Fisheries Science

, Volume 82, Issue 6, pp 983–989 | Cite as

Mitigating irrational reputational damage to marine products from radiation contamination

  • Tsutom MiyataEmail author
  • Hiroki Wakamatsu
Original Article Social Science


Many negative influences from the Great East Japan Earthquake of 2011, the subsequent tsunami, and Fukushima disaster, persist in the devastated areas, including reputational damage to the Japanese fishers. The Sanriku brand of wakame seaweed has experienced irrational reputational damage even though almost all of their products have tested negative for radioactivity. To recover from such damage, we tested the effectiveness of countermeasure promotions by measuring the effects of displayed elements on packaging and at a point of purchase (POP) display. Direct counter-promotion, such as mentioning radioactivity levels in seafood, can potentially cause adverse effects by reminding consumers of the radioactive contamination. Accordingly, we analyzed the direct effects of information about radioactive safety and the indirect effects of the information using images of a girl, aquaculture farmers, and a cook and labels of safety and security, inspection, and recovery from the earthquake disaster to identify which elements effectively mitigate irrational reputational damage. We employed conjoint analysis through a web survey. The results indicate that images and labels increase consumer utility without adverse effects. Furthermore, the labels of safety and security and inspection substitute the direct effect of publicizing the radioactivity test results.


Promotion strategy Counterpropaganda Information treatment The Fukushima disaster Conjoint analysis Consumer preference 



This study is funded mainly by the Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Council as part of the “Development research of sustainable production system in fisheries and aquacultures” project. The pictures were used with approval from the Iwate Prefecture Commerce and Marketing Division and Fisheries Promotion Division. We are grateful for the cooperation of these organizations.


  1. 1.
    Morita A (2015) Recovery from earthquake-stricken farmland and nuclear accident. Rep Nippon Agric Res Inst 28:257–268 (in Japanese) Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Suzuki H (2013) “Make an exit!” Challenges toward co-prosperity by producers and distributors: practical method of extensive distribution for low-used resources and unutilized resources. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 79(1):98–99 (in Japanese) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shimizu M (2010) The possibilities and challenges for retailers handling regional brands: focusing on the Osakamon brand vegetables. J Rural Probl 45(4):336–342 (in Japanese with English abstract) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kiyono S (2009) Effects by information statement marketing to consumers in a store. In: Umemoto M (ed) Distinction of behavior buying a fruit and marketing in store. Nourintokeipub, Tokyo, pp 97–112 (in Japanese) Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Miyata T (2010) Basic issues in brand strategy for marine products. In: Lou X et al (eds) Logic and practice for branding marine products. Hokutopub, Tokyo, pp 281–302 (in Japanese) Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ito M, Suzuki M (2005) A study on the confidence and evaluation of the quality guarantee label on agricultural products. J Agric Sci (Tokyo Univ. of Agric.) 50(1):21–30 (in Japanese with English abstract) Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Oishi T, Ominami J, Tamura N, Yagi N (2010) Estimates of the potential demand of Japanese consumers for eco-labeled seafood products. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 76(1):26–33 (in Japanese with English abstract) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ariji M, Matsui T (2012) Grasp of consumer needs and merchandizing strategy for changing fisheries into 6th industry: the case of Miyazu City, Kyoto. J Int Fish 11:1–11 (in Japanese with English abstract) Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fujii Y, Umemoto M, Ooura U, Yamamoto J (2008) Distinction of buying behavior and tool of point-of-purchase marketing in direct selling shop for agricultural products. J Rural Probl 44(1):163–168 (in Japanese) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Miyata T, Wakamatsu H (2015) Irrational reputational damage on wakame seaweed in Sanriku district after the Fukushima nuclear disaster: revealed preference by auction experiment. Fish Sci 81(5):995–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Miyata T, Lou X, Onodera M (2008) Analysis of the competitive power of domestic seafood in a globalization Japanese market: a case of Japanese Wakame. J Reg Fish 48(1–2):1–17 (in Japanese with English abstract) Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ariji M (2011) A quantitative analysis for regional differences of tuna consumption preference. J Int Fish 10:27–41 (in Japanese with English abstract) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Society of Fisheries Science 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Research Institute of Fisheries ScienceJapan Fisheries Research and Education AgencyYokohamaJapan

Personalised recommendations