Skip to main content

Food security policies in India and China: implications for national and global food security

Abstract

Food insecurity is a much more serious concern in India than China. In addition to income and poverty differences, we argue in this paper that differences in food policies can further explain the different food security outcomes across the two countries. First, India mostly uses price-based input subsidies to support agricultural incentives whereas China has recently adopted direct transfers to support agricultural incentives, which are believed to be less distorting and more efficient. Second, the two countries apply quite different approaches to address poor consumers’ access to food, with India adopting a widely criticized public distribution system and China mainly using direct income transfers and other social safety nets. Third, although both committed considerable fiscal resources to insulating their respective domestic markets, especially during recent food price spikes, India’s heavy dependence on price-based measures causes relatively larger and more volatile fiscal burdens, thereby likely making it more vulnerable in dealing with similar events in the future. These findings have important implications for food policy and food security in the two countries in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Notes

  1. 1.

    Utilization of food refers to the ability to reach a state of nutritional wellbeing through an adequate diet, clean water, sanitation and health care. A related concept is malnutrition which is the result of deficiencies, excesses or imbalances in the consumption of macro- and/or micronutrients (FAO 2008). Malnutrition is often caused by an inadequate diet but can also result from poor hygienic conditions etc.

  2. 2.

    Other measures include the basic pension and medical schemes for urban and rural residents who are not covered elsewhere.

  3. 3.

    Source: Statistical Bulletins on Social Service Development of Ministry of Civil Affairs of China, and the Chinese Statistics Yearbooks.

  4. 4.

    Simply put, the AMS or total AMS is the total value of all domestic support provided to agricultural producers that are not exempt under the Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture. See http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/agric_e/ag_intro03_domestic_e.htm for further explanation.

References

  1. Ahluwalia, D. (1993). Public distribution of food in India: coverage, targeting and leakages. Food Policy, 18, 33–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, K., & Nelgen, S. (2012). Agricultural trade distortions during the global financial crisis. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 28, 235–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Basu, K. (2011). India’s foodgrain policy: an economic theory perspective. Economic & Political Weekly, 46, 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brink, L. (2014). Support to Agriculture in India in 1995–2013 and the Rules of the WTO. International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium (IATRC) Working Paper

  5. Chen, S., Ravallion, M., & Wang, Y. (2006). Di Bao: A Guaranteed Minimum Income in China’s Cities? World Bank Policy Research Paper. Washington: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dawe, D. (2012). The Rice Crisis:“ Markets, Policies and Food Security”, Routledge.

  7. Dreze, J. & Sen, A. (2014). An Uncertain Glory: India and its Contradictions, Penguin.

  8. FAO (2008). An Introduction to the Basic Concepts of Food Security. Food Security Information for Action. Practical Guides. EC - FAO Food Security Programme.

  9. FAO. (2009). The state of agricultural commodity markets: High food prices and the food crisis – experience and lessons learned. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  10. FAO (2013). The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2013. Food and Agriculture Orginization of the United Nations.

  11. FAO (2014). The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2014. Food and Agriculture Orginization of the United Nations.

  12. Gao, Q., Garfinkel, I., & ZHAI, F. (2009). Anti-poverty effectiveness of the minimum living standard assistance policy in urban china. Review of Income and Wealth, 55, 630–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Golan, J., Terry, S., & Umapathi, N. (2014). Any guarantees?: China’s rural minimum living standard guarantee program. World Bank Working Paper. Washington: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gouel, C., Gautam, M. & Martin, W. J. (2014). Managing Food Price Volatility in a Large Open Country The Case of Wheat in India. mimeo.

  15. Grossman, N. & Carlson, D. (2011). Agriculture policy in India: The role of input subsidies. USITC executive briefings on trade.

  16. Hansen, J., Tuan, F., & Somwaru, A. (2011). Do China’s agricultural policies matter for world commodity markets? China Agricultural Economic Review, 3, 20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Heerink, N., Kuiper, M., & Shi, X. (2006). China’s new rural income support policy: impacts on grain production and rural income inequality. China & World Economy, 14, 58–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Huang, J., Wang, X., Zhi, H., Huang, Z., & Rozelle, S. (2011). Subsidies and distortions in China’s agriculture: evidence from producer-level data*. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 55, 53–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jensen, H. G. & Anderson, K. (2014). Grain price spikes and beggar-thy-neighbor policy responses: a global economywide analysis. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper.

  20. Jha, R., Gaiha, R., Pandey, M. K., & Kaicker, N. (2013). Food subsidy, income transfer and the poor: a comparative analysis of the public distribution system in India’s states. Journal of Policy Modeling, 35, 887–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jones, D., & Kwiecinski, A. (2010). Policy responses in emerging economies to international agricultural commodity price surges. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Kapur, D., Mukhopadhyay, P., & Subramanian, A. (2008). The case for direct cash transfers to the poor. Economic and Political Weekly, 43, 37–43.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Khera, R. (2008). Access to the targeted public distribution system: a case study in Rajasthan. Economic and Political Weekly, 43, 51–56.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Khera, R. (2011). Trends in diversion of PDS grain. Economic and Political Weekly, 46(21), 106–114.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Khera, R. (2014). Cash vs. in-kind transfers: Indian data meets theory. Food Policy, 46, 116–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kishore, A., Joshi, P. K., & Hoddinott, J. (2014). Indias right to food act: A novel approach to food security. 2013 global food policy report. Washington: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Li, Y., & Yang, S. (2009). Impacts of China’s urban minimum living standard assistance on income distribution and poverty. China: China Population Science (in Chinese).

  28. Martin, W. & Anderson, K. (2012). Export restrictions and price insulation during commodity price booms. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 94, 422–427.

  29. Meng, L. (2012). Can grain subsidies impede rural–urban migration in hinterland China? Evidence from field surveys. China Economic Review, 23, 729–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. OECD. (2009). India. Agricultural policies in emerging economies 2009: Monitoring and evaluation. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. OECD. (2013). China. Agricultural policy monitoring and evaluation 2013: OECD countries and emerging economies. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. OECD (2014). Feeding India: Prospects and challenges in the next decade. OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2014. Paris: OECD Publishing.

  33. Pritchard, B., Rammohan, A., Sekher, M., Parasuraman, S., & Choithani, C. (2013). Feeding India: Livelihoods, entitlements and capabilities. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Pursell, G., Gulati, A., & Gupta, K. (2007). Distortions to agricultural incentives in India. Agricultural distortions working paper 48483. Washington: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sen, A. (1981). Poverty and famines. An essay on entitlement and deprivation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sharma, V. P. (2012). Dismantling fertilizer subsidies in India: Some issues and concerns for farm sector growth.

  37. Slayton, T. (2009). Rice crisis forensics: How Asian governments carelessly set the world rice market on fire. Center for Global Development working paper, 163.

  38. Subramanian, A., Kapur, D. & Mukhopadhyay, P. (2008). More on Direct Cash Transfers. Economic and Political Weekly, 43, 85–87.

  39. Svedberg, P. (2012). Reforming or replacing the public distribution system with cash transfers? Economic & Political Weekly, 47, 53–62.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Umali-Deininger, D. L., & Deininger, K. W. (2001). Towards greater food security for Indias poor: balancing government intervention and private competition. Agricultural Economics, 25, 321–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. World Bank. (1986). Poverty and hunger: Issues and options for food security in developing countries. Washington: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  42. World Food Summit. (1996). Rome Declaration on World Food Security. Rome. Available from http://www.fao.org/docrep/003/w3613e/w3613e00.HTM.

  43. Wu, A. M., & Ramesh, M. (2014). Poverty reduction in urban China: the impact of cash transfers. Social Policy and Society, 13, 285–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Xu, C., Holly Wang, H., & Shi, Q. (2012). Farmers’ income and production responses to rural taxation reform in three regions in China. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 63, 291–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Yi, F., Sun, D., & Zhou, Y. (2015). Grain subsidy, liquidity constraints and food security—impact of the grain subsidy program on the grain-sown areas in China. Food Policy, 50, 114–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Yu, W. & Bandara, J. S. (2014). India’s grain security policy in the era of high food prices: A computable general equilibrium analysis. Paper presented at the EAAE congress in Ljubljana, August 2014.

  47. Yu, W., & Jensen, H. G. (2010). China’s agricultural policy transition: impacts of recent reforms and future scenarios. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61, 343–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Yu, W., & Jensen, H. G. (2014). Trade policy responses to food price crisis and implications for existing domestic support measures: the case of China in 2008. World Trade Review, 13, 651–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Yu, B., Liu, F., & You, L. (2012). Dynamic agricultural supply response under economic transformation: a case study of Henan, China. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 94, 370–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge valuable comments and suggestions from two anonymous referees and the guest editor on an earlier draft of the paper, and useful discussions with Lijuan Cao on China’s income support programs. This paper was part of a workshop sponsored by the OECD Co-operative Research Programme on Biological Resource Management for Sustainable Agricultural Systems.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wusheng Yu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, W., Elleby, C. & Zobbe, H. Food security policies in India and China: implications for national and global food security. Food Sec. 7, 405–414 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-015-0432-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Agricultural and food policy
  • Food security
  • India
  • China