Skip to main content
Log in

Enhancing concept comprehension in a web-based course using a framework integrating the learning cycle with variation theory

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Education Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Concept comprehension is an important foundation for more complex thoughts. To enhance concept comprehension, teachers of traditional classrooms have been using instructional strategies and specific course designs, which have been proven effective. It initiates a hypothesis that integrating instructional strategies in the course designs of an e-learning system would improve the effectiveness of concept comprehension. The purpose of this study is to propose a framework that integrates the learning cycle with variation theory in the course design of a web-based e-learning system to prove the hypothesis. A pretest and posttest quasi-experimental design is employed to test whether the framework is feasible. Two types of web-based courses are designed for the experiments: a course designed according to a science textbook and another course designed using the framework. The participants in this study were 120 fifth-grade students in Taiwan. The results of the experiments show that the average scores of the experimental group, using the course designed with the framework, are significantly higher than that of the control group, using the course designed without any instructional strategy, on comprehension of course concepts. This confirms that the coherent, explicit and systematic framework is feasible for designing web-based e-learning courses for effectively enhancing concept comprehension as well as the evidence to prove the hypothesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2010). Class differences: Online education in the United States. http://sloanconsortium.org/sites/default/files/class_differences.pdf. Accessed 5 July 2011.

  • Barbour, M. K. (2007). Principles of effective web-based content for secondary school students: Teacher and developer perceptions. Journal of Distance Education, 21(3), 93–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bi, X. (2000). Instructional design attributes of web-based courses. Paper presented at the Proceedings of WebNet World Conference on the WWW and Internet 2000, Chesapeake, VA.

  • Bybee, R. W., & Landes, N. M. (1988). Science for life and living: Integrating science, technology, and health. Science and Children, 25(8), 36–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Carlson Powell, J., Westbrook, A., et al. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. Colorado Springs, CO: BSCS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, M. Y., & Ho, C. M. (2008). A study on applying the variation theory to Chinese communicative writing. Asian Social Science, 4(10), 14–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Concannon, J. P., & Aulgur, L. (2011). An interdisciplinary theme: Topographic maps and plate tectonics. Science Activities: Classroom Projects and Curriculum Ideas, 48(2), 49–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dogru-Atay, P., & Tekkaya, C. (2008). Promoting students’ learning in genetics with the learning cycle. Journal of Experimental Education, 76(3), 259–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, D. M., Allison, S., Coombes, H., Case, J., & Linder, C. J. (2006). Using variation to enhance learning in engineering. International Journal of Engineering Education, 22(1), 102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, D. M., & Linder, C. J. (2009). Teaching in higher education through the use of variation: Examples from distillation, physics and process dynamics. European Journal of Engineering Education, 34(4), 369–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, D. M., Pillay, R., Tjatindi, L., & Case, J. M. (2007). Enhancing the learning of fluid mechanics using computer simulations. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(4), 381–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, A., Watts, D., Croston, J., & Durkin, C. (2002). Evaluating online CPD using educational criteria derived from the experiential learning cycle. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(4), 367–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanuscin, D. L., & Lee, M. H. (2008). Using the learning cycle as a model for teaching the learning cycle to preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 20(2), 51–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. D., & Aragon, S. R. (2003). An instructional strategy framework for online learning environments. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 100, 31–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanuka, H., & Anderson, T. (1999). Using constructivism in technology-mediated learning: Constructing order out of the chaos in the literature. Radical Pedagogy, 1(2). http://auspace.athabascau.ca/bitstream/2149/728/1/Using%20Constructivism%20in%20Technology-Mediated%20Learning_%20_br_Constructing%20Order.pdf. Accessed 10 Nov 2013.

  • Karplus, R., & Thier, H. D. (1967). A new look at elementary school science, new trends in curriculum and instruction series. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keogh, B., & Naylor, S. (1996). Scientists and primary schools: A practical guide. Manchester: Millgate House Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, A. E. (1988). A better way to teach biology. American Biology Teacher, 50(5), 266–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, A. E. (1994). Science teaching and the development of thinking. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, A. (2008). Dragging in a dynamic geometry environment through the lens of variation. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 13(2), 135–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linder, C., & Fraser, D. (2006). Using a variation approach to enhance physics learning in a college classroom. The Physics Teacher, 44(9), 63–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, T.-C., Peng, H., Wu, W.-H., & Lin, M.-S. (2009). The effects of mobile natural-science learning based on the 5E learning cycle: A case study. Educational Technology and Society, 12(4), 344–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malamitsa, K., Kokkotas, P., & Kasoutas, M. (2008). Graph/chart interpretation and reading comprehension as critical thinking skills. Science Education International, 19(4), 371–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandrin, P.-A., & Preckel, D. (2009). Effect of similarity-based guided discovery learning on conceptual performance. School Science and Mathematics, 109(3), 133–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marek, E. A., Gerber, B. L., & Cavallo, A. M. (1999). Literacy through the learning cycle. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED455088.

  • Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography—describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10(2), 177–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., Runesson, U., & Tsui, A. B. M. (2004a). The space of learning. In F. Marton & A. B. M. Tsui (Eds.), Classroom discourse and the space of learning (pp. 3–40). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., & Trigwell, K. (2000). Variatio est mater studiorum [Variation Is the Mother of Learning]. Invited contribution. Higher Education Research and Development, 19(3), 381–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., Tsui, A. B. M., Chik, P. P. M., Ko, P. Y., & Lo, M. L. (2004b). Classroom discourse and the space of learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. E. (2007). Organizing data in tables and charts: Different criteria for different tasks. Teaching Statistics: An International Journal for Teachers, 29(3), 98–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musheno, B. V., & Lawson, A. E. (1999). Effects of learning cycle and traditional text on comprehension of science concepts by students at differing reasoning levels. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(1), 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, R. (1999). Exploring strategies for online teaching and learning. Distance Education, 20(2), 240–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pang, M. F. (2003). Two faces of variation: On continuity in the phenomenographic movement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(2), 145–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pang, M. F., Linder, C., & Fraser, D. (2006). Beyond lesson studies and design experiments—using theoretical tools in practice and finding out how they work. International Review of Economia Education, 5(1), 28–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pang, M. F., & Marton, F. (2003). Beyond “Lesson Study”: Comparing two ways of facilitating the grasp of some economic concepts. Instructional Science, 31(3), 175–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pang, M. F., & Marton, F. (2005). Learning theory as teaching resource: Enhancing students’ understanding of economic concepts. Instructional Science, 33(2), 159–191. doi:10.1007/s11251-005-2811-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rovai, A. P., & Downey, J. R. (2010). Why some distance education programs fail while others succeed in a global environment. Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 141–147. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.07.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowntree, D. (1995). Teaching and learning online: A correspondence education for the 21st century? British Journal of Educational Technology, 26(3), 205–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruey, S. (2010). A case study of constructivist instructional strategies for adult online learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(5), 706–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneckenberg, D., Ehlers, U., & Adelsberger, H. (2011). Web 2.0 and competence-oriented design of learning-potentials and implications for higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 747–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sendag, S., & Odabasi, H. F. (2009). Effects of an online problem based learning course on content knowledge acquisition and critical thinking skills. Computers and Education, 53(1), 132–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamp, N., & O’Brien, T. (2005). GK-12 partnership: A model to advance change in science education. BioScience, 55(1), 70–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su, C. Y., Chiu, C. H., & Wang, T. I. (2010). The development of SCORM-conformant learning content based on the learning cycle using participatory design. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 26(5), 392–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swarat, S., Light, G., Park, E. J., & Drane, D. (2011). A typology of undergraduate students’ conceptions of size and scale: Identifying and characterizing conceptual variation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(5), 512–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallent-Runnels, M. K., Thomas, J. A., Lan, W. Y., Cooper, S., Ahern, T. C., Shaw, S. M., et al. (2006). Teaching courses online: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 93–135. doi:10.3102/00346543076001093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thota, N., & Whitfield, R. (2010). Holistic approach to learning and teaching introductory object-oriented programming. Computer Science Education, 20(2), 103–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thune, M., & Eckerdal, A. (2009). Variation theory applied to students’ conceptions of computer programming. European Journal of Engineering Education, 34(4), 339–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsoi, M. F., & Goh, N. K. (2008). Addressing cognitive processes in e-learning: TSOI hybrid learning model. US-China Education Review, 5(7), 29–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Udall, A. J., & Daniels, J. E. (1991). Creating the thoughtful classroom: Strategies to promote student thinking. Arizona: Zephyr Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vikstrom, A. (2008). What is intended, what is realized, and what is learned? Teaching and learning biology in the primary school classroom. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19(3), 211–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yukselturk, E., & Bulut, S. (2007). Predictors for student success in an online course. Educational Technology and Society, 10(2), 71–83.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tzone-I Wang.

Appendix: The five questions classified as the analysis level in bloom’s taxonomy in the posttest

Appendix: The five questions classified as the analysis level in bloom’s taxonomy in the posttest

  1. 1.

    Which technique of building igloos done by Inuit listed below is the most important element for reducing the heat transfer?

    1. A.

      Constructing a short tunnel

    2. B.

      Filling the gaps between the ice blocks with snow

    3. C.

      Cutting and stacking snow blocks as the building materials

    4. D.

      Using animal skins as the door flaps

  2. 2.

    Which design of refrigerator does not influence the thermal insulation effects of heat convection in gases?

    1. A.

      A freezer on the top of cabinet

    2. B.

      Multi drawers

    3. C.

      Multi doors

    4. D.

      Vacuumed plastic liners

  3. 3.

    The insulating capability of a material is associated with the thermal conductivity. Low thermal conductivity is equivalent to high insulating capability. A space shuttle orbiter sustains the heat of 1,650 °C while reentering the atmospheric. So the entire orbiter surface need different materials with required heat protection in varying parts. Please sort the thermal conductivity of materials of varying parts from low to high.

    1. A.

      The leading edges of wings and nose cap > The orbiter’s exterior bottom surfaces > The orbiter’s exterior top surfaces

    2. B.

      The orbiter’s exterior bottom surfaces > The leading edges of wings and nose cap > The orbiter’s exterior top surfaces

    3. C.

      The orbiter’s exterior bottom surfaces > The orbiter’s exterior top surfaces > The leading edges of wings and nose cap

    4. D.

      The orbiter’s exterior top surfaces > The leading edges of wings and nose cap > The orbiter’s exterior bottom surfaces

  4. 4.

    To keep it warm in a house in winter, which way listed below is the lowest thermal insulation effect than that of any others?

    1. A.

      Painting the outer walls of a house black

    2. B.

      A house faces south

    3. C.

      Using vacuumed double glass windows

    4. D.

      Building a house with hollow bricks

  5. 5.

    Which way of slowing down the melting of ice cream is wrong?

    1. A.

      Putting ice cream in a styrofoam box

    2. B.

      Putting ice cream in a thermos bottle

    3. C.

      Covering ice cream with a quilt

    4. D.

      Blowing ice cream with a fan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hsu, CC., Wang, TI. Enhancing concept comprehension in a web-based course using a framework integrating the learning cycle with variation theory. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 15, 211–222 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-013-9311-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-013-9311-8

Keywords

Navigation