Farm production diversity and dietary quality: linkages and measurement issues
Recent research has analyzed whether higher levels of farm production diversity contribute to improved diets in smallholder farm households. We add to this literature by using and comparing different indicators, thus helping to better understand some of the underlying linkages. The analysis builds on data from Indonesia, Kenya, and Uganda. On the consumption side, we used 7-day food recall data to calculate various dietary indicators, such as dietary diversity scores, consumed quantities of fruits and vegetables, calories and micronutrients, and measures of nutritional adequacy. On the production side, we used a simple farm species count in addition to looking at the number of different food groups produced. Regression models showed that production diversity measured through simple species count is positively associated with most dietary indicators. However, when measuring production diversity in terms of the number of food groups produced, the association turns insignificant in many cases. Further analysis revealed that diverse subsistence production often contributes less to dietary diversity than cash income generated through market sales. If farm diversification responds to market incentives and builds on comparative advantage, it can contribute to improved income and nutrition. Yet, increasing the number of food groups produced on the farm independent of market incentives may foster subsistence, reduce income, and thus rather worsen dietary quality. The results suggest that improving the functioning of agricultural markets and smallholder market access are key strategies to enhance nutrition.
KeywordsDietary diversity Micronutrients Nutrition-sensitive agriculture Smallholder farm households Developing countries
This research was financially supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) as part of the GlobalFood Program (grant number RTG 1666) and by the German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL) (grant number 2813FSNu01).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.
- Barrett, C. B. (2010). Food systems and the escape from poverty and ill-health traps in Sub-Sahara Africa. In P. Pinstrup-Andersen (Ed.), The African Food System and Its Interaction with Human Health and Nutrition (pp. 242–260). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press in cooperation with the United Nations University.Google Scholar
- Burlingame, B., & Dernini, S. (Eds.). (2012). Sustainable Diets and Biodiversity: Directions and Solutions for Policy, Research and Action. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and Bioversity International.Google Scholar
- Fanzo, J., Hunter, D., Borelli, T., & Mattei, F. (Eds.). (2013). Diversifying Food and Diets, Using Agricultural Diversity to Improve Nutrition and Health. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- FAO. (2016). Minimum dietary diversity for women: a guide for measurement. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
- FAO. (2011). Guidelines for Measuring Household and Individual Dietary Diversity. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
- FAO. (2010). World food dietary assessment system, Version 2.0. Rome: International Network of Food Data Systems, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
- FAO, WHO, & UNO. (2004). Human energy requirements: Report of a joint FAO/WHO/UNU expert consultation : Rome, 17–24 October 2001. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
- Geertz, C. (1978). The bazaar economy: Information and search in peasant marketing. American Economic Review, 68(2), 28–32.Google Scholar
- IFPRI. (2017). Global Nutrition Report. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
- Khoury, C. K., Bjorkman, A. D., Dempewolf, H., Ramirez-Villegas, J., Guarino, L., Jarvis, A., Rieseberg, L. H., & Struik, P. C. (2014). Increasing homogeneity in global food supplies and the implications for food security. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 111(11), 4001–4006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Krishna, V. V., Euler, M., Siregar, H., Fathoni, Z., & Qaim, M. (2017). Differential livelihood impacts of oil palm expansion in Indonesia. Agricultural Economics, 48(5), 639–653.Google Scholar
- Luckett, B. G., DeClerck, F. A. J., Fanzo, J., Mundorf, A. R., & Rose, D. (2015). Application of the nutrition functional diversity indicator to assess food system contributions to dietary diversity and sustainable diets of Malawian households. Public Health Nutrition, 18(13), 2479–2487.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rowland, D., Ickowitz, A., Powell, B., Nasi, R., & Sunderland, T. (2016). Forest foods and healthy diets: quantifying the contributions. Environmental Conservation, 1–13, doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892916000151.
- SMILING (2013). Food composition table for Indonesia. South East Asian Ministers of Education Organization, Indonesia Ministry of Health, Indonesia, Wageningen University, The Netherlands. http://www.fao.org/infoods/infoods/tables-and-databases/asia/en/. Accessed 20 July 2015.
- Swindale, A., & Bilinsky, P. (2006). Household Dietary Diversity Score (HDDS) for Measurement of Household Food Access: Indicator Guide (v.2). Washington, D.C.: FHI 360/FANTA.Google Scholar
- USDA. (2005). Composition of foods, Raw, processed, prepared, national nutrient database for standard references, release 18. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar