Access to genes: linkages between genebanks and farmers’ seed systems
Genebanks conserve key resources for handling current and future challenges to food production and security. The role of genebanks has evolved from primarily serving plant breeders to include long-term biodiversity conservation and distribution to a wider user community. International policy frameworks stress the complementarity of ex situ and in situ conservation and management, but a dichotomy prevails in the public and scholarly agricultural development discourse. Here, we present a study of existing linkages between the two conservation and management approaches, their challenges and future options. First, we show that farmers, farmer organizations, and NGOs now comprise a considerable user group of genebank material, receiving at least 8% of the seed samples distributed from international genebanks in 2015, on par with the proportion distributed to the commercial seed sector. Second, we map and categorize approaches to introduce genebank material into farmers’ seed systems. Based on a survey, interviews and a literature review we categorize direct genebank-farmer linkages into six categories: (1) Reintroduction, (2) Emergency Seed Interventions, (3) Community Seed Banks, (4) Participatory Plant Breeding, (5) Variety Introduction, and (6) Integrative Seed System Approaches. We investigate the merits of these approaches as alternative and complementary pathways for enhancing farmers’ access to crop diversity. Finally, we discuss challenges related to scale, sustainability and legal frame conditions and point out opportunities to realize synergies to achieve the ultimate goal of the ex situ conservation agenda and the farmers’ rights agenda, namely to strengthen farmers’ access to suitable seeds.
KeywordsPlant Genetic Resources Ex situ conservation In situ conservation Seed System Development
This article is based on a report written on a grant from the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad). We thank all survey respondents and experts interviewed for taking the time to participate. We thank the Global Crop Diversity Trust for providing the distribution data from the CGIAR genebanks and for their support in setting up the electronic survey used in this study.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.
- Almekinders, C., & Hardon, J. (2006). Bringing farmers back into breeding: Experiences with participatory plant breeding and challenges for institutionalisation, AgroSpecial 5. The Netherlands: Agromisa Foundation.Google Scholar
- Ana, D. (2015). Unfreezing the seed: State, expertise and patriotism at the Suceava Gene Bank. Budapest: Central European University.Google Scholar
- Andersen, R., & Winge, T. (2011). Linking community seedbanks and farmers’ rights. In A. P. Kroglund, A. Wilhelmsen, B. B. Torheim, K. Ulsrud, P. Shresta, R. Ortiz, et al. (Eds.), Banking for the future: Savings, security and seeds. A short study of community seed banks in Bangladesh, Costa Rica, Ethiopia, Honduras, India, Nepal, Thailand, Zambia and Zimbabwe (pp. 5-6). The development fund, Grøset: Oslo.Google Scholar
- Andersen, R., & Winge, T. (2013). Realising Farmers' rights to crop genetic resources: Success stories and best practices. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Andersen, R., Borromeo, T. H., & Altoveros, N. C. (2013). A community register in the Philippines. In R. Andersen & T. Winge (Eds.), Realising Farmers' rights to crop genetic resources: Success stories and best practices. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Argumedo, A. (2008). The Potato Park, Peru: Conserving agrobiodiversity in an Andean indigenous biocultural heritage area. In T. Amend, J. Brown, A. Kothari, A. Phillips, & S. Stolton (Eds.), Protected landscapes and agrobiodiversity values (pp. 45–58). Heidelberg: Kasparek Verlag.Google Scholar
- Asdal, Å. (2011). Bevaringssorter/tradisjonssorter - aktuelle tiltak i regi av Norsk genressurssenter (conservation varieties/traditional varieties - relevant activities administered by the Norwegian genetic resource center). In Fagsamling om Gamle Kornsorter (Workshop on Old Cereal Varieties), Sigdal, Norway, 2011. Ås: Norwegian Genetic Resource Center.Google Scholar
- Bänziger, M., & de Meyer, J. (2002). Collaborative maize variety development for stress-prone environments in southern Africa. Farmers, scientists, and plant breeding: Integrating knowledge and practice (pp. 269-296). Oxon: CABI.Google Scholar
- Berg, T. (1997). Devolution of plant breeding. In L. Sperling & Loevinsohn (Eds.), Using diversity: Enhancing and maintaining genetic resources on-farm. Proceedings of a workshop held 19-21 June 1995, in New Delhi. New Delhi: International Development Research Centre (IDRC).Google Scholar
- Bioversity. (2016a). The crowdsourcing approach: Seeds for Needs Factsheet 2. In Bioversity International (Ed.), (Vol. 2, pp. 2). Rome: Bioversity International.Google Scholar
- Bioversity (2016b). The ‘Seeds for Needs’ initiative in Ethiopia: Integrating farmer and scientist knowledge. In Bioversity International (Ed.), (Vol. 1, pp. 4). Rome: Bioversity International.Google Scholar
- Borges Días, T. A., da Fonseca Ferreira, M. A. J., Barbieri, R. L., França Teixeira, F., & de Azevedo, S. G. (2013). Gene banks that promote on-farm management through the reintroduction of local varieties in Brazil. In W. S. de Boef, A. Subedi, N. Peroni, M. Thijssen, & E. O'Keefe (Eds.), Community biodiversity management: Promoting resilience and the conservation of plant genetic resources (pp. 91–95). London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
- Bragdon, S., Jarvis, D. I., Gauchan, D., Mar, I., Hue, N. N., Balma, D., et al. (2009). The agricultural biodiversity policy development process: Exploring means of policy development to support the on-farm management of crop genetic diversity. International Journal of Biodiversity Science and Management, 5(1), 10–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bramel-Cox, P. (2000). Toward establishing links between farmers and the ICRISAT genebank. In E. Friis-Hansen & B. Sthapit (Eds.), Participatory approaches to the conservation and use of plant genetic resources (pp. 69–74). Rome: International Plant Genetic Resources Institute.Google Scholar
- Burke, M. B., Lobell, D. B., & Guarino, L. (2009). Shifts in African crop climates by 2050, and the implications for crop improvement and genetic resources conservation. Global Environmental Change: Human and Policy Dimensions, 19(3), 317–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.04.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Campesina, L. V. (2015). You are destroying the treaty on plant genetic resources. https://viacampesina.org/en/: La via Campesina. Accessed 26 Apr 2017.
- Chambers, R., Pacey, A., & Thrupp, L. A. (1994). Farmer first: Farmer innovation and agricultural research. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.Google Scholar
- CIP. (2016). Una visita al saber tradicional para celebrar a la papa. http://cipotato.org/press_release/una-visita-al-saber-tradicional-para-celebrar-la-papa/. Accessed 08 Nov 2016.
- CIP. (n. d.). La Ruta del Condor. http://cipotato.org/es/programas-de-investigacion/banco-genetico/la-ruta-del-condor/. Accessed 09 Nov 2016.
- Clancy, E., & Vernooy, R. (2016). Realizing farmers’ rights through community-based agricultural biodiversity management. Rome: Bioversity International.Google Scholar
- Conway, G. (2012). One billion hungry: Can we feed the world? Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Correa, C. M. (2015). Plant variety protection in developing countries: A tool for designing a sui generis plant variety protection system: An alternative to UPOV 1991. By: Association for Plant Breeding for the benefit of society (APBREBES) and its member organizations: Berne declaration, the development fund, SEARICE and third world network.Google Scholar
- Dalle, S. P., & Walsh, S. (2015). USC Canada's experiance in supporting community seed banks in Africa, Asia and the Americas. In R. Vernooy, P. Shrestha, & B. Sthapit (Eds.), Community seed banks: Origins, evolution and prospects (pp. 212–230). London: Earthscan from Routledge.Google Scholar
- Davies, L., & Allender, C. J. (2017). Who is sowing our seeds? A systematic review of the use of plant genetic resources in research. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-017-0491-7 Online first 1-10.
- de Boef, W. S., Subedi, A., Peroni, N., Thijssen, M., & O'Keeffe, E. (2013). Community biodiversity management: Promoting resilience and the conservation of plant genetic resources. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Desclaux, D., Ceccarelli, S., Navazio, J., Coley, M., Trouche, G., Aguirre, S., et al. (2012). Centralized or decentralized breeding: The potentials of participatory approaches for low-input and organic agriculture. In Organic crop breeding (pp. 99–123). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
- FAO. (1993). Plant Genetic Resources Service. Quality declared seed system. FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper 185. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
- FAO. (2009). The International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (p. 60). Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
- FAO. (2010). Seeds in emergencies: a technical handbook (FAO plant production and protection paper 202). Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
- FAO. (2011). Second global plan of action for plant genetic resources for food and agriculture (p. 91). Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
- FAO. (2013). Fifth session of the governing body, resolution 8/2013, implementation of article 9, Farmers' rights. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
- FAO. (2014). Genebank standards for plant genetic resources for food and agriculture (Rev ed.). Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
- FAO. (2015a). Opinions and advice of the Ad Hoc Technical Advisory Committee on the Multilateral System and the Standard Material Transfer Agreement. In FAO (Ed.). Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
- FAO. (2015b). Sixth session of the governing body of the international treaty on plant genetic rousources for food and agriculture, 5–9 October 2015. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
- FAO. (2016a). Food security capacity building: Seeds. http://www.fao.org/in-action/food-security-capacity-building/project-components/seeds/en/#c257003. Accessed 16 Nov 2016.
- FAO. (2016b). Seed security and rehabilitation. http://www.fao.org/agriculture/crops/thematic-sitemap/theme/seeds-pgr/seed-sys/security/en/. Accessed 16 Nov 2016.
- FAO. (2016c). Seed security assessment: A practitioner's guide. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
- FAO. (2017a). Sixteenth regular session of the commission on genetic resources for food and agriculture, Rome, 30 January – 3 February 2017. In FAO (Ed.). Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
- FAO. (2017b). Webpage of the Easy-SMTA. https://mls.planttreaty.org/itt/. Accessed 01 Sept 2017.
- Feyissa, R., Gezu, G., Tsegaye, B., & Desalegn, T. (2013). On-farm management of plant genetic resources through community seed banks in Ethiopia. In W. Simon de Boef, A. Subedi, N. Peroni, M. Thijssen, & E. O’Keeffe (Eds.), Community biodiversity management- promoting resilience and the conservation of plant genetic resources (pp. 26–31). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Fowler, C. (2013). Complementarity and conflict. In V. D. Nazarea, R. E. Rhoades, & J. Andrews-Swann (Eds.), Seeds of resistance, seeds of hope: Place and agency in the conservation of biodiversity (pp. 196–2013). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
- Frankel, O. (1986). Genetic resources: The founding years. Part II: The Movement’s constituent assembly. Diversity, 2(8), 30–32.Google Scholar
- Frankel, O., & Bennett, E. (Eds.). (1970). Genetic resources in plants—Their exploration and conservation. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- GFAR, DF, & CEPA. (2015). Capacity building material for the realization of farmers' rights in Malawi: farmers' rights related to plant genetic resources for food and agriculture in Malawi. Oslo: Global Forum on Agricultural Research, The Development Fund of Norway and Centre for Environmental Policy and Advocacy.Google Scholar
- Global Alliance. (2016). The future of food: Seeds of resilience, a compendium of perspectives on agricultural biodiversity from around the world.: Global alliance for the future of food.Google Scholar
- Hassena, M., van den Broek, J., de Boef, W., Thijssen, M., & Louwaars, N. (2012). Integrated seed sector development: Experiences in Africa. In The defining moments in ethiopian seed system (pp. 327–339). Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research.Google Scholar
- Hindess, K. (2016). Whose seeds are they anyway? Resurgence and Ecologist Magazine 6. January 2016. https://theecologist.org/2016/jan/06/real-farming-report-whose-seeds-are-they-anyway. Accessed 26 Apr 2017
- IRRI. (2016). Cambodia and IRRI. http://books.irri.org/Cambodia_IRRI_brochure.pdf. Accessed 26 Apr 2017.
- ISSD. (2017a). Integrated seed sector development Ethiopia programme. http://www.issdethiopia.org/. Accessed 26 Apr 2017.
- ISSD. (2017b). Integrated seed sector development, course web page, Wageningen UR. http://www.wur.nl/en/show/CDIcourse_ISSD_2017.htm. Accessed 26 Apr 2017.
- Jarvis, D. I., Hodgkin, T., Sthapit, B. R., Fadda, C., & Lopez-Noriega, I. (2011). An heuristic framework for identifying multiple ways of supporting the conservation and use of traditional crop varieties within the agricultural production system. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 30(1–2), 125–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kendall, J., & Gras, E. (2013). The Maison de la Semence Paysanne and diversity platform: Promoting agrobiodiversity in France. In W. S. de Boef, A. Subedi, N. Peroni, M. Thijssen, & E. O'Keefe (Eds.), Community biodiversity management: Promoting resilience and the conservation of plant genetic resources (pp. 43–50). London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
- Kloppenburg, J. R. (2005). First the seed: The political economy of plant biotechnology: Univ of Wisconsin press, Madison.Google Scholar
- Laurie, S., & Magoro, M. (2008). Evaluation and release of new sweet potato varieties through farmer participatory selection. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 3(10), 672–676.Google Scholar
- LI-BIRD. (2016). Safeguarding seeds in the aftermath of the earthquake. http://www.libird.org/app/news/view.aspx?record_id=35. Accessed 26 Apr 2017.
- Melaku, W., Awegechew, T., & Tesfaye, T. (2000). Participatory approaches linking farmer access to genebanks: Ethiopia. In E. Friis-Hansen & B. R. Sthapit (Eds.), Participatory approaches to the con-servation and use of plant genetic resources (pp. 149–153). Rome: International Plant Genetic Resources Institute.Google Scholar
- Meza, C., Rutti, A., Gómez, R., & Zapata, F. (2012). Conservación y uso de la agrobiodiversidad: Guía para la implementación de bancos comunales de semillas. Lima: SGCAN, Instituto de Montaña, UICN-Sur.Google Scholar
- Nazarea, V. D., & Rhoades, R. E. (2013). Conservation beyond design: An introduction. In V. D. Nazarea, R. E. Rhoades, & J. Andrews-Swann (Eds.), Seeds of resistance, seeds of hope: Place and agency in the conservation of biodiversity (pp. 3–16). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
- Nesbitt, H. J. (1997). Rice production in Cambodia. Manila: International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
- Nishikawa, Y., & Winge, T. (2013). The Hiroshima agricultural Gene Bank: Re-introducing local varieties, maintaining traditional knowledge. In R. Andersen & T. Winge (Eds.), Realising farmers' rights to crop genetic resources : Success stories and best practices (pp. 167–178). London: Earthscan from Routledge.Google Scholar
- Pistorius, R. (1997). Scientists, plants and politics – A history of the plant genetic resources movement. Rome: IPGRI.Google Scholar
- Potato Park, ANDES, & CIP. (2004). Agreement on the repatriation, restoration and monitoring of agrobiodiversity of native potatoes and associated community knowledge systems. https://www.grain.org/article/entries/2165-andes-potato-park-cip-agreement. Accessed 08 Nov 2016.
- Richards, P., & Ruivenkamp, G. (1997). Seeds and survival: Crop genetic resources in war and reconstruction in Africa. Rome: International Plant Genetic Resources Institute.Google Scholar
- SeedSystem.org.org. (2016a). Field assessments around the world. http://SeedSystem.org.org/field-assessments-action-plans/. Accessed 16 Nov 2016.
- SeedSystem.org.org. (2016b). Seed system: strengthening smallholder farmer seed systems. http://SeedSystem.org.org/. Accessed 16 Nov 2016.
- Sperling, L. (2008). When disaster strikes: A guide to assessing seed system security. Cali: Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical.Google Scholar
- Sthapit, B. (2012). Emerging theory and practice: community seed banks, seed system resilience and food security. In Community seed banks in Nepal: Past, present, future. Proceedings of a National Workshop, Pokhara, Nepal, 14–15 June 2012, Rome, Italy, 2012 (pp. 16–40): LI-BIRD and Bioversity International.Google Scholar
- Sumberg, J., & Thompson, J. (2012). Contested agronomy: Agricultural research in a changing world. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Tapia Bastidas, C. G., & Carrera Rueda, H. F. (2013). Practices that contribute to promoting and appreciating Andean crops and identity in Cotacachi, Ecuador. In W. S. de Boef, A. Subedi, N. Peroni, M. Thijssen, & E. O'Keefe (Eds.), Community biodiversity management: Promoting resilience and the conservation of plant genetic resources (pp. 77–82). London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
- Tay, D. (2009). Model genebank concept: CIP Genebank as an example. In 15th Triennial International Society for Tropical Root Crops Symposium, Lima, Peru, 2009 (pp. 5–11).Google Scholar
- Teshome, H. M., & Ortiz, R. (2015). Norway's development fund: Supporting community seed bank practices. In R. Vernooy, P. Shrestha, & B. Sthapit (Eds.), Community seed banks: Origins, evolution and prospects (pp. 194–205). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- The Development Fund Norway. (2011). Banking for the future: Savings, security and seeds. In A short study of community seed banks in Bangladesh, Costa Rica, Ethiopia, Honduras, India, Nepal, Thailand, Zambia and Zimbabwe. Oslo: Grøset.Google Scholar
- The Right to Food and Nutrition Watch Consortium. (2016). Keeping seeds in peoples’ hands. Berlin: LokayDRUCK.Google Scholar
- Thijssen, M. H., Bishaw, Z., Beshir, A., & De Boef, W. S. (2008). Farmers, seeds and varieties. Supporting informal seed supply in Ethiopia. Wageningen International: Wageningen.Google Scholar
- Vernooy, R., Shrestha, P., & Sthapit, B. (2015). Community seed banks: Origins, evolution and prospects. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Visser, B. (2016). The impact of national seed laws on the functioning of small-scale seed systems: A country-case study. The Hague: Oxfam Novib.Google Scholar
- Walsh, S and Remington, T and Kugbei, S and Ojiewo, C O (2015) Review of Community Seed Production Practices in Africa Part 1: Implementation Strategies and Models. In: Workshop Proceedings on Community Seed Production, 9-11 December 2013. Addis Ababa: ICRISAT & FAOGoogle Scholar