Skip to main content

Governance of food systems across scales in times of social-ecological change: a review of indicators

Abstract

Governance of food systems is a poorly understood determinant of food security. Much scholarship on food systems governance is non-empirical, while existing empirical research is often case study-based and theoretically and methodologically incommensurable. This complicates aggregation of evidence and generalization. This paper presents a review of literature to identify a core set of methodological indicators to study food systems governance in future research. Indicators were identified from literature gathered through a structured consultation and sampling from recent systematic reviews and were classified according to governance levels and the food system activity domain they investigate. We found a concentration of indicators in food production at local to national levels and with less literature investigating how food governance affects food distribution and consumption. Many indicators of institutional structure were found, while indicators capturing social agency and indicators of cross-scale dynamics were moderately represented but critical perspectives on governance were lacking. These gaps present an opportunity for future empirical research to investigate more comprehensively the diverse components of food systems and how governance arrangements at different scales affect them.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Notes

  1. This 15 member panel included 10 of the authors of this paper, plus five additional experts.

  2. This team includes four authors of this paper, plus three research assistants.

References

  • Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., Robinson, J. A., & Yared, P. (2009). Reevaluating the modernization hypothesis. Journal of Monetary Economics, 56(8), 1043–1058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power. Prosperity and Poverty: Crown Publishing, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adger, W. N. (2001). Scales of governance and environmental justice for adaptation and mitigation of climate change. Journal of International Development, 13(7), 921–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alrøe, H., Moller, H., Læssøe, J., & Noe, E. (2016). Opportunities and challenges for multicriteria assessment of food system sustainability. Ecology and Society, 21(1), 38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altieri, M. A., & Toledo, V. M. (2011). The agroecological revolution in Latin America: Rescuing nature, ensuring food sovereignty and empowering peasants. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(3), 587–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azmat, F., & Coghill, K. (2005). Good governance and market-based reforms: A study of Bangladesh. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 71(4), 625–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biermann, F., Abbott, K., Andresen, S., Bäckstrand, K., Bernstein, S., Betsill, M. M., et al. (2012). Transforming governance and institutions for global sustainability: Key insights from the earth system governance project. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4(1), 51–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bizikova, L., Echeverría, D., & Hammill, A. (2014). Systematic review approach to identifying key trends in adaptation governance at the supranational level. (no. 93). Copenhagen, Denmark: CGIAR research Programme on climate change agriculture and food security (CCAFS). www.ccafs.cgiar.org

  • Bizikova, L., Nijnik, M., & Nijnik, A. (2015). Exploring institutional changes in agriculture to inform adaptation planning to climate change in transition countries. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 20(8), 1385–1406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blunt, P. (1995). Cultural relativism, “good” governance and sustainable human development. Public Administration and Development, 15(1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boons, F., & Mendoza, A. (2010). Constructing sustainable palm oil: How actors define sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(16–17), 1686–1695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brownhill, L., & Hickey, G. M. (2012). Using interview triads to understand the barriers to effective food security policy in Kenya: A case study application. Food Security, 4(3), 369–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Candel, J. J. L. (2014). Food security governance: A systematic literature review. Food Security, 6(4), 585–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Candel, J. J. L., Breeman, G. E., & Termeer, C. J. A. M. (2015). The European Commission’s ability to deal with wicked problems: An in-depth case study of the governance of food security. Journal of European Public Policy, 1–25.

  • Clapp, J. (2017). The trade-ification of the food sustainability agenda. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 44(2), 335–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colonna, P., Fournier, S., & Touzard, J. (2013). Food Systems. In C. Esnouf, M. Russel, & N. Bricas (Eds.), Food system sustainability: Insights from duALIne. UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, S. J., & Wheeler, T. (2015). Adaptive governance: Livelihood innovation for climate resilience in Uganda. Geoforum, 65, 96–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornwall, A., & Coelho, V. S. (2007). Spaces for change?: The politics of citizen participation in new democratic arenas. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, T. A., Delaney, A., Tamás, P. A., Chesterman, S., & Ericksen, P. (2017). A systematic review of local vulnerability to climate change in developing country agriculture: In search of transparency, coherence and comparability. WIREs Climate Change, 8(4), e464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Schutter, O. (2014). Final report: The transformative potential of the right to food (no. a/HRC/25/57). New York, USA: UN general assembly, human rights council. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/RegularSessions/Session25/Pages/ListReports.aspx

  • Delaney, A., & Tamás, P. A. (2016). Strengthening the food systems governance evidence base: Supporting commensurability of research through a systematic review of methods - technical report supporting working paper 167, Copenhagen, Denmark: CGIAR research program on climate change, agriculture and food security (CCAFS). Denmark: Copenhagen http://hdl.handle.net/10568/72721 .

    Google Scholar 

  • Delaney, A., Evans, T., John, M., Blekking, J., Schlachter, T., Korhonen-Kurki, K., et al. (2016a). Strengthening the food systems governance evidence base: Supporting commensurability of research through a systematic review of methods (no. 167). Copenhagen, Denmark: CGIAR research program on climate change, agriculture and food security (CCAFS). http://hdl.handle.net/10568/72720

  • Delaney, A., Tamás, P. A., Crane, T. A., & Chesterman, S. (2016b). Systematic review of methods in low-consensus fields: Supporting commensuration through ‘construct-centered methods aggregation’ in the case of climate change vulnerability research. PLoS One, 11(2), e0149071. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149071.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, R. Z., Clarke, G., & Sloth, C. (2010). Verification of progress related to enabling activities for the Guyana-Norway REDD+ agreement. USA: Rainforest Alliance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupuis, J., & Biesbroek, R. (2013). Comparing apples and oranges: The dependent variable problem in comparing and evaluating climate change adaptation policies. Global Environmental Change, 23(6), 1476–1487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubbeling, M., Santini, G., Renting, H., Taguchi, M., Lançon, L., Zuluaga, J., et al. (2017). Assessing and planning Sustainable City region food systems: Insights from two Latin American cities. Sustainability, 9, 1455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eakin, H., Connors, J. P., Wharton, C., Bertmann, F., Xiong, A., & Stoltzfus, J. (2017). Identifying attributes of food system sustainability: Emerging themes and consensus. Agriculture and Human Values, 34, 757–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eakin, H., Eriksen, S., Eikeland, P.-O., & Øyen, C. (2011). Public sector reform and governance for adaptation: Implications of new public management for adaptive capacity in Mexico and Norway. Environmental Management, 47(3), 338–351.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Eakin, H., Winkels, A., & Sendzimir, J. (2009). Nested vulnerability: Exploring cross-scale linkages and vulnerability teleconnections in Mexican and Vietnamese coffee systems. Environmental Science & Policy, 12(4), 398–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericksen, P. J. (2008). Conceptualizing food systems for global environmental change research. Global Environmental Change, 18(1), 234–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericksen, P. J., Ingram, J. S., & Liverman, D. M. (2009). Food security and global environmental change: Emerging challenges. Environmental Science & Policy, 12(4), 373–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esnouf, C., Russel, M., & Bricas, N. (2013). Food system sustainability: Insights from duALIne. UK: Cambridge University Press http://www.cambridge.org/us/academic/subjects/life-sciences/natural-resource-management-agriculture-horticulture-and/food-system-sustainability-insights-dualine .

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • FAO. (1996). World Food Summit: Rome Declaration and Plan of Action. http://www.fao.org/docrep/003/w3613e/w3613e00.HTM . Accessed 25 November 2015.

  • FAO. (2011). Good food security governance: The crucial premise to the twin-track approach - background paper. FAO, Rome, Italy. http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/righttofood/documents/other_documents/2011_good_food_security_gov/FoodSecurityGovernanceWorkshop_backgroundpaper.pdf. Accessed 25 Nov 2015.

  • FAO. (2012). FAO - News Article: FAO calls for strengthened food security governance. http://www.fao.org/news/story/en/item/162391/icode/ . Accessed 25 Nov 2015.

  • FAO. (2014). SAFA: Sustainability assessment of food and agriculture systems - guidelines version 3.0. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO, IFAD and WFP. (2013) The state of food insecurity in the world 2013: The multiple dimensions of food security. Rome: FAO.

