Abstract
This paper attempts to identify leadership practices of school principals as they engaged in exploring and exploiting possibilities in and around the school contexts to build teacher capacity for change. Based on interview data of school principals, this paper shows that principals from different schools engaged in qualitatively different practices when they led their schools in building teacher capacity for school improvement. Three approaches to teacher development are identified, namely deficit approach, interactive-growth approach and participatory-growth approach, each delineating a unique set of teacher capacity building practices, teacher learning activities and contextual conditions in which they occur. Implications for developing efficacious principal leadership in teacher capacity building are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Benner, P., Tanner, C. A., & Chesla, C. A. (1996). Expertise in nursing practice: Caring, clinical judgment and ethics. New York: Springer.
Borko, H., Wolf, S. A., Simone, G., & Uchiyama, K. P. (2003). Schools in transition: Reform efforts and school capacity in Washington State. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(2), 171–201.
Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper and Row.
Campbell, E. (2012). Teacher agency in curriculum contexts. Curriculum Inquiry, 42(2), 183–190.
Clark, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 947–967.
Cohen, D. K., Moffitt, S. L., & Golden, S. (2007). Policy and practice: The dilemma. American Journal of Education, 113(4), 515–548.
Copland, M. A. (2003). Leadership of inquiry: Building and sustaining capacity for school improvement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(4), 375–395.
Danielson, C. (2007). The many faces of leadership. Educational leadership, 65(1), 14–19.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1993). Reframing the school reform agenda: Developing capacity for school transformation. Phi Delta Kappan, 74(10), 752–761.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1998). Teacher learning that supports student learning. Educational Leadership, 55(5), 6–11.
Day, C., Harris, A., Hadfield, M., Tolley, H., & Bereford, J. (2000). Leading schools in times of change. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Elmore, R. F. (2008). Leadership as the practice of improvement. In D. Nusche, D. Hopkins, & B. Pont (Eds.), Improving school leadership: Volume 2: Case studies on system leadership (pp. 37–67). Lexington, KY: OECD.
Firestone, W. A., & Riehl, C. (Eds.). (2005). A new agenda for research in educational leadership. New York: Teachers College Press.
Fletcher, J. K., & Käufer, K. (2003). Shared leadership: Paradox and possibility. In C. L. Pearce & J. A. Conger (Eds.), Shared leadership (pp. 21–47). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York: Teachers College.
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2010). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. School Leadership and Management, 30(2), 95–110.
Huberman, M., & Guskey, T. R. (1995). The diversities of professional development. In T. R. Guskey & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education: New paradigms and practices (pp. 269–272). New York: Teachers College.
Hunzicker, J. (2012). Professional development and job-embedded collaboration: How teachers learn to exercise leadership. Professional Development in Education, 38(2), 267–289.
Jackson, D. S. (2000). The school improvement journey: Perspectives on leadership. School Leadership and Management, 20(1), 61–78.
Kaplan, L. S., & Owings, W. A. (1999). Assistant principals: The case for shared instructional leadership. NASSP Bulletin, 83(610), 80–94.
Katzenmeyer, M., & Moller, G. (2009). Awakening the sleeping giant: Helping teachers develop as leaders (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
King, M. B., & Newmann, F. M. (2001). Building school capacity through professional development: Conceptual an empirical considerations. The International Journal of Educational Management, 15(2), 86–93.
Knapp, M. S. (1997). Between systemic reforms and the mathematics and science classroom: The dynamics of innovation, implementation, and professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(2), 227–266.
Lambert, L. (2002). A framework for shared leadership. Educational Leadership, 59(8), 37–40.
Leithwood, K., & Day, C. (2010). Starting with what we know. In C. Day & K. Leithwood (Eds.), Successful principal leadership in times of change: An international perspective (pp. 1–15). Dordrecht: Springer.
Malen, B., & Rice, J. K. (2004). A framework for assessing the impact of education reforms on school capacity: Insights from studies of high-stakes accountability initiatives. Educational Policy, 18(5), 631–660.
Marks, H. M., & Louis, K. S. (1999). Teacher empowerment and the capacity for organizational learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(5), 707–750.
Marks, H. M., & Printy, S. M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 370–397.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Muijs, D., & Harris, A. (2007). Teacher leadership in (in)action. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 35(1), 111–134.
Muijus, D., & Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership: Improvement through empowerment? Educational Management and Administration, 3(4), 437–448.
Murphy, J. (2005). Connecting teacher leadership and school improvement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Newmann, F. M., King, M. B., & Youngs, P. (2000). Professional development that addresses school capacity: Lessons from urban elementary schools. American Journal of Education, 108(4), 259–299.
Poekert, P. E. (2012). Teacher leadership and professional development: Examining links between two concepts central to school improvement. Professional Development in Education, 38(2), 169–188.
Rice, J. K., & Croninger, R. (2005). Resource generation, reallocation, or depletion: An analysis of the impact of reconstitution on school capacity. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(2), 73–103.
Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 23–28.
Tsui, A. (2009). Distinctive qualities of expert teachers. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(4), 421–439.
Tsui, A. B. M., & Ng, M. M. Y. (2010). Cultural contexts and situated possibilities in the teaching of second language writing. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(4), 364–375.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Acknowledgments
The research reported in this study was supported by a grant from the Education Bureau of Hong Kong SAR government. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Education Bureau of Hong Kong SAR government.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lai, E. Principal leadership practices in exploiting situated possibilities to build teacher capacity for change. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 15, 165–175 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-014-9314-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-014-9314-0