The effectiveness and efficiency of China’s special admission policies: the case of X University

Article
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

The Chinese government has implemented a series of special admission policies in recent years to increase access to elite universities for disadvantaged students from rural areas and less developed inland regions. Using administrative data of 1996–2015 freshman cohorts and survey data of a 2014 freshman cohort at X University in the eastern China, we empirically assess the effectiveness, and the dual concerns of equity and efficiency of these policies. Findings show that these policies have effectively changed the geographic composition of enrollees at X University toward higher proportions of students from the central and western regions and lower share of the local students. While students from the western region underperformed academically, urban students in this region caught up quickly. Low family SES and weak academic preparation largely explained why rural students from the western region underperformed. Importantly, compared with the local students who scored lower in college entrance exam—the proxy for likely displaced students because of the policies, the likely admission policy beneficiaries performed about equally well. These results indicate that the current practice of Chinese special admission policies has effectively promoted equal access to Chinese elite universities with a limited loss in efficiency.

Keywords

College performance Disadvantaged students Special admission policies 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a China Ministry of Education Humanity and Social Science Research Planning Project Grant (#16YJA880029). We are grateful to Grace Zheng and Amani Grow for their instructive feedbacks and editorial supports.

References

  1. Adelman, C. (2004). Principal indicators of student academic histories in postsecondary education, 1972–2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  2. Adelman, C. (2006). The toolbox revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school through college. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  3. Alon, S., & Tienda, M. (2007). Diversity, opportunities, and the shifting meritocracy in higher education. American Sociological Review, 72, 487–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Astin, A. (1972). College dropouts: A national profile. ACE Research Reports, 7 [M]. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education.Google Scholar
  5. Bastedo, M. N., & Jaquette, O. (2011). Running in place: Low-income students and the dynamics of higher education stratification. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(3), 318–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowen, W. G., & Bok, D. (1998). The shape of the river: Long-term consequences of considering race in college and university admissions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coleman, J. S. (1990). Equality and achievement in education. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  8. Crawford, C. (2000). Weighing the benefits and costs of racial preference in college admissions. Society, 37(4), 71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DesJardins, S. L., Ahlburg, D. A., & McCall, B. P. (2002). A temporal investigation of factors related to timely degree completion. Journal of Higher Education, 73(5), 555–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Flores, M. (2003) Senator wants college rule axed; Official: Automatic admission for top 10% in high schools is unfair. San Antonio Express News, p. 1.Google Scholar
  11. Helms, R. M. (2008). University admissions worldwide. World Bank Education Working Paper 15.Google Scholar
  12. Hill, L. D. (2008). School strategies and the ‘college linking’ process: Reconsidering the effects of high schools on college enrollment. Sociology of Education, 28, 53–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Liu, L., & Neilson, W. S. (2011). High scores but low skills. Economics of Education, 30, 507–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Long, M. C., & Tienda, M. (2008). Winners and losers: Changes in Texas University admissions post-hopwood. Educational Evaluation & Policy Analysis, 30(3), 255–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Massey, D. S., & Mooney, M. (2007). The effects of America’s three affirmative action programs on academic performance. Social Problems, 54(1), 99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Montejano, D. (2001). Access to the University of Texas at Austin and the ten percent plan: A three-year assessment. Austin, TX: University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
  17. Nettles, M. T. (2015). Improving education and outcomes for underrepresented students. Present Institute, The Council of Independent Colleges, 2015. http://www.cic.edu/News-and-Publications/Independent-Newsletter/PI-2015/ Pages/PI-underrepresented-students.aspx.
  18. Niu, S. X., & Tienda, M. (2010). Texas Top 10% Law and minority student academic performance: Lessons from UT-Austin. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32(1), 44–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Porter, O. F. (1989). Undergraduate completion and persistence at four-year colleges and universities. Washington, DC: National Institute of Independent Colleges and Universities.Google Scholar
  20. Reardon, S. F., Baker, R., & Klasik, D. (2012). Race, income, and enrollment patterns in highly selective colleges, 1982–2004. Stanford, CA: Center for Education Policy Analysis, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  21. Roderick, M. R. (2009). From high School to the future: Making hard work pay off. Research report. Consortium on Chicago School Research at the University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  22. Roderick, M. R., Nagaoka, J., Coca, V., & Moeller, E. (2008). From high school to the future: Potholes on the road to college. Research report. Consortium on Chicago School Research at the University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  23. Rothstein, J. M. (2004). College performance predictions and the SAT. Journal of Econometrics, 121(1–2), 297–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schuck, P. H. (2014). Assessing affirmative action. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3), 483–568.Google Scholar
  25. Thernstrom, A., & Thernstrom, S. (1996). Reflections on the shape of the river. UCLA Law Review, 46, 1583–1632.Google Scholar
  26. Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45, 89–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd edn.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  28. Tyson, C. (2014). To maximize graduation rates, colleges should focus on middle-range students. Inside Higher Education.Google Scholar

References in Chinese

  1. Chen, B. (2003). On the value pursuit and policy choice of equity in Chinese higher education. Journal of Central China Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 42(2), 128–135.Google Scholar
  2. Deng, X. Y., Qiao, T. Y., Yu, X. L., Chen, H., Lu, X. D., & Huang, X. T. (2014). An Efficiency criterion of province-based university enrollment -A big data research of regional student group academic performance differences. Chinese Higher Education Research, 2014(12), 23–27.Google Scholar
  3. Li, C. L. (2010). Expansion of higher education and inequality in opportunity of education: A study on effect of “Kuozhao” policy on equalization of educational attainment. Sociology Study, 2010(3), 82–113 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  4. Li, Y. H., Cao, Z., Jia, D. M., Zhang, Z. W., & Liu, Y. S. (2016). Institutional evolution and urban-rural differences in China: Analysis based on 30-years panel data. Areal Research and Development, 35(1), 45–50.Google Scholar
  5. Liu, J. M. (2014). Ability and background: Analysis of mechanism affecting access to higher education. Social Science in China, 2013(8), 109–128.Google Scholar
  6. Liu, S. X. (1999). Thoughts on equity and efficiency in higher education. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Social Sciences), 7(3), 25–28.Google Scholar
  7. Lu, X. D., Yu, X. L., Chen, H., & Huang, X. T. (2016). Will the rural-urban gap in K-12 school continue in university: An empirical case study of students academic performance. Journal of Higher Education Management, 10(1), 56–60.Google Scholar
  8. Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2015). Postsecondary institution list.Google Scholar
  9. National Bureau of Statistics of the People’s Republic of China (2013). National Data.Google Scholar
  10. Niu, X. C. (2017). Early academic performance of rural students under special admission policies-evidence from an Elite University. Fudan Education Forum, 15(4), 52–61.Google Scholar
  11. Qi, L. L., & Wang, Y. W. (2010). Inter-provincial differences -Analysis of resources disequilibrium of education in China. Higher Education Development and Evaluation, 5(26), 34–40.Google Scholar
  12. The State Council of China. (2000). Notice on development of the western regions.Google Scholar
  13. Tian, Z. P., & Li, J. Y. (2002). On equality of education. Research on Education Tsinghua University, 23(1), 39–48.Google Scholar
  14. Tsinghua University. (2014). Inequalities in higher education, China in 2011.Google Scholar
  15. Wang, C. H., & Li, N. (2007). Inequality in the process of attaining higher education. Tsinghua Journal of Education, 28(4), 36–41.Google Scholar
  16. Wang, X. H., Pan, K. F., & Wu, Q. X. (2017). Study on students’ academic performance of the rural and poor area special enrollment program in high level universities: Evidence from A University. Journal of National Academy of Education Administration, 5, 66–75.Google Scholar
  17. Wu, Y. X. (2013). Educational opportunities of Chinese rural and urban residents in 1978-2007: Inequality and evolution. Social Science in China, 3, 4–21.Google Scholar
  18. Xie, A. (2015). Inside the college gate: Rural students and their academic and social success. Chinese Education & Society, 48, 77–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Xiong, J., & Yu, X. L. (2015). Analysis of learning experience between poor students and non-poor students in research universities. Journal of Higher Education, 36(2), 46–55.Google Scholar
  20. Yang, D. G., & Zhang, X. (2003). Some thoughts on equity and efficiency in higher education. Peking University Education Review, 1(1), 63–69.Google Scholar
  21. Yang, D. P. (2011). Higher education opportunities for students from poor families, Education Commentary (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  22. Yu, X. L., & Bai, X. (2016). Undergrduate special admission policies favoring candidates of rural China: Debate, reflection and reform. Journal of Higher Education, 37(1), 22–29.Google Scholar
  23. Zhang, Y. Q., & Wang, Y. J. (2015). A qualitative study of the adaptation of rural college students to college life. Chinese Education & Society, 48, 105–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Education Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fudan UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.University of West FloridaPensacolaUSA

Personalised recommendations