  • Fukuyama, F. (2013). What is governance? Governance, 26, 347–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fung, A. (2004). Empowered participation. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galiè, A. (2013). Governance of seed and food security through participatory plant breeding: Empirical evidence and gender analysis from Syria. Natural Resources Forum, 37(1), 31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1), 78–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C. C., Ostrom, E., & Ahn, T. K. (2000). The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: A survey. Ecological Economics, 32(2), 217–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, I. R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J. F., et al. (2010). Food security: The challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science, 327(5967), 812–818.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grindle, M. S. (2004). Good enough governance: Poverty reduction and reform in developing countries. Governance, 17(4), 525–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, J., Termeer, C., Klostermann, J., Meijerink, S., van den Brink, M., Jong, P., et al. (2010). The adaptive capacity wheel: A method to assess the inherent characteristics of institutions to enable the adaptive capacity of society. Environmental Science & Policy, 13(6), 459–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermes, N., & Lensink, R. (2001). Changing the conditions for development aid: A new paradigm? Journal of Development Studies, 37(6), 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, P. D., Adams, W. M., Brosius, J. P., Zia, A., Bariola, N., & Dammert, J. L. (2011). Acknowledging conservation trade-offs and embracing complexity. Conservation Biology: The Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 25(2), 259–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2003). Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. American Political Science Review, 97(2), 233–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, P., Banwart, S. A., Brockington, D., Brown, G. W., Bruce, R., Cameron, D., et al. (2017). An agenda for integrated system-wide interdisciplinary agri-food research. Food Security, 9(2), 195–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hospes, O., & Brons, A. (2016). Food system governance: A systematic literature review. In A. Kennedy & J. Liljeblad (Eds.), Food systems governance: Challenges for justice, equality, and human rights. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntjens, P., Lebel, L., Pahl-Wostl, C., Camkin, J., Schulze, R., & Kranz, N. (2012). Institutional design propositions for the governance of adaptation to climate change in the water sector. Global Environmental Change, 22(1), 67–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, J. (2011). A food systems approach to researching food security and its interactions with global environmental change. Food Security, 3(4), 417–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobi, J., Schneider, M., Mariscal, M. P., Huber, S., Weidmann, S., Bottazzi, P., & Rist, S. (2015a). Farm resilience in organic and nonorganic cocoa farming systems in alto Beni, Bolivia. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 39(7), 798–823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobi, J., Schneider, M., Bottazzi, P., Pillco, M., Calizaya, P., & Rist, S. (2015b). Agroecosystem resilience and farmers’ perceptions of climate change impacts on cocoa farms in alto Beni, Bolivia. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 30(2), 170–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jawtusch, J., Schader, C., Stolze, M., Baumgart, L., & Niggli, U. (2013). Sustainability Monitoring and Assessment Routine: Results from pilot applications of the FAO SAFA Guidelines. In Symposium International sur L’Agriculture Biologique Méditerranénne et Les Signes Distinctifs de Qualité liée à l’Origine, 2–4 Décembre 2013, Agadir, Morocco. http://orgprints.org/29547/ . Accessed 22 Jan 2016.

  • Juhola, S., & Westerhoff, L. (2011). Challenges of adaptation to climate change across multiple scales: A case study of network governance in two European countries. Environmental Science & Policy, 14(3), 239–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jurgilevich, A., Birge, T., Kentala-Lehtonen, J., Korhonen-Kurki, K., Pietikäinen, J., Saikku, L., & Schösler, H. (2016). Transition towards circular economy in the food system. Sustainability, 8, 69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabubo-Mariara, J. (2007). Land conservation and tenure security in Kenya: Boserup’s hypothesis revisited. Ecological Economics, 64(1), 25–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, C. (2009). Development strategies and rural development: Exploring synergies, eradicating poverty. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 36(1), 103–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koohafkan, P., Altieri, M. A., & Gimenez, E. H. (2012). Green agriculture: Foundations for biodiverse, resilient and productive agricultural systems. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 10(1), 61–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korhonen-Kurki, K., Sehring, J., Brockhaus, M., & Gregorio, M. D. (2014). Enabling factors for establishing REDD+ in a context of weak governance. Climate Policy, 14(2), 167–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landert, J., Schader, C., Moschitz, H., Stolze, M., (2017). A holistic sustainability assessment method for urban food system governance. Sustainability, 9, 490.

  • Lang, T., & Barling, D. (2012). Food security and food sustainability: Reformulating the debate. The Geographical Journal, 178(4), 313–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, A. M., & Petkova, E. (2011). An introduction to forest governance, people and REDD+ in Latin America: Obstacles and opportunities. Forests, 2(1), 86–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamine, C., Renting, H., Rossi, A., Wiskerke, J. S. C., & Brunori, G. (2012). Agri-food systems and territorial development: Innovations, new dynamics and changing governance mechanisms. Farming systems research into the 21st century: The new dynamic. I. Darnhofer, D. Gibbon and B. Dedieu. Dordrecht, springer Netherlands: 229-256.

  • Lebel, L., Anderies, J., Campbell, B., Folke, C., Hatfield-Dodds, S., Hughes, T., & Wilson, J. (2006). Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society http://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/sms_facpub/52 .

