Abstract
Educators and administrators in secondary and higher education in Kazakhstan have experienced significant reforms since 2010. New policies, curricula, pedagogy, assessment practices, accountability mechanisms, and legislation were implemented in an education revolution, to modernize Kazakh education and build human capital for economic prosperity. The development and use of educational research is a component of these reforms but little is known about practitioners’ understanding of and engagement with educational research. This qualitative study employed individual in-depth interviews with ten educational practitioners in secondary and higher education to address the knowledge gap. The findings suggest that practitioner understandings of research remain underdeveloped. While some practitioners both consume and produce research to improve practice and institutional decision-making, issues of access to research, the challenge of time within workload and perceptions of the limited relevance of externally produced research continue to be barriers to more extensive utilization of research. Further research is being undertaken to explore this issue with policymakers and researchers. The findings may be used to improve the mobilization of research to policy and practice, especially in other post-soviet contexts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Secondary education in Kazakhstan includes grades five to 12 of schooling.
Higher Education refers to university level education and excludes Technical and Vocational Education. It encompasses qualifications at levels 6–8 of the National Qualifications framework—Kazakhstan (2021).
Additional information is currently under embargo.
References
AEO NIS. (2008–2023a). History. https://nis.edu.kz/en/about/history/
AEO NIS. (2008–2023b). Action research and Lesson Study, research practice in general are essential for successful professional development. https://www.nis.edu.kz/ru/news/?id=10981
Andronic, R.-L. (2010). A brief history of action research. Review of the Air Force Academy. Brasov, 2, 144–149. https://www.proquest.com/docview/851792716
Australian Institute of Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL). (2017). Australian Professional Standards for Teachers. https://www.aitsl.edu.au/standards/highly-accomplished
Australian Institute of Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL). (2021). Informing teaching: navigating and translating education best practice. https://www.aitsl.edu.au/research/spotlight/informing-teaching-navigating-and-translating-education-best-practice
Baitokayeva, L. (2019). Teachers’ Understanding of Action Research: A Qualitative Case Study of a Specialized School in Kazakhstan (Master’s Thesis). https://nur.nu.edu.kz/handle/123456789/4337
Beaulieu, R. J. (2013). Action research: Trends and variations. Canadian Journal of Action Research, 14(3), 29–39. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303268657_Action_Research_Trends_and_variations
Berliner, D. C. (2002). Comment: Educational research: The hardest science of all. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 18–20. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X031008018
Bloomer, M., & James, D. (2003). Educational research in educational practice. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 27(3), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877032000098671
Booth, W., Colomb, G., Williams, J., Bizup, J., & FitzGerald, W. (2016). The craft of research (4th ed., pp. 51–67). University of Chicago Press.
Brackenbury, G., Carroll, C., Roberts, A., & Webster, R. (2022). School-university partnerships: a model for knowledge co-creation for inclusive education: Research brief. UCL Centre for Inclusive Education. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10148461/
Bridges, D. (2017). Philosophy and practice: A philosopher in the classroom? In Philosophy in educational research (pp. 133–145). Springer. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311314568_Philosophy_and_Practice_A_Philosopher_in_the_Classroom
Cambridge University, Faculty of Education. (2023). Kazakhstan Programme: Classroom Action Research. https://www.educ.cam.ac.uk/networks/eri/casestudies/kazakhstan/actionresearch/
Clausen, K. (2012). The ends and the mean-spirited in action research: An editorial. Canadian Journal of Action Research, 13(2), 1–2. https://journals.nipissingu.ca/index.php/cjar/article/view/34
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. Teachers College Press.
Cooper, A., & Levin, B. (2013). Research use by leaders in Canadian school districts. International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 8(7), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.22230/ijepl.2013v8n7a449
Cresswell, J. W. (2012). Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.
Dagenais, C., Lysenko, L., Abrami, P., Bernard, R., Ramdé, J., & Janosz, M. (2012). Use of research-based information by school practitioners and determinants of use: A review of empirical research. Evidence and Policy A Journal of Research Debate and Practice, 8, 285–309. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1160017
Elliot, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. McGraw-Hill Education.
Ellis, N., & Loughland, T. (2016). The challenges of practitioner research: A comparative study of Singapore and NSW. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(2). https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n2.8
Europass European Union. (n.d.). Description of the eight EQF levels. https://europa.eu/europass/en/description-eight-eqf-levels
European Training Foundation. (2021). National Qualifications framework—Kazakhstan. https://www.etf.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2021-05/kazakhstan.pdf
European University Association. (2018). Transition to University Autonomy in Kazakhstan: State of play of university governance and recommendations for the reform process. https://eua.eu/downloads/publications/trunak%20eua%20report%20wp1_final.pdf
Farley-Ripple, E., May, H., Karpyn, A., Tilley, K., & McDonough, K. (2018). Rethinking connections between research and practice in education: A conceptual framework. Educational Researcher, 47(4), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X18761042
Felix, S. M. C. (2016). Fostering criticality within neoliberal higher education: A critical action research study with first year students in Kazakhstan. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Sussex]. Sussex Research Online. https://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/61301/
Fhi360’s Research Utilization Framework (n.d.). Fhi-360-The science of improving lives. Retrieved from https://www.fhi360.org/expertise/research-utilization
Gandin, L. A., & Lima, I. G. D. (2015). Reconfiguration of teacher’s work: An examination of the introduction of pedagogical intervention programs. Revista Brasileira De Educação, 20, 663–677. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-24782015206206
Gimranova, A., Shamatov, D., Sharplin, E., & Durrani, N. (2021). Education in Kazakhstan. Education systems entering the twenty-first century (pp. 404–438). Keurkopie.
Groothuijsen, S. E. A., Bronkhorst, L. H., Prins, G. T., & Kuiper, W. (2023). Scope, nature and progress of impact in practice-oriented educational research: A conceptual and empirical substantiation. Research Papers in Education, 38(3), 378–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2021.1974529
Hargreaves, D. (1996). Teaching as a research-based profession: Possibilities and prospects. Paper Presented at the Teacher Training Agency Annual Lecture, April [online]. http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Portals/0/PDF%20reviews%20and%20summaries/TTA%20Hargreaves%20lecture.pdf
Hernández-Torrano, D., Karabassova, L., Izekenova, Z., & Courtney, M. G. (2021). Mapping education research in post-Soviet countries: A bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Educational Development, 87, 102502. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738059321001553
Ibrasheva, O. H., Rakisheva, A. K., Sharplin, E. D., & Ramazanova, M. Zh. (2021). ИHTEPHAЦИOHAЛИЗAЦИЯ ИCCЛEДOBAHИЙ BЫCШEГO OБPAЗOBAHИЯ B КAЗAXCTAHE: КEЙC PAЗBИTИЯ ИCCЛEДOBATEЛЬCКOЙ ЭTИКИ B COЦИAЛЬHЫX HAУКAX (in Russian). The impact of internationalization on research in higher education in Kazakhstan. KazNU Bulletin, 69(4), 16–27.
Independent Agency for Quality Assurance in Education. (2008–2023). The Bologna Process in Kazakhstan. https://iqaa.kz/en/higher-education/the-bologna-process/the-bologna-process-in-kazakhstan#:~:text=In%20March%202010%2C%20Kazakhstan%20officially,of%20the%20European%20Educational%20Area
Information Analytic Centre [IAC]. (n.d.). About the center. https://iac.kz/?page_id=1003&lang=en
Jumakulov, Z., Ashirbekov, A., Sparks, J., & Sagintayeva, A. (2019). Internationalizing research in Kazakhstan higher education: A case study of Kazakhstan’s State Program of Industrial Innovative Development 2015 to 2019. Journal of Studies in International Education, 23(2), 234–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315318786445
Khokhotva, O., & Albizuri, I. E. (2020). Student voice in lesson study as a space for EFL teachers’ learning: A case study in Kazakhstan. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 9(2), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-06-2019-0054
Kizilaslan, I., & Leutwyler, B. (2012). Pre-service teacher action research: Concept, international trends and implications for teacher education in Turkey. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED567079.pdf
Kuzhabekova, A. (2020). Invisibilizing Eurasia: How North-South dichotomization marginalizes post-Soviet scholars in international research collaborations. Journal of Studies in International Education, 24(1), 113–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315319888887
Lee, J. T., & Kuzhabekova, A. (2019). Building local research capacity in higher education: A conceptual model. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 41(3), 342–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2019.1596867
Linse, A. R. (2017). Interpreting and using student ratings data: Guidance for faculty serving as administrators and on evaluation committees. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 54(September), 94–106. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X16300232
Lopez-Alvarado, J. (2017). Educational research: Educational purposes, the nature of knowledge and ethical issues. International Journal of Research and Education, 1, 1. https://doi.org/10.19239/ijrev2n1p1
Lundqvist, C., & Westerlund, S. (2022). Principals’ enactment of policy on research-based education: Interpreting and facilitating policy in local school settings in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2022.2148270
Mills, J. P., & Earl Rinehart, S. K. (2019). Teachers as researchers. Teachers and Curriculum, 19(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.15663/tandc.v19i1.338
Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan [MON]. (2016). State Program for the Development of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2020–2025. 2016. [electronic resource]. https://online.zakon.kz/document/?doc_id=32372771
Mukhtarova, A., & Smith, A. (2014). Aspiring international standards: Challenges and outcomes of project management in the context of Kazakhstan higher education. Life Science Journal, 11(6), 218–222. http://www.lifesciencesite.com/lsj/life1106/029_23702life110614_218_222.pdf
Nagibova, G. (2019). Professional development: The challenges of action research implementation in Kazakhstan. International Academy Journal Web of Scholar. https://doi.org/10.31435/rsglobal_wos/30092019/6691
Namyssova, G. (2021). Secondary school novice teachers’ understanding and experiences of becoming a teacher professional in Kazakhstan: A phenomenological study. PhD Thesis. https://nur.nu.edu.kz/handle/123456789/6729
Natow, R. (2020). Research utilization in higher education rulemaking: A multi-case study of research prevalence, sources, and barriers. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 28, 95. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.28.5048
Nelson, J., & Campbell, C. (2017). Evidence-informed practice in education: Meanings and applications. Educational Research, 59(2), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2017.1314115
Nelson, J., Mehta, P., Sharples, J., & Davey, C. (March, 2017). Measuring teachers’ research engagement: Findings from a pilot study. Report and Executive Summary. https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/public/files/Evaluation/Research_Use/NFER_Research_Use_pilot_report_-_March_2017_for_publication.pdf
Nurkesheva, D. (2015). Translation of NIS experience to the mainstream schools. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences, 3, 87–95.
OECD. (2017). Education at a glance 2017: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/eag-2017-en
OECD. (2018). Education at a glance 2018: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/eag-2018-en
OECD. (2021). Bolashak International Scholarship Programme. https://stip.oecd.org/stip/interactive-dashboards/policy-initiatives/2021%2Fdata%2FpolicyInitiatives%2F23980
On Approval of the Model Qualification Characteristics of Positions Held by Teaching Staff and Persons Equated to Them. Order of the Minister of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 338 dated July 13, 2009, https://almau.edu.kz/standard_qualification_characteristics-9879
On Approval of the Rules for the Assignment (Confirmation) of Qualification Categories to Teachers, Information and Legal System of Normative Legal Acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan. No. 561 (2020 & rev. 2021). https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/V2000020618
On Approval of the Rules for Conferring Academic Titles (associate professor, professor). Information and Legal System of Normative Legal Acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan. No. 128 (2011). https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/V1100006939
On the Status of "Nazarbayev University", "Nazarbayev Intellectual Schools" and "Nazarbayev Fund", 2011, Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan. https://adilet.zan.kz/eng/docs/Z1100000394
On Teacher Status, Information and Legal System of Normative Legal Acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan. No. 293-VI ЗPК (2019 & rev. 2022). https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/Z1900000293
Oolbekkink-Marchand, H. W., van der Steen, J., & Nijveldt, M. (2014). A study of the quality of practitioner research in secondary education: Impact on teacher and school development. Educational Action Research, 22(1), 122–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2013.854175
Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
Seitova, D. (2016). Perspectives on the present state and future of higher education faculty development in Kazakhstan: Implications for national human resource development. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(18), 11081–11096.
Sharples, M. (2013). Mobile learning: Research, practice and challenges. Distance Education in China, 3(5), 5–11. https://oro.open.ac.uk/37510/2/sharples.pdf
Sharplin, E. D., & Wake, D. (2021). Becoming a teaching professional: Scoping the ethical and legal domains. In J. Allen & S. White (Eds.), Teaching in a new era (2nd ed. pp. 362–405). Cambridge Press.
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC). (2019). Guidelines for effective knowledge mobilization. https://www.sshrc-crsh.gc.ca/funding-financement/policies-politiques/knowledge_mobilisation-mobilisation_des_connaissances-eng.aspx#:~:text=and%20related%20activities.-,What%20is%20knowledge%20mobilization%3F,by%20researchers%20and%20knowledge%20users
Somekh, B., & Zeichner, K. (2009). Action research for educational reform: Remodeling action research theories and practices in local contexts. Educational Action Research, 17(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790802667402
Swabey, K., Muir, T., Thomas, D., Emery, S., & Edwards, M. (2022). University and school research partnerships as a source of professional growth in regional communities. Australian Educational Researcher, 49, 961–977. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-021-00477-1
Tertiary Education Qualification Standards of Australia [TEQSA]. (2023). Australian qualifications framework. https://www.teqsa.gov.au/how-we-regulate/acts-and-standards/australian-qualifications-framework
Tunison, S. (2020). How educational leaders conceptualise the usefulness of academic research to support their decision-making. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 193, 63–77. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1261242.pdf
Webber, C. F. (2016). Higher education administration, and leadership: Current assumptions, responsibilities, and considerations. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership, 1(1), 61–84. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1207780
Wilson, E., Turner, F., Sharimova, A., & Brownhill, S. (2013). Reform at scale: Teacher development in Kazakhstan. European Educational Research Association, 1–18. https://www.educ.cam.ac.uk/people/staff/wilson/TeacherEducationReform-in-Kazakhstan29082013.pdf
Yakavets, N., Winter, L., Malone, K., Zhontayeva, Z., & Khamidulina, Z. (2022). Educational reform and teachers’ agency in reconstructing pedagogical practices in Kazakhstan. Journal of Educational Change. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-022-09463-5
Yassinova, K. (2019). Factors Impacting Research Productivity at Higher Educational Institutions in Kazakhstan [Master’s thesis, Nazarabayev University]. Nazarbayev University Repository. https://nur.nu.edu.kz/handle/123456789/4336?locale-attribute=en
Yin, R. K. (2015). Qualitative research from start to finish. Guilford Publications.
Funding
This study was financed by Nazarbayev University Faculty Research Grant No. 021220FD3251 for which the authors are grateful.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Authors contributed to the study according to the following taxonomy: Conceptualization: LK; Methodology: LK; Literature review: ES; Data collection: MB, LK; Formal analysis: ES, MB; Writing—original draft preparation: ES; Writing—review and editing: ES, MB, LK; Funding acquisition: LK; Funding accountability: ES; Project oversight: ES.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
The research was approved by the Nazarbayev University Institutional Research Ethics Committee and was conducted in compliance with international standards for human subject research ethics.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Sharplin, E., Karabassova, L. & Bekova, M. Educational practitioners’ conceptualizations of the nature, impact and challenges of educational research in Kazakhstan. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 25, 213–227 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-023-09900-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-023-09900-x