Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Experimental and numerical investigations of the turbulent wake flow of a generic space launcher at \(M_\infty =3\) and \(M_\infty =6\)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
CEAS Space Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The turbulent wake of a generic space launcher wind tunnel model with an underexpanded nozzle jet is investigated experimentally and numerically to gain insight into the variation of intricate wake flow phenomena of space vehicles at higher stages of the flight trajectory with increasing Mach number. The experiments are carried out at \(M_\infty =3\) and \(M_\infty =6\) in the Ludwieg tube test facility at the Institute of Fluid Mechanics at the Technische Universität Braunschweig, while the corresponding time-resolved computations are performed by the Institute of Aerodynamics at RWTH Aachen University using a zonal RANS–LES approach. A strong alteration of the wake topology with increasing Mach number due to the changing pressure ratio at the nozzle exit is found. At \(M_\infty =3\) the moderate underexpansion rate of \(p_\mathrm{e}/p_\infty \approx 5\) leads to a formation of a recirculation region with an elongated triangular cross-section reaching to the nozzle exit. At \(M_\infty =6\) a substantially stronger afterexpansion of the jet plume (\(p_\mathrm{e}/p_\infty \approx 100\)) causes the formation of a cavity region with a quadrangular cross-section. The stronger deflection towards the nozzle at \(M_\infty =3\) results in lower mean and rms wall pressure ratios than at \(M_\infty =6\). However, due to the higher freestream pressure value at the lower Mach number the relation of absolute values is reciprocal, making the lower supersonic regime more critical with respect to dynamic structural loads. This observation is confirmed by an overall good agreement between numerical and experimental data at characteristic positions on the base and nozzle wall. Furthermore, it was shown that undesired effects of the strut support in the wake are present along the whole circumference. For \(M_\infty =3\) the strut influence is found to be particularly intense. The spectral analysis of wall pressure fluctuations reveals fundamental differences in the dynamic behavior of the two investigated wake flow regimes. At \(M_\infty =3\), a dominant frequency range around \(Sr_\mathrm{D}\approx 0.2\) associated with the inner dynamics of the recirculation bubble is found at the base, while on the nozzle a broad-band low-frequency content of substantially higher amplitudes is detected, which is a footprint of the graduate realignment of the turbulent shear layer along the nozzle wall. The spectra at \(M_\infty =6\) are characterized by several high-frequency sharp peaks at \(Sr_\mathrm{D}\geqslant 0.8\). A strong correlation between the supported wind tunnel configuration and the axisymmetric free-flight case is found for the peaks at \(Sr_\mathrm{D}\approx 0.85\) known to be caused by the radial flapping motion of the shear layer along the cavity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

D :

Main body diameter

M :

Mach number

Re :

Reynolds number

Sr :

Strouhal number

x :

Streamwise distance (\(x=0\) in the base plane)

\(\varphi\) :

Azimuthal position in deg (\(\varphi =0^\circ\) at the strut position)

\(\delta\) :

Boundary layer thickness

\(\Delta\) :

Grid resolution

\(\infty\) :

Freestream conditions

0:

Total value

e :

Value at the nozzle exit

mean:

Time-averaged value

rms:

Root-mean-square value

\('\) :

Fluctuating part

\(^+\) :

Wall unit

References

  1. Hammond, W.: Design Methodologies for Space Transportation Systems. AIAA education series (2001). doi:10.2514/4.861734

  2. Deprés, D., Reijasse, P., Dussauge, J.-P.: Analysis of unsteadiness in afterbody transonic flows. AIAA J. 42(12), 2541–2550 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Meliga, P., Reijasse, P.: Unsteady transonic flow behind an axisymmetric afterbody equipped with two boosters. AIAA Paper, p. 4564 (2007)

  4. Deck, S., Thorigny, P.: Unsteadiness of an axisymmetric separating-reattaching flow: numerical investigation. Phys. Fluids 19, 065103 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Hannemann, K., Lüdeke, H., Pallegoix, J.-F., Ollivier, A., Lambare, H., Maseland, H., Geurts, E.G.M., Frey, M., Deck, S., Schrijer, F.F.J., Scarano, F., Schwane, R.: Launch vehicle base buffeting- recent experimental and numerical investigations. In: Proceedings 7th European Symposium on Aerothermodynamics for Space Vehicles, Brugge, Belgium, 9–12 May, vol. 692, p. 102 (2011)

  6. Schrijer, F.F.J., Sciacchitano, A., Scarano, F., Hanneman, K., Pallegoix, J.F., Maseland, J.E.J., Schwane, R.: Experimental investigation of base flow buffeting on the Ariane 5 launcher using high speed PIV. In: Proceedings 7th European Symposium on Aerothermodynamics for Space Vehicles, Brugge, Belgium, 9–12 May, vol. 692, p. 103 (2011)

  7. Schrijer, F.F.J., Sciacchitano, A., Scarano, F.: Spatio-temporal and modal analysis of unsteady fluctuations in a high-subsonic base flow. Phys. Fluids 26, 086101 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Marié, S., Druault, Ph, Lambaré, H., Schrijer, F.: Experimental analysis of the pressure-velocity correlations of external unsteady flow over rocket launchers. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 30(1), 83–93 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Eaton, J.K., Johnston, J.P.: A review of research on subsonic turbulent flow reattachment. AIAA J. 19(9), 1093–1099 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Le, H., Moin, P., Kim, J.: Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flow over a backward-facing step. J. Fluid Mech. 330, 349–374 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Brewer, E.B., Craven, C.E.: Experimental investigation of base flow field at high altitude for a four-engine clustered nozzle configuration. NASA Technical Report TN D-5164 (1969)

  12. Janssen, J.R., Dutton, J.C.: Time-series analysis of supersonic base-pressure fluctuations. AIAA J. 42, 605–613 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bannink, W.J., Houtman, E.M., Bakker, P.G.: Base flow/underexpanded exhaust plume interaction in a supersonic external flow. AIAA Paper, pp. 98–1598 (1998)

  14. Scarano, F., van Oudheusden, B.W., Bannink, W.J., Bsibsi, M.: Experimental investigation of supersonic base flow plume interaction by means of particle image velocimetry. In: Proceedings of the 5th European Symposium on Aerothermodynamics for Space Vehicles (ESA SP-563). Published by ESA Publications Division, pp. 601–607 (2005)

  15. Saile, D., Gülhan, A.: Plume-induced effects on the near-wake region of a generic space launcher geometry. In: 32nd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, AIAA Aviation and Aeronautics Forum and Exposition, number AIAA 2014–3137 (2014)

  16. Stephan, S., Wu, J., Radespiel, R.: Propulsive jet influence on generic launcher base flow. CEAS Space J 7(4), 453–473 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Benay, R., Servel, P.: Two-equation k-\(\sigma\) turbulence model: application to a supersonic base flow. AIAA J. 39, 407–416 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Papp, J.L., Ghia, K.N.: Application of the RNG turbulence model to the simulation of axisymmetric supersonic separated base flows. AIAA Paper , pp. 2001–2027 (2001)

  19. Forsythe, J.R., Hoffmann, K.A., Cummings, R.M., Squires, K.D.: Detached-eddy simulation with compressibility corrections applied to a supersonic axisymmetric base flow. J. Fluid Eng. 124, 911–923 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kawai, S., Fujii, K.: Computational study of a supersonic base flow using LES/RANS hybrid methodology. AIAA Paper, pp. 2004–2068 (2004)

  21. Fureby, C., Kupiainen, K.: Large-eddy simulation of supersonic axisymmetric baseflow. In: Turbulent Shear Flow Phenomena, TSFP3, Sendai, Japan, vol. 3, pp. 1157–1162 (2003)

  22. Sandberg, R.D., Fasel, H.F.: High-accuracy DNS of supersonic base flows and control of the near wake. In: Proceedings of the Users Group Conference, pp. 96–104. IEEE Computer Society (2004)

  23. Sandberg, R.D., Fasel, H.F.: Numerical investigation of transitional supersonic axisymmetric wakes. J. Fluid Mech. 563, 1–41 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Strelets, M.: Detached eddy simulation of massively separated flows. AIAA Paper, pp. 2001–0879 (2001)

  25. Lüdeke, J.D.M.H., Hannemann, K.: Launch vehicle base flow analysis using improved delayed detached-eddy simulation. AIAA J. 53(9), 2454–2471 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Statnikov, V., Meiß, J.-H., Meinke, M., Schröder, W.: Investigation of the turbulent wake flow of generic launcher configurations via a zonal RANS/LES method. CEAS Space J. 5(1–2), 75–86 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Statnikov, V., Sayadi, T., Meinke, M., Schmid, P., Schröder, W.: Analysis of pressure perturbation sources on a generic space launcher after-body in supersonic flow using zonal RANS/LES and dynamic mode decomposition. Phys. Fluids 27(016103), 1–22 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sippel, M., Herbertz, A.: System requirements on investigation of base flow/plume interaction, vol. 98 of NNFM: RESPACE-Key Technologies for Reusable Space Systems. Springer (2003–2007)

  29. Estorf, M., Wolf, T., Radespiel, R.: Experimental and numerical investigations on the operation of the hypersonic ludwieg tube braunschweig. In: Proceedings of the 5th European Symposium on Aerothermodynamics for Space Vehicles (ESA SP-563). Published by ESA Publications Division (2005)

  30. Wu, J., Radespiel, R.: Tandem nozzle supersonic wind tunnel design. Int. J. Eng. Syst. Model. Simul. Proc. 5(1), 8–18 (2013). doi:10.1504/IJESMS.2013.052369

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wu, J., Zamre, P., Radespiel, R.: Flow quality experiment in a tandem nozzle wind tunnel at Mach 3. Exp. Fluids 56(20), 1–18 (2015). doi:10.1007/s00348-014-1887-1

    Google Scholar 

  32. Liou, M.-S., Steffen, C.J.: A new flux splitting scheme. J. Comput. Phys. 107, 23–39 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Boris, J., Grinstein, F., Oran, E., Kolbe, R.: New insights into large eddy simulation. Fluid Dyn. Res. 10, 199–228 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Meinke, M., Schröder, W., Krause, E., Rister, Th: A comparison of second- and sixth-order methods for large-eddy simulations. Comput. Fluids 31, 695–718 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Alkishriwi, N., Meinke, M., Schröder, W.: A large-eddy simulation method for low Mach number flows using preconditioning and multigrid. Comput. Fluids 35(10), 1126–1136 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. El-Askary, W., Schröder, W., Meinke, M.: LES of compressible wall-bounded flows. AIAA Paper, pp. 2003–3554 (2003)

  37. Spalart, P.R., Allmaras, S.R.: A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. AIAA Paper, pp. 92–0439 (1992)

  38. Allmaras, S.R., Johnson, F.T., Spalart, P.R.: Modifications and clarifications for the implementation of the spalart-allmaras turbulence model. In: 7th International Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics (ICCFD7), ICCFD7-1902 (2012)

  39. Roidl, B., Meinke, M., Schröder, W.: Reformulated synthetic turbulence generation method for a zonal RANS-LES method and its application to zero-pressure gradient boundary layers. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 44, 28–40 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Roidl, B., Meinke, M., Schröder, W.: Boundary layers affected by different pressure gradients investigated computationally by a zonal RANS-LES method. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 45, 1–13 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Jarrin, N., Benhamadouche, N., Laurence, S., Prosser, D.: A synthetic-eddy-method for generating inflow conditions for large-eddy simulations. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 27, 585–593 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Pamiès, M., Weiss, P.-É., Garnier, E., Deck, S., Sagaut, P.: Generation of synthetic turbulent inflow data for large eddy simulation of spatially evolving wall-bounded flows. Phys. Fluids 21, 045103 (2009)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Choi, H., Moin, P.: Grid-point requirements for large eddy simulation: Chapman’s estimates revisited. Center for Turbulence Research Annual Research Briefs (2011)

  44. Priebe, S., Wu, M., Martin, P.: Direct numerical simulation of a reflected-shock-wave/turbulent-boundary-layer interaction read more. AIAA J. 47(5), 1173–1185 (2009). doi:10.2514/1.38821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Brown, G.L., Roshko, A.: On density effects and large structure in turbulent mixing layers. J. Fluid Mech. 64(6), 775–816 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Papamoschou, Dimitri, Roshko, Anatol: The compressible turbulent shear layer: an experimental study the compressible turbulent shear layer: an experimental study the compressible turbulent shear layer: an experimental study. J. Fluid Mech. 197, 453–477 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Saile, D., Gülhan, A., Henckels, A.: Investigations on the near-wake region of a generic space launcher geometry. AIAA, pp. 2011–2352 (2011)

  48. Statnikov, V., Saile, D., Meiß, J.-H., Henckels, A., Meinke, M., Gülhan, A., Schröder, W.: Experimental and numerical investigation of the turbulent wake flow of a generic space launcher configuration. Prog. Flight Phys. 7, 329–350 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Financial support from the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG) in the framework of the Transregional Collaborative Research Center (SFB/TRR40) is gratefully acknowledged by the authors. Computational resources have been provided by the Stuttgart High-Performance Computing Center (HLRS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Aerodynamics and Chair of Fluid Mechanics, RWTH Aachen University, Wüllnerstrae 5a, 52062, Aachen, Germany

    V. Statnikov, K. Pausch, M. Meinke & W. Schröder

  2. Institute of Fluid Mechanics, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Hermann-Blenk-Str. 37, 38107, Brunswick, Germany

    S. Stephan & R. Radespiel

Authors
  1. V. Statnikov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Stephan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K. Pausch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Meinke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. R. Radespiel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. W. Schröder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Statnikov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Statnikov, V., Stephan, S., Pausch, K. et al. Experimental and numerical investigations of the turbulent wake flow of a generic space launcher at \(M_\infty =3\) and \(M_\infty =6\) . CEAS Space J 8, 101–116 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12567-016-0112-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12567-016-0112-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation