Abstract
To provide more insights into inconsistent findings on the relationship of organizational commitment to effectiveness, this study conducted a questionnaire survey among 188 academics in Beijing. Analysis of survey responses suggested that organizational commitment presented significant relationships to performance and effectiveness. These relationships varied with the nature of commitment dimensions. Besides, performance mediated the relationships of commitment dimensions to effectiveness in teaching and research. These relationships could be partly explained with faculty’s personal goals, available resources, perceptions of reward/effort balance, and the contribution of teaching and research activities to teaching outcome and research output. These findings enrich the literature by identifying performance as an intervening variable in the relationship of organizational commitment to effectiveness. Meanwhile, these findings provide practical implications for the promotion of Chinese academics’ teaching outcome and research output.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrami, P. C., d’Apollonia, S., & Rosenfield, S. (1997). The dimensionality of student ratings of instruction: What we know and what we do not. In R. P. Perry & J. C. Smart (Eds.), Effective teaching in higher education: Research and practice (pp. 321–367). New York: Agathon Press.
Agesa, J., Granger, M., & Price, G. N. (2002). The research productivity of black economists: Ranking by individuals and doctoral alma mater (pp. 7–24). Fall: The Review of Black Political Economy.
Baird, L. L. (1986). What characterizes a productive research department? Research in Higher Education, 25(3), 211–225.
Ballantyne, R., Bain, J. D., & Packer, J. (1999). Researching university teaching in Australia: Themes and issues in academics’ reflections. Studies in Higher Education, 24(2), 237–257.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.
Becker, H. S. (1960). Note on the concept of commitment. American Journal of Sociology, 66, 32–42.
Bella, M. L., & Toutkoushian, R. K. (1999). Faculty time allocations and research productivity: Gender, race, and family effects. The Review of Higher Education, 22(4), 367–390.
Blackburn, R. T., & Lawrence, J. H. (1995). Faculty at work. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10(2), 99–109.
Brew, A. (1999). Research and teaching: Changing relationships in a changing context. Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), 291–301.
Campbell, J. P. (1994). Alternative models of job performance and their implications for selection and classification. In M. G. Rumsey, C. B. Walker, & J. H. Harris (Eds.), Personnel selection and classification (pp. 33–52). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Association Inc.
Centra, J. A. (1993). Reflective faculty evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Chang, M. K. (1998). Predicting unethical behavior: A comparison of the theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 1825–1834.
Chughtai, A. A., & Zafar, S. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of organizational commitment among Pakistani university teachers. Applied Human Resource Management Research, 11(1), 39–64.
Cohen, A. (2003). Multiple commitments in the workplace: An integrative approach. London: Lawrence Erlhaum Associates.
Dilts, D., Bialik, D., & Harber, L. (1994). Assessing what professors do: An introduction to academic performance appraisal in higher education. Westport: Greenwood Press.
Dramstad, S. A. (2004). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment among teachers in Norway: A comparative study of selected schools from public and private educational systems. Berrien Springs: Andrews University.
Dunham, R. B., Grube, J. A., & Castaneda, M. B. (1994). Organizational commitment: The utility of an integrative definition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(3), 370–380.
Durning, B., & Jenkins, A. (2005). Teaching/research relations in departments: The perspectives of built environment academics. Studies in Higher Education, 30(4), 407–426.
Eisinga, R., Teelken, C., & Doorewaard, H. (2010). Assessing cross-national invariance of the three-component model of organizational commitment: A six-country study of European university faculty. Cross-Cultural Research, 44(4), 341–373.
Feldman, K. A. (1997). Identifying exemplary teachers and teaching: Evidence from student ratings. In R. P. Perry & J. C. Smart (Eds.), Effective teaching in higher education: Research and practice (pp. 368–395). New York: Agathon Press.
Fischer, J. L., & Cation, L. J. (2005). Developments: Impact of a residency research program on research activity, faculty involvement, and institutional cost. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 17(2), 159–165.
French, R., Rayner, C., Rees, G., & Rumbles, S. (2006). Organizational behavior. Queensland: Wiley.
Gillespie, D., Dolsak, N., Kochis, B., Krabill, R., Lerum, K., Peterson, A., et al. (2005). Research circles: Supporting the scholarship of junior faculty. Innovative Higher Education, 30(3), 149–161.
Hakanen, J. J., Schaufeli, W. B., & Ahola, K. (2008). The job demands-resources model: A three-year cross-lagged study of burnout, depression, commitment, and work engagement. Work & Stress, 22(3), 224–241.
Ho, K. K. (1998). Research output among the three faculties of Business, Education, Humanities and Social Sciences in six Hong Kong universities. Higher Education, 36, 195–208.
Hu, Q., & Gill, T. G. (2000). IS faculty research output: Influential factors and implications. Information Resources Management Journal, 13(2), 15–25.
Hu, J., & Mo, Y. (2005). A research on organizational commitment and job performance of university teachers. Journal of Zhejiang Institute of Science and Technology, 22(4), 420–429.
Jing, L. Z. (2010). The impact of work stress and organizational commitment on university faculty’s task performance and effectiveness in Mainland China. Hong Kong: The University of Hong Kong.
Kocak, R. (2006). The validity and reliability of the teachers’ performance evaluation scale. Educational Sciences: Theory and practice, 6(3), 799–808.
Kreber, C. (2000). How university teaching award winners conceptualize academic work: Some further thoughts on the meaning of scholarship. Research in Higher Education, 5(1), 61–79.
Lawrence, J., Ott, M., & Bell, A. (2012). Faculty organizational commitment and citizenship. Research in Higher Education, 53(3), 325–352.
Liddle, B. J., Westergren, A. J., & Duke, D. L. (1997). Time allocation and research productivity among counseling faculty. Psychological Reports, 80(1), 339–344.
Ling, W. Q., Fang, L. L., & Zhang, Z. C. (2002). Research on Chinese employees’ organizational commitment. Social Sciences in China (Autumn), 59–67.
Liu, Y. L. (2006). The relationship between job stress and job performance and the moderating effect of locus of control among teachers in universities. Dalian: Dalian Polytechnic University.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2006). New directions in goal-setting theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(5), 265–268.
Lu, G. L. (2005). Research on organizational commitment of university teachers. Kaifeng: Henan University.
Marsh, H. W., & Hattie, J. (2002). The relation between research productivity and teaching effectiveness: Complementary, antagonistic or independent constructs? Journal of Higher Education, 73(5), 603–638.
Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 171–194.
McWey, L. M., Henderson, T. L., & Piercy, F. P. (2006). Cooperative learning through collaborative faculty-student research teams. Family Relations, 55(2), 252–262.
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89.
Meyer, J. P., & Herscovitch, L. (2001). Commitment in the workplace toward a general model. Human Resource Management Review, 11, 299–326.
Motowidlo, S. J., Borman, W. C., & Schmit, M. J. (1997). A theory of individual differences in task and contextual performance. Human Performance, 10(2), 71–83.
Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (1982). Employee-organizational linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. New York: Academic Press.
Murphy, P. R., & Jackson, S. E. (1999). Managing work role performance: Challenging the twenty-first century organizations and their employees. In D. R. Ilgen & E. D. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of performance: Implications for staffing, motivations, and development (pp. 325–365). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Murray, H. G. (1997). Effective teaching behaviors in the college classroom. In R. P. Perry & J. C. Smart (Eds.), Effective teaching in higher education: Research and Practice (pp. 171–204). New York: Agathon Press.
Print, M., & Hattie, J. (1997). Measuring quality in universities: An approach to weighing research output. Higher Education, 33, 453–469.
Quinlan, K. M., & Akerlind, G. S. (2000). Factors affecting departmental peer collaboration for faculty development: Two cases in context. Higher Education, 40, 23–52.
Riketta, M. (2002). Attitudinal organizational commitment and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 257–266.
Robbins, S. P. (2003). Organizational behavior (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Searle, B. J., Bright, J. E. H., & Bochner, S. (1999). Testing the 3-factor model of occupational stress: The impact of demands, control and social support on a mail sorting task. Work & Stress, 13(3), 268–279.
Sharobeam, M. H., & Howard, K. (2002). Teaching demands versus research productivity. Journal of College Science Teaching, 31(7), 436–442.
Shirabe, M. (2004). Measures of performance of universities and their faculty in Japan. Information Knowledge Systems Management, 4, 167–178.
Shong, A. H., & Cai, Y. H. (2005). Teacher organizational commitment construct: Confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Development and Education, 2, 48–51.
Shouksmith, G. (1994). Variables related to organizational commitment in health professionals. Psychological Reports, 74, 707–711.
Siegrist, J. (1996). Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1, 27–41.
Siu, Q. L. (2003). Job stress and job performance among employees in Hong Kong: The role of Chinese work values and organizational commitment. International Journal of Psychology, 38(6), 337–347.
Smeby, J. C. (1998). Knowledge production and knowledge transmission: The interaction between research and teaching at universities. Teaching in Higher Education, 3(1), 5–19.
Smeby, J. C., & Try, S. (2005). Departmental contexts and faculty research activity in Norway. Research in Higher Education, 46(6), 593–619.
Song, S. Q., & Qin, J. L. (2006). Investigation on organizational commitment of kindergarten teachers. Theory and Practice of Education, 26(6), 59–61.
Stack, S. (2003). Research productivity and student evaluation of teaching in social science classes: A research note. Research in Higher Education, 44(5), 539–556.
Stack, S. (2004). Gender, children and research productivity. Research in Higher Education, 45(8), 891–918.
Tang, T. L. P., & Chamberlain, M. (1997). Attitudes toward research and teaching: Differences between administrators and faculty members. The Journal of Higher Education, 68(2), 212–227.
Teodorescu, D. (2000). Correlates of faculty publication productivity: A cross-national analysis. Higher Education, 39, 201–222.
Timperley, H., & Robinson, V. M. J. (2000). Workload and the professional culture of teachers. Educational Management & Administration, 28(1), 47.
Uctug, Y., & Koksal, G. (2003). An academic performance measurement system and its impact on quality of engineering faculty work at Middle East Technical University. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(3), 251–264.
Wang, X., Liao, J., Xia, D., & Chang, T. (2010). The impact of organizational justice on work performance: Mediating effects of organizational commitment and leader-member exchange. International Journal of Manpower, 31(6), 660–677.
Wiener, Y. (1982). Commitment in organizations: A normative view. Academy of Management Review, 2(3), 418–428.
Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601.
Wong, C. S., Wong, T. Y., Hui, C., & Law, K. S. (2001). The significant role of Chinese employees’ organizational commitment: Implications for managing employees in Chinese societies. Journal of World Business, 36, 326–340.
Wu, X. P., Xu, F. Y., & Zhou, Y. (2006). Determinants of university teachers’ job performance. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 24(1), 30–37.
Xu, S. G., & Lu, G. L. (2008). Research on the relationships between organizational commitment of university teachers and their job performance. Psychological Science, 31(4), 987–988.
Zeffane, W., & Fitzgerald, F. (2006). Organizational behaviour: Core concepts and applications. Milton: Wiley.
Zhao, X., Li, M., & Tan, T. (2009). The relationship between university faculty’s organizational commitment and job performance. Human Resource Management Review, 99–100.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jing, L., Zhang, D. The mediation of performance in the relationship of organizational commitment to university faculty’s effectiveness. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 15, 141–153 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-013-9309-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-013-9309-2