Advertisement

Anatomical Science International

, Volume 93, Issue 2, pp 277–283 | Cite as

Considering the inferior surface area of lower lumbar vertebrae: determining weight transmission pattern at the lumbosacral junction

  • Uchenna Kenneth EzemaguEmail author
  • Chike P. Anibeze
  • Chinedu F. Akpuaka
Original Article

Abstract

The biomechanical function of the lumbosacral junction (LSJ) is obscure, but its medical significance is not, as it is the most common site of low back pain. In this study, we analyzed the difference between the mean values of the surface areas of the inferior body and total inferior facet areas of the fourth and fifth lumbar vertebrae. We aimed to define the function of the LSJ during weight transmission and clarify its mechanical significance. Vertebral columns of 45 adult male human cadavers from five anatomy departments in Nigeria were cut at the L3–L4 intervertebral disc and macerated. Using the graph paper method, the mean values of the surface area of the inferior body and total facet area of the fourth and fifth lumbar vertebrae were 1356 ± 26 and 329 ± 6 and 1277 ± 27 and 418 ± 8 mm2, respectively. The relationships between the fourth and fifth lumbar vertebrae paired variables were highly significant (P < 0.001). A sudden reduction in the surface area of the inferior body of the fifth lumbar vertebra was compensated for by a corresponding increase in its total inferior facet area, which indicated that corresponding weight was diverted from the anterior column to the posterior column at the LSJ. This pattern of weight transmission may be a beneficial functional adaptation in man to protect the relatively large intervertebral disc of the LSJ in bipedal posture, or it may predispose the LSJ synovial zygapophyseal joints to mechanical stress.

Keywords

Lumbar vertebrae Mechanics Posture Sacrum Weight-bearing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing. We thank Dr. G. Ndukwe and Dr. S. Danborno for granting us access to the facilities at the Gross Anatomy laboratory of Abia State University and Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, respectively, and Dr. Felix Aguboshim for the statistical analysis of this work.

Compliance with ethical standards

Source of funding

There were no sponsorships or grants received in support of this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Adams MA, Hutton WC (1980) The effect of posture on the role of the joints in resisting intervertebral compressive forces. J Bone Jt Surg (Br) 62(3):358–362Google Scholar
  2. Aruna N, Rajeshwari T, Rajangam S (2003) Transmission of weight through the neural arch of lumbar vertebrae in man. J Anat Soc India 52(2):128–131Google Scholar
  3. Bateman AH, Balkovec C, Akens MK et al (2016) Closure of the annulus fibrosus of the intervertebral disc using a novel suture application device—in vivo porcine and ex vivo biomechanical evaluation. Spine J 16(7):889–895CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ezemagu UK, Anibeze CIP (2011) Sagittal angle and orientation of superior articular facets of the zygapophyseal joints at lumbosacral junction. J Exp Clin Anat 11(1):18–20Google Scholar
  5. Ezemagu UK, Anibeze CIP, Ani CO, Ossi GC (2016) Correlation of body mass index with low back pain amongst patients without injury in a Nigeria population. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci 5(11):371–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Giles LGF, Singer KP (1997) Clinical anatomy and management of low back pain series. Butterworth-Heinemann, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Kim JY, Ryu DS, Paik HK et al (2016) Paraspinal muscle, facet joint, and disc problems: risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar fusion. Spine J. 16(7):867–875CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Limthongkul W, Karaikovic EE, Savage JW, Markovic A (2010) Volumetric analysis of thoracic and lumbar vertebral bodies. Spine J. 10(2):153–158CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Mai HT, Mitchell SM, Hashmi SZ, Jenkins TJ, Patel AA, Hsu WK (2016) Differences in bone mineral density of fixation points between lumbar cortical and traditional pedicle screws. Spine J. 16(7):835–841CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Moshirfar A, Rand FF, Sponseller PD et al (2005) Pelvic fixation in spine surgery: historical overview, indications, biomechanical relevance, and current techniques. J Bone Jt Surg Am 87(Suppl 2):89–106Google Scholar
  11. Pal GP, Routal RV (1987) Transmission of weight through lower thoracic and lumbar regions of vertebral column in man. J Anat 152:93–105PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Pal GP, Routal RV, Saggu SK (2001) The orientation of articular facets of the zygapophyseal joints at the cervical and upper thoracic region. J Anat 198(Pt4):431–441CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Ponnusamy KE, Iyer S, Gupta G, Khanna AJ (2011) Instrumentation of the osteoporotic spine: biomechanical and clinical considerations. Spine J. 11(1):54–63CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Putzier M, Hartwig T, Hoff EK, Streitparth F, Strube P (2016) Minimally invasive TLIF leads to increased muscle spring of the multifundus muscle but not the longissimus muscle compared with conventional PLIF—a prospective randomized clinical trial. Spine J. 16(7):811–819CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Rahimizadeh A (2011) Bleeding in a lumbar juxtafacet cyst with cauda equina syndrome: report of a case and review of the literature. World Spinal Column J 2(1):46–51Google Scholar
  16. Robert DL (2007) Growth and maturation of the spine from birth to adolescence. J Bone Jt Surg Am 89(suppl1):3–7Google Scholar
  17. Shikinami Y, Kawabe Y, Yasukawa K et al (2010) A biomimetic artificial intervertebral disc system composed of a cubic three-dimensional fabric. Spine J 10(2):141–152CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Shinohara H (1997) Changes in the surface of the superior articular joint from the lower thoracic to the upper lumbar vertebrae. J Anat 190:461–465CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Sowa GA, Coelho JP, Bell KM et al (2011) Alterations in gene expression in response to compression of nucleus pulposus cells. Spine J. 11(1):36–43CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Yang KH, King AI (1984) Mechanism of facet load transmission as a hypothesis for low back pain. Spine. 9(6):557–565CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Association of Anatomists 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Uchenna Kenneth Ezemagu
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Chike P. Anibeze
    • 1
    • 3
  • Chinedu F. Akpuaka
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of AnatomyAbia State UniversityUturuNigeria
  2. 2.Department of AnatomyFederal University Ndufu Alike IkwoEbonyi StateNigeria
  3. 3.Department of AnatomyEnugu State University of Science and TechnologyEnuguNigeria
  4. 4.College of Medicine, Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu UniversityUli CampusAnambra StateNigeria

Personalised recommendations