Does gender matter in the adoption of push-pull pest management and other sustainable agricultural practices? Evidence from Western Kenya
- 168 Downloads
This paper examines whether there is a difference in the adoption of push-pull pest management technology (PPT) and other sustainable agricultural practices (SAPs) on field-plots managed by males or females and those that are jointly-managed by males and females using plot-level and gender disaggregated data from Western Kenya. The econometric results suggest that there was no gender heterogeneity in the adoption of PPT after controlling for the manager of the field-plot and plot characteristics. However, gender differences in the adoption pattern of some other SAPs were evident. Jointly-managed plots were more likely to receive animal manure and soil and water conservation measures compared to male-managed and female-managed plots. We did not find any gender differences in the adoption of maize-grain legume intercropping, crop rotation, fertilizer use and improved maize seeds. The analysis further showed a significant correlation between PPT and other SAPs, suggesting that the adoption of agricultural technologies is interrelated. Lack of evidence on gender differences suggests that promotion and dissemination of PPT can be supported equally for male and female cereal farmers. Wider adoption can be achieved through promoting awareness of the technology and offering training through field days.
KeywordsPush-pull technology Complementarity Trade-offs Plot manager Agricultural Technology Adoption Kenya Africa
This paper is based on the Partnership for Economic Policy (PEP)-Structural Transformation of African Agriculture and Rural Spaces ‘STAARS’ Project-10 and International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe) research work carried out with financial support from the Government of Canada through the International Development Research Centre (IDRC), and the European Union through the Integrated Biological Control Applied Research Programme (IBCARP). PEP receives core funding from the Department for International Development (DFID) of the United Kingdom (or UK Aid) and the IDRC. icipe also receives core funding from DFID, the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida), the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC), Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ), Germany, and the Kenyan Government. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 91st Agricultural Economics Society Conference (AES 2017) at the Royal Dublin Society Center, Ireland. We are grateful for the useful comments from the participants at the conference. The views and opinions expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of icipe or PEP.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Braun, v. J., & Kennedy, E. (1994). Agricultural Commercialization, Economic Development, and Nutrition. Washington: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- Cappellari, L., & Jenkins, S. P. (2003). Multivariate probit regression using simulated maximum likelihood. The Stata Journal, 3(3), 278–294.Google Scholar
- Croppenstedt, A., Goldstein, M., & Rosas, N. (2013). Gender and agriculture: inefficiencies, segregation, and low productivity traps. The World Bank Research Observer, lks024.Google Scholar
- Diiro, G., Ker, A. P., & Sam, A. G. (2015). The role of gender on fertilizer adoption in Uganda. African Journal of Agricultural & Resource Economics, 10(2), 117–130.Google Scholar
- Ellis, A. (2007). Gender and economic growth in Kenya: Unleashing the power of women. Washington: The World Bank.Google Scholar
- Fafchamps, M. (2004). Market institutions in sub-Saharan Africa: Theory and evidence. Comparative Institutional Analysis (CIA) Series, Vol. 3. Google Scholar
- Gilbert, R. A., Sakala, W. D., & Benson, T. D. (2002). Gender analysis of a nationwide cropping system trial survey in Malawi. African Studies Quarterly, 6(1–2), 223–243.Google Scholar
- Gilley, J. E., Risse, L. M., & Eghball, B. (2002). Managing runoff following manure application. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 57(6), 530–533.Google Scholar
- Government of Kenya (GoK). (2010). Agricultural Sector Development Strategy, 2010–2020. Retrieved from http://www.ascu.go.ke/DOCS/ASDS%20Final.pdf.
- Greene, W. (2012). Econometric Analysis (7th ed.). England: Pearson Higher Education.Google Scholar
- Khan, Z. R., & Pickett, J. A. (2004). The ‘push-pull’ strategy for stemborer management: a case study in exploiting biodiversity and chemical ecology. In G. M. Gurr, S. D. Wratten, & M. A. Altieri (Eds.), Ecological Engineering for Pest Management: Advances in Habitat Manipulation for Arthropods (pp. 155–164). Wallingford: CABI Publ.Google Scholar
- Khan, Z. R., Hassanali, A., Overholt, W., Khamis, T. M., Hooper, A. M., Pickett, J. A., Wadhams, L. J., & Woodcock, C. M. (2002). Control of witchweed Striga hermonthica by intercropping with Desmodium spp., and the mechanism defined as allelopathic. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 28(9), 1871–1885.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Khan, Z. R., Midega, C. A., Pittchar, J. O., Murage, A. W., Birkett, M. A., Bruce, T. J., & Pickett, J. A. (2014). Achieving food security for one million sub-Saharan African poor through push–pull innovation by 2020. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 369(1639), 20120284.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Kristjanson, P., Waters-Bayer, A., Johnson, N., Tipilda, A., Njuki, J., Baltenweck, I., Delia G., & MacMillan, S. (2014). Livestock and women’s livelihoods. In Gender in Agriculture (pp. 209–233). Springer.Google Scholar
- Marenya, P., Kassie, M., & Tostao, E. (2015). Fertilizer use on individually and jointly managed crop plots in Mozambique. Journal of Gender, Agriculture and Food Security, 1(2), 62–83.Google Scholar
- Murage, A., Obare, G., Chianu, J., Amudavi, D., Pickett, J., & Khan, Z. R. (2011). Duration analysis of technology adoption effects of dissemination pathways: a case of “push–pull” technology for control of striga weeds and stemborers in Western Kenya. Crop Protection, 30(5), 531–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ogborn, J. (1984). Striga: Research priorities with specific reference to agronomy. In E. S. Ayensu, H. Dogget, R. D. Keynes, J. Marton-Lefevre, L. J. Musselman, C. Parker, & A. Pickering (Eds.), Striga: Biology and control (pp. 195–212). Ottawa: ICSU press, IDRC.Google Scholar
- Peterman, A., Behrman, J. A., & Quisumbing, A. R. (2014). A Review of Empirical Evidence on Gender Differences in Nonland Agricultural Inputs, Technology, and Services in Developing Countries. In A. R. Quisumbing, R. Meinzen-Dick, L. T. Raney, A. Croppenstedt, A. J. Behrman, & A. Peterman (Eds.), Gender in Agriculture: Closing the Knowledge Gap (pp. 145–186). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. Retrieved from. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8616-4_7.
- Robson, T. O., & Broad, H. (1989). Striga, Improved Management in Africa: Proceedings of the FAO/OAU All-Africa Government Consultation on Striga Control, Maroua, Cameroon, 20–24 October 1988. Food & Agriculture Organization of the UN.Google Scholar