Fisheries Science

, Volume 78, Issue 4, pp 841–847 | Cite as

Fish body condition and recruitment success reflect antecedent flows in an Australian dryland river

  • Stephen R. Balcombe
  • Jaye S. Lobegeiger
  • Sharon M. Marshall
  • Jonathan C. Marshall
  • Diana Ly
  • Darryl N. Jones
Original Article Biology

Abstract

In fluctuating aquatic environments such as intermittent streams, fish condition is often highly variable due to the associated fluctuating levels of food resources. Having the physiological capacity to both metabolise and catabolise lipids, fish can survive through droughts and rapidly gain condition during flows and floods. Dryland rivers continuously cycle through periods of boom and bust due to their intermittent patterns of rainfall and flow. To help gain an understanding of how fish respond physiologically to varying antecedent flow conditions, we examined body condition measured by percent tissue water content of two generalist fish species in an Australian dryland river. We predicted that fish would be in better condition following recent flows and poorer condition when there had been no recent flows. Our expectations were met for both species with low water tissue content after high flows and high tissue water content after significant drying. It was also found that strong juvenile recruitment was also evident when body condition was high, indicating that when there are food resource spikes driven by flow pulses fish can utilise resources both to produce offspring and to store as lipid for future survival.

Keywords

Fish condition Antecedent hydrology Flow variability Recruitment 

References

  1. 1.
    Arthington AH, Balcombe SR, Wilson GG, Thoms MC, Marshall JC (2005) Spatial and temporal variation in fish assemblage structure in isolated waterholes during the 2001 dry season of an arid-zone river, Cooper Creek, Australia. Mar Freshw Res 56:25–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Balcombe SR, Bunn SE, McKenzie-Smith FJ, Davies PE (2005) Variability of fish diets between dry and flood periods in an arid zone floodplain river. J Fish Biol 67:1552–1567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burford M, Cook A, Fellows CS, Balcombe SR, Bunn SE (2008) Sources of carbon fuelling production in an arid floodplain river. Mar Freshw Res 59:224–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Paukert C, Rogers RS (2005) Factors affecting condition of flannelmouth suckers in the Colorado River, Grande Canyon, Arizona. North Am J Fish Manage 24:648–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Adams SM (1999) Ecological role of lipids in the health and success of fish populations. In: Arts MT et al. (eds) Lipids in freshwater ecosystems. Springer, New York, pp 300–318Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kent M (1990) Hand held instrument for fat/water determination in whole fish. Food Control 1:47–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Plante S, Lambert Y, De la Noule J (2005) Alternative methods for measuring energy content in winter flounder. North Am J Fish Manage 25:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Balcombe SR, Arthington AH (2009) Temporal changes in fish abundance in response to hydrological variability in a dryland floodplain river. Mar Freshw Res 60:146–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Puckridge JT, Walker KF, Costelloe JF (2000) Hydrological persistence and the ecology of dryland rivers. Reg Rivers 16:385–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Balcombe SR, Arthington AH, Foster ND, Thoms MC, Wilson GG, Bunn SE (2006) Fish assemblages of an Australian dryland river: abundance, assemblage structure and recruitment patterns in the Warrego River, Murray–Darling Basin. Mar Freshw Res 57:619–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Balcombe SR, Bunn SE, Arthington AH, Fawcett JH, McKenzie-Smith FJ, Wright A (2007) Fish larvae, growth and biomass relationships in an Australian arid zone river: links between floodplains and waterholes. Freshw Biol 52:2385–2398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sternberg D, Balcombe S, Marshall J, Lobegeiger J (2008) Food resource variability in an Australian dryland river: evidence from the diet of two generalist native fish species. Mar Freshw Res 59:137–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Balcombe SR, Arthington AH, Thoms MC, Wilson GG (2011) Fish assemblage patterns across a gradient of flow regulation in an Australian dryland river system. River Res Appl 27:168–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pusey B, Kennard M, Arthington AH (2004) Freshwater fishes of North-eastern Australia. CSIRO, CollingwoodGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Medeiros ESF, Arthington AH (2008) Diel variation in food intake and diet composition of three native fish species in floodplain lagoons of the Macintyre River, Australia. J Fish Biol 73:1024–1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Blessing JJ, Marshall JC, Balcombe SR (2010) Humane killing of fish for scientific research: a comparison of two methods. J Fish Biol 76:2571–2577PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lloret J, Galzin R, Gil de Sola L, Souplet A, Demestre M (2005) Habitat related differences in lipid reserves of some exploited fish species in the north western Mediterranean continental shelf. J Fish Biol 67:51–65Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Systat Software, Inc. (SSI), (2004). ‘Systat® for Windows®.’ Systat Software, Inc., RichmondGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Quinn GP, Keogh MJ (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Spranza JJ, Stanley EH (2000) Condition, growth, and reproductive styles of fishes exposed to different environmental regimes in a prairie drainage. Environ Biol Fish 59:99–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Oliva-Paterna FJ, Minano PA, Torralva M (2003) Habitat quality affects the condition of Barbus sclateri in Mediterranean semi arid streams. Environ Biol Fish 67:13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fellows CS, Bunn SE, Sheldon F, Beard NJ (2009) Benthic metabolism in two turbid floodplain rivers. Freshw Biol 54:236–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lloret J, Rätz H (2000) Condition of cod (Gadus morhua) off Greenland during 1982–1988. Fish Res 4:79–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Richoux NB, Deibel D, Thompson RJ, Parrish CC (2004) Seasonal changes in the lipids of Mysis mixsta (Mysidae) from the hypobenthos of a cold ocean environment (Conception Bay, Newfoundland). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 61:1940–1953CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japanese Society of Fisheries Science 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen R. Balcombe
    • 1
  • Jaye S. Lobegeiger
    • 2
  • Sharon M. Marshall
    • 2
  • Jonathan C. Marshall
    • 2
  • Diana Ly
    • 1
  • Darryl N. Jones
    • 3
  1. 1.eWater Cooperative Research Centre and Australian Rivers InstituteