Skip to main content
Log in

Manners of terminology and description in Galen’s anatomy in the ancient Rome and their historical consequences up to the modern time

  • Review Article
  • Convergence and Divergence of Anatomical Terminology
  • Published:
Anatomical Science International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The oldest extant anatomy textbooks compiled in ancient Rome were by Galen who described in writing most of the various parts and organs of the body. History tells us that ever since the time of Galen, anatomical terminology would be a necessary and beneficial feature, but it also brought unexpected and annoying consequences into the field. The benefits are readily apparent in the case of muscle terminology. Galen identified more than 150 different kinds of skeletal muscles, most of which were unnamed, hence difficult to identify without professional knowledge of anatomy. Vesalius introduced detailed anatomical illustrations in Fabrica (1543), which made the identification of the muscles easier. Bauhin then introduced proper descriptive names for the muscles in Theatrum anatomicum (1605), which enabled the identification of the muscles without illustrations. After the terminology became complex and diverse, a logically consistent standard nomenclature was established by Nomina anatomica (1895). The unexpected consequences may be found in the terminology of bones and joints. Galen gave 39 proper names for individual bones, and classified and termed the types of bony joints. Many of these terms have survived in modern anatomy as literal translations of the bone terms, as well as the joint terms. The annoying consequences may be found in the terminology of intestines. Galen divided the small and large intestines into three portions, such that the major part of the small intestine suspended by the mesentery was divided into two without sufficient reason. The Latin translations of jejunum and ileum were, respectively assigned to them by Mondino in his Anatomia written in 1316.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bauhin C (1605) Theatrum anatomicum, novis figuris aeneis illustratum et in lucem emissum opera & sumptibus Theodori de Brÿ p. m. relictae viduae & filiorum Joannis Theodori & Joannis Israelis de Brÿ. Typis Matthaei Beckeri, Francofurti at Moenum

  • Celsus AC (1478) De medicina. Nicolaus Laurentii, Alamanus, Florence

  • Dalley AF, Agur AMR (2023) Moore’s clinically oriented anatomy. Wolters Kluwer, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Daremberg C (1854–56) Oeuvres anatomiques, physiologiques et médicales de Galien, vol 1. Baillière, Paris, pp 11–706 (vol. 2, p. 1–211).

  • Duckworth WLH (1962) Galen on anatomical procedures: the later books. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Federative Committee on Anatomical Terminology (1998) Terminologia anatomica: international anatomical terminology. Thieme, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Garofalo I (1991) Galeno procedimenti anatomici. Biblioteca Universale Rizzoli, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  • Garofalo I, Debru A (2005) Galien tome II: les os pour les débutants; l’anatomie des muscles. Belles Lettres, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Garofalo I, Debru A (2008) Galien tome VIII: l’anatomie des nerfs; l’anatomie des veines et des artères. Belles Lettres, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Guinther J, Vesalius A, Nutton V (2017) Principles of anatomy according to the opinion of Galen. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • His W (1895) Die Anatomische. Nomenclature Nomina Anatomica, Verzeichnis der von der Anatomischen Gesellschaft auf Ihrer IX. Versammlung in Basel Angenommenen Namen. von Veit, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattern SP (2013) The prince of medicine Galen in the Roman Empire. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • May TM (1968) Galen on the usefulness of the parts of the body. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondino (1478) Anothomia. Antonium de Carcano, Papie

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley CD (1964) Andreas Vesalius of Brussels 1514–1564. University of California Press, Berkley

    Google Scholar 

  • Persaud TVN (1997) A history of anatomy: the post-Vesalian era. Charles C Thomas, Springfield

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakai T, Ikeda R, Sawai T (2011) Galen anatomical treatises [in Japanese]. Kyoto University Press, Kyoto

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawai T, Sakai T (2006) Gaspard Bauhin and the nomenclature of muscles [in Japanese]. J Jpn Soc Hist Med 52(4):601–630

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer C (1925) The evolution of anatomy: a short history of anatomical and physiological discovery to Harvey. Alfred A. Knopf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer C (1956) Galen on anatomical procedures: translation of the surviving books. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylvius J (1555) Hippocratis et Galeni physiologiae partem anatomicam isagoge, à Jacobo Sylvio … conscripta & in libros tres distributa. Apud Joannem Hulpeau, Parisiis

    Google Scholar 

  • Traina G (2001) Summaria Alexandrinorum. In: Cancik H, Schneider H (eds) Der neue Pauly, vol 11. Metzler, Stuttgart, p 1110

    Google Scholar 

  • Vesalius A (1543) De humani corporis fabrica libri septem. Joannis Oporini, Basileae

    Google Scholar 

  • Vesalius A, Richardson WF, Carman JB (1998–2009) On the fabric of the human body. Norman Publishing, San Francisco

  • Vesalius A, Garrison DH, Hast MH (2014) The fabric of the human body: an annotated translation of the 1543 and 1555 editions. Karger, Basel

    Google Scholar 

  • Winslow D, Douglas G (1734) An anatomical exposition of the structure of the human body. A. Bettesworth and C. Hitch, J. Osborn and T. Longman, R. Ware, S. Birt, C. Davis and T. Astley, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported, in part, by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan (Grant no. 19K00276).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, TS; Interpretation of Greek and Latin text, FM and TS; manuscript writing TS.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tatsuo Sakai.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no competing interests or conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sakai, T., Masayuki, F. Manners of terminology and description in Galen’s anatomy in the ancient Rome and their historical consequences up to the modern time. Anat Sci Int (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12565-024-00768-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12565-024-00768-4

Keywords

Navigation