Advertisement

Students’ and teachers’ readiness for autonomy: beliefs and practices in developing autonomy in the Chinese context

Abstract

In 2004, the Chinese Ministry of Education issued the College English Curriculum Requirements in an effort to revitalise English language teaching in China. This official document underpins “College English”, a compulsory course for non-English majors in the first 2 years of university study. In a break with the past, the policy document placed considerable emphasis on the development of learner autonomy. Despite these aspirations, in practice it has been observed that many teachers struggle to implement their content (Lin, Chen, Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages 32(2):45–50, 2009; Luo, Journal of the Foreign Language World 183(6):29–36, 2017; Xu, Language and Education 7(4):2–7, 2014). To better document this mismatch and identify its causes, this research investigated 668 students and 182 teachers’ beliefs, practices and readiness for autonomy in the context of the College English course. Through a triangulated approach, this article found that both the students and teachers appeared psychologically, but not technically or behaviourally, ready for autonomy. The challenges to the promotion of autonomy in Chinese universities, therefore, seem to be more about pedagogical than cultural impediments. We conclude the paper with a number of implications to enable classroom practitioners to better integrate the development of autonomy into the curriculum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 99

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Notes

  1. 1.

    The invalid responses refer to those with incomplete responses. If a teacher participant failed to answer all the questions in the two sections, his or her questionnaire was considered invalid.

  2. 2.

    f: frequency.

  3. 3.

    All the quotes have been translated by the authors.

References

  1. Benson, P. (2005). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

  2. Borg, S., & Al-Busaidi, S. (2012). Learner autonomy: English language teachers’ beliefs and practices. London: the British Council.

  3. Bouchard, P. (2009). Some factors to consider when designing semi-autonomous learning environments. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 7(2), 93–100.

  4. Candy, P. C. (1991). Self-direction for lifelong learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  5. Chan, V. (2001). Readiness for learner autonomy: What do our learners tell us? Teaching in Higher Education, 6(4), 505–518.

  6. Chan, V. (2003). Autonomous language learning: The teachers’ perspectives. Teaching in Higher Education, 8(1), 33–54.

  7. Chan, V., Spratt, M., & Humphreys, G. (2002). Autonomous language learning: Hong Kong tertiary students’ attitudes and behaviour. Evaluation and Research in Education, 16(1), 1–18.

  8. Cotterall, S. (1995). Readiness for autonomy: Investigating learner beliefs. System, 23(2), 195–205.

  9. Dam, L. (1995). Learner autonomy 3: From theory to classroom practice. Dublin: Authentik.

  10. Doğan, G., & Mirici, İ. H. (2017). EFL instructors’ perception and practices on learner autonomy in some Turkish universities. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13(1), 166–193.

  11. Édes, C. (2009). ‘Teachers know best’—Autonomous beliefs and behaviours of English majors: A case study of three first-year students at Eötvös university. In R. Lugossy, J. Horváth & M. Nikolov (Eds.), UPRT 2008: Empirical studies in English applied linguistics (pp. 43–57). Pécs: Lingua Franca Csoport.

  12. Gulbahar, Y., & Madran, R. O. (2009). Communication and collaboration, satisfaction, equality and autonomy in blended learning environments: A case from Turkey. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(2), 1–22.

  13. Guo, Y. (2007). Autonomous English learning among postgraduate EFL learners in China: A study of attitudes and behaviours. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 4(3), 47–70.

  14. Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and learning in the language classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  15. Higgs, J. (1988). Planning learning experiences to promote autonomous learning. In D. Boud (Ed.), Developing student autonomy in learning (pp. 40–58). London: Kogan Page.

  16. Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy in foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.

  17. Januin, J. (2007). Exploring readiness for language learning autonomy among distance learners in Sabah, Malaysia. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 5(1), 16–26.

  18. La Ganza, W. (2008). Learner autonomy—Teacher autonomy: Interrelating and the will to empower. In T. Lamb & H. Reinders (Eds.), Learner and teacher Autonomy: Concepts, realities, and responses (pp. 63–79). Amsterdam: John Benjamin.

  19. Launer, R. (2010). Five assumptions about blended learning: What is important to make blended learning a successful concept? In P. Tsang, S. K. S. Cheung, V.S.K. Lee, & R. Huang (Eds.), Hybrid learning: Third international conference, August 16–19, Proceedings, (pp. 9–15). Berlin: Springer.

  20. Lin, L. L., & Reinders, H. (2017). Assessing learner autonomy: Development and validation of a localised scale. In H. Reinders, D. Nunan & B. Zou. (Eds.), Innovation in language teaching: The case of China (pp. 307–328). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  21. Lin, L. L., & Chen, Y. E. (2009). An investigation into psychology, learning behaviour and outcomes of tertiary students in resource-based learning. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages, 32(2), 45–50.

  22. Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy 1: Definition, issues and problems. Dublin: Authentik.

  23. Little, D. (1995). Learning as dialogue: The dependence of learner autonomy on teacher autonomy. System, 23(2), 175–182.

  24. Little, D. (1999). Learner autonomy is more than a Western cultural construct. In S. Cotterall & D. Crabbe (Eds.), Learner autonomy in language learning: Defining the field and effecting change (pp. 11–18). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

  25. Littlewood, W. (1996). ‘Autonomy’: An anatomy and a framework. System, 24(4), 427–435.

  26. Luo, R. (2017). A study of an autonomous foreign language learning mode in the Internet environment. Journal of the Foreign Language World, 183(6), 29–36.

  27. Lynch, R., & Dembo, M. (2004). The relationship between self-regulation and online learning in a blended learning context. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 5(2), 1–16.

  28. Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2004). College English curriculum requirements (for trial implementation). Beijing: Qinghua University Press.

  29. Murphy, L., & Hurd, S. (2011). Fostering learner autonomy and motivation in blended teaching. In M. Nicolson, L. Murphy & M. Southgate (Eds.), Language teaching in blended contexts (pp. 43–58). Edinburgh: Dunedin Academic Press.

  30. Nakata, Y. (2011). Teachers’ readiness for promoting learner autonomy: A study of Japanese EFL high school teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(5), 900–910.

  31. Oliver, M., & Trigwell, K. (2005). Can ‘blended learning’ be redeemed? E-Learning, 2(1), 17–26.

  32. Piyawan, R. (2012). Student readiness for learner autonomy: Case study at a university in Thailand. Asian Journal of Education and Learning, 3(2), 28–40.

  33. Poon, J. (2013). Blended learning: An institutional approach for enhancing students’ learning experiences. MERLOT Journal of Online Teaching and Learning, 9(2), 271–288.

  34. Rayo, J., & Vieira, F. (2015). Enhancing autonomy in language education. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

  35. Razeq, A. A. A. (2014). University EFL learners’ perceptions of their autonomous learning responsibilities and abilities. RELC Journal, 45(3), 321–336.

  36. Reinders, H. (2011). From autonomy to autonomous language learning. In A. Ahmed, G. Cane & M. Hanzala (Eds.), Teaching English in multilingual contexts: Current challenges, future directions (pp. 37–52). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

  37. Riley, P. (1988). The ethnography of autonomy. In A. Brookers & P. Grundy (Eds.), Individualisation and autonomy in language learning (pp. 12–34). London: Modern English Publications/the British Council.

  38. Scharle, A., & Szabó, A. (2000). Learner autonomy: A guide to developing learner responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  39. Smith, R., & Erdoğan, S. (2008). Teacher-learner autonomy: Program goals and student-teacher constructs. In T. Lamb & H. Reinders (Eds.), Learner and teacher Autonomy: Concepts, realities, and responses (pp. 83–102). Amsterdam: John Benjamin.

  40. Sönmez, G. (2016). How ready are your students for autonomous language learning? Turkish Online Journal of English Language Teaching (TOJELT), 1(3), 126–134.

  41. Tayjasanant, C., & Suraratdecha, S. (2016). Thai EFL teachers and learners’ beliefs and readiness for autonomous learning. 3L Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 22(3), 153–169.

  42. Thang, S. M., & Azarina, A. (2007). Investigating readiness for autonomy: Comparison of Malaysian EFL undergraduates of three public universities. Reflection on English Language Teaching Journal, 6(1), 1–18.

  43. Thavenius, C. (1999). Teacher autonomy for learner autonomy. In S. Cotterall & D. Crabbe (Eds.), Learner autonomy in language learning: Defining the field and effecting change (pp. 159–163). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

  44. Vieira, F. (2007). Reflective teacher development towards pedagogy for autonomy in schools: Promoting and understanding change through pedagogical inquiry. In J. Raya & L. Sercu (Eds.), Challenges in teacher development: Learner autonomy and intercultural competence (pp. 147–168). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

  45. Vieira, F., & Barbosa, I. (2009). Investigating contexts for autonomy—A study of learner readiness and beyond. In F. Vieira (Ed.), Struggling for autonomy in language education (pp. 145–185). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

  46. Wenden, A. (1991). Learner strategies for learner autonomy. London: Prentice Hall International.

  47. Xu, J. F. (2014). The current situation and reflection on Chinese college students’ autonomous English learning ability. Language and Education, 7(4), 2–7.

  48. Yao, J., & Li, X. H. (2017). Are Chinese undergraduates ready for autonomous learning of English listening?—A survey on students’ learning situation. The Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, 7(2), 21–35.

  49. Yıldırım, Ö (2012). A study on a group of Indian English as a second language learners’ perceptions of autonomous learning. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 3(2), 18–29.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Lilan Lin.

Appendices

Appendix 1

The SLLA

We would like to ask you to help us by participating in a survey. This questionnaire is not a test so there are no “right” or “wrong” answers. We are interested in your personal opinions. The results of this survey will be used for curriculum development in this school. Thank you very much for your help!

Section 1

In this section, circle your response for each item: 1: strongly disagree, 2: disagree, 3: neither disagree nor agree, 4: agree, 5: strongly agree

No Item 1 2 3 4 5
1 Students are responsible for deciding their learning goals      
2 Students are responsible for selecting learning materials that suit them      
3 Apart from the teachers, students are responsible for evaluating learning outcomes      
4 I believe I can overcome difficulties in my learning process.      
5 I am able to use effective learning strategies that suit me.      
6 I will learn more when I am interested in a topic      
7 I will encourage myself when I meet setbacks in the learning process      
8 Every time when I begin a learning task, I know my aims      
9 I can use different strategies for different learning tasks      
10 I have my objectives for English learning      
11 I have my own learning plans apart from the teachers’ assignments      
12 I have a clear idea how I should improve my English      
13 I give a process evaluation to make sure the tasks finished      
14 I can finish the learning tasks according to my plan      
15 I will monitor how I implement my learning plan after a period of time      
16 I will reflect how I have learnt      
17 I will evaluate my learning outcomes by finding out problems and solutions      
18 When I finish a task, I evaluate if I have attained the goal      
19 I know how to improve my English based on my weak points      
20 I can evaluate my progress and make a plan accordingly      

Section 2

In this section, please circle your response for each item: 1: never, 2: seldom, 3: sometimes, 4: often, 5: always

No Item 1 2 3 4 5
21 I preview the learning materials for classroom teaching      
22 Apart from the textbooks, I select learning materials that suit me      
23 I review what I have learnt recently      
24 I use the library and the internet to increase English knowledge      
25 I try to improve my listening by using the internet      
26 I have the habit of reading in English      
27 I have the habit of writing in English      
28 I use all the possible means to improve my oral English      
29 I select the suitable pace to finish the self-access listening tasks      
30 After learning one or two units, I will test my learning outcomes      
31 I learn the cultures of English-speaking countries to supplement my English learning      
32 I consult my teachers or classmates when I don’t understand      

Appendix 2

Survey of teachers’ perceptions of learner autonomy

How do you evaluate your students’ degree of autonomy? What is your general impression of the level of autonomy of the students in your classes?

What roles do you think a teacher should play in fostering students’ autonomy?

How would you implement these roles in your teaching practice?

Please specify approaches you think are helpful in promoting learner autonomy.

Have you ever tried any approaches to promote learner autonomy? If yes, how? What about the effects of the approach(es)? What might be the reasons for the success or the failure of your approach(es)?

What do you think is the biggest challenge in the promotion of learner autonomy?

Have you ever felt frustrated about how to foster learner autonomy? If yes, what might be the cause(s)?

Appendix 3

Student questionnaire

Do you think you are an autonomous learner? Please evaluate your level of autonomy in learning English.

Do you like the blended learning mode? Do you think that you are adapted to blended learning? If not, why?

What do you think is the biggest obstacle in this learning process?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, L., Reinders, H. Students’ and teachers’ readiness for autonomy: beliefs and practices in developing autonomy in the Chinese context. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 20, 69–89 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-018-9564-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Learner autonomy
  • Teacher autonomy
  • Readiness for autonomy
  • Teacher beliefs
  • Classroom practice