  • Leith, P., Jacobs, B., Brown, P. R., & Nelson, R. (2012). A participatory assessment of NRM capacity to inform policy and practice: Cross-scale evaluation of enabling and constraining factors. Society & Natural Resources, 25(8), 775–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesnikowski, A. C., Ford, J. D., Berrang-Ford, L., Barrera, M., Berry, P., Henderson, J., & Heymann, S. J. (2013). National-level factors affecting planned, public adaptation to health impacts of climate change. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 1153–1163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (Eds.). (1975). The Delphi method: Techniques and applications. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liverman, D., & Kapadia, K. (2012). Chapter 1 food systems and the global environment: An overview. In J. Ingram, P. J. Ericksen, & D. Liverman (Eds.), Food Security and Global Environmental Change. 3-24: New York: Routledge.

  • MacRae, R. (1999). Not just what, but how: Creating agricultural sustainability and food security by changing Canada’s agricultural policy making process. Agriculture and Human Values, 16(2), 187–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makhura, M. T. (1998). The development of food security policy for South Africa (SAFSP): A consultative process. Food Policy, 23(6), 571–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandemaker, M., Bakker, M., & Stoorvogel, J. (2011). The role of governance in agricultural expansion and intensification: A global study of arable agriculture. Ecology and Society, 6(12), 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maye, D., & Kirwan, J. (2013). Food security: A fractured consensus. Journal of Rural Studies, 29, 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C., & Erickson, P. (2006). The politics of bridging scales and epistemologies: Science and democracy in global environmental governance. In W. V. Reid, T. J. Wilbanks, D. Capistrano, & F. Berkes (Eds.), Bridging scales and knowledge systems: Concepts and applications in ecosystem assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T., Baird, T., Littlefield, C., Kofinas, G. F., Chapin, I. I. I., & Redman, C. (2008). Epistemological pluralism: Reorganizing interdisciplinary research. Ecology and Society, 13(2), 46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minde, I. J., Jayne, T., Crawford, E., Ariga, J., & Jones, G. (2008). Promoting fertilizer use in Africa: current issues and empirical evidence from Malawi, Zambia, and Kenya. (no. 54501). Michigan: Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, food, and resource economics.

  • Moragues-Faus, A., Sonnino, R., & Marsden, T. (2017). Exploring European food system vulnerabilities: Towards integrated food security governance. Environmental Science & Policy, 75, 184–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, B., Crumley, C. L., Hassan, N., Lambin, E. F., Pahl-Wostl, C., Underdal, A., & Wasson, R. (2005). A conceptual template for integrative human–environment research. Global Environmental Change, 15(4), 299–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osbahr, H., Twyman, C., Neil Adger, W., & Thomas, D. S. G. (2008). Effective livelihood adaptation to climate change disturbance: Scale dimensions of practice in Mozambique. Geoforum, 39(6), 1951–1964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osbahr, H., Twyman, C., Adger, W. N., & Thomas, D. S. G. (2010). Evaluating successful livelihood adaptation to climate variability and change in southern Africa. Ecology and Society, 15(2), 27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paillard, S., Treyer, S., & Dorin, B. (2011). Agrimonde – Scenarios and challenges for feeding the world. Editions Quae. http://www.springer.com/us/book/9789401787444 . Accessed 10 Oct 2015.

  • Pesqueira, L., & Glasbergen, P. (2013). Playing the politics of scale: Oxfam’s intervention in the roundtable on sustainable palm oil. Geoforum, 45, 296–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poteete, A. R., & Ostrom, E. (2004). Heterogeneity, group size and collective action: The role of institutions in forest management. Development and Change, 35(3), 435–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purdon, M. (2014). The Comparative Turn in Climate Change Adaptation and Food Security Governance Research (no. 92). Copenhagen, Denmark: CGIAR research Programme on climate change agriculture and food security (CCAFS). https://ccafs.cgiar.org/publications/comparative-turn-climate-change-adaptation-and-food-security-governance-research#.Via1BivsQxI . Accessed 20 Oct 2015.

  • Purdon, M. (2015). Advancing comparative climate change politics: Theory and method. Global Environmental Politics, 15(3), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, C. H., Ziervogel, G., Taylor, A., Takama, T., & Thomalla, F. (2011). Coping with multiple stresses in rural South Africa. Ecology and Society, 16(3), 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rastoin, J.-L., & Ghersi, G. (2010). Le système alimentaire mondial: Concepts et méthodes, analyses et dynamiques. Paris: Quae.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance. Policy networks, governance, reflexibility and accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, S. M., Jones, J. P., & Frohling, O. (2005). NGOs and the globalization of managerialism: A research framework. World Development, 33(11), 1845–1864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schouten, G., Leroy, P., & Glasbergen, P. (2012). On the deliberative capacity of private multi-stakeholder governance: The roundtables on responsible soy and sustainable palm oil. Ecological Economics, 83, 42–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sietz, D., Boschütz, M., & Klein, R. J. (2011). Mainstreaming climate adaptation into development assistance: Rationale, institutional barriers and opportunities in Mozambique. Environmental Science & Policy, 14(4), 493–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spielman, D. J., Cohen, M. J., & Mogues, T. (2008). Mobilizing rural institutions for sustainable livelihoods and equitable development: A case study of local governance and smallholder cooperatives in Ethiopia. Washington DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, P. F. (2015). Can we generalize from case studies? Global Environmental Politics, 15(3), 152–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J., Lin, J., Monga, C., & Patel, E. (2013). Industrial policy in the African context (no. WPS6633). The World Bank, Washington DC.

  • Termeer, C. J. A. M., Dewulf, A., Breeman, G., & Stiller, S. J. (2013). Governance capabilities for dealing wisely with wicked problems. Administration & Society, 47(6), 680–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Termeer, C. J. A. M., Dewulf, A., & van Lieshout, M. (2010). Disentangling scale approaches in governance research: Comparing monocentric, multilevel, and adaptive governance. Ecology and Society, 15(4), 29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen, S. J., Campbell, B. M., & Ingram, J. S. I. (2012). Climate change and food systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 37(1), 195–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Bers, C., Pahl-Wostl, C., Ericksen, P.J., Lenaerts, L., Förch, W., Korhonen-Kurki, K., Methner, N., Jones, L., Vasileiou, I., & Ericksen, S. (2016). Transformations in governance towards resilient food systems, CCAFS working paper (no. 190). Copenhagen, Denmark.

  • von Braun, J. (2009). Addressing the food crisis: Governance, market functioning, and investment in public goods. Food Security, 1(1), 9–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Geibler, J. (2013). Market-based governance for sustainability in value chains: Conditions for successful standard setting in the palm oil sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 56, 39–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahlqvist, M. L., McKay, J., Chang, Y.-C., & Chiu, Y.-W. (2012). Rethinking the food security debate in Asia: Some missing ecological and health dimensions and solutions. Food Security, 4(4), 657–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wambugu, S. W., Chomba, S. W., & Atela, J. (2015). Institutional arrangements for climate-smart landscapes. In P. A. Minang, M. Van Noordwijk, O. E. Freeman, C. Mbow, J. De Leeuw, and D. Catacutan, editors. Climate-Smart Landscapes: Multifunctionality in Practice. Nairobi: World agroforestry Centre (ICRAF).

  • Wilder, M., Scott, C. A., Pablos, N. P., Varady, R. G., Garfin, G. M., & McEvoy, J. (2010). Adapting across boundaries: Climate change, social learning, and resilience in the US–Mexico border region. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 100(4), 917–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanella, M. A., Rahmanian, M., Perch, L. N., Callenius, C., Rubio, J. L., Vuningoma, F., et al. (2015). Discussion: Food security and sustainable food systems: The role of soil. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 3(2), 154–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the CGIAR Fund Council, Australia (ACIAR), Irish Aid, European Union, International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), Netherlands, New Zealand, Switzerland, UK, USAID and Thailand for funding to the CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS). The research for this article was funded by the CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), under the Priorities and Policies for CSA Flagship. This article builds upon an earlier version which appeared as a CCAFS Working Paper, number 167. This work was also supported by the US National Science Foundation (grant numbers BCS-1534544, SES-1360421, and SES-1360463) and some authors benefitted from support from the R4D project “Food Sustainability” funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF 400540-152033). We would like to thank Katrien Termeer for helpful insights throughout the project. Thanks are also extended to all those who helped by suggesting literature during consultation, all authors who responded to requests during the review and to Patricia Lezotte of the Ostrom Workshop at Indiana University for invaluable assistance during drafting. We acknowledge the services of the Bibliothèque Nationale de Luxembourg for providing access to materials reviewed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aogán Delaney.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. We disclose above the sources of funding that made this research possible.

Appendix: List of records included in full review

Appendix: List of records included in full review

Table 6 List of records included in full review

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Delaney, A., Evans, T., McGreevy, J. et al. Governance of food systems across scales in times of social-ecological change: a review of indicators. Food Sec. 10, 287–310 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-018-0770-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-018-0770-y

Keywords

  • Food systems
  • Governance
  • Food security
  • Research methods
  • Evidence synthesis
  • Socio-ecological change