Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Supervisor style as a predictor of counseling supervision relationship quality and supervisee satisfaction: perceptions of U.S. and South Korean supervisees

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Education Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study tested a model of counseling supervisory process and outcome across two cultural contexts: one in the United States (U.S.) and one in South Korea. We hypothesized that (1) the supervisory alliance and supervisee nondisclosure would mediate the relationship between supervisor style and supervisee satisfaction and (2) the path coefficients of the model in the U.S. samples and South Korean samples would differ. Participants included 299 U.S. supervisees (mean age 30.25 years) and 334 South Korean supervisees (mean age 34.42 years), all of whom were engaged in counseling supervision. Self-reported measures were used to collect the data by using both online survey and paper–pencil survey. Results of structural equation modeling demonstrated that both the proposed model and path coefficients were statistically significant. In addition, we identified a stronger relationship between the supervisory working alliance and both supervisee nondisclosures and supervisee satisfaction in the U.S. sample in comparison to the South Korean sample. The attractive, interpersonally sensitive, and collaborative supervisory styles were differentially related to both supervisory alliance and supervisee satisfaction across U.S. and Korean samples. Implications for counseling supervision, training, and research are described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arbuckle, J. L. (2009). Amos, Version 18.0. Crawfordville, FL: Amos Development Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association. (2015a). Guidelines for clinical supervision in health service psychology. American Psychologist, 70, 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association, Commission on Accreditation. (2015b). Standards of accreditation for health service psychology. https://www.apa.org/ed/accreditation/about/policies/standards-of-accreditation.pdf.

  • An, H. Y., Seo, Y. S., Park, S. H., Lee, J. Y., & Choi, Y. R. (2017). Supervisee perceptions of counseling supervisors’ adherence to ethical guidelines. The Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 29, 915–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armeniox, L. F. (2000). Level of supervisee disclosure in the clinical supervision of counselors-in-training. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Greensboro.

  • Bambling, M., & King, R. (2014). Supervisor social skill and supervision outcome. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 14, 256–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bang, K., & Park, J. (2009). Korean supervisors’ experiences in clinical supervision. The Counseling Psychologist, 37, 1042–1075. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000009339341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beddoe, L. (2016). Supervision in social work in Aotearoa New Zealand: Challenges in changing contexts. The Clinical Supervisor, 35, 156–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, J. M., & Goodyear, R. K. (2019). Fundamentals of clinical supervision (6th ed.). Boston: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordin, E. S. (1983). A working alliance based model of supervision. The Counseling Psychologist, 11, 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000083111007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britt, E., & Gleaves, D. H. (2011). Measurement and prediction of clinical psychology students’ satisfaction with clinical supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 30, 172–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2011.604274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, J. W., Pak, J. H., & Goodyear, R. K. (2000). Cultural differences in alliance formation during group supervision. In Paper presented at the 107th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.

