Rethinking the measurement of food security: from first principles to best practice

Abstract

While food security measurement has been substantially expanded in recent decades, there persists significant dissatisfaction with existing measurement systems, especially in the wake of the ongoing food and financial crises. In this paper we first set out a list of criteria that an ideal food security measurement system should satisfy. In addition to standard issues of cross-sectional validity, our criteria include inter-temporal validity (the ability to gauge trends and shocks), and nutritional relevance. Using a mixture of literature review and fresh empirical analysis, we then benchmark four types of indicators (calories, poverty, dietary diversity and subjective indicators) against these criteria as a means of systematically identifying their relative strengths and weaknesses, and comparing overall performance. We conclude that, overall, dietary diversity indicators are the best performing class of indicators: they are powerful predictors of economic status and malnutrition (both stunting and wasting), sensitive to shocks, and relatively cheap to measure. Our concluding section therefore also outlines possible steps for scaling up the measurement of dietary diversity (and other indicators) through a mixture of increased funding, greater inter-agency coordination and technological (ICT) innovations that will reduce the cost of high frequency food security measurement.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    We adopt the concept of food security, as defined at the 1996 World Food Summit (FAO 1996), a definition which is given below. Unlike for food security, there is no generally accepted definition of nutrition security. A key difference between the two concepts is that nutrition outcomes are significantly influenced by health factors and child care practices. Moreover, nutrition security tends to focus more on the welfare of young children and women in reproductive age, given the well-established hypothesis that growth faltering typically occurs in the first “thousand days” of life (Victora et al. 2010).

  2. 2.

    Indeed, somewhat in contradiction to our statement above, one anonymous reviewer suggested there had in fact been some convergence in recent years around these four classes of indicators. At the same time, we believe there is still a large variety of specific indicators within each class of indicator. For example, there still persists various different types of dietary diversity scores.

  3. 3.

    Conceivably, there are other indicators that could be considered here. For example, asset indices are sometimes referred to as food security indicators, although we view them as conceptually too remote to the latent concept of food security, even if they bear a strong correlation with food security outcomes in practice. There are also composite indexes incorporating different food and nutrition security indicators such as the Global Hunger Index of the International Food Policy Research Institute. We do not explicitly discuss such composite indexes since their strengths and weaknesses emerge from the individual indicators used.

  4. 4.

    Indeed, such assessments should very much be a research priority in the future. Too often, research in this area tries to prove that an indicator works well, rather than to prove that it doesn’t.

  5. 5.

    See de Haen et al. (2011) for an overview. Note that FAO’s methodology is being revised to make use of a larger number of recent household expenditure and consumption surveys among others (FAO 2009, 2011).

  6. 6.

    Though not shown, we found the same results for Yemen using data from the Household Budget Survey 2005/06.

  7. 7.

    Ideally, one should engage in multivariate tests. However, it is unlikely that these would substantially improve significance levels, and it is also striking that bivariate correlations are still significant for non-calorie indicators.

  8. 8.

    There is also some suggestion that rural households were better able to cope with the crisis than urban households thanks to a higher share of food from own production.

  9. 9.

    There are several explanations for this discrepancy. First, a bias may occur from the difficulties of pricing subsistence consumption. Second, unobserved seasonal shortfalls are a major issue in rural areas but much less so in urban areas. Third, monetary poverty indicators perform poorly in capturing access to and quality of essential services that are important for nutrition such as health, education, and family planning services.

  10. 10.

    Nationally representative household surveys collect data usually over 1 year (including all seasons). The sampling is often designed to account for seasonality through repeated visits of the same enumeration area so that seasonality effects should average out at the aggregate level. Nonetheless, the surveys cannot be used easily to examine seasonal dynamics because each household is interviewed normally only once during the survey year so that cross-sectional and inter-temporal effects cannot be separated.

  11. 11.

    Why is this dietary diversity indicator more strongly correlated with stunting, wasting and low BMI outcomes? There could be several possible reasons. First, although the dietary diversity and undernourishment estimates are calculated from the same data source (the FAO Food Balance sheets), dietary diversity is probably subject to less measurement error, because no assumptions are made about the distribution of diets, whereas the FAO undernourishment approach must estimate this distribution with infrequent data. Moreover, if the calories from staples and calories from non-staples are measured with similarly sized and similarly signed errors, then taking the ratio of the two will roughly cancel out the errors. In contrast, a simple measure of calories will still contain this error. Second, dietary diversity is presumably a better proxy for micronutrient deficiencies, which are indeed important for young children, particularly resisting diseases that cause short term wasting, which in turn contributes to stunting (a cumulative nutrition indicator). Third, since diets only diversify when calorie needs are satisfied, dietary diversity could in fact be thought of as an index of both quality and quantity of diets.

  12. 12.

    Analyzing the 2012 SOFI data (see http://www.fao.org/publications/sofi/food-security-indicators/en/) we again found correlation patterns similar to those in Table 3. In fact, the share of animal sourced proteins proved to have the strongest bivariate correlation with stunting (−0.79) and its correlation with wasting as strong as the correlation between wasting and the share of calories derived from non-starch foods (in both cases, −0.50).

  13. 13.

    We should add a caveat to that result. Brinkman et al. (2010) do not use a preferred regression framework in our view, since they use logs of levels rather than first differences. A differenced model would remove fixed effects, which could be causing simultaneity biases in the regressions. Moreover the sample sizes for two of the countries (Haiti and Nepal) are small enough (500–600 households) to suggest that they are not nationally representative. And, perhaps most critically, there is no means of distinguishing between net food producing and net food consuming households. Clearly net food producing households might benefit from higher food prices.

  14. 14.

    A smaller panel survey from Java also reports decreased meat consumption (Hartini et al. 2003a, b).

  15. 15.

    Unpublished work from two recent IFPRI studies tends to find a strong correlation between household and individual.

  16. 16.

    In several cases the indicator was only significant when interacted with other terms, although such interactions are often intuitive (such as interactions with the age of the child).

  17. 17.

    We thank Chris Barrett for this point. Barrett (2010) makes a compelling case for sentinel surveys, and argues that they should include subjective “early warning” questions.

  18. 18.

    These three questions on hunger were subsequently developed into the Household Hunger Scale. Also, while this paper does not consider the Reduced Coping Strategies Index as an indicator of food insecurity per se, a subset of the coping strategies was also validated for cross-cultural use (see Maxwell et al. 2008).

  19. 19.

    Similarly, Studdert et al.’s (2001) survey of Jakartan mothers found that some terms—such as the term “balanced diet”—translated very poorly to that context.

  20. 20.

    We should add a caution regarding over-interpretation of the correlation coefficients between the food security indicators, considering that estimates of (food) expenditure, calorie consumption, and dietary diversity are derived from the same module in the surveys that likely contributes to strong correlations.

  21. 21.

    One proposed means of improving subjective data is to use “anchoring vignettes” to elicit common reference frames (King et al. 2004). Other response biases could also be reduced through assurances of confidentiality, and informing respondents that their answers to these question have no bearing on their qualification for transfer schemes.

  22. 22.

    For example, how does one compare price levels between the Cameroon, where cassava is a key staple, and India, where it is not? These are fundamental issues that poverty measurement literature has been struggling with - yet persisting with - for decades.

  23. 23.

    This recommendation is essentially along the sentinel systems advocated by Barrett (2010).

  24. 24.

    While there is a large number of developing countries in the world, a subset of developing countries is much more exposed to natural disasters and economic volatility than others. This is evident from data on food aid receipts from the FAO (2012) and estimates of the number of people affected by disasters, produced by EM-DAT (2012).

  25. 25.

