Abstract
Grassroots reform, particularly in the private educational sector, has had a noticeable impact on the Australian middle years of schooling landscape. Middle years’ grassroots reform however, has often been implemented in ad hoc ways, which has meant it has not always resulted in meaningful change that is aligned with middle years’ research and philosophy. This case study examines one school’s efforts to improve education in the middle years through a grassroots reform project, namely the “Year 9 Project”. The study explores how capacity building for meaningful change can be both helped and hindered during grassroots reform. It also examines the experiences and involvement of teachers in grassroots reform, understanding their pivotal role as key implementers of school change. The study reaches two conclusions regarding how capacity building may be enhanced to effectuate meaningful change at the grassroots level.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Governed by ethics.
References
Aspland, T., & Nicholson, E. (2003). Windows into the middle years: A Queensland perspective. Australian Journal of Middle Schooling, 3(1), 34–38.
Australian Council for Educational Research. (2012). Junior secondary: Theory and practice. Report to Queensland Department of Education and Training. Australian Council for Educational Research.
Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2012). Australian charter for the professional learning of teachers and school leaders. Retrieved from http://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/professional-growth-resources/professional-learning-charter-resources/australian_charter_for_the_professional_learning_of_teachers_and_school_leaders.pdf
Bahr, N., & Crosswell, L. (2011). Contesting lost ground for the middle years in Australia: Using the case of Queensland. Australian Journal of Middle Schooling, 11(2), 12–19.
Bahr, N., & Pendergast, D. (2007). The millennial adolescent. Australian Council of Educational Research.
Barratt, R. (1998). Shaping middle schooling in Australia: A report of the national middle schooling project. Australian Curriculum Studies Association.
Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2015). The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 624–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044325
Calvert, L. (2016). Moving from compliance to agency: What teachers need to make professional learning work. Learning Forward.
Carrington, V. (2006). Rethinking middle years: Early adolescents, schooling and digital culture. Allen & Unwin.
Coffey, A., Berlach, R., & O’Neill, M. (2011). Transitioning year 7 primary students to secondary settings in Western Australian Catholic schools: A description of the process. Journal of Catholic School Studies, 83(2), 6–17.
Cosner, S. (2009). Building organisational capacity through trust. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45(2), 248–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08330502
Dinham, R., & Rowe, K. (2007). Teaching and learning in middle schooling: A review of the literature. Retrieved from Ministry of Education (New Zealand) website http://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/36281/913_TL-MidSchool.pdf
Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). Routledge.
Goodman, J. (1994). External change agents and grassroots school reform: Reflections from the field. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 9(2), 113–135.
Hall, P., & Simeral, A. (2008). Building teachers’ capacity for success. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Routledge.
Harris, A. (2011). System improvement through collective capacity building. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(6), 624–636. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231111174785
Hopkins, D., & Jackson, D., et al. (2003). Building the capacity for leading and learning. In A. Harris (Ed.), Effective leadership for school improvement (pp. 84–104). Routledge Falmer.
James, N. (2007). The use of Email interviewing as a qualitative method of inquiry in educational research. British Educational Research Journal, 33(6), 963–976.
Kaniuka, T. S. (2012). Toward an understanding of how teachers change during school reform: Considerations for educational leadership and school improvement. Journal of Educational Change, 13, 327–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-012-9184-3
Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2017). The leadership challenge (6th ed.). Wiley.
Luke, A., Elkins, J., Weir, K., Land, R., Carrington, V., Dole, S., Pendergast, D., Kapitzke, C., van Kraayenoord, C., Moni, K., McIntosh, A., Mayer, D., Bahr, M., Hunter, L., Chadbourne, R., Bean, T., Alverman, D., & Stevens, L. (2003). Beyond the middle: A report about literacy and numeracy development of target group students in the middle years of schooling (Vol. 1). Commonwealth Department of Education Training and Science.
Middle Years of Schooling Association. (2008). MYSA position paper—Middle Schooling: people, practices and places. Retrieved from http://www.adolescentsuccess.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/MYSA-Position-Paper.pdf
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis—an expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Mitchell, C., & Sackney, L. (2011). Profound improvement: Building capacity for a learning community (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Nygreen, K. (2017). Negotiating tensions: Grassroots organizing, school reform, and the paradox of neoliberal democracy. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 49(1), 42–60.
Pendergast, D. (2017). Middle years education. In D. Pendergast, K. Main, & N. Bahr (Eds.), Teaching middle years: Rethinking curriculum, pedagogy and assessment (3rd ed., pp. 3–20). Allen & Unwin.
Pendergast, D., Main, K., Barton, G., Kanasa, H., Geelan, D., & Dowden, T. (2015). The education change model as vehicle for reform: Shifting Year 7 into high school and implementing Junior Secondary. Australian Journal of Middle Schooling, 15(2), 4–18.
Priestley, M., Robinson, S., & Biesta, G. (2011). Mapping teacher agency: an ecological approach to understanding teachers’ work. Paper presented at the Oxford Ethnography and Education conference. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mark_Priestley/publication/268204999_Mapping_teacher_agency_an_ecological_approach_to_understanding_teachers'_work/links/546ddd290cf2193b94c5d954.pdf
Sahlberg, P. (2015). Finnish lessons 2.0. Teachers College Press.
Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership. Jossey-Bass.
Seward-Linger, R. (2019). Reforming middle years’ education in Australia: Challenges, implications and opportunities. In D. Virtue (Ed.), International handbook of middle level education, theory, research and policy (pp. 306–317). Routledge.
Shanks, B., & Dowden, T. (2019). Investigating the provision of professional learning and development for middle level teachers in New Zealand. Australian Journal of Middle Schooling, 19(2), 6–17.
Simpson, A., Guoyuan, S., Wood, J., Yiting, W., & Bixin, Y. (2018). A dialogue about teacher agency: Australian and Chinese perspectives. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 316–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.07.002
Smyth, J., & McInerney, P. (2007). Teachers in the middle: Reclaiming the wasteland of the adolescent years of schooling. Peter Lang Publishing.
South Australian Department of Education. (2019). Year 7 to high school. Retrieved May 2, 2020, from https://www.education.sa.gov.au/site-and-facilities/year-7-high-school
Stringer, P. (2013). Capacity building for school improvement revisited. Sense Publishers.
Symes, C., & Preston, N. (1997). Schools and classrooms: A cultural studies analysis of education (2nd ed.). Longman.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
Granted by the University Ethics Committee meeting Australian standard.
Consent to participate
As per ethics approved.
Consent for publication
As per ethics approval.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Seward-Linger, R., Dowden, T. & Andrews, D. Building capacity for grassroots reform: an Australian case study. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 23, 221–232 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09724-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09724-7