, C., & van Veldhuizen, L. (2009b). Building partnerships to promote local innovation processes. In I. Scoones & J. Thompson (Eds.), Farmer first revisited. Innovation for agricultural research and development. Warwickshire: Practical Action Publishing.Google Scholar
- Wettasinha, C., & Waters-Bayer, A. (Eds.), (2010). Farmer-led joint research: Experiences of PROLINNOVA partners. Silang, Cavite, Philippines: IIRR/Leusden: PROLINNOVA International Secretariat, ETC EcoCulture.Google Scholar
- Wettasinha, C., Wongtschowski, M., & Waters-Bayer, A. (Eds.), (2008). Recognising local innovation: Experience of PROLINNOVA partners. Silang, Cavite, the Philippines: International Institute of Rural Reconstruction/Leusden: PROLINNOVA International Secretariat, ETC EcoCulture.Google Scholar
- Wright, B. D. (1983). The economics of invention incentives: patents, prizes, and research contracts. The American Economic Review, 73(4), 691–707.Google Scholar
- Wünscher, T., & Tambo, J. A. (2016). Identification and acceleration of farmer innovativeness in upper East Ghana. In J. von Braun & F. Gatzweiler (Eds.), Technological and institutional innovations for marginalized smallholders in agricultural development (pp. 163–180). Cham, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar