Food Security

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 397–409 | Cite as

Social relationships impact adoption of agricultural technologies: the case of food crop varieties in Timor-Leste

  • Liv Pommer Jensen
  • Kim Picozzi
  • Octavio da Costa Monteiro de Almeida
  • Marcelino de Jesus da Costa
  • Luc Spyckerelle
  • William Erskine
Original Paper

Abstract

Factors related to adoption of new agricultural technologies have been given increasing attention, especially in developing countries where such technologies offer opportunities to increase food production. One of the most immediate ways to improve food production significantly is through the adoption of high yielding varieties of food crops, but rates of adoption are often low, especially among the rural poor. In Timor-Leste, improved varieties of food crops with yield advantages across all agro-ecological zones have been introduced. However, despite yield advantages, suitability and high levels of food insecurity, discontinuance occurs and adoption rates are low. To identify factors related to adoption of the improved varieties across agro-ecological zones, binary logistic regression was performed on data collected from 1511 rural households. The results identified several factors related to adoption and showed that their impact varied across agro-ecological zones. The factor most strongly related to adoption was having a relationship to a grower of an improved variety of food crop and the closeness of this relationship. Furthermore, the following factors were related to adoption with variation across agro-ecological zones: age; education; size of farming plots; travel time between household and farming plot; involvement with the programme developing the improved varieties of food crops and participation in groups and training programmes. Overall, the findings of this study emphasize that dissemination strategies should embrace social relationships and be sensitive to agro-ecological zones.

Keywords

Adoption Agricultural technologies Social relationships Agro-ecological zone Improved food crop varieties Timor-Leste 

References

  1. Adesina, A. A., & Zinnah, M. E. (1993). Technology characteristics, farmers perceptions and adoption decisions: a tobit model application in Sierra Leone. Agricultural Economics, 9, 297–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ARPAPET (1996). Agro-climatic zones of East Timor. Indonesian-Australian Development Cooperation, Agricultural and Regional Planning Assistance Program East Timor, Kantor Wilayah Departemen Pertanian Propinsi Timor Timur, Jalan Estrada de Balide, Dili, Timor Timur, 88112, Indonesia.Google Scholar
  3. Barnett, J., Dessal, S., & Jones, R. N. (2007). Vulnerability to climate and change in East Timor. Ambio, 36(5), 372–378.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borges, L. F., Ferreira, A. F., Silva, D. D., Williams, R., Andersen, R., Dalley, A., et al. (2009). Improving food security through agricultural research and development in Timor-Leste: a country emerging from conflict. Food Security, 1, 403–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cromwell, E., Friis-Hansen, E., & Turner, M. (1992). The seed sector in developing countries: a framework for performance analysis. Working paper 65, Overseas Development Institute, London.Google Scholar
  6. CSIRO (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation) (2010). Climate change is East Timor – a brief overview of future climate projections. Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency, Australia. http://www.cdu.edu.au/itl/documents/East-Timor-review-for%20submission%20to%20DCCEE.pdf. Accessed 03 Jan 2013.
  7. da Costa, H., Piggin, C., Fox, J., & da Cruz, C. J. (2003). Introduction and Acknowledgement. In: H. da Costa, C. Piggin, C. J. da Cruz, & J. J. Fox (Eds.), Agriculture: New directions for a New Nation – East Timor (Timor-Leste), 1 – 3 October 2002, Dili, East Timor, ACIAR Proceedings 113 (pp. 2–4). Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  8. da Costa, M. J., Lopes, M., Ximenes, A., Ferreira, A. R., Spyckerelle, L., Williams, R., et al. (2013). Household food insecurity in Timor-Leste. Food Security, 5, 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. de Graaff, J., Amsalu, A., Bodnar, F., Kessler, A., Posthumus, H., & Tenge, A. (2008). Factors influencing adoption and continued use of long-term soil and water conservation measures in five developing countries. Applied Geography, 28, 271–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. de sa Benevides, T. F. (2003). Cropping systems in East Timor. In: H. da Costa, C. Piggin, C. J. da Cruz, & J. J. Fox (Eds.), Agriculture: New directions for a New Nation – East Timor (Timor-Leste), 1 – 3 October 2002, Dili, East Timor, ACIAR Proceedings 113 (pp. 17–20). Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  11. Doss, C. R., & Morris, M. L. (2001). How does gender affect the adoption of agricultural innovations? The case of improved maize technology in Ghana. Agricultural Economics, 25, 27–39.Google Scholar
  12. Feder, G., & Umali, D. L. (1993). The adoption of agricultural innovations. A review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 43, 215–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Feder, G., Just, R. E., & Zilberman, D. (1985). Adoption of agricultural innovations in developing countries: a survey. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 33, 255–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fox, J. J. (2003). Drawing from the past to prepare for the future: Responding to the challenges of food security in East Timor. In: H. da Costa, C. Piggin, C. J. da Cruz, & J. J. Fox (Eds.), Agriculture: New directions for a New Nation – East Timor (Timor-Leste), 1 – 3 October 2002, Dili, East Timor, ACIAR Proceedings 113 (pp. 105–114). Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  15. Ghadim, A. K., & Pannell, D. J. (1999). A conceptual framework of adoption of an agricultural innovation. Agricultural Economics, 21, 145–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ivanic, M., & Martin, W. (2010). Promoting global agricultural growth and poverty reduction. The World Bank. European Association of Agricultural Economists, 114th Seminar of the European Association of Agricultural Economists, Structural Change in Agriculture: Modeling Policy Impacts and Farm Strategies, April 15–16, 2010, Berlin, Germany. https://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/resources/download/4883.pdf. Accessed 04 Jan 2012.
  17. Jack, K. (2011). Constraints to adoption of agricultural technologies in developing coutries. Agricultural Technology Adoption Initiative, The Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Center for Effective Global Action, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  18. Javier, E. L. San Valentin, G., Kapukha, P., Monaghan, M., Palmer, B. Piggin, C., et al. (2003). Selection of better rice for East Timor. In: H. da Costa, C. Piggin, C. J. da Cruz, & J. J. Fox (Eds.), Agriculture: New directions for a New Nation – East Timor (Timor-Leste), 1–3 October 2002, Dili, East Timor, ACIAR Proceedings 113 (pp. 79–83). Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  19. Knowler, D., & Bradshaw, B. (2007). Farmers adoption of conservation agriculture: a review and synthesis of recent research. Food Policy, 32, 25–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lacoste, M., Williams, R., Erskine, W., Nesbitt, H., Pereira, L., & Marçal, A. (2012). Varietal diffusion in marginal seed systems: participatory trials initiate change in East Timor. Journal of Crop Improvement, 26, 468–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lee, D. R. (2005). Agricultural sustainability and technology adoption: issues and policies for developing countries. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87(5), 1325–1334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lopes, M., & Nesbitt, H. (2012). Improving food security in Timor-Leste with higher yield crop varieties. 56th Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society annual conference, Fremantle, Western Australia, February 7–10 2012. http://aciar.gov.au/files/node/14932/tr080_food_security_in_east_timor_papua_new_guin_12173.pdf#page=13 Accessed 21 Dec 2012.
  23. Mbaga-Semgalawe, Z., & Folmer, H. (2000). Household adoption behaviour of improved soil conservation: the case of the North Pare and West Usambara Mountains of Tanzania. Land Use Policy, 17, 321–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Molyneux, N., da Cruz, G. R., Williams, R. L., Andersen, R., & Turner, N. C. (2012). Climate change and population growth in Timor Leste: implications for food security. Ambio, 41, 823–840.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Noltze, M., Schwarze, S., & Qaim, M. (2012). Understanding the adoption of system technologies in smallholder agriculture: the system of rice intensification (SRI) in Timor-Leste. Agricultural Systems, 108, 64–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. RDTL (República Democrática de Timor-Leste) (2010). Brief history of Timor-Leste: A History, Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste. http://www.gov.east-timor.org/AboutTimorleste/history.htm. Accessed 21 Sep 2012.
  27. RDTL (República Democrática de Timor-Leste). (2011). Volume 3: social and economic characteristics, population and housing census of Timor-Leste, 2010. Dili, Timor-Leste: National Statistics Directorate and UNFPA.Google Scholar
  28. RDTL (República Democrática de Timor-Leste) (2013). 2010 Census Results: Timor-Leste’s population grows slower than projected. Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste, Dili, Timor-Leste. http://timor-leste.gov.tl/?p=4144&lang=en. Accessed 21 Jan 2013.
  29. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  30. Ryan, B., & Gross, N. (1943). The diffusion of hybrid seed corn in two Iowa communities. Rural Sociology, 8(1), 15–24.Google Scholar
  31. Schuck, E. C., Nganje, W., & Yantio, D. (2002). The role of land tenure and extension education in the adoption of slash and burn agriculture. Ecological Economics, 43, 61–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Seeds of Life. (2012a). Annual research report. Dili, Timor-Leste: Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries.Google Scholar
  33. Seeds of Life. (2012b). Seeds of life 3 baseline survey. Dili, Timor-Leste: Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries.Google Scholar
  34. Seeds of Life. (2013). Seeds of life program Timor-Leste. Dili, Timor-Leste: Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries.Google Scholar
  35. Shiferaw, B., & Holden, S. T. (1998). Resource degradation and adoption of land conservation technologies in the Ethiopian Highlands: a case study in Andit Tid, North Shewa. Agricultural Economics, 18, 233–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shively, G. E. (1997). Consumption risk, farmer characteristics, and soil conservation adoption among low income farmers in the Philippines. Agricultural Economics, 17, 165–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sidibe, A. (2005). Farm-level adoption of soil and water conservation techniques in northern Burkina Faso. Agricultural Water Management, 71, 211–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Somda, J., Nianogo, A. J., Nassa, S., & Sanou, S. (2002). Soil fertility management and socio-economic factors in crop-livestock systems in Burkina Faso: a case study of composting technology. Ecological Economics, 43, 175–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tenge, A. J., de Graaff, J. D., & Hella, J. P. (2003). Social and economic factors affecting the adoption of soil and water conservation in West Usambara Highlands, Tanzania. Land Degradation and Development, 15, 99–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Thornton, P. (2012). Recalibrating food production in the developing world: Global warming will change more than just the climate, Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, Research programme on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security, Policy Brief 6. http://cgspace.cgiar.org/handle/10568/24696. Accessed 31 Dec 2012.
  41. Viegas, E. (2003). Agricultural mechanisation: Managing technology change. In: H. da Costa, C. Piggin, C. J. da Cruz, & J. J. Fox (Eds.), Agriculture: New directions for a New Nation – East Timor (Timor-Leste), 1 – 3 October 2002, Dili, East Timor, ACIAR Proceedings 113 (pp. 79–83). Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  42. Wejnert, B. (2002). Integrating models of diffusion of innovations: a conceptual framework. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 297–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Williams, R., Fontes, L., da Silva, D., Dalley, A., & Monaghan, B. (2008). Participatory variety selection increases adoption of modern varieties by subsistence farmers in East Timor, Australian Society of Agronomy. http://www.regional.org.au/au/asa/2008/concurrent/achieving-change/5885_williamsr.htm. Accessed 02 Feb 2012.
  44. Williams, R., Borges, L. F., Lacoste, M., Andersen, R., Nesbitt, H., & Johansen, C. (2012). On-Farm evaluation of introduced maize varieties and their yield determining factors in East Timor. Field Crops Research, 137, 170–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht and International Society for Plant Pathology 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Liv Pommer Jensen
    • 1
  • Kim Picozzi
    • 2
  • Octavio da Costa Monteiro de Almeida
    • 3
  • Marcelino de Jesus da Costa
    • 4
  • Luc Spyckerelle
    • 4
  • William Erskine
    • 5
  1. 1.University of Edinburgh, Medical SchoolChancellor’s BuildingEdinburghUK
  2. 2.University of Edinburgh Medical SchoolEdinburghUK
  3. 3.Directorate for Policy and PlanningMinistry of Agriculture and Fisheries, ComoroDiliTimor-Leste
  4. 4.Seeds of Life, Timor-LesteDiliTimor-Leste
  5. 5.Centre for Legumes in Mediterranean AgricultureUniversity of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia

Personalised recommendations