Abstract
East Asia shows newly emerging experiments in lifelong learning that contrast with European experiences. The concepts and ideas share a similar platform, while the trajectories of institutionalization reveal great differences. It is because the idea of lifelong learning was coined by international agencies, like UNESCO, to share, it rather shows divergent mode of institutionalization in different contexts. In this article, I intend to grasp the particular characteristics of ‘institution formation’ in lifelong learning practices, especially shown in East Asian countries, including the Republic of Korea, Japan, and China. In so doing, I adopt social systems theories in interpreting the phenomena. Education is presumed to be a social system, or ‘autopoiesis’ that functionally differentiates and expands itself by self-referential reproduction. In this context, lifelong learning is a relative newcomer with new frameworks and ideas, which sometimes conflict with traditional education, and institutionalizes itself by competing the contested terrains of the system, most of which are preoccupied by early sectors of education. In this paper, I focus on how the ‘idea’ of lifelong learning embodies into the system, secures its own education spaces, and keeps expansive reproductions as a part of the education system in general.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
1.The terminologies of adult education were ‘사회교육’ (/sahoe gyoyug/) in Korea, ‘社會敎育 (/shakai kyoiku/)’ in Japan, and ‘成人教育 (/chéngrén jiàoyù/) in China. For the sake of convenience, I am going to call all of the term as ‘adult education’ in English expression.
References
Baets, W. R. J. (2006). Complexity, learning and organizations. New York: Routledge.
Bhola, H. S. (1997). Adult education policy projections in the Delors Report. Prospects, 27(2), 207–222.
Bidwell, C. E. (2006). Varieties of institutional theory: Traditions and prospects for educational research. In H.-D. Meyer & B. Rowan (Eds.), The new institutionalism in education (pp. 33–47). Albany: SUNY Press.
Borg, C., & Mayo, P. (2005). The EU memorandum on lifelong learning. Old wine in new bottles? Globalisation, Societies and Education, 3(2), 203–225.
Borg, C., & Mayo, P. (2008). Globalisation, Southern Europe and European adult education policy. Policy Futures in Education, 6(6), 701–717. doi:10.2304/pfie.2008.6.6.701.
Capra, F. (2002). Hidden connections (강주헌, Trans.). 서울: 휘슬러.
Carlsen, A., & Yang, J. (2012). Lifelong Learning in China: Progress, Lessons learned, and the way Forward. UNESCO, unpublished.
Cheng, K.-M., Jin, X., & Gu, X. (1999). From training to education: lifelong learning in China. Comparative Education, 35(2), 119–129.
Choi, I., & Yang, B. C. (2012). Comparing the characteristics of lifelong learning cities in Korea and Japan: A historical sociological approach. KEDI Journal of Education Policy, 9(1), 183–202.
Coffield, F. (Ed.). (1996). A national strategy for lifelong learning. Newcastle: Newcastle University.
Daly, H. E., & Cobb, J. B., Jr. (1989). For the common good: Redirecting the economy toward community, the environment, and a sustainable future. Boston: Beacon Press.
Davies, B., & Ellison, L. (1997). School leadership for the 21st century: A competency and knowledge approach. London and New York: Routledge Falmer.
Davis, B., & Simmt, E. (2003a). Understanding learning systems: Mathematics education and complexity science. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(2), 137–167.
Davis, B., & Simmt, E. (2003b). Understanding learning systems: Mathematics education complexity science. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 34(2), 137–167.
Davis, B., Sumara, D., & Luce-Kapler, R. (2008). Engaging minds: Learning and teaching in a complex world. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Dehmel, A. (2006). Making a European area of lifelong learning a reality? Some critical reflections on the European Union’s lifelong learning policies. Comparative Education, 42(1), 49–62.
Dewey, J. (1928/1987). Democracy and education, 민주주의와 교육. 서울: 교육과학사.
Faure, et al. (1972). Learning to be: The world of education today and tomorrow. Paris: UNESCO.
Fenwick, T. (2003). Reclaiming and re-embodying experiential learning through complexity science. Studies in Education of Adults, 35(2), 123–132.
Fenwick, T., Edwards, R., & Sawchuk, P. (2011). Emerging approaches to educational research: Tracing the sociomaterial. New York: Routledge.
Field, J. (2002). Building a European dimension: A realistic response to globalisation? In J. Field (Ed.), Promoting European dimensions in lifelong learning (pp. 1–10). Leicester, UK: NIACE.
Han, S. (2007). Asian lifelong learning in the context of a global knowledge economy: A task re-visited. Asia Pacific Education Review, 8(3), 478–486.
Han, S. (2008). The lifelong learning ecosystem in Korea: evolution of learning capitalism? International Journal of Lifelong Education, 27(5), 517–524. doi:10.1080/02601370802051637.
Han, S. (2013). Confucian states and learning life: making scholar-officials and social learning a political contestation. Comparative Education, 49(1), 57–71. doi:10.1080/03050068.2012.740220.
Han, S., & Makino, A. (2013). Learning cities in East Asia: Japan, the Republic of Korea, and China. International Review of Ecucation, 59(4), 443–468.
Holford, J., & Milana, M. (2014). Introduction: European adult education policy in question. In J. Holford & M. Milana (Eds.), Adult education policy and the European Union (pp. 1–13). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Huang, J., & Shi, W. (2008). Policies and practices of lifelong learning in China. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 27(5), 499–508.
Jackson, M. C. (2007). Social systems theory and practice: the need for a critical approach. International Journal of General Systems, 10(2–3), 135–151. doi:10.1080/03081078508934877.
Jarvis, P. (2007). Globalization, lifelong learning and the learning society: Sociological perspectives. New York: Routledge.
Klatt, M. (2014). Understanding the European Union and its political power. In M. Milana & J. Holford (Eds.), Adult education policy and the European Union (pp. 53–72). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Kolenc, J. (2012). Luhmann’s theory of education. Solsko Polje, 23(1), 241–252.
Kono, H. (2014). Lifelong learning policy in Japan—Trends and tasks 日本の生涯学習政策の動向と課題. 北星学園大学社会福祉学部北星論集, 51, 102-116.
Liu, Y. (2003). On the establishment of LLL in China. Journal of APEC Studies, 5(1).
Luhmann, N. (1984/1995). Social systems (J. John Bednarz & D. Baecker, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford Stanford University Press.
Luhmann, N. (2002). Introduction to systems theory. Cambridge: Polity.
Makino, A. (2013). Chaning grassroots communities and lifelong learning in Japan. Comparative Education, 49(1), 42–56.
Mason, M. (2008). What is complexity theory and what are its implications for educational change? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(1), 35–49.
Maturana, H. R. (1981). Autopoiesis. In M. Zeleny (Ed.), Autopoiesis: A theo of living organization. New York: Elsevier-North Holland.
Maturana, H., & Varela, F. (1998). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Shambhara: Boston & London.
Meyer, H.-D., & Rowan, B. (2006). Institutional analysis and the study of education. In H.-D. Meyer & B. Rowan (Eds.), The new institutionalism in education. Albany: SUNY Press.
Miller, J. H., & Page, S. E. (2007). Complex adaptive systems. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
OECD. (2016). Governing education in a complex world. Paris: OECD.
Ogawa, A. (2009). Japan’s new lifelong learning policy: Exploring lessons from the European knowledge economy. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 28(5), 601–614.
Okumoto, K. (2008). Lifelong learning in England and Japan: Three translations. Compare, 38(2), 173–188.
Park, P., Brydon-Miller, M., Hall, B., & Jackson, T. (Eds.). (1993). Voices of change: Participatory research in the United States and Canada. Toronto: OISE Press.
Peters, M. A., Ondercin, D. J., & Liu, T.-C. (2011). Open learning systems: The next evolution of education. Review of Contemporary Philosophy, 10, 9–24.
Poli, R. (2010). The complexity of self-reference. A critical evaluation of Luhmann’s theory of social systems (Vol. 50). Università degli Studi di Trento, Dipartimento di Sociologia e Ricerca Sociale.
Qvortrup, L. (2005). Society’s education system—An introduction to Niklas Luhmann’s pedagogical theory. Seminar.net, 1(1), 1–21.
Rasmussen, P. (2014). Adult learning policy in the European commission. In M. Milana & J. Holford (Eds.), Adult education policy and the European Union (pp. 17–34). Rotterdam: Sense Publisher.
Seidl, D. (2004). Luhmann’s theory of autopoietic social systems. Munich: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat Munchen, Munich School of Management.
Simons, M., & Masschelein, J. (2007). The learning society and governmentality: An introduction. In J. Masschelein, M. Simons, U. Brockling, & L. Pongrantz (Eds.), The learning society from the perspective of governmentality. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Spolar, V. A. M., & Holford, J. (2014). Adult learning: from the margins to the mainstream. In M. Milana & J. Holford (Eds.), Adult education policy and the European Union (pp. 35–52). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Sun, Q. (2009). Adult education in China 1978-2008: An analytical review on the influence of national educational policies. Convergence, 42(1), 23–37.
Sun, Q. (2010). Confucian education philosphy and its implication for lifelong learning and lifelong education. In W. Zhang (Ed.), Theories, policy and practice of lifelong learning in East Asia. London: Routlege.
Tuschling, A., & Engemann, C. (2007). From education to lifelong learning: The emergence regime of learning in the European Union. In J. Masschelein, M. Simons, U. Brockling, & L. Pongratz (Eds.), The learning society from the perspective of governmentality. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Uehara, N. (2011). the changes of adult education and the structure. Lifelong Learning and Career Education Study, 7, 25–34.
Urrestarazu, H. (2013). Social autopoiesis? Constructivist Foundations, 9(2), 153–166.
Vanderstraeten, R. (2004). The social differentiation of the Educational System. Sociology, 38(2), 255–272. doi:10.1177/0038038504040863.
Wain, K. (1993). Lifelong education and adult education—The state of the theory. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 12(2), 85–99. doi:10.1080/0260137930120202.
Wain, K. (2004). The learning society in a postmodern world: the education crisis. Counterpoints, 260, xvi.
Welton, M. R. (2005). Designing the just learning society : a critical inquiry.
Zhang, W. (2010). Conceptions of lifelong learning in Confucian culture: Their impact on adult learners. In W. Zhang (Ed.), Theories, policy, and practice of lifelong learning in East Asia. London: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Han, S. Institutionalization of Lifelong Learning in Europe and East Asia: from the Complexity Systems perspective. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 18, 281–294 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-017-9490-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-017-9490-9