Abstract
This study investigated differences in the fibular diaphyseal curvature between prehistoric Jomon hunter–gatherers and modern Japanese people. A total of 115 skeletal remains of 40 individuals from the Late/Final Jomon period (approximately 4300–2500 years BP) and 75 modern Japanese individuals were included in the analysis. The degree of anteroposterior and mediolateral diaphyseal curvature was measured based on digital photographs taken from the frontal and sagittal planes at every 5% diaphyseal region between the range of 20–80% of the fibular length. Fibular diaphyseal curvature was compared between both populations and sexes, and the correlation between fibular diaphyseal curvature with diaphyseal cross-sectional morphology and body size variables were confirmed. The results showed significant differences in the anteroposterior diaphyseal curvature between the Jomon and modern Japanese populations, and a significantly curved anterior direction was noted for Jomon males and females, compared with modern Japanese males and females. On the contrary, little populational difference was noted in terms of mediolateral diaphyseal curvature. The curvature of the fibular diaphysis showed less correlation with body size variables. Moreover, anteroposterior diaphyseal curvatures were correlated with diaphyseal robustness and had low correlation with diaphyseal shape. A relationship between anteroposterior curvature and diaphyseal cross-sectional morphology, an indicator of habitual activity, was confirmed. This suggests that the fibular curvature is possibly influenced by mechanical loading from daily activities as well.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the author on reasonable request.
References
Allen MD, Johnstone J, Rice CL, Marsh GD (2011) Differences in leg bone geometry in young, old and very old women. Eur J Appl Physiol 111:2865–2871. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421−011−1902−7
Baba H (1991) Osteometry. In: Eto M (ed) Anthropology suppl. Yuzankaku, Tokyo (in Japanese)
Baba H, Endo B (1982) Postcranial skeleton of the Minatogawa man. In: Suzuki H, Hanihara K (eds) The Minatogawa man. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, pp 61–195
Bertram JEA, Biewener AA (1988) Bone curvature: sacrificing strength for load predictability? J Theor Biol 131:75–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022−5193(88)80122−x
Brzobohatá H, Krajíček V, Velemínský P, Velemínská J (2019) Three− dimensional geometry of human tibial anterior curvature in chronologically distinct population samples of Central Europeans (2900 BC—21st century AD). Sci Rep 9:4234. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598−019−40625−3
Buikstra JE, Ubelaker DH (1994) Standards for data collection from human skeletal remains (Report No 44) Research Series. Arkansas Archaeological Survey, Fayetteville, AR
Chevalier T, Tignères M (2020) Age− related site− specific modifications in diaphyseal structural properties of the human fibula: furrows and cross-sectional geometry. Am J Phys Anthropol 173:535–555. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.24108
Cointry GR, Nocciolino L, Ireland A, Hall NM, Kriechbaumer A, Ferretti JL, Rittweger J, Capozza RF (2016) Structural differences in cortical shell properties between upper and lower human fibula as described by pQCT serial scans. Biomech Interpret Bone 90:185–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2016.06.007
Cooke NP, Mattiangeli V, Cassidy LM, Okazaki K, Stokes CA, Onbe S, Hatakeyama S, Machida K, Kasai K, Tomioka N, Matsumoto A, Ito M, Kojima Y, Bradley DG, Gakuhari T, Nakagome S (2021) Ancient genomics reveals tripartite origins of Japanese populations. Sci Adv 7:eabh2419. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abh2419
Hagihara Y (2021) Dorso-palmar elongation of the diaphysis of the third metacarpal bone in prehistoric Jomon people. Anat Sci Int 96:119–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12565−020−00570−y
Hagihara Y, Nara T (2016) Morphological features of the fibula in Jomon hunter—gatherers from the shell mounds of the Pacific coastal area. Am J Phys Anthropol 160:708–718. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23000
Hall SJ (2004) Basic biomechanics. McGraw, Hill, New York
Hanihara K (1991) Dual structure model for the population history of the Japanese. Jpn Rev 2:1–33
Horai S, Murayama K, Hayasaka K, Matsubayashi S, Hattori Y, Fucharoen G, Harihara S, Park KS, Omoto K, Pan IH (1996) mtDNA polymorphism in East Asian populations, with special reference to the peopling of Japan. Am J Hum Genet 59:579–590
Hudson MJ, Nakagome S, Whitman JB (2020) The evolving Japanese: the dual structure hypothesis at 30. Evol Hum Sci 2:1–13
Jade S, Tamvada KH, Strait DS, Grosse IR (2014) Finite element analysis of a femur to deconstruct the paradox of bone curvature. J Theor Biol 341:53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.09.012
Javaheri B, Razi H, Gohin S, Wylie S, Chang YM, Salmon P, Lee PD, Pitsillides AA (2020) Lasting organ-level bone mechanoadaptation is unrelated to local strain. Sci Adv 6:eaax8301. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax8301
Kaifu Y, Masuyama T (2018) Why humeri of the Jomon people are so thick? Implication from its inter-site variation. Anthropol Sci (jpn Ser) 126:133–155 (in Japanese)
Kimura K (1973) Anterior femoral curvature in the Japanese and the Ainu. J Anthropol Soc Nippon 81:103–112. https://doi.org/10.1537/ase1911.81.103
Lacosta Jeanson A, Santos F, Dupej J, Velemínská J, Brůžek J (2018) Sex− specific functional adaptation of the femoral diaphysis to body composition. Am J Hum Biol 30:e23123
Lanyon LE (1980) The influence of function on the development of bone curvature. An experimental study on the rat tibia. J Zool 192:457–466. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469−7998.1980.tb04243.x
Macintosh AA, Davies TG, Pinhasi R, Stock JT (2015) Declining tibial curvature parallels ~ 6150 years of decreasing mobility in central European agriculturalists. Am J Phys Anthropol 157:260–275. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22710
Martin R (1893) Zur physischen Anthropologieder Feuerl ̈ander. Archiv Anthrop 22:155–218
Martin R, Saller K (1957) Lehrbuch der anthropologie Band I. Gustav Fischer Verlag. 1:311–321
McNeil CJ, Raymer GH, Doherty TJ, Marsh GD, Rice CL (2009) Geometry of a weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing bone in the legs of young, old, and very old men. Calcif Tissue Int 85:22–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223−009−9261−7
Phenice TW (1969) A newly developed visual method of sexing the os pubis. Am J Phys Anthropol 30:297–301. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330300214
Ruff CB (2000) Body size, body shape, and long bone strength in modern humans. J Hum Evol 38:269–290
Ruff CB (2008) Biomechanical analyses of archaeological human remains. In: Katzenberg MA, Saunders SR (eds) Biological anthropology of the human skeleton. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp 183–206
Ruff CB, Holt BM, Niskanen M, Sladék V, Berner M, Garofalo E, Garvin HM, Hora M, Maijanen H, Niinimäki S, Salo K, Schuplerová E, Tompkins D (2012) Stature and body mass estimation from skeletal remains in the European Holocene. Am J Phys Anthropol 148:601–617. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22087
Ruff CB, Holt BM, Sladék V, Berner M, Murphy WA Jr, Nedden D, Seidler H, Recheis W (2006) Body size, body proportions, and mobility in the Tyrolean “Iceman.” J Hum Evol 51:91–101
Sakaue K (2007) Evaluation of the sexing methods using the cranial traits in the Japanese. Jpn J Leg Med 63:125–140 (in Japanese)
Shackelford LL, Trinkaus E (2002) Late Pleistocene human femoral diaphyseal curvature. Am J Phys Anthropol 118:359–370. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.10093
Stewart TD (1962) Anterior femoral curvature: its utility for race identification. Hum Biol 34:49–62
Stock JT (2006) Hunter-gatherer postcranial robusticity relative to patterns of mobility, climatic adaptation, and selection for tissue economy. Am J Phys Anthropol 131:194–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.20398
Takigawa W (2006) Inter-regional variation of metric traits of limb bones in Jomon and modern Japanese. Anthropol Sci (Jpn Ser) 114:101–129 (in Japanese)
Tümer N, Arbabi V, Gielis WP, de Jong PA, Weinans H, Tuijthof GJM, Zadpoor AA (2019) Three-dimensional analysis of shape variations and symmetry of the fibula, tibia, calcaneus and talus. J Anat 234:132–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.12900
Yamaguchi B (1982) A review of the osteological characteristics of the Jomon population in Prehistoric Japan. J Anthropol Soc Nippon 90:77–90. https://doi.org/10.1537/ase1911.90.Supplement_77
Acknowledgements
The author is grateful to the following individuals and organizations for providing permission to analyze the study materials: Dr. I. Kageyama (Nippon Dental University, Niigata); Dr. O. Kondo (University of Tokyo); Dr. G. Suwa (University Museum, University of Tokyo); Dr. K. Shinoda, Dr. K. Sakaue, and Dr. H. Kanzawa− Kiriyama (National Museum of Nature and Science); Dr. M. Nakatsukasa (Department of Science, Kyoto University); Mr. T. Masuyama (Tahara Municipal Museum); and Dr. T. Suzuki, Mr. J. Nemoto (The Tohoku University Museum).
Funding
This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI (Grant No. 19K13418).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author has no conflict of interest to declare.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.