Skip to main content
Log in

Estimation of target strength of Sardina pilchardus and Sardinella aurita by theoretical approach

  • Original Article
  • Fisheries
  • Published:
Fisheries Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The target strength (TS) patterns of Sardina pilchardus and Sardinella aurita at 38 and 120 kHz were estimated by a prolate-spheroid model, using measurements of swimbladder length and width. The ratio of swimbladder length to total length (TL) was similar in both species, however the ratio of swimbladder width to TL was smaller and more variable for S. aurita. Assuming a normal distribution of fish swimming orientation angle (θ fish) with mean ± standard deviation (SD) of 0 ± 10°, the normalized (by TL) average TS (b 20) was estimated to be −64.0 dB (38 kHz) and −65.2 dB (120 kHz) for S. pilchardus, and −66.2 dB (38 kHz) and −67.2 dB (120 kHz) for S. aurita. Compared with currently applied b 20 values at 38 kHz, our results under four different θ fish assumptions (0 ± 10°, 0 ± 15°, −5 ± 10°, and −5 ± 15°) were 6–9 dB higher for S. pilchardus and 5–7 dB higher for S. aurita. This suggests four- to eightfold overestimation risk for S. pilchardus and three- to fivefold overestimation risk for S. aurita when using the currently applied b 20 values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. FAO (2013) Report of the FAO Working Group on the Assessment of Small Pelagic Fish off Northwest Africa. Casablanca. Morocco, 24–28 May 2011. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Report No. 1026. Rome

  2. FAO (2013) Report of the FAO working group on the assessment of small pelagic fish off Northwest Africa. Dakar, Senegal 21–25 May 2012. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Report No. 1036. Rome

  3. Parrish RH, Serra R, Grant WS (1989) The monotypic sardines, Sardina and Sardinops: their taxonomy, distribution, stock structure, and zoogeography. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 46:2019–2036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bard FX, Koranteg KA (1995) Dynamics and use of sardinella resources from upwelling off Ghana and Ivory Coast. ORSTOM, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  5. ICES (2012) Report of the working group on small pelagic fishes, their ecosystems and climate impact (WGSPEC), 27 February–2 March 2012, Fuengirola, Spain. ICES CM 2012/SSGEF: 10

  6. Simmonds EJ, MacLennan DN (2005) Fisheries acoustics: theory and practice. Blackwell Science, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Hazen EL, Horne JK (2003) A method for evaluating the effects of biological factors on fish target strength. ICES J Mar Sci 60:555–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ona E (1990) Physiological factors causing natural variations in acoustic target strength of fish. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 70:107–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ona E (2003) An expanded target strength relationship for herring. ICES J Mar Sci 60:493–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Svellingen I, Ona E (1999) A summary of target strength observations on fishes from the shelf off West Africa. Joint Meeting of ASA/EAA/DEGA. J Acoust Soc Am 105(2)

  11. Barange M, Hampton I, Soule M (1996) Empirical determination of in situ target strengths of three loosely aggregated pelagic fish species. ICES J Mar Sci 53:225–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. ICES (2011) Report of the working group on acoustic and egg surveys for sardine and anchovy in ICES areas VIII and IX (WGACEGG), 22–26 November 2010, ICES CM 2010/SSGESST: 24

  13. Degnbol P, Lassen H, Staehr KJ (1985) In-situ determination of target strength of herring and sprat at 38 and 120 kHz. Dana 5:45–54

    Google Scholar 

  14. ICES (1982) Report of the 1982 planning group on ICES-coordinated herring and sprat acoustic surveys. ICES Document CM 1982/H: 04

  15. Foote KG (1987) Fish target strengths for use in echo integrator surveys. J Acoust Soc Am 82(3):981–987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Machias A, Tsimenides N (1996) Anatomical and physiological factors affecting the swim-bladder cross-section of the sardine Sardina pilchardus. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 53:280–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Whitehead PJP, Blaxter JHS (1989) Swimbladder form in clupeoid fishes. Zool J Linnean Soc 97:299–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Foote KG (1980) Importance of swimbladder in acoustic scattering by fish: a comparison of gadoid and mackerel target strengths. J Acoust Soc Am 67(6):393–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Foote KG (1985) Rather-high-frequency sound scattering by swimbladdered fish. J Acoust Soc Am 78:688–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Clay CS, Horne JK (1994) Acoustic models of fish: the Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua). J Acoust Soc Am 96:1661–1668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ye Z, Furusawa M (1995) Modeling of target strength of swimbladder fish at high frequencies. J Acoust Soc Jpn 16:371–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Furusawa M (1988) Prolate spheroidal models for predicting general trends of fish target strength. J Acoust Soc Jpn 9:13–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Foote KG (1980) Averaging of fish target strength functions. J Acoust Soc Am 67(2):504–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ona E (1984) Tilt angle measurements on herring. ICES CM 1984/B: 19

  25. Amakasu K, Sadayasu K, Abe K, Takao Y, Sawada K, Ishii K (2010) Swimbladder shape and relationship between target strength and body length of Japanese anchovy (Engraulis japonicus). J Mar Acoust Soc Jpn 37:46–59 (in Japanese with English abstract and captions)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Beltestad AK (1973) Feeding behaviour and vertical migration in 0-group herring (Clupea harengus L.) in relation to light intensity. Candidata realium thesis, University of Bergen, Norway (in Norwegian)

  27. Edwards JI, Armstrong F, Magurran AE, Pitcher TJ (1984) Herring, mackerel and sprat target strength experiments with behavioural observations. ICES CM 1984/B: 34

  28. Foote KG, Ona E (1985) Tilt angles of schooling penned saithe. ICES CM 1985/B: 26

  29. Huse I, Ona E (1996) Tilt angle distribution and swimming speed of overwintering Norwegian spring-spawning herring. ICES J Mar Sci 53:863–873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Edwards JI, Armstrong F (1983) Measurement of the target strength of live herring and mackerel. FAO Fish Rep 300:69–77

    Google Scholar 

  31. Edwards I, Armstrong F (1983) Target strength measurements on herring, sprat and mackerel. ICES CM 1983/B: 23

  32. Traynor JJ, Williamson NJ (1983) Target strength measurements of walleye pollock (Theragra chalcogramma) and a simulation study of the dual beam method. FAO Fish Rep 300:112–124

    Google Scholar 

  33. Amenzoui K, Ferhan-Tachinante F, Yahyaoui A, Kifani S, Mesfioui AH (2006) Analysis of the cycle of reproduction of Sardina pilchardus (Walbaum, 1792) off the Moroccan Atlantic coast. C R Biol 329:892–901

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Pešić A, Đurović M, Joksimović A, Regner S, Simonović P, Glamuzina B (2010) Some reproductive patterns of the sardine, Sardina pilchardus (Walbaum, 1792), in Boka Kotorska Bay (Montenegro, southern Adriatic Sea). Acta Adriat 51(2):159–168

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sawada K, Takahashi H, Abe K, Ichii T, Watanabe K, Takao Y (2009) Target-strength, length, and tilt-angle measurements of Pacific saury (Cololabis saria) and Japanese anchovy (Engraulis japonicus) using an acoustic-optical system. ICES J Mar Sci 66:1212–1218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhao X, Wang Y, Dai F (2008) Depth-dependent target strength of anchovy (Engraulis japonicus) measured in situ. ICES J Mar Sci 65:882–888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kang D, Cho S, Lee C, Myoung JG, Na J (2009) Ex situ target-strength measurements of Japanese anchovy (Engraulis japonicus) in the coastal Northwest Pacific. ICES J Mar Sci 66:1219–1224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sawada K, Ye Z, Kieser R, McFarlane GA, Miyanohana Y, Furusawa M (1999) Target strength measurements and modeling of walleye pollock and Pacific hake. Fish Sci 65:193–205

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the technicians of the Institut National de Recherche Halieutique (INRH) Agadir regional center for collection of fish samples in Agadir, Dr. Atsushi Kawabata for providing measurement data of E. japonicus, and the captain and crew of R.V. Al Amir Moulay Abdallah for keeping live S. pilchardus on board the vessel. The work was conducted under the Morocco–Japan cooperative project, “Capacity development of fisheries resource monitoring for the sustainable management of small pelagic resources in the Kingdom of Morocco” that involved cooperation between INRH and the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). We are also grateful for the scientific support provided by Hokkaido University throughout the project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tadanori Fujino.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ayoubi, S.E., Mamza, K., Fujino, T. et al. Estimation of target strength of Sardina pilchardus and Sardinella aurita by theoretical approach. Fish Sci 82, 417–423 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12562-016-0986-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12562-016-0986-8

Keywords

Navigation