Abstract
The variation of bone structure and biomechanics between the metacarpals is not well characterized. It was hypothesized that their structure would reflect their common patterns of use (i.e., patterns of hand grip), specifically that trabecular bone density would be greater on the volar aspect of all metacarpal bases, that this would be most pronounced in the thumb, and that the thumb diaphysis would have the greatest bending strength. Cross-sections at basal and mid-diaphyseal locations of 50 metacarpals from 10 human hands were obtained by peripheral quantitative computed tomography. The volar and dorsal trabecular densities of each base were measured and characterized using the volar/dorsal density ratio. The polar stress–strain index (SSIp), a surrogate measure of torsional/bending strength, was measured for each diaphysis and standardized for bone length and mass. Comparisons were made using mixed-model analyses of variance (ANOVAs) and post hoc tests. Volar/dorsal trabecular density ratios showed even distribution in all metacarpal bases except for the thumb, which showed greater values on the volar aspect. The thumb, second, and third metacarpals all had high bending strength (SSIp), but the thumb’s SSIp relative to its length and trabecular mass was much higher than those of the other metacarpals. Trabecular density of the metacarpal bases was evenly distributed except in the thumb, which also showed higher bending strength relative to its length and mass. Understanding of how these indicators of strength differ across metacarpals may improve both fracture diagnosis and treatment and lays the groundwork for investigating changes with age, hand dominance, and occupation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barak MM, Lieberman DE, Hublin J-J (2011) A Wolff in sheep’s clothing: trabecular bone adaptation in response to changes in joint loading orientation. Bone 49:1141–1151. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2011.08.020
Boutroy S, Bouxsein ML, Munoz F, Delmas PD (2005) In vivo assessment of trabecular bone microarchitecture by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:6508–6515. doi:10.1210/jc.2005-1258
Bushnell BD, Draeger RW, Crosby CG, Bynum DK (2008) Management of intra-articular metacarpal base fractures of the second through fifth metacarpals. J Hand Surg Am 33:573–583. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.11.019
Carlsen BT, Moran SL (2009) Thumb trauma: Bennett fractures, Rolando fractures, and ulnar collateral ligament injuries. J Hand Surg Am 34:945–952. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.03.017
Cooney WP, Chao EY (1977) Biomechanical analysis of static forces in the thumb during hand function. J Bone Joint Surg Am 59:27–36
Diederichs G, Issever A-S, Greiner S et al (2009) Three-dimensional distribution of trabecular bone density and cortical thickness in the distal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18:399–407. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2008.11.001
Edmunds JO (2011) Current concepts of the anatomy of the thumb trapeziometacarpal joint. J Hand Surg Am 36:170–182. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.10.029
El-Shennawy M, Nakamura K, Patterson RM, Viegas SF (2001) Three-dimensional kinematic analysis of the second through fifth carpometacarpal joints. J Hand Surg Am 26:1030–1035. doi:10.1053/jhsu.2001.28761
Ferretti JL, Capozza RF, Zanchetta JR (1996) Mechanical validation of a tomographic (pQCT) index for noninvasive estimation of rat femur bending strength. Bone 18:97–102
Habib MB, Ruff CB (2008) The effects of locomotion on the structural characteristics of avian limb bones. Zool J Linn Soc 153:601–624. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.2008.00402.x
Halilaj E, Rainbow MJ, Got C et al (2013) In vivo kinematics of the thumb carpometacarpal joint during three isometric functional tasks. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:1114–1122. doi:10.1007/s11999-013-3063-y
Hasegawa Y, Schneider P, Reiners C (2001) Age, sex, and grip strength determine architectural bone parameters assessed by peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) at the human radius. J Biomech 34:497–503
Haverstock JP, Katchky RN, Lalone EA et al (2012) Regional variations in radial head bone volume and density: implications for fracture patterns and fixation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21:1669–1673. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2012.07.002
Hayes WC, Swenson LW, Schurman DJ (1978) Axisymmetric finite element analysis of the lateral tibial plateau. J Biomech 11:21–33. doi:10.1016/0021-9290(78)90040-4
Ladd AL, Crisco JJ, Hagert E et al (2014) The 2014 ABJS Nicolas Andry Award: the puzzle of the thumb: mobility, stability, and demands in opposition. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:3605–3622. doi:10.1007/s11999-014-3901-6
Lazenby RA, Angus S, Cooper DML, Hallgrímsson B (2008) A three-dimensional microcomputed tomographic study of site-specific variation in trabecular microarchitecture in the human second metacarpal. J Anat 213:698–705. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7580.2008.00991.x
Lazenby RA, Skinner MM, Hublin J-J, Boesch C (2011) Metacarpal trabecular architecture variation in the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes): evidence for locomotion and tool-use? Am J Phys Anthropol 144:215–225. doi:10.1002/ajpa.21390
