Skip to main content
Log in

The development of Internet use for communication among undergraduate students: a multilevel analysis

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Education Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As few studies utilized longitudinal design to examine the development of Internet use for communication, the purpose of this study was to examine the effects of gender and initial Internet use for communication on subsequent use. The study sample was 280 undergraduate students who were assessed at five time points. Hierarchical linear models were used to analyze longitudinal data regarding the development of three Internet mediums, email, instant messaging, and chat. The negative correlation between initial status and growth rate demonstrated that students using one particular medium relatively heavily tended to grow slower, and thus students with low initial use of a medium increased their use of that medium faster and thus closed the gap between students with low and high initial status. Findings about the use of a certain medium on the use of others were mixed with four models supporting neither displacement nor augmentation hypothesis and two remaining models supporting the displacement hypothesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amiel, T., & Sargent, S. L. (2004). Individual differences in internet usage motives. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 711–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anolli, L., Villani, D., & Riva, G. (2005). Personality of people using chat: An on-line research. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 8, 89–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnett, J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, N. S. (2004). See you online: Gender issues in college student use of instant messaging. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23, 397–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boneva, B., Kraut, R., & Frohlich, D. (2001). Using email for personal relationships: The difference gender makes. American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 530–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, V. (1997). Psychology of computer use: XLVII. Parameters of internet use, abuse and addiction: The first 90 days of the internet usage survey. Psychological Reports, 80, 879–882.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, S. E. (2003). Preference for online social interaction: A theory of problematic internet use and psychosocial well-being. Communication Research, 30, 625–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copher, J. I., Kanfer, A. G., & Walker, M. B. (2002). Everyday communication patterns of heavy and light emails users. In B. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The internet in everyday life (pp. 263–288). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Graphics, Visualization and Usability Center. (1997a). GVU’s 6th WWW user survey. Atlanta, GA: Georgia Tech Research Corporation. Retrieved January 2, 2005, from http://www.gatech.edu/user-surveys/survey-10-1996/.

  • Graphics, Visualization and Usability Center. (1997b). GVU’s 7th WWW user survey. Atlanta, GA: Georgia Tech Research Corporation. Retrieved January 2, 2005, from http://www.gatech.edu/user-surveys/survey-1997-04/.

  • Graphics, Visualization and Usability Center. (1998). GVU’s 8th WWW user survey. Atlanta, GA: Georgia Tech Research Corporation. Retrieved January 2, 2005, from http://www.gatech.edu/user-surveys/survey-1997-10/.

  • GVU’s WWW User Surveys. (1998). Chat groups. Retrieved January 2, 2005, from http://www-static.cc.gatech.edu/gvu/user_surveys/survey-1998-10/graphs/use/q110.htm.

  • Haworth, B. (1999). An analysis of the determinants of student email use. Journal of Education for Business, 75, 55–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Y., Smith, V., & Westbrook, N. (2004). Friendships through IM: Examining the relationship between instant messaging and intimacy. Journal of Computer-Mediate Communication, 10(1).

  • Jackson, L. A., Ervin, K. S., Gardner, P. D., & Schmitt, N. (2001). Gender and the internet: Women communicating and men searching. Sex Roles, 44, 363–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. (2002). The Internet goes to college: How students are living in the future with today’s technology. ERIC Document ED 472669.

  • Katz, J. E., & Rice, R. E. (2002). Syntopia: Access, civic involvement, and social interaction on the Net. In B. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The internet in everyday life (pp. 114–138). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53, 1017–1031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R., Scherlis, W., Mukhopadhyay, T., Manning, J., & Kiesler, S. (1996). The HomeNet field trial of residential Internet services. Communications of the ACM, 39, 55–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuenki, J. J. (1999–2000). Trends in college students’ computer use and ownership. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 28, 21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanthier, R. P., & Windham, R. C. (2004). Internet use and college adjustment: The moderating role of gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 591–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenhart, A., Rainie, L., & Lewis, O. (2000). Tracking online life: How women use the internet to cultivate relationships with family and friends. Retrieved June 10, 2005, from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/Report1.pdf.

  • Lenhart, A., Rainie, L., & Lewis, O. (2001). Teenage life online: The rise of the instant message generation and the Internet’s impact on friendships and family relationships. Retrieved August 13, 2006, from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Teens_Report.pdf.

  • Morahan-Martin, J. (1998). Males, females, and the internet. In J. Gackenbach (Ed.), Psychology and the internet (pp. 169–197). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morahan-Martin, J., & Schumacher, P. (2003). Loneliness and social uses of the internet. Computers and Human Behavior, 19, 659–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nie, N. H. (2001). Sociability, interpersonal relations, and the internet. American Behaviorist Scientist, 45, 420–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nie, N. H., & Erbring, L. (2002). Internet and society: A preliminary report. IT & Society, 1, 275–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nie, N. H., Hillygus, D. S., & Erbring, L. (2002). Internet use, interpersonal relations, and sociability. In B. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The internet in everyday life (pp. 215–243). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odell, P. M., Korgen, K. O., Schumacher, P., & Delucchi, M. (2000). Internet use among female and male college students. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 5, 855–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ono, H., & Zavodny, M. (2003). Gender and the internet. Social Science Quarterly, 84, 111–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peris, R., Gimeno, M. A., Pinazo, D., Ortet, G., Carrero, V., Sanchiz, M., et al. (2002). Online chat rooms: Virtual spaces of interaction for socially oriented people. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 5, 43–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitkow, J. E., & Kehoe, C. M. (1996). Emerging trends in the www user population. Communications of the ACM, 39, 106–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S., Bryk, A., Cheong, Y. F., & du Toit, M. (2004). HLM 6: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Application and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. P., Kestnbaum, M., Neustadtl, A., & Alvarez, A. S. (2002). The internet and other uses of time. In B. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The internet in everyday life (pp. 244–262). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rollman, J. B., Krug, K., & Parente, F. (2000). The chat room phenomenon: Reciprocal communication in cyberspace. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 3, 161–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savichi, V., & Kelley, M. (2000). Computer mediated communication: Gender and group composition. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 5, 817–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, R., End, C., Kraan, E., Cole, A., Campbell, J., Birchmeier, Z., et al. (2000). The internet gender gap among college students: Forgotten but not gone? CyberPsychology and Behavior, 3, 885–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shklovski, I, Kraut, R., & Rainie, L. (2004). The internet and social participation: Contrasting cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(1).

  • Sierpe, E. (2005). Gender distinctiveness, communicative competence, and the problem of gender adjustments in computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behaviors, 21, 127–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Harris Poll # 40. (2005). May 12, 2005, Almost three-quarters of all US adults (An estimated 163 million) go online. Retrieved July 23, 2006, from http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=569.

  • UCLA Center for Communication Policy. (2000). The UCLA Internet report: “Surveying the digital future.” Retrieved August 12, 2006, from http://www.ccp.ucla.edu.

  • Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007). Online communication and adolescent well-being: Testing the stimulation versus the displacement hypothesis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1169–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, I. M., & Richmond-Abbott, M. (2005). Gender and the internet: Causes of variation in access, level, and scope of use. Social Science Quarterly, 86, 252–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chiungjung Huang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huang, C. The development of Internet use for communication among undergraduate students: a multilevel analysis. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 12, 215–226 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-010-9127-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-010-9127-8

Keywords

Navigation