    In the 2011 drought in the Horn of Africa, it was estimated by major humanitarian agencies (such as UN-OCHA, WFP and USAID) that around 14 million people in four countries were in need of humanitarian assistance. In fact, it is quite difficult to ascertain how these specific numbers were obtained. However, the WFP was extremely helpful in sharing details of their methods. Specifically, they typically use Emergency Food Security Assessments (EFSA) to crisis situations, and their handbook on conducting EFSAs is available on the web (www.wfp.org/content/emergency-food-security-assessment-handbook). We were informed that EFSAs vary a lot by context in terms of being rapid or in-depth, quantitative or qualitative data, and in terms of what information is collected, and what existing data are available. For example, an EFSA in Bangladesh primarily relied on focus group interviews and some collected market price data. Interestingly, that EFSA also used some baseline data from the Bangladesh NSS. EFSAs in South Sudan and Senegal had more quantitative data, but the nature of this data varied substantially across the two countries. In South Sudan the WFP were utilizing sentinel sites, as well as a range of other household survey and census data. In Senegal a relatively small survey of 552 household was conducted in affected areas. Our perception is that this flexible approach is sensible given existing data constraints and limited resources, but our argument is that more high-frequency data could and should be collected in all but the most volatile environments. Indeed, high-frequency surveys should also be thought of as a capacity building instrument for the countries involved.

References

  1. Ali, D., Kuntal, K.S., Phuong, N., Michael, T., Purnima, M., Rahul, R., Marie, R. (2013). Is household food insecurity associated with child undernutrition? A multi-country study using data from Bangladesh, Ethiopia and Vietnam. Unpublished manuscript, The International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).

  2. Alkire, S., & Santos, M. E. (2010). Acute multidimensional poverty: A new index for developing countries, OPHI working paper no. 38. Oxford Poverty & Human Development Initiative (OPHI), Queen Elizabeth House (QEH), University of Oxford.

  3. Arimond, M., & Ruel, M. (2006). Dietary diversity is associated with child nutritional status: evidence from 11 demographic and health surveys. Journal of Nutrition, 134, 2579–2585.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barrett, C. B. (2010). Measuring food insecurity. Science, 327, 825–828.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Beegle, K., De Weerdt, J., Friedman, J., & Gibson, J. (2012). Methods of household consumption measurement through surveys: Experimental results from Tanzania. Journal of Development Economics, 98(1), 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Behrman, J., & Deolalikar, A. (1987). Will developing country nutrition improve with income? A case study for rural South India. Journal of Political Economy, 95(3), 492–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bennett, M. (1941). Wheat in national diets. Wheat Studies, 18(2), 37–76.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Block, S. A., Kiess, L., Webb, P., Kosen, S., Moench-Pfanner, R., Bloem, M. W., et al. (2004). Macro shocks and micro outcomes: child nutrition during Indonesia’s crisis. Economics and Human Biology, 2(1), 21–44.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bloem, M. W., Moench-Pfanner, R., & Panagides, D. (2003). Health & nutritional surveillance for development. Singapore: Helen Keller Worldwide.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bloem, M. W., de Pee, S., & Darnton-Hill, I. (2005). Micronutrient deficiencies and maternal thinness: first chain in the sequence of nutrition and health events in economic crises. In A. Bendich & R. J. Deckelbaum (Eds.), Preventive nutrition: The comprehensive guide for health professionals (3rd ed.). Totowa: Humana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bouis, H., & Haddad, L. (1992). Are estimates of calorie-income elasticities too high? A recalibration of the plausible range. Journal of Development Economics, 39, 333–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bouis, H., Haddad, L., & Kennedy, E. (1992). Does it matter how we survey demand for food?: Evidence from Kenya and the Philippines. Food Policy, 17(6), 349–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bouis, H. E. (1994). The effects of income on demand for food in poor countries: are our food databases giving us reliable estimates? Journal of Development Economics, 44(1), 199–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Breunig, R., Cobb-Clark, D., Gong, X., & Venn, D. (2007). Disagreement in Australian partners reports of financial difficulty. Review of Economics of the Household, 5(1), 59–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Brinkman, H.-J., de Pee, S., Sanogo, I., Subran, L., & Bloem, M. W. (2010). High food prices and the global financial crisis have reduced access to nutritious food and worsened nutritional status and health. Journal of Nutrition, 140, 153S–161S.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Coates, J., Rogers, B. L., Webb, P., Maxwell, D., Houser, R., & McDonald, C. (2007a). Dietary diversity study. Prepared for the strengthening emergency needs assessment capacity project. Rome: World Food Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Coates, J., Swindale, A., & Bilinsky, P. (2007b). Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS) for measurement of Food Access: Indicator Guide. Food and Nutrition Technical Assitance (FANTA) project. Washington DC: United States Agency for International Development.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cordeiro, L. S., Wilde, P. E., Semu, H., & Levinson, F. J. (2012). Household food security is inversely associated with undernutrition among adolescents from Kilosa, Tanzania. Journal of Nutrition, 142(9), 1741–1747.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. de Haen, H., Klasen, S., & Qaim, M. (2011). What do we really know? Metrics for food insecurity and undernutrition. Food Policy, 36(6), 760–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. de Hoyos, R., & Medvedev, D. (2009). Poverty effects of higher food prices: a global perspective. Policy research working paper, no. 4887. Washington DC: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Deaton, A. (1989). Rice prices and income distribution in Thailand: a non-parametric analysis. The Economic Journal, 99, 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Deaton, A., & Dreze, J. (2002). Poverty and inequality in India: A Re-examination. Economic and Political Weekly, Special articles, pp. 3729–3748.

  23. Deaton, A., & Drèze, J. (2009). Nutrition in India: facts and interpretations. Economic and Political Weekly, 44(7), 42–65.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Deaton, A. (2010). Price indexes, inequality, and the measurement of world poverty. Atlanta: Presidential Address to the American Economic Association.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Deaton, A. (2011). The financial crisis and the well-being of America. NBER working paper no. 17128. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Deaton, A., & Dupriez, O. (2011). Purchasing power parity exchange rates for the global poor. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 3(2), 137–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Deitchler, M., Ballard, T., Swindale, A., & Coates, J. (2010). Validation of a measure of household hunger for cross-cultural use. Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance II Project (FANTA-2) technical report. Washington DC: USAID.

    Google Scholar 

  28. EM-DAT. (2012). EM-DAT: The OFDA/CRED international disaster database. Brussels: www.em-dat.net.

  29. FAO. (1996). Rome declaration on world food security and world food summit plan of action, http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/003/W3613E/W3613E00.HTM.

  30. FAO. (2003). FAO Methodology for the measurement of food deprivation. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  31. FAO. (2009). The state of food insecurity in the World: Economic crises—impacts and lessons learned. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  32. FAO. (2011). The state of food insecurity in the world: How does international price volatility affect domestic economies and food security? Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  33. FAO. (2012). AGROSTAT. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization. http://faostat.fao.org/default.aspx. Accessed April 22.

  34. Frankenberg, E., Thomas, D., & Beegle, K. (1999). The real costs of Indonesia's economic crisis: Preliminary findings from the Indonesia Family Life Survey. Santa Monica: RAND.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Funk, C., Dettinger, M. D., Michaelsen, J. C., Verdin, J. P., Brown, M. E., Barlow, M., et al. (2008). Warming of the Indian Ocean threatens eastern and southern African food security but could be mitigated by agricultural development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(32), 11081–11086.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Gabbert, S., & Weikard, H. P. (2001). How widespread is undernourishment? A critique of measurement methods and new empirical results. Food Policy, 26, 209–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Hatloy, A., Torheim, L., & Oshaug, A. (1998). Food variety: a good indicator of nutritional adequacy of the diet? A case study from an urban area in Mali, West Africa. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 52(12), 891–898.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Hartini, T. N. S., Winkvist, A., Lindholm, L., Stenlund, H., Persson, V., Nurdiati, D. S., et al. (2003). Nutrient intake and iron status of urban poor and rural poor without access to rice fields are affected by the emerging economic crisis: the case of pregnant Indonesian women. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 57, 654–666.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Hartini, T. N. S., Winkvist, A., Lindholm, L., Stenlund, H., & Surjono, A. (2003). Food patterns during an economic crisis among pregnant women in Purworejo District, Central Java, Indonesia. Food and Nutrition Bulletin, 24(3), 256–267.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Headey, D., Chiu, A., & Kadiyala, S. (2012). Agriculture’s role in the Indian enigma: help or hindrance to the malnutrition crisis? Food Security.

  41. Headey, D. (2013). The impact of the global food crisis on self-assessed food security. World Bank Economic Review, 27(1), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. HKI. (2011). The food security and nutrition surveillance project, round 4: February–May 2011. Bulletin No. 2, Bangladesh: Helen Keller International.

  43. Hoddinott, J., & Yohannes, Y. (2002). Dietary diversity as a food security indicator. Food consumption and nutrition division discussion paper. Washington DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  44. IPCC. (2012). Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. Cambridge University Press, New York: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

  45. Ivanic, M., & Martin, W. (2008). Implications of higher global food prices for poverty in low-income countries. Agricultural Economics, 39(s1), 405–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Ivanic, M., Martin, W., & Zaman, H. (2011). Estimating the short-run poverty impacts of the 2010–11 surge in food prices. Policy research working paper 5633. Washington DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Jensen, R. T., & Miller, N. H. (2010). A revealed preference approach to measuring undernutrition and poverty using calorie shares. NBER Working Paper, No. 16555.

  48. Kac, G., Velásquez-Melendez, G., Schlüssel, M. M., Segall-Côrrea, A. M., Silva, A. A., & Pérez-Escamilla, R. (2012). Severe food insecurity is associated with obesity among Brazilian adolescent females. Public Health Nutrition, 15(10), 1854–1860.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Kennedy, G., Pedro, M. R., Seghieri, C., Nantel, G., & Brouwer, I. (2007). Dietary diversity score is a useful indicator of micronutrient intake in non breast-feeding Filipino children. Journal of Nutrition, 13, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Kennedy, G., Ballard, T., & Dop, M. C. (2011). Guidelines for measuring household and individual dietary diversity. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  51. King, G., Murray, C. J. L., Salomon, J. A., & Tandon, A. (2004). Enhancing the validity and cross-cultural comparability of measurement in survey research. American Political Science Review, 98(1), 191–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Maxwell, D., Caldwell, R., & Langworthy M. (2008). Measuring food insecurity: can an indicator based on localized coping behaviors be used to compare across contexts? Food Policy, 33(6), 533–540.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Nabarro, D. (2010). Nutrition repositioned in the development agenda? Current prospects for scaling-up nutrition outcomes. Paper presented at "Annual Martin J. Forman Memorial Lecture," November 4, 2010. Washington DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Ngwenya, E., & Ray, R. (2007). Changes in Indonesian food consumption patterns and their nutritional implications. UTAS Discussion paper 2007–06, University of Tasmania, Department of Economics and Finance.

  56. Nubé, M. (2001). Confronting dietary energy supply with anthropometry in the assessement of undernutrition prevalence at the level of countries. World Development, 29(7), 1275–1289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. OECD-FAO. (2009). OECD-FAO Agricultural outlook 2009–2018. Geneva and Rome: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations.

  58. Osei, A., Pandey, P., Spiro, D., Nielson, J., Shrestha, R., Talukder, Z., et al. (2010). Household food insecurity and nutritional status of children aged 6 to 23 months in Kailali District of Nepal. Food and Nutrition Bulletin, 31(4), 483–494.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Pelletier, D. L., Deneke, K., Kidane, Y., Haile, B., & Negussie, F. (1995). The food-first bias and nutrition policy: lessons from Ethiopia. Food Policy, 20(4), 279–298.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Ruel, M. (2003). Operationalizing dietary diversity: A review of measurement issues and research priorities. Journal of Nutrition, 133, 3911S–3926S.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Ruel, M. T., Harris, J., & Cunningham, K. (2012). Measuring dietary quality in developing countries: A review of the usefulness of individual dietary diversity indicators. Chapter 18. In V. R. Preedy (Ed.), Diet quality: An evidence-based approach. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Savy, M., Martin-Prevel, Y., Traissac, P., Emyard-Duvernay, S., & Delpeuch, F. (2006). Dietary diversity scores and nutritional status of women change during the seasonal food shortage in rural Burkina Faso. Journal of Nutrition, 136, 2625–2632.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Sibrian, R. (2008). Deriving Food Security Statistics from National Household Surveys: Experience, Achievements and Challenges. In R. Sibrian (Ed.), Deriving food security information from national household budget surveys: Experience, achievements and challenges. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Skoufias, E. (2003). Is the calorie–income elasticity sensitive to price changes? Evidence from Indonesia. World Development, 31(7), 1291–1307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Smith, L. C. (1998). Can FAO’S measure of chronic undernourishment be strengthened? Food Policy, 23(5), 425–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Smith, L. C., Alderman, H., & Aduayom, D. (2006). Food insecurity in Sub-Saharan Africa: New estimates from household expenditure surveys. Research report 146. Washington DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Smith, L., & Subandoro, A. (2007). Food security in practice: Measuring food security using household expenditure surveys. Washington DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Spears, D. (2013). How much international variation in child height can sanitation explain? Working paper. New Jersey: Princeton University.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Steyn, N. P., Nel, J. H., Nantel, G., Kennedy, G., & Labadarios, D. (2006). Food variety and dietary diversity scores in children: are they good indicators of dietary adequacy? Public Health Nutrition, 9(5), 644–650.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Studdert, L. J., Frongillo, E. A., & Valois, P. (2001). Household food security was prevalent in Java during Indonesia’s economic crisis. Journal of Nutrition, 131, 2685–2691.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Svedberg, P. (1999). 841 Million undernourished? World Development, 27(12), 2081–2098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Svedberg, P. (2002). Undernutrition overestimated. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 51(1), 5–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Swindale, A., & Bilinsky, P. (2006a). Household dietary diversity measurement of household food access: Indicator guide, version 2. Washington DC: Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance Project.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Swindale, A., & Bilinsky, P. (2006b). Development of a universally applicable household food insecurity measurement tool: process, current status, and outstanding issues. Journal of Nutrition, 136(5), 1449S–1452S.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Swinnen, J. (2010). The right price of food: Reflections on the political economy of policy analysis and communication. LICOS discussion paper 25910, Centre for Institutions and Economic Performance, K.U. Leuven.

  76. Torheim, L. E., Ouattara, F., Diarra, M. M., Thiam, F. D., Barikmo, I., Hatloy, A., et al. (2004). European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 58, 594–604.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Torlesse, H., Kiess, L., & Bloem, M. W. (2003). Association of household rice expenditure with child nutritional status indicates a role for macroeconomic food policy in combating malnutrition. Journal of Nutrition, 133, 1320–1325.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. USDA. (2009). Agricultural projections to 2018. Washington DC: US Department of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Victora, C. G., de Onis, M., Curi Hallal, P., Blössner, M., & Shrimpton, R. (2010). Worldwide timing of growth faltering: revisiting implications for interventions. Pediatrics, 125(3), 473–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. WFP. (2008). Food consumption analysis: Calculation and use of the food consumption score. Rome: World Food Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  81. WHO. (2006). Reliability of anthropometric measurements in the WHO multicentre growth reference study. Acta Paediatrica, 450(Suppl), 38–46.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Wiesmann, D., Bassett, L., Benson, T., & Hoddinott, J. (2009). Validation of the World Food Programme’s food consumption score and alternative indicators of household food security. IFPRI Discussion Paper 00870. Washington DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  83. World Bank. (2008). International Comparison Program (ICP), http://siteresources.worldbank.org/ICPEXT/Resources/ICP_2011.html. Accessed, September 23, 2012.

  84. World Bank. (2012). PovcalNET, http://iresearch.worldbank.org/PovcalNet/index.htm?3.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to the Food Security Analysis Unit of the World Food Programme (WFP) and particularly Claudia Ahpoe, Siemon Hollema, Joyce Luma, Kathryn Ogden, and Astrid Mathiassen for their insights into WFP’s food and nutrition security assessment. Jean-Francois Trinh Tan of the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) provided excellent research assistance. We also thank our IFPRI colleagues Disha Ali and Michael Tedla for letting us report some of their results. And we are indebted to participants at the "International Scientific Symposium on Food and Nutrition Security Information: From Valid Measurement to Effective Decision Making" organized by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and the European Union (EU) (in Rome, January 2012) and at the International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE) triennial meeting (in Foz do Iguaçu, August 2012). All errors are our own.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Derek Headey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Headey, D., Ecker, O. Rethinking the measurement of food security: from first principles to best practice. Food Sec. 5, 327–343 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-013-0253-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Food security
  • Nutrition
  • Food crisis
  • Economic shock
  • Climatic shock
  • Measurement system