Fisheries Science

, Volume 80, Issue 3, pp 427–434 | Cite as

Evaluation of the predictability of fishing forecasts using information theory

Original Article Fisheries

Abstract

The catch forecast is important for fisheries activities. Previous research has tried to improve forecast accuracy. However the forecast accuracy does not directly correspond to the forecast benefit, and an inaccurate forecast could be more beneficial than accurate one. Herein as part of the forecast utility, predictability was evaluated using information theory. Mutual information (MI) was used as index of predictability. MI denotes a reduction in uncertainty when a forecast is taken into account. Adding this, hit ratio (HR) and relative entropy (R) were used as consistency indices. HR denotes a frequency for which the predicted values are consistent with the actual values, and R denotes the distance of the probability distribution between the actual and forecasted fishing conditions. As an application, the long-term change-ratio forecasts in 1972–2009 (n = 36), short-term change-ratio forecasts (n = 34), and short-term level forecasts (n = 33) in 2004–2009 of Pacific saury Cololabis saira fishery were evaluated. The order of MI, HR, and R varied between these forecasts, indicating that forecast predictability and consistency do not correspond. Monitoring multiple indices would improve forecasting systems.

Keywords

Fishing forecast Forecast evaluation Information theory Mutual information Pacific saury Relative entropy 

Supplementary material

12562_2014_736_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (199 kb)
Supplementary Tables (PDF 198 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Sazonova L, Osipov G, Godovnikov M (1999) Intelligent system for fish stock prediction and allowable catch evaluation. Environ Modell Softw 14:391–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kendall AW, Duker GJ (1998) The development of recruitment fisheries oceanography in the United States. Fish Oceanogr 7:69–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Megrey B, Lee YW, Macklin S (2005) Comparative analysis of statistical tools to identify recruitment–environment relationships and forecast recruitment strength. ICES J Mar Sci 62:1256–1269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Watanabe K, Tanaka E, Yamada S, Kitakado T (2006) Spatial and temporal migration modeling for stock of Pacific saury Cololabis saira (Brevoort), incorporating effect of sea surface temperature. Fish Sci 72:1153–1165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rupp DE, Wainwright TC, Lawson PW, Peterson WT (2012) Marine environment-based forecasting of coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) adult recruitment. Fish Oceanogr 21:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hanson PJ, Vaughan DS, Narayan S (2006) Forecasting annual harvests of Atlantic and Gulf Menhaden. N Am J Fish Manag 26:753–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Watanabe K (2008) Application and issues of prediction model of fish abundance index for Pacific saury. Annu Rep Res Meet Saury Resour 56:158–161 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rupp DE, Wainwright TC, Lawson PW, Bradford MJ (2012) Effect of forecast skill on management of the Oregon coast coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) fishery. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 69:1016–1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Takahashi H (1989) About fishing forecast for Pacific saury. Annu Rep Res Meet Saury Resour 37:245–249 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee YW, Megrey BA, Macklin SA (2009) Evaluating the performance of Gulf of Alaska walleye pollock (Theragra chalcogramma) recruitment forecasting models using a Monte Carlo resampling strategy. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 66:367–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Murphy AH (1993) What is a good forecast? An essay on the nature of goodness in weather forecasting. Weather Forecast 8:281–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    DelSole T (2004) Predictability and information theory. Part I: measures of predictability. J Atmos Sci 61:2425–2440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 27:379–423, 623–656Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cover TM, Thomas JA (1991) Elements of information theory. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tang Y, Kleeman R, Moore AM (2008) Comparison of information-based measures of forecast uncertainty in ensemble ENSO prediction. J Clim 21:230–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kullback S, Leibler RA (1951) On information and sufficiency. Ann Math Stat 22:79–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Akaike H (1973) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov N, Csaki F (eds) Proceedings of 2nd international symposium on information theory. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, pp 267–281Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Takasugi T (1989) The situation of utilization of the Pacific saury fishing forecast obtained by the interview. Annu Rep Res Meet Saury Resour 37:262–268 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Watanabe K, Ueno Y, Ito S, Suyama S, Nakagami M, Watanobe M, Utiyama M, Sno N, Tutui M, Tomikawa N, Mizuno T, Sato H, Kosaka S (2004) Methods and issues of Pacific Saury short-term forecast. Annu Rep Res Meet Saury Resour 52:253–260 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fisheries Agency Tohoku National Fisheries Research Institute (1989–1999) Annual report of the research meeting on saury resources, Miyagi, pp 37–47 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fisheries Agency Tohoku National Fisheries Research Institute Hachinohe branch office (2000, 2001) Annual report of the research meeting on saury resources, Aomori, pp 48–49 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fisheries Research Agency Tohoku National Fisheries Research Institute Hachinohe Branch Office (2002–2011) Annual report of the research meeting on saury resources, Aomori, pp 50–59 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Watanabe K (2005) Evaluation of fishing forecast. Annu Rep Res Meet Saury Resour 53:149–150 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Watanabe K (2006) Evaluation of fishing forecast for Pacific saury in the Northwestern Pacific Ocean in August 2004. Annu Rep Res Meet Saury Resour 54:162–164 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Watanabe K (2007) Evaluation of fishing forecast for Pacific saury in the Northwestern Pacific Ocean in August 2005. Annu Rep Res Meet Saury Resour 55:148–150 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Natsume M (2008) Evaluation of fishing forecast for Pacific saury in the Northwestern Pacific Ocean in August 2006. Annu Rep Res Meet Saury Resour 56:136–137 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Watanabe K (2009) Evaluation of fishing forecast for Pacific saury in the Northwestern Pacific Ocean in August 2007. Annu Rep Res Meet Saury Resour 57:130–132 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Watanabe K (2010) Evaluation of fishing forecast for Pacific saury in the Northwestern Pacific Ocean in August 2008. Annu Rep Res Meet Saury Resour 58:144–146 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Watanabe K (2011) Evaluation of fishing forecast for Pacific saury in the Northwestern Pacific Ocean in August 2009. Annu Rep Res Meet Saury Resour 59:140–142 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kraskov A, Stögbauer H, Grassberger P (2004) Estimating mutual information. Phys Rev E 69:066138CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japanese Society of Fisheries Science 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Fisheries SciencesHokkaido UniversityHakodateJapan
  2. 2.Faculty of Fisheries SciencesHokkaido UniversityHakodateJapan

Personalised recommendations