Marangalou JH, Eckstein F, Kuhn V et al (2014) Locally measured microstructural parameters are better associated with vertebral strength than whole bone density. Osteoporos Int 25:1285–1296. doi:10.1007/s00198-013-2591-3
Marchi D (2005) The cross-sectional geometry of the hand and foot bones of the Hominoidea and its relationship to locomotor behavior. J Hum Evol 49:743–761. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2005.08.002
Marzke MW (2013) Tool making, hand morphology and fossil hominins. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 368:20120414. doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0414
Marzke MW, Wullstein KL (1996) Chimpanzee and human grips: a new classification with a focus on evolutionary morphology. Int J Primatol 17:117–139. doi:10.1007/BF02696162
Moran SL, Berger RA (2003) Biomechanics and hand trauma: what you need. Hand Clin 19:17–31. doi:10.1016/S0749-0712(02)00130-0
Nakamura K, Patterson RM, Viegas SF (2001) The ligament and skeletal anatomy of the second through fifth carpometacarpal joints and adjacent structures. J Hand Surg Am 26:1016–1029. doi:10.1053/jhsu.2001.26329
Niechajev I (1985) Dislocated intra-articular fracture of the base of the fifth metacarpal: a clinical study of 23 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 75:406–410
Oak N, Lawton JN (2013) Intra-articular fractures of the hand. Hand Clin 29:535–549. doi:10.1016/j.hcl.2013.08.007
Robling AG, Hinant FM, Burr DB, Turner CH (2002) Improved bone structure and strength after long-term mechanical loading is greatest if loading is separated into short bouts. J Bone Miner Res 17:1545–1554. doi:10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.8.1545
Rovinsky D, Haskell A, Liu Q et al (2000) Evaluation of a new method of small fragment fixation in a medial malleolus fracture model. J Orthop Trauma 14:420–425
Ruff CB (2002) Long bone articular and diaphyseal structure in Old World monkeys and apes. I: locomotor effects. Am J Phys Anthropol 119:305–342. doi:10.1002/ajpa.10117
Ruff C, Holt B, Trinkaus E (2006) Who’s afraid of the big bad Wolff ?: ‘Wolff’s law’ and bone functional adaptation. Am J Phys Anthropol 129:484–498. doi:10.1002/ajpa.20371
Ruffoni D, Wirth AJ, Steiner JA et al (2012) The different contributions of cortical and trabecular bone to implant anchorage in a human vertebra. Bone 50:733–738. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2011.11.027
Seebeck J, Goldhahn J, Städele H et al (2004) Effect of cortical thickness and cancellous bone density on the holding strength of internal fixator screws. J Orthop Res 22:1237–1242. doi:10.1016/j.orthres.2004.04.001
Sheu Y, Zmuda JM, Boudreau RM et al (2011) Bone strength measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography and the risk of nonvertebral fractures: the osteoporotic fractures in men (MrOS) study. J Bone Miner Res 26:63–71. doi:10.1002/jbmr.172
Siu WS, Qin L, Leung KS (2003) pQCT bone strength index may serve as a better predictor than bone mineral density for long bone breaking strength. J Bone Miner Metab 21:316–322. doi:10.1007/s00774-003-0427-5
Skinner MM, Stephens NB, Tsegai ZJ et al (2015) Human evolution. human-like hand use in Australopithecus africanus. Science 347:395–399. doi:10.1126/science.1261735
Su-Bum AL, Hyo-Jin BK, Jae-Myeung CC et al (2011) Osseous microarchitecture of the scaphoid: cadaveric study of regional variations and clinical implications. Clin Anat 25:203–211. doi:10.1002/ca.21198
Tsegai ZJ, Kivell TL, Gross T et al (2013) Trabecular bone structure correlates with hand posture and use in hominoids. PLoS ONE 8:e78781–e78781. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078781
Wallace IJ, Judex S, Demes B (2015) Effects of load-bearing exercise on skeletal structure and mechanics differ between outbred populations of mice. Bone 72:1–8. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2014.11.013
Wetzsteon RJ, Petit MA, Macdonald HM et al (2008) Bone structure and volumetric BMD in overweight children: a longitudinal study. J Bone Miner Res 23:1946–1953. doi:10.1359/jbmr.080810
Wirth AJ, Goldhahn J, Flaig C et al (2011) Implant stability is affected by local bone microstructural quality. Bone 49:473–478. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2011.05.001
Yoshida R, Shah MA, Patterson RM et al (2003) Anatomy and pathomechanics of ring and small finger carpometacarpal joint injuries. J Hand Surg Am 28:1035–1043. doi:10.1016/S0363-5023(03)00373-3
Zeininger A, Richmond BG, Hartman G (2011) Metacarpal head biomechanics: a comparative backscattered electron image analysis of trabecular bone mineral density in Pan troglodytes, Pongo pygmaeus, and Homo sapiens. J Hum Evol 60:703–710. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.01.002
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
No funding was received for this study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wong, A.L., Meals, C.G. & Ruff, C.B. Computed tomographic analysis of the internal structure of the metacarpals and its implications for hand use, pathology, and surgical intervention. Anat Sci Int 93, 231–237 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12565-017-0400-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12565-017-0400-3