  • Cherniss, C., & Egnatios, E. (1977). Styles of clinical supervision in community mental health programs. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 1195–1196. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.45.6.1195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, Y., Lee, E.-J., & Yoo, S.-K. (2014). The changing process of supervisees’ negative experiences in the counseling supervision. The Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 26, 841–877.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, H., & Kim, C.-D. (2008). The dimensionality of supervisees’ perceptions of a good supervisory relationship. The Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 20, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, S. C., & Kibum, K. (2004). Chemyeon-social face in Korean culture. Korea Journal, 44, 30–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duan, C., Falender, C., Goodyear, R. K., Qian, M., Jia, X., & Jiang, G. (2019). Telesupervision of supervision across national boundaries: U.S. and China. Journal of Clinical Psychology/In Session, 75, 302–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan, C., & Roehlke, H. (2001). A descriptive “snapshot” of cross-racial supervision in university counseling center internships. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 29, 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1912.2001.tb00510.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efstation, J. F., Patton, M. J., & Kardash, C. M. (1990). Measuring the working alliance in counselor supervision. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37, 322–329. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.37.3.322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, M. V. (2010). Bridging the science and practice of clinical supervision: Some discoveries, some misconceptions. The Clinical Supervisor, 29, 95–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325221003741910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falender, C. A., Cornish, J. A. E., Goodyear, R., Hatcher, R., Kaslow, N. J., Leventhal, G., et al. (2004). Defining competencies in psychology supervision: A consensus statement. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 771–785. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falender, C. A., & Shafranske, E. P. (2004). Clinical supervision: A competency-based approach (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Falender, C. A., Shafranske, E. P., & Falicov, C. J. (2014). Multiculturalism and diversity in clinical supervision: A competency-based approach. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fernando, D. M. (2013). Supervision by doctoral students: A study of supervisee satisfaction and self-efficacy, and comparison with faculty supervision outcomes. The Clinical Supervisor, 32, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2013.778673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, L. D., Chavez-Korell, S., & Rodríguez, M. M. D. (2010). No hay rosas sin espinas: Conceptualizing Latina-Latina supervision from a multicultural developmental supervisory model. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 4, 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedlander, M. L., & Ward, L. G. (1984). Development and validation of the Supervisory Styles Inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31, 541–557. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.31.4.541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heppner, P. P., Leong, F. T., & Chiao, H. (2008). A growing internationalization of counseling psychology. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Handbook of counseling psychology (4th ed., pp. 68–85). Hobken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, S. A., Knox, S., Schultz, J. M., Hill, C. E., Sloan, L., Brandt, S., et al. (2008). Predoctoral interns’ nondisclosure in supervision. Psychotherapy Research, 18, 400–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503300701697505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, E. L., Freund, R. D., Gardner, S. L., Nelson, M. L., & Walker, B. R. (1989). Relation of power and involvement to theoretical orientation in supervision: An analysis of discourse. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36, 88–102. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.36.1.88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, J.-Y. (2008). The influence of supervisory style on the supervisory working alliance and the satisfaction with supervision. The Korea Journal of Counseling, 9, 1489–1504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, K. K. (1999). Filial piety and loyalty: Two types of social identification in Confucianism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 163–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839x.00031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inman, A. G., & Ladany, N. (2014). Multicultural competencies in psychotherapy supervision. In F. T. L. Leong, L. Comas-Díaz, G. C. Nagayama Hall, V. C. McLoyd, & J. E. Trimble (Eds.), APA handbook of multicultural psychology: Applications and training (Vol. 2, pp. 643–658). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ju, Y. A., Han, Y. J., Lee, H., & Lee, D. G. (2016). Counselling psychology in South Korea. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 29, 184–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2015.1127209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ju, Y. A., Kang, S.-W., & Cho, H.-N. (2014). The effect of supervisee’s perception of working alliance on counselor activity self-efficacy and supervision satisfaction: The mediation effect of self-disclosure. The Korea Journal of Youth Counseling, 22, 157–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kee, T. S. (2008). Influences of Confucianism on Korean corporate culture. Asian Profile, 36, 9–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Killian, K. D. (2001). Differences making a difference: Cross-cultural interactions in supervisory relationships. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 12, 61–103. https://doi.org/10.1300/J086v12n02_03.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D., Pan, Y., & Park, H. S. (1998). High-versus low-context culture: A comparison of Chinese, Korean, and American cultures. Psychology and Marketing, 15, 507–521. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(199809)15:6<507:AID-MAR2>3.0.CO;2-A.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladany, N., Ellis, M. V., & Friedlander, M. L. (1999a). The supervisory working alliance, trainee self-efficacy, and satisfaction. Journal of Counseling and Development, 77, 447–455. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1999.tb02472.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladany, N., Hill, C. E., Corbett, M. M., & Nutt, E. (1996a). Nature, extent, and importance of what psychotherapy trainees do not disclose to their supervisors. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 10–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.43.1.10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladany, N., Hill, C. E., & Nutt, E. A. (1996b). Supervisory satisfaction questionnaire. Unpublished instrument.

