Abstract
In this study, we examined the longitudinal reciprocal relationships among mastery goals, autonomous motivation, and motivation instability. In the hierarchical model of motivation, mastery goal for overall course subject learning has been positioned at the contextual level, while autonomous motivation and motivation instability during a specific class session were positioned at the situational level. A longitudinal online survey of university students in five asynchronous online classes at a Japanese university was conducted at three time points in one semester. A total of 218 university students participated in the study. A cross-lagged panel model was constructed and analyzed by structural equation modeling. The results showed that the mastery goal at Time 1 was positively associated with autonomous motivation at Time 2. In addition, the mastery goal at Time 2 was positively associated with autonomous motivation at Time 3 and negatively associated with motivation instability at Time 3. These results indicate a top-down effect of mastery goal at the contextual level on situational motivation, which is located lower in the hierarchical model. Furthermore, autonomous motivation at Time 2 was positively associated with the mastery goal at Time 3. This indicates a bottom-up effect, in which contextual motivation, which is located higher in the hierarchical model, can be altered by situational motivation in the classroom. The results of the study clearly show a longitudinal reciprocal relationship between contextual level motivation and situational level motivation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261
Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 260–267. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.260
Blanchard, C. M., Mask, L., Vallerand, R. J., de la Sablonnière, R., & Provencher, P. (2007). Reciprocal relationships between contextual and situational motivation in a sport setting. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8(5), 854–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2007.03.004
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040–1048. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040
Elliot, A. J., McGregor, H. A., & Gable, S. (1999). Achievement goals, study strategies, and exam performance: A mediational analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 549–563. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.549
Elliot, A. J., & Murayama, K. (2008). On the measurement of achievement goals: Critique, illustration, and application. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 613–628. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.613
Elliott, E. S., & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(1), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.5
Guay, F., Mageau, G. A., & Vallerand, R. J. (2003). On the hierarchical structure of self-determined motivation: A test of top-down, bottom-up, reciprocal, and horizontal effects. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(8), 992–1004. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203253297
Guay, F., Ratelle, C. F., & Chanal, J. (2008). Optimal learning in optimal contexts: The role of self-determination in education. Canadian Psychology/psychologie Canadienne, 49(3), 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012758
Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J., & Blanchard, C. (2000). On the assessment of situational intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The situational motivation scale (SIMS). Motivation and Emotion, 24, 175–213. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005614228250
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424
Hulleman, C. S., Schrager, S. M., Bodmann, S. M., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). A meta-analytic review of achievement goal measures: Different labels for the same constructs or different constructs with similar labels? Psychological Bulletin, 136(3), 422–449. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018947
Hyde, J. S., & Durik, A. M. (2005). Gender, competence, and motivation. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 375–391). Guilford Press.
Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 588–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019682
Lavigne, G. L., & Vallerand, R. J. (2010). The dynamic processes of influence between contextual and situational motivation: A test of the hierarchical model in a science education setting. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(9), 2343–2359. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00661.x
Lüdtke, O., & Robitzsch, A. (2021). A critique of the random intercept cross-lagged panel model. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/6f85c
Mustafa, S. M. S., Elias, H., Roslan, S., & Noah, S. M. (2011). Can mastery and performance goals predict learning flow among secondary school students? International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 11(1), 93–98.
Okada, R. (2010). Structural changes in academic motivation from elementary school to university: A meta-analytic review of relations among motivational constructs. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 58(4), 414–425. https://doi.org/10.5926/jjep.58.414
Okada, R. (2018). Effects of teachers’ autonomy support: A meta-analysis. Memoirs of the Faculty of Education, Kagawa University Part I, 150, 31–50.
Okada, R., & Nakaya, M. (2006). Motivational style and interest in tasks: Self-determination theory. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 54(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5926/jjep1953.54.1_1
Okada, R., Ohtani, K., Ito, T., & Umemoto, T. (2015). Tendency of monitoring motivation and procrastination: An examination of the process mediated by perceived instability of motivation. Memoirs of the Faculty of Education, Kagawa University. Part I, 143, 55–61.
Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 459–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00015-4
Roth, G., Assor, A., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Kaplan, H. (2007). Autonomous motivation for teaching: How self-determined teaching may lead to self-determined learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 761–774. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.761
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1521/978.14625/28806
Senko, C., Hulleman, C., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2011). Achievement goal theory at the crossroads: Old controversies, current challenges, and new directions. Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 26–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.538646
Standage, M., & Treasure, D. C. (2002). Relationship among achievement goal orientations and multidimensional situational motivation in physical education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(1), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709902158784
Umemoto, T., & Inagaki, T. (2019). Relationship between motivational regulation strategies and instability of motivation during class. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 90(2), 207–213. https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.90.18312
Umemoto, T., & Inagaki, T. (2021). Interactive effects of level and instability of situational motivation for learning during class. Kansai University Journal of Higher Education, 12, 87–98. https://doi.org/10.32286/00022993
Umemoto, T., & Inagaki, T. (2022). Predictors of motivation instability during synchronous online classes: Reproducibility of study results via multi-group analysis. Information and Technology in Education and Learning. https://doi.org/10.12937/itel.2.1.Reg.p001
Umemoto, T., & Inagaki, T. (2023). Relationship between motivation instability and type of motivation level in University learning based on self-determination theory: A cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Reports, 126(3), 1516–1530. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941211067389
Vallerand, R. J., & Lalande, D. R. (2011). The MPIC model: The perspective of the hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Psychological Inquiry, 22(1), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2011.545366
Vallerand, R. J., & Ratelle, C. F. (2002). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: A hierarchical model. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 37–63). University of Rochester.
Vansteenkiste, M., Aelterman, N., De Muynck, G. J., Haerens, L., Patall, E., & Reeve, J. (2018). Fostering personal meaning and self-relevance: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization. The Journal of Experimental Education, 86(1), 30–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2017.1381067
Vansteenkiste, M., Sierens, E., Soenens, B., Luyckx, K., & Lens, W. (2009). Motivational profiles from a self-determination perspective: The quality of motivation matters. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 671–688. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015083
Wentzel, K. R., & Miele, D. B. (2016). Handbook of motivation at school (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Wolters, C. A. (2004). Advancing achievement goal theory: Using goal structures and goal orientations to predict students’ motivation, cognition, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 236–250. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.236
Acknowledgements
We thank the university students for their participation.
Funding
Funding was provided by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Grant No. 19K14398).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest associated with this study.
Informed consent
Participants were given information regarding the research study, and they provided informed consent for their participation.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Umemoto, T., Inagaki, T. Longitudinal reciprocal relationships among mastery goals, autonomous motivation, and motivation instability. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-024-09952-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-024-09952-7