Skip to main content
Log in

Principal leadership practices in exploiting situated possibilities to build teacher capacity for change

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Education Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper attempts to identify leadership practices of school principals as they engaged in exploring and exploiting possibilities in and around the school contexts to build teacher capacity for change. Based on interview data of school principals, this paper shows that principals from different schools engaged in qualitatively different practices when they led their schools in building teacher capacity for school improvement. Three approaches to teacher development are identified, namely deficit approach, interactive-growth approach and participatory-growth approach, each delineating a unique set of teacher capacity building practices, teacher learning activities and contextual conditions in which they occur. Implications for developing efficacious principal leadership in teacher capacity building are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benner, P., Tanner, C. A., & Chesla, C. A. (1996). Expertise in nursing practice: Caring, clinical judgment and ethics. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borko, H., Wolf, S. A., Simone, G., & Uchiyama, K. P. (2003). Schools in transition: Reform efforts and school capacity in Washington State. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(2), 171–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, E. (2012). Teacher agency in curriculum contexts. Curriculum Inquiry, 42(2), 183–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 947–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D. K., Moffitt, S. L., & Golden, S. (2007). Policy and practice: The dilemma. American Journal of Education, 113(4), 515–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copland, M. A. (2003). Leadership of inquiry: Building and sustaining capacity for school improvement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(4), 375–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danielson, C. (2007). The many faces of leadership. Educational leadership, 65(1), 14–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (1993). Reframing the school reform agenda: Developing capacity for school transformation. Phi Delta Kappan, 74(10), 752–761.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (1998). Teacher learning that supports student learning. Educational Leadership, 55(5), 6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, C., Harris, A., Hadfield, M., Tolley, H., & Bereford, J. (2000). Leading schools in times of change. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmore, R. F. (2008). Leadership as the practice of improvement. In D. Nusche, D. Hopkins, & B. Pont (Eds.), Improving school leadership: Volume 2: Case studies on system leadership (pp. 37–67). Lexington, KY: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firestone, W. A., & Riehl, C. (Eds.). (2005). A new agenda for research in educational leadership. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, J. K., & Käufer, K. (2003). Shared leadership: Paradox and possibility. In C. L. Pearce & J. A. Conger (Eds.), Shared leadership (pp. 21–47). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York: Teachers College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2010). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. School Leadership and Management, 30(2), 95–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huberman, M., & Guskey, T. R. (1995). The diversities of professional development. In T. R. Guskey & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education: New paradigms and practices (pp. 269–272). New York: Teachers College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunzicker, J. (2012). Professional development and job-embedded collaboration: How teachers learn to exercise leadership. Professional Development in Education, 38(2), 267–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. S. (2000). The school improvement journey: Perspectives on leadership. School Leadership and Management, 20(1), 61–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, L. S., & Owings, W. A. (1999). Assistant principals: The case for shared instructional leadership. NASSP Bulletin, 83(610), 80–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katzenmeyer, M., & Moller, G. (2009). Awakening the sleeping giant: Helping teachers develop as leaders (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, M. B., & Newmann, F. M. (2001). Building school capacity through professional development: Conceptual an empirical considerations. The International Journal of Educational Management, 15(2), 86–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, M. S. (1997). Between systemic reforms and the mathematics and science classroom: The dynamics of innovation, implementation, and professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(2), 227–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, L. (2002). A framework for shared leadership. Educational Leadership, 59(8), 37–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., & Day, C. (2010). Starting with what we know. In C. Day & K. Leithwood (Eds.), Successful principal leadership in times of change: An international perspective (pp. 1–15). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malen, B., & Rice, J. K. (2004). A framework for assessing the impact of education reforms on school capacity: Insights from studies of high-stakes accountability initiatives. Educational Policy, 18(5), 631–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, H. M., & Louis, K. S. (1999). Teacher empowerment and the capacity for organizational learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(5), 707–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, H. M., & Printy, S. M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 370–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muijs, D., & Harris, A. (2007). Teacher leadership in (in)action. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 35(1), 111–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muijus, D., & Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership: Improvement through empowerment? Educational Management and Administration, 3(4), 437–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, J. (2005). Connecting teacher leadership and school improvement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmann, F. M., King, M. B., & Youngs, P. (2000). Professional development that addresses school capacity: Lessons from urban elementary schools. American Journal of Education, 108(4), 259–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poekert, P. E. (2012). Teacher leadership and professional development: Examining links between two concepts central to school improvement. Professional Development in Education, 38(2), 169–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, J. K., & Croninger, R. (2005). Resource generation, reallocation, or depletion: An analysis of the impact of reconstitution on school capacity. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(2), 73–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 23–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, A. (2009). Distinctive qualities of expert teachers. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(4), 421–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, A. B. M., & Ng, M. M. Y. (2010). Cultural contexts and situated possibilities in the teaching of second language writing. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(4), 364–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research reported in this study was supported by a grant from the Education Bureau of Hong Kong SAR government. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Education Bureau of Hong Kong SAR government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edith Lai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lai, E. Principal leadership practices in exploiting situated possibilities to build teacher capacity for change. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 15, 165–175 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-014-9314-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-014-9314-0

Keywords

Navigation