Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Goal orientations and metacognitive skills of normal technical and normal academic students on project work

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Education Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 2000, the Singapore Ministry of Education launched Project Work (PW) to encourage the application of knowledge across disciplines, and to develop thinking, communication, collaboration and metacognitive skills. This preliminary findings of a large scale study examines the role of goal orientations (achievement goals and social goals) in predicting metacognition and enjoyment in project work of Secondary Two Normal Technical (NT, less academically inclined students) and Normal Academic (NA) students. Both achievement goals and social goals are significant predictors of metacognition and enjoyment of PW. NA students adopt more mastery approach and performance avoidance goals than NT students whilst NT students tend to value more social approval from others. Implications of the findings will be discussed with practical suggestions to help teachers design successful PW for the less academically inclined students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260–267. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderman, H. A., & Anderman, E. M. (1999). Social predictors of changes in student achievement goal orientations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 21–37. doi:10.1006/ceps.1998.0978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderman, E. M., Eccles, J. S., Yoon, K. S., Roeser, R., Wigfield, A., & Blumenfeld, P. (2001). Learning to value mathematics and reading: Relations to mastery and performance-oriented instructional practices. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(1), 76–95. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderman, E. M., Griesinger, T., & Westerfield, G. (1998). Motivation and cheating during early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 84–93. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.1.84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, R. (2006). Are mastery and ability goals both adaptive? Evaluation, initial goal construction and the quality of engagement. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 595–611. doi:10.1348/000709905X52319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, R. H., & Andrews, B. (2002). Cognitive and psychological factors underlying secondary school work students’ feelings towards group work. Educational Psychology, 1, 75–92. doi:10.1080/01443410120101260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, T. T., & Chang, S. C. A. (2003). Assessing the project work: A teachers’ and students’ perspective. Paper presented at the Asian Pacific Conference on Education, Singapore, 2–4 June 2002.

  • Chua, J. J. (2004). Evaluating the effects of project work on learning in a primary school. Unpublished Master’s thesis, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

  • Coutinho, S. A. (2007). The relationship between goals, metacognition, and academic success. The Journal of Doctoral Research in Education, 7, 39–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowson, M., & McInerney, D. M. (1997). The development of the goal orientation and learning strategies survey (GOALS-S): A quantitative instrument designed to measure students’ achievement goals and learning strategies in Australian educational settings. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. Retrieved November 12, 2007, from Eric database.

  • Dowson, M., & McInerney, D. M. (2003). What do students say about their motivational goals? Towards a more complex and dynamic perspective on student motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 91–113. doi:10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00010-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowson, M., & McInerney, D. M. (2004). The development and validation of the Goal Orientation and Learning Strategies Survey (GOALS-S). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 290–310. doi:10.1177/0013164403251335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ee, J. (1998). Relationships among teachers’ classroom orientations, strategy-based instruction, and students’ goal orientations, self-regulated learning and achievement. Unpublished Phd Thesis, The University of Newcastle, Australia.

  • Ee, J., & Atputhasamy, L. (2002). Differences in teacher feedback for HA and LD students. Teaching & Learning, 23(1), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ee, J., Lee, O. K., & Potter, G. (2004). Teachers’ understanding and practices of strategy-based instruction and goal orientations for students’ self-regulation: Findings across cultures. In J. Ee, A. Chang, & O. S. Tan (Eds.), Thinking about thinking: What educators need to know (pp. 108–141). Singapore: Mc-Graw Hill Education. Chapter 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ee, J., & Moore, P. J. (2004). Motivation, strategies and achievement: A comparison of teachers and students in high, average and low achieving classes. In J. Ee, A. Chang, & O. S. Tan (Eds.), Thinking about thinking: What educators need to know (pp. 142–160). Singapore: Mc-Graw Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218–232. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501–519. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, E. S., & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(1), 5–12. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, J. K., Smith, E. M., Weissbein, D. A., Gully, S. M., & Salas, E. (1998). Relationships of goal orientation, metacognitive activity, and practice strategies with learning outcomes and transfer. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 218–233. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurdish, G. (2007). The project work enterprise in Singapore: Progression or regression? Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education, Fremantle, Perth, Australia, 25–29 November.

  • Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Pintrich, P. R., Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. (2002). Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 638–645. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinkley, J. W., McInerney, D. M., & Marsh, H. W. (2001, April 10–14). The multi-faceted structure of school achievement motivation: A case for social goals. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA. Retrieved November 6, 2007, from Eric database.

  • Malka, A., & Covington, M. V. (2005). Perceiving school performance as instrumental to future goal attainment: Effects on graded performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 60–80. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.04.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAuley, E., Duncan, T. E., & Tammen, V. V. (1989). Psychometric properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a competitive sport setting: A confirmatory factor analysis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 60, 48–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. (1993a). Beyond “cold” conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63, 167–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993b). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning—MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801–813. doi:10.1177/0013164493053003024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, T. L. S. (2002). Using project work as a motivating factor in lower secondary mathematics. Unpublished Master’s thesis, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

  • Theodosiou, A., & Papaioannou, A. (2006). Motivational climate, achievement goals, and metacognitive activity in physical education and exercise involvement in out- of- school settings. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 7, 361–379. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2005.10.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschannen-Moren, M., Uline, C., Hoy, A. W., & Mackley, T. (2000). Creating smarter schools through collaboration. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(3), 247–271. (online).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urdan, T. C. (1997). Examining the relations among early adolescent students’ goals and friends’ orientation toward effort and achievement in school. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 165–191. doi:10.1006/ceps.1997.0930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urdan, T. C., & Maehr, M. L. (1995). Beyond a two goal theory of motivation and achievement. A case for social goals. Review of Educational Research, 65, 213–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urdan, T. C., & Mestas, M. (2006). The goals behind performance goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 354–365. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.2.354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wentzel, K. R. (1991). Social and academic goals at school: Motivation and achievement in context. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 7, pp. 185–212). Greenwich, Connecticut: Jai Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolters, C. A. (2004). Advancing achievement goal theory: Using goal structures and goal orientations to predict students’ motivation, cognition and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 236–250. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is made possible by the funding obtained from the Education Research Fund EP 3/05 TOS: Enhancing Learning for Normal Stream Students: Insights into cognitive and motivational processes in Project Work awarded by the Ministry of Education, Singapore.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Psychological Studies Academic Group, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, 1 Nanyang Walk, Singapore, 637616, Singapore

    J. Ee, C. K. J. Wang, C. Koh, O. S. Tan & W. C. Liu

Authors
  1. J. Ee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. K. J. Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C. Koh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. O. S. Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. W. C. Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Ee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ee, J., Wang, C.K.J., Koh, C. et al. Goal orientations and metacognitive skills of normal technical and normal academic students on project work. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 10, 337–344 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-009-9033-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-009-9033-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation