Advertisement

Fisheries Science

, Volume 84, Issue 2, pp 335–347 | Cite as

Impacts of the nonlinear relationship between abundance and its index in a tuned virtual population analysis

  • Midori HashimotoEmail author
  • Hiroshi Okamura
  • Momoko Ichinokawa
  • Kazuhiko Hiramatsu
  • Takashi Yamakawa
Original Article Fisheries

Abstract

The abundance index used in a tuned virtual population analysis (VPA) is usually assumed to be proportional to actual abundance. However, the actual abundance and abundance index do not always have a linear relationship. Such nonlinearity can cause biases in abundance estimates as well as retrospective biases arising from systematic differences in abundance estimates when more data are successively added. Severe retrospective biases can damage the reliability of stock assessments. In this study, we use an approach to estimate an additional parameter that controls the nonlinearity in a tuned VPA. A performance test using simulated data revealed that the tuned VPA was able to accurately estimate the nonlinearity parameter and thus yielded less biased abundance estimates and smaller retrospective biases. We also found that estimating the nonlinearity parameters was effective even under other model misspecification scenarios, such as disregarding historical increases in catchability and time-varying natural mortality. Moreover, we applied this approach to some Japanese fish stocks and evaluated its validity. We found that estimating the nonlinearity parameters in the tuned VPA enhances the reliability of fisheries stock assessments.

Keywords

Hyperstability Maximum likelihood method Retrospective bias Stock assessment 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We appreciate the valuable comments of Drs. Hiromu Zenitani, Shota Nishijima and Sho Furuichi on our manuscript. This study was supported by the Japan Science and Technology Agency, Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology program. Finally, we thank Dr. Yutaka Kurita and two anonymous reviewers whose constructive comments improved our manuscript.

References

  1. Brooks EN, Legault CM (2016) Retrospective forecasting—evaluating performance of stock projection for New England groundfish stocks. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 73:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Butterworth DS (1981) The value of catch-statistics-based management techniques for heavily fished pelagic stocks with special reference to the recent decline of the southwest African pilchard stock. In: Haley K (ed) Applied operations research in fishing, NATO conference series II, vol 10. Plenum, London, pp 441–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen Y, Jiao Y, Sun CL, Chen X (2008) Calibrating virtual population analysis for fisheries stock assessment. Aquat Living Resour 21:89–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chimura Y, Yamashita Y, Tanaka H, Funamoto T (2016) Stock assessment and evaluation for Sea of Japan stock of walleye pollock (fiscal year 2015). In: Marine fisheries stock assessment and evaluation for Japanese waters (fiscal year 2015/2016), Fisheries Agency and Fisheries Research Agency of Japan, pp 337–393 (In Japanese) Google Scholar
  5. Deroba JJ (2014) Evaluating consequences of adjusting fish stock assessment estimates of biomass for retrospective patterns using Mohn’s rho. N Am J Fish Manage 34:380–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deroba JJ, Schueller AM (2013) Performance of stock assessments with misspecified age- and time-varying natural mortality. Fish Res 146:27–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dunn A, Harley SJ, Doonan IJ, Bull B (2000) Calculation and interpretation of catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE) indices. NZ Fish Assess Rep 2000/1. Ministry of Fisheries, Wellington, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  8. Fisheries Agency and Fisheries Research Agency of Japan (2016) Marine fisheries stock assessment and evaluation for Japanese waters (fiscal year 2015/2016) (In Japanese) Google Scholar
  9. Harley SJ, Myers RA, Dunn A (2001) Is catch-per-unit-effort proportional to abundance? Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:1760–1772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hilborn R, Walters C (1992) Quantitative fisheries stock assessment: choice, dynamics and uncertainty. Chapman and Hall, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. ICES (2002) Report of the Working Group on Methods on Fish Stock Assessments. ICES Headquarters, Copenhagen, Denmark, 3–7 December 2001. ICES CM 2002/D:01Google Scholar
  12. ICES (2007) Report of the Working Group on Methods on Fish Stock Assessments (WGMG). Woods Hole, USA, 13–22 March 2007. ICES CM 2007/RMC:04Google Scholar
  13. ICES (2008) Report of the Working Group on Methods on Fish Stock Assessments (WGMG). Woods Hole, USA, 7–16 March 2008. ICES CM 2008/RMC:03Google Scholar
  14. Ichinokawa M, Okamura H (2014) Review of stock evaluation methods using VPA for fishery stocks in Japan: implementation with R. Bull Jpn Soc Fish Oceanogr 78:104–113 (in Japanese with English abstract) Google Scholar
  15. Lassen H, Medley P (2001) Virtual population analysis—a practical manual for stock assessment. FAO fisheries technical paper 400Google Scholar
  16. Legault CM (2009) Report of the Retrospective Working Group. January 14-16, 2008, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, US Department of Commerce, Northeast Fish Sci Cent Ref Doc 09-01Google Scholar
  17. Mohn R (1999) The retrospective problem in sequential population analysis: an investigation using cod fishery and simulated data. ICES J Mar Sci 56:473–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mori K, Hiyama Y (2014) Stock assessment and management for walleye pollock in Japan. Fish Sci 80:161–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nakayama Y, Hiramatsu K (2010) Evaluation of the reliability of VPA used for stock assessment for TAC species. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 76:1043–1047 (In Japanese with English abstract) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Okamura H, Yamashita Y, Ichinokawa M (2017) Ridge virtual population analysis to reduce the instability of fishing mortality in the terminal year. ICES J Mar Sci 74:2427–2436Google Scholar
  21. Pope JG (1972) An investigation of the accuracy of virtual population using cohort analysis. Res Bull Inst Comm Northw Atlant Fish 9:65–74Google Scholar
  22. Quin TJ, Deriso RB (1999) Quantitative fish dynamics. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.R-project.org/
  24. Watanabe C, Kamimura Y, Yukami R, Akamine T, Kishida T (2016a) Stock assessment and evaluation for the Pacific stock of Japanese sardine (fiscal year 2015). In: Marine fisheries stock assessment and evaluation for Japanese waters (fiscal year 2015/2016), Fisheries Agency and Fisheries Research Agency of Japan, pp 15–47 (In Japanese) Google Scholar
  25. Watanabe C, Yukami R, Kamimura Y, Akamine T, Watari S (2016b) Stock assessment and evaluation for the Pacific stock of jack mackerel (fiscal year 2015). In: Marine fisheries stock assessment and evaluation for Japanese waters (fiscal year 2015/2016), Fisheries Agency and Fisheries Research Agency of Japan, pp 85–113 (In Japanese) Google Scholar
  26. Wilberg MJ, Thorson JT, Linton BC, Berkson J (2010) Incorporating time-varying catchability into population dynamic stock assessment models. Rev Fish Sci 18:7–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yoda M, Kurota T, Fukuwaka M (2016) Stock assessment and evaluation for the Tsushima warm current stock of jack mackerel (fiscal year 2015). In: Marine fisheries stock assessment and evaluation for Japanese waters (fiscal year 2015/2016), Fisheries Agency and Fisheries Research Agency of Japan, pp 114–145 (In Japanese) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Society of Fisheries Science 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Midori Hashimoto
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hiroshi Okamura
    • 1
  • Momoko Ichinokawa
    • 1
  • Kazuhiko Hiramatsu
    • 2
  • Takashi Yamakawa
    • 3
  1. 1.National Research Institute of Fisheries ScienceJapan Fisheries Research and Education AgencyYokohamaJapan
  2. 2.Atmosphere and Ocean Research InstituteThe University of TokyoKashiwaJapan
  3. 3.Graduate School of Agricultural and Life SciencesThe University of TokyoBunkyoJapan

Personalised recommendations