Advertisement

Food Security

, Volume 7, Issue 6, pp 1299–1320 | Cite as

Gendered food security in rural Malawi: why is women’s food security status lower?

  • Menale KassieEmail author
  • Jesper Stage
  • Hailemariam Teklewold
  • Olaf Erenstein
Original Paper

Abstract

Gendered food security gaps between female- and male-headed households (FHHs and MHHs) can be decomposed into two sets of components: those explained by observable differences in levels of resource use, and those due to unobserved differences affecting the returns to the resources used. Employing exogenous switching ordered probit and binary probit regression models, this paper examines the gendered food security gap and its causes in rural Malawi. We conducted a counterfactual analysis and found that the food security of FHHs would improve significantly if they had the same levels of resource use as MHHs. However, even if FHHs had the same levels of resource use as MHHs, the gendered food security gap would not be closed because of the differences in the returns to those resources. Such differences in returns to resources explain 40 % (45 %) of the observed gendered chronic (transitory) food insecurity gap and 54 % (19 %) of the food break-even (surplus) gap. Further analysis suggests that the intensity with which sustainable agricultural practices have been adopted has a greater impact on the food security of FHHs than on MHHs.

Keywords

Food security Gender gap Switching regression Malawi 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) and the Australian International Food Security Research Centre (AIFSRC) through the Adoption Pathways Project and the Sustainable Intensification of Maize-Legume Cropping Systems for Food Security in Eastern and Southern Africa (SIMLESA) Programme led by the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT). We would also like to acknowledge the CGIAR Research Program on Maize for its financial support for the collection of national maize survey data. Jesper Stage acknowledges support from the Jan Wallander and Tom Hedelius Foundation, as well as from the Swedish Research Council Formas through its Commons Programme. We would like to thank Chalmers Mulwa and Geoffrey Muricho for cleaning and organising the data. The views expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the donors or the authors’ institution. The usual disclaimers apply.

References

  1. Angner, E. (2010). Subjective well-being. Journal of Socioeconomics, 39, 361–368.Google Scholar
  2. Asfaw, S., Lipper, L., Dalton, T. J., & Audi, P. (2012). Market participation, on-farm crop diversity and household welfare: micro-evidence from Kenya. Environment and Development Economics, 1(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Babatunde, R. O., & Qaim, M. (2010). Impact of off-farm income on food security and nutrition in Nigeria. Food Policy, 35(4), 303–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Babatunde, R. O., Omotesho, O. A., Olorunsanya, E. O., & Owotoki, G. M. (2008). Determinants of vulnerability to food insecurity: a gender based analysis of farming households in Nigeria. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economic, 63, 116–125.Google Scholar
  5. Babu, S., Gajanan, S. N., & Sanyal, P. (2014). Food security, poverty and nutrition policy analysis: Statistical methods and applications (2nd ed.). Atlanta: Elsevier Inc.Google Scholar
  6. Bauer, T. K., & Sinning, M. (2008). An extension of the blinder–oaxaca decomposition to nonlinear models. Advances in Statistical Analysis, 92, 197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Behrman, J. A., Meinzen-Dick, R., & Quisumbing, A. R. (2014). Understanding gender and culture in agriculture: The role of qualitative and quantitative approaches. In A. R. Quisumbing, R. Meinzen-Dick, T. L. Raney, A. Croppenstedt, J. A. Behrman, & A. Peterman (Eds.), Gender in agriculture: Closing the knowledge gap (pp. 31–54). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chamberlin, J., & Jayne, T. S. (2013). Unpacking the meaning of ‘market Access’: evidence from rural Kenya. World Development, 41, 245–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chinsinga, B. (2012). The political economy of agricultural policy processes in Malawi: A case study of the fertilizer subsidy programme. Future Agricultures Consortium Working Paper 39. http://r4d.dfid.gov.uk/PDF/Outputs/Futureagriculture/FAC_Working_ Paper_039.pdf. Accessed October 2014.
  10. Chipande, G. H. R. (1987). Innovation adoption among female-headed households: the case of Malawi. Development and Change, 18(2), 315–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chiwona-Karltun, L., Katundu, C., Ngoma, J., Chipungu, F., Mkumbira, J., Simukoko, S., & Jiggins, J. (2002). Bitter cassava and women: an intriguing response to food security. LEISA Magazine, 18(4), 14–15.Google Scholar
  12. Deaton, A. (2010). Price indices, inequality, and the measurement of world poverty. Atlanta: Presidential Address, American Economic Association.Google Scholar
  13. Dolan, C. S. (2004). I sell my labour now: gender and livelihood diversification in Uganda. Canadian Journal of Development Studies, 25(4), 643–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Doss, C. R. (2001). Designing agricultural technology for African women farmers: lessons from 25 years of experience. World Development, 29(12), 2075–2092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Due, J. M., & Gladwin, C. H. (1991). Impacts of structural adjustment programs on African women farmers and female-headed households. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73, 1431–1439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ellis, F. (1998). Household strategies and rural livelihood diversification. Journal of Development Studies, 35, 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eswaran, M. (2014). Why gender matters in Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  18. FAO/Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations. (2011). Gender inequalities in rural employment in Malawi: An overview. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  19. FAO/Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations. (2012). Good practices in building innovative rural institutions to increase food security. Case studies. Rome: FAO. http://www.fao.org/docrep/016/ap209e/ap209e.pdf. Accessed April 2014.
  20. Feleke, S. T., Kilmer, E. L., & Gladwin, C. H. (2005). Determinants of food security in southern Ethiopia at household level. Agricultural Economics Journal, 33, 351–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fortin, N., Lemieux, T., & Firpo, S. (2011). Decomposition methods in economics. Handbook of Labour Economics, 4, 1–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Foster, A. D., & Rosenzweig, M. R. (2001). Imperfect commitment, altruism, and the family: evidence from transfer behavior in low-income rural areas. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(3), 389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). What can economists learn from happiness research? Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 402–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gilbert, R. A., Sakala, W. D., & Benson, T. D. (2002). Gender analysis of a nationwide cropping system trial survey in Malawi. African Studies Quarterly, 6(1–2), 223–243.Google Scholar
  25. Heckman, J. J., Tobias, J. L., & Vytlacil, E. J. (2001). Four parameters of interest in the evaluation of social programs. Southern Economic Journal, 68, 210–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hoddinott, J., & Haddad, L. (1995). Does female income share influence household expenditures? Evidence from Cote d’Ivoire. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 57(1), 77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Iram, U., & Butt, M. S. (2004). Determinants of household food security: an empirical analysis for Pakistan. International Journal of Social Economics, 31(8), 753–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. IRIN/Integrated Regional Information Networks. (2006). Southern Africa: Female headed households most vulnerable to food insecurity. http://www.irinnews.org/report/37270/southern-africa-female-headed-households-most-vulnerable-to-food-insecurity. Accessed November, 2015.
  29. Jann, B. (2008). The blinder-Oaxaca decomposition for linear regression models. The Stata Journal, 8(4), 453–479.Google Scholar
  30. Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kassie, M., Ndiritu, S. W., & Stage, J. (2014). What determines gender inequality in household food security in Kenya? Application of exogenous switching treatment regression. World Development, 56, 153–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kassie, M., Hailemariam, T., Moti, J., Marenya, P., & Erenstein, O. (2015a). Understanding the adoption of a portfolio of sustainable intensification practices in eastern and southern Africa. Land Use Policy, 42, 400–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kassie, M., Teklewold, H., Marenya, P., Jaleta, M., & Erenstein, O. (2015b). Production risk and food security under alternative technology choices in Malawi. Application of a multinomial endogenous switching regression. Journal of Agricultural Economics. doi: 10.1111/1477–9552.12099.Google Scholar
  34. Kennedy, E., & Peters, P. (1992). Household food security and child nutrition: the interaction of income and gender of household head. World Development, 20(8), 1077–1085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. La Ferrara, E. (2003). Kin groups and reciprocity: a model of credit transaction in Ghana. The American Economic Review, 93(5), 1730–1751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mallick, D., & Rafi, M. (2010). Are female-headed households more food insecure? Evidence from Bangladesh. World Development, 38, 593–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mark, B., Sudharshan, C., Stephan, K., & David, L. (2006). Gender and growth in sub-Saharan Africa: Issues and evidence. Research Paper, UNU-WIDER, United Nations University (UNU), No. 2006/37. ISBN 9291908053.Google Scholar
  38. Martin, K. S., Rogers, B. L., Cook, J. T., & Joseph, H. M. (2004). Social capital is associated with decreased risk of hunger. Social Science & Medicine, 58, 2645–2654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mearns, R., & Norton, A. (2010). Social dimensions of climate change: Equity and vulnerability in a warming world. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  40. Meinzen-Dick, R., Johnson, N., Quisumbing, A. R., Njuki, J., Behrman, J. A., Rubin, D., Peterman, A., & Waithanji, E. (2014). The gender asset gap and its implications for agricultural and rural development. In A. R. Quisumbing, R. Meinzen-Dick, T. L. Raney, A. Croppenstedt, J. A. Behrman, & A. Peterman (Eds.), Gender in agriculture: Closing the knowledge gap (pp. 91–115). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Meinzen-Dick, R., Quisumbing, A., Behrman, J., Biermayr-Jenzano, P., Wilde, V., Noordeloos, M., Ragasa, C., & Beintema, N. (2011). Engendering agricultural research, development and extension (IFPRI Research Monograph). Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
  42. Minot, N., Kherallah, M., & Berry, P. (2000). Fertilizer market reform and the determinants of fertilizer use in Benin and Malawi (MSSD Discussion Paper 40). Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
  43. Mkwara, B., & Marsh, D. (2011). Effects of maize fertilizer subsidies on food security in Malawi (Department of Economics Working Paper Series, Number 14/11). Hamilton: University of Waikato.Google Scholar
  44. Onjala, J., Ndiritu, S. W., & Stage, J. (2014). Risk perception, choice of drinking water and water treatment: evidence from Kenyan towns. Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development, 4(2), 268–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Peterman, A., Quisumbing, A. R., Behrman, J., & Nkonya, E. (2011). Understanding the complexities surrounding gender differences in agricultural productivity in Nigeria and Uganda. Journal of Development Studies, 47(10), 1482–1509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Peters, P. E. (1995). Uses and abuses of the concept of ‘female-headed households’ in research on agrarian transformation and policy. In D. F. Bryceson (Ed.), Women wielding the hoe: Lessons from rural Africa for feminist theory and development practice (pp. 93–108). Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  47. Peters, P. E. (1997). Against the odds: matriliny, land and gender in the shire highlands of Malawi. Critique of Anthropology, 17(2), 189–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Quisumbing, A. R. (1995). Gender differences in agricultural productivity: Survey of empirical evidence (FCND Discussion Paper No. 5). Washington, DC: Food Consumption and Nutrition Division, International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
  49. Quisumbing, A. (2003). Food aid and child nutrition in rural Ethiopia. World Development, 7, 1309–1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Quinsumbing, A. R., & Maluccio, J. A. (2003). Resources at marriage and intrahousehold allocation: evidence from Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Indonesia, and South Africa. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 65(3), 283–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Quisumbing, A. R., Meinzen-Dick, R., Raney, T. L., Croppenstedt, A., Behrman, J. A., & Peterman, A. (Eds.). (2014). Gender in agriculture: Closing the knowledge gap. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  52. Ragasa, C. (2014). Improving gender responsiveness of agricultural extension. In A. R. Quisumbing, R. Meinzen-Dick, T. L. Raney, A. Croppenstedt, J. A. Behrman, & A. Peterman (Eds.), Gender in agriculture: Closing the knowledge gap (pp. 411–430). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ravallion, M., & Lokshin, M. (2002). Self-rated economic welfare in Russia. European Economics Review, 46(8), 1453–1473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Santiago, B., & Pedro, T.-P. (2009). Subjective assessment on vocational training activities. A generalized ordered probit approach. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 1(2), 123–144.Google Scholar
  55. Sinning, M., Hahn, M., & Bauer, T. K. (2008). The Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition for nonlinear regression models. The Stata Journal, 8(4), 480–492.Google Scholar
  56. Stutzer, A. S., & Frey, B. S. (2010). Recent advances in the economics of individual subjective well-being. IZA DP No. 4850. Institute for the Study of Labour (IZA). https://wwz.unibas.ch/fileadmin/wwz/redaktion/wipo/Alois_Stutzer/Stutzer_Frey_2010.pdf.
  57. Sun, S., An, H., & Marcoul, P. (2014). Food gifting, kinship networks and household food security. Paper presented at the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association’s 2014 Annual Meeting, Minneapolis, USA, 27–29 July 2014.Google Scholar
  58. Takane, T. (2008). Customary land tenure, inheritance rules and smallholder farmers in Malawi. Journal of Southern African Studies, 34(2), 269–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Takane, T. (2009). Disparities and diversities among female-headed households in rural Malawi after 20 years of economic liberalization. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 30, 358–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Teklewold, H., Kassie, M., & Shiferaw, B. (2013a). Adoption of multiple sustainable agricultural practices in rural Ethiopia. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64(3), 597–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Teklewold, H., Kassie, M., Bekele, S., & Kholin, G. (2013b). Cropping systems diversification, conservation tillage and modern seed adoption in Ethiopia: impacts on household income, agrochemical use and demand for labor. Ecological Economics, 93, 85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. The Economist Intelligence Unit. (2012). Global Food Security Index 2012. http://foodsecurityindex.eiu.com/: Economist Intelligence Unit. Accessed on July 2015.
  63. Van Hoorn, A., Mabsout, R., & Sent, E.-M. (2010). Happiness and capability: introduction to the symposium. Journal of Socio-Economics, 39, 339–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Van Praag, B. M. S., Frijters, P., & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2003). The anatomy of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 51(1), 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wollni, M., Lee, D. R., & Janice, L. T. (2010). Conservation agriculture, organic marketing, and collective action in the Honduran hillsides. Agricultural Economics, 41, 373–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. World Bank. (2000). Can Africa claim the 21st Century? (Report prepared jointly by the African Development Bank, African Economic Research Consortium, Global Coalition for Africa, Economic Commission for Africa, and the World Bank). Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  67. World Bank. (2001). Engendering development: Through gender equality in rights, resources, and voice – A World Bank Policy Research Report. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  68. World Bank. (2012). World development report: Gender equality and development. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  69. World Bank and The One Campaign. (2013). Levelling the field: Improving opportunities for women farmers in Africa. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/17790/860390WP0WB0ON0osure0date0March0180.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed November 2014.
  70. Yu, L., Hurley, T., Kliebenstein, J., & Orazem, P. (2012). A test for complementarities among multiple technologies that avoids the curse of dimensionality. Economic Literature, 116, 354–357.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht and International Society for Plant Pathology 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Menale Kassie
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jesper Stage
    • 2
  • Hailemariam Teklewold
    • 3
  • Olaf Erenstein
    • 4
  1. 1.International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT)NairobiKenya
  2. 2.Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social SciencesLuleå University of TechnologyLuleåSweden
  3. 3.Environmental Economics Policy Forum in Ethiopia (EEPFE)Addis AbabaEthiopia
  4. 4.International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT)El BatanMexico

Personalised recommendations