  • Ladany, N., & Lehrman-Waterman, D. E. (1999). The content and frequency of supervisor self-disclosures and their relationship to supervisor style and the supervisory working alliance. Counselor Education and Supervision, 38, 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6978.1999.tb00567.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladany, N., Lehrman-Waterman, D., Molinaro, M., & Wolgast, B. (1999b). Psychotherapy supervisor ethical practices: Violations of and adherence to standards. The Counseling Psychologist, 27, 443–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000099273008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladany, N., Mori, Y., & Mehr, K. E. (2013). Effective and ineffective supervision. The Counseling Psychologist, 41, 28–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000012442648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladany, N., Walker, J. A., & Melincoff, D. S. (2001). Supervisory style: Its relation to the supervisory working alliance and supervisor self-disclosure. Counselor Education and Supervision, 40, 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6978.2001.tb01259.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. (2019). A simulation study on model specification to control covariates in mediation analysis with structural equation modeling. Studies on Korean Youth, 30, 5–35. https://doi.org/10.14816/sky.2019.30.3.5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.-E., & Chung, N.-W. (2003). Research of novice therapists’ experience in group supervision. The Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 15, 441–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong, F. T. L., & Blustein, D. L. (2000). Toward a global vision of counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 28, 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000000281001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, X., Jiang, G., & Duan, C. (2016). Necessity and urgency of increasing graduate training in Chinese clinical and counseling psychology: Wuhan Declaration. Psychotherapy Bulletin, 51, 26–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macho, S., & Ledermann, T. (2011). Estimating, testing, and comparing specific effects in structural equation models: The phantom model approach. Psychological Methods, 16, 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martens, M. P. (2005). The use of structural equation modeling in counseling psychology research. The Counseling Psychologist, 33, 269–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000004272260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mays, V. M., Rubin, J., Sabourin, M., & Walker, L. (1996). Moving toward a global psychology: Changing theories and practice to meet the needs of a changing world. American Psychologist, 51, 485–487. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.51.5.485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehr, K. E., Ladany, N., & Caskie, G. I. L. (2010). Trainee nondisclosure in supervision: What are they not telling you? Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 10, 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733141003712301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merkin, R. S. (2009). Cross-cultural communication patterns-Korean and American Communication. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 20. Online journal. https://www.immi.se/intercultural/nr20/merkin.htm.

  • Minkov, M., & Hofstede, G. (2011). Is national culture a meaningful concept? Cultural values delineate homogeneous national clusters of in-country regions. Cross-Cultural Research, 46, 133–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397111427262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyoshi, M. (2016). The elements of the clinical supervision: Exporting concepts to Japan. Doctoral Dissertation, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/60589063.pdf.

  • Mori, Y., Inman, A. G., & Caskie, G. I. (2009). Supervising international students: Relationship between acculturation, supervisor multicultural competence, cultural discussions, and supervision satisfaction. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 3, 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J. R., Bennett-Levy, J., Wilson, S., Ryan, K., Rotumah, D., Budden, W., et al. (2015). Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander mental health practitioners propose alternative clinical supervision models. International Journal of Mental Health, 44, 33–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, M. F., & Smith, P. B. (2008). Social structures and processes in cross-cultural management. In P. B. Smith, M. F. Peterson, & D. C. Thomas (Eds.), The handbook of cross-cultural management research (pp. 35–58). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Preston, C. C., & Colman, A. M. (2000). Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: Reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychologica, 104, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-6918(99)00050-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quek, K. M., & Storm, C. L. (2012). Chinese values in supervisory discourse: Implications for culturally sensitive practices. Contemporary Family Therapy, 34, 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-011-9172-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos-Sánchez, L., Esnil, E., Goodwin, A., Riggs, S., Touster, L. O., Wright, L. K., et al. (2002). Negative supervisory events: Effects on supervision and supervisory alliance. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33, 197–202. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.33.2.197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynaga-Abiko, G. (2010). Opportunity amidst challenge: Reflections of a Latina supervisor. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 4, 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodolfa, E., Bent, R., Eisman, E., Nelson, P., Rehm, L., & Ritchie, P. (2005). A cube model for competency development: Implications for psychology educators and regulators. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 36, 347–354. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.36.4.347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rønnestad, M. H., & Skovholt, T. M. (2003). The journey of the counselor and therapist: Research findings and perspectives on professional development. Journal of Career Development, 30, 5–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/089484530303000102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousmaniere, T. G., & Ellis, M. V. (2013). Developing the construct and measure of collaborative clinical supervision: The supervisee’s perspective. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 7, 300–308. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, D. W., Kahn, J. H., Spoth, R., & Altmaier, E. M. (1998). Analyzing data from experimental studies: A latent variable structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45, 18–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, P., Ethier, N., & Woody, E. (2011). Interpersonal complementarity. In L. M. Horowitz & S. Strack (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment, and therapeutic interventions (pp. 123–142). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, K. S., & Friedlander, M. L. (2017). What do “interpersonally sensitive” supervisors do and how do supervisees experience a relational approach to supervision? Psychotherapy Research, 27, 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2015.1080877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shim, S. S. (2002). Cultural landscapes of pastoral counseling in Asia: The case of Korea with a supervisory perspective. American Journal of Pastoral Counseling, 5, 77–97. https://doi.org/10.1300/j062v05n01_04.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.7.4.422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siembor, M. (2013, June). Psychometric properties of the Supervision Nondisclosure Scale. In Presentation presented at the 9th annual International Interdisciplinary Clinical Supervision Conference, Garden City, NY.

