Skip to main content

Mind the (yield) gap(s)

Abstract

This paper explores the origin of the notion of “yield gap” and its use as a framing device for agricultural policy in sub-Saharan Africa. The argument is that while the yield gap of policy discourse provides a simple and powerful framing device, it is most often used without the discipline or caveats associated with the best examples of its use in crop production ecology and microeconomics. This argument is developed by examining how yield gap is used in a selection of recent and influential agricultural policy documents. The message for policy makers and others is clear: “mind the (yield) gap(s)”, for they are seldom what they appear.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

Notes

  1. See: http://yieldgap.org/

  2. Jaggard et al. (2010) deal most directly with yield gaps but there is relatively little in the paper on SSA.

References

  • Amanor, K. S. (2009). Global food chains, African smallholders and world bank governance. Journal of Agrarian Change, 9(2), 247–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audebert, A., & Fofana, M. (2009). Rice yield gap due to iron toxicity in West Africa. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 195(1), 66–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, E. R., & Jones, B. D. (1991). Agenda dynamics and policy sub-systems. Journal of Politics, 53(4), 1044–1074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, M., Johnson, D. E., Wopereis, M. C. S., & Sow, A. (2003). Rice yield gaps in irrigated systems along an agro-ecological gradient in West Africa. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science-Zeitschrift fur Pflanzenernahrung und Bodenkunde, 166(1), 61–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Borras, S. M. (2010). The politics of transnational agrarian movements. Development and Change, 41(5), 771–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassman, K. G., Dobermann, A., Walters, D. T., & Yang. (2003). Meeting cereal demand while protecting natural resources and improving environmental quality. Annual Review of Environmental Resources, 28, 315–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 103–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. (1954). World supply and requirements of farm products. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 117(3), 263–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daviter, F. (2007). Policy framing in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(4), 654–666. doi:10.1080/13501760701314474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Bie, C. (2004). The yield gap of mango in Phrao, Thailand, as investigated through comparative performance evaluation. Scientia Horticulturae, 102(1), 37–52. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2003.11.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Janvry, A., & Sadoulet, E. (2010). Agriculture for development in Africa: business-as-usual or new departures? Journal of African Economies, 19(suppl_2), ii7–ii39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desmarais, A. A. (2007). La Vıa Campesina: Globalization and the power of peasants. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devereux, S., Scoones, I., & Thompson, J. (2009). Critical responses to the World Bank’s World development report 2008: agriculture for development. Journal of Peasant Studies, 36(2), 468–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Druckman, J. N. (2001). The implications of framing effects for citizen competence. Political Behavior, 23(3), 225–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, S., & Biggs, S. (2012). The politics of international assessments: the IAASTD process, reception and significance. Journal of Agrarian Change, 12(1), 144–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fermont, A. M., van Asten, P. J. A., Tittonell, P., van Wijk, M. T., & Giller, K. E. (2009). Closing the cassava yield gap: an analysis from smallholder farms in East Africa. Field Crops Research, 112(1), 24–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foresight. (2011). The future of food and farming: Challenges and choices for global sustainability. Final project report. London: The Government Office for Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fresco, L. O., Huizing, H., Van Keulen, H., Luning, H., & Schipper, R. (1994). Land evaluation and farming systems analysis for land Use planning. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, I. R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J. F., et al. (2010). Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science, 327(5967), 812–818.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hayami, Y. (1969). Sources of agricultural productivity gap among selected countries. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 51(3), 564–575. doi:10.2307/1237909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herdt, R. W., & Mandac, A. M. (1981). Modern technology and economic efficiency of Philippine rice farmers. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 29(2), 375–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington, K. (2009). The strategic incoherence of development: marketing expertise in the World Development Report. Journal of Peasant Studies, 36(3), 653–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • InterAcademy Council. (2004). Realizing the promise and potential of African agriculture. Amsterdam: InterAcademy Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishii-Eiteman, M. (2009). Food sovereignty and the International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development. Journal of Peasant Studies, 36(3), 689–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaggard, K. W., Qi, A., & Ober, E. S. (2010). Possible changes to arable crop yields by 2050. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 365, 2835–2851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kretzmann, J., & McKnight, J. (1993). Building communities from the inside-out. Chicago: ACTA Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobell, D. B., Ortiz-Monasterio, J. I., & Falcon, W. P. (2007). Yield uncertainty at the field scale evaluated with multi-year satellite data. Agricultural Systems, 92(1–3), 76–90. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2006.02.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobell, D. B., Cassman, K. G., & Field, C. B. (2009). Crop yield gaps: their importance, magnitudes, and causes. Annual Review of Environmental Resources, 34, 179–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathie, A., & Cunningham, G. (2003). From clients to citizens: asset-based community development as a strategy for community-driven development. Development in Practice, 13(5), 474–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, B. D., Herren, H. R., Wakhungu, J., & Watson, R. T. (2009). Agriculture at a crossroads: International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development, Global Report. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMichael, P. (2009). Banking on agriculture: a review of the World Development Report 2008. Journal of Agrarian Change, 9(2), 235–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray Li, T. (2009). Exit from agriculture: a step forward or a step backward for the rural poor? Journal of Peasant Studies, 36(3), 629–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz-Ferrara, G., Joshi, A. K., Chand, R., Bhatta, M. R., Mudwari, A., Thapa, D. B., et al. (2006). Partnering with farmers to accelerate adoption of new technologies in South Asia to improve wheat productivity. In Symposium on Challenges to International Wheat Improvement, Obregon, MEXICO, (pp. 399–407).

  • Oya, C. (2009). The World Development Report 2008: inconsistencies, silences, and the myth of ‘win-win’ scenarios. Journal of Peasant Studies, 36(3), 593–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prost, L., Makowski, D., & Jeuffroy, M. H. (2008). Comparison of stepwise selection and Bayesian model averaging for yield gap analysis. Ecological Modelling, 219(1–2), 66–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scoones, I. (2009). The politics of global assessments: the case of the International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD). Journal of Peasant Studies, 36(3), 547–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seck, P. A., Tollens, E., Wopereis, M. C. S., Diagne, A., & Bamba, I. (2010). Rising trends and variability of rice prices: threats and opportunities for sub-Saharan Africa. Food Policy, 35(5), 403–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stirling, A. (2008). “Opening up” and “Closing down”—power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology. Science Technology & Human Values, 33(2), 262–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The World Bank. (2007). Agriculture for development: World Development Report 2008. Washington DC: The World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tittonell, P., Vanlauwe, B., Corbeels, M., & Giller, K. E. (2008). Yield gaps, nutrient use efficiencies and response to fertilisers by maize across heterogeneous smallholder farms of Western Kenya. Plant and Soil, 313(1–2), 19–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Asten, P., Wopereis, M., Haefele, S., Isselmou, M. O., & Kropff, M. (2003). Explaining yield gaps on farmer-identified degraded and non-degraded soils in a Sahelian irrigated rice scheme. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 50, 277–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Ittersum, M. K., & Rabbinge, R. (1997). Concepts in production ecology for analysis and quantification of agricultural input–output combinations. Field Crops Research, 52(3), 197–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Ittersum, M. K., Cassman, K. G., Grassini, P., Wolf, J., Tittonell, P., & Hochman, Z. (in press). Yield gap analysis with local to global relevance—a review. Field Crops Research.

  • Veltmeyer, H. (2009). The World Bank on ‘agriculture for development’: a failure of imagination or the power of ideology? Journal of Peasant Studies, 36(2), 393–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddington, S., Li, X., Dixon, J., Hyman, G., & de Vicente, M. (2010). Getting the focus right: production constraints for six major food crops in Asian and African farming systems. Food Security, 2, 27–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, J. A. (1989). The powers of problem definition: the case of government paperwork. Policy Sciences, 22(2), 97–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodhouse, P. (2009). Technology, environment and the productivity problem in african agriculture: comment on the World Development Report 2008. Journal of Agrarian Change, 9(2), 263–276. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0366.2009.00205.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zinck, J. A., Berroteran, J. L., Farshad, A., Moameni, A., Wokabi, S., & Van Ranst, E. (2004). Approaches to assessing sustainable agriculture. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 23(4), 87–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James Sumberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sumberg, J. Mind the (yield) gap(s). Food Sec. 4, 509–518 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-012-0213-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-012-0213-0

Keywords

  • Africa
  • Agriculture
  • Productivity
  • Crop
  • Ecology