  • Sohn, S.-H. (2005). Supervisees’ nondisclosure in counseling supervision. The Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 17, 57–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Son, E., & Ellis, M. V. (2013). A cross-cultural comparison of clinical supervision in South Korea and the United States. Psychotherapy, 50, 189–205. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Son, E., Ellis, M. V., & Yoo, S. K. (2013). Clinical supervision in South Korea and the United States: A comparative descriptive study. The Counseling Psychologist, 41, 48–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000012442650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamai, K., & Lee, J. (2002). Confucianism as cultural constraint: A comparison of Confucian values of Japanese and Korean university students. International Education Journal, 3, 33–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, K. M., Hopwood, C. J., Woody, E., Ethier, N., & Sadler, P. (2014). Momentary assessment of interpersonal process in psychotherapy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 61, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsong, Y. (2004). The roles of supervisee attachment styles and perception of supervisors’ general and multicultural competence in supervisory working alliance, supervisee omissions in supervision, and supervision outcome. Unpublished Dissertation, University of Southern California.

  • Watkins, C. E. (2014). The supervisory alliance as quintessential integrative variable. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 44, 151–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, S.-K., Du, K.-H., Kim, E.-H., & Chung, Y.-J. (2009). A study of the supervisee’s perception on their supervision experiences in Korea. The Korea Journal of Counseling, 10, 1907–1927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, E., & Jepsen, D. A. (2008). Expectations of and attitudes toward counseling: A comparison of Asian international and U.S. graduate students. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 30, 116–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10447-008-9050-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yourman, D. B., & Farber, B. A. (1996). Nondisclosure and distortion in psychotherapy supervision. Psychotherapy: Theory Research, Practice, Training, 33, 567–575. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-3204.33.4.567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yum, J. O. (2011). The role of Confucianism on interpersonal communication patterns in Asia. In L. Samovar, R. Porter, & E. McDaniel (Eds.), Intercultural communication: A reader (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Yongmoon Graduate School of Counseling Psychology, Seoul, South Korea

    Ha Yan An

  2. University of Redlands, Redlands, USA

    Rodney K. Goodyear

  3. Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea

    Young Seok Seo

  4. Bates College, Lewiston, ME, USA

    Yunkyoung Garrison

  5. Myongji University, Seoul, South Korea

    Keun Young Baek

  6. Hannam University, Daejeon, South Korea

    Hwa Jin Cho

Authors
  1. Ha Yan An
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rodney K. Goodyear
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Young Seok Seo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yunkyoung Garrison
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Keun Young Baek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hwa Jin Cho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ha Yan An.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

An, H.Y., Goodyear, R.K., Seo, Y.S. et al. Supervisor style as a predictor of counseling supervision relationship quality and supervisee satisfaction: perceptions of U.S. and South Korean supervisees. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 21, 487–504 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-020-09637-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-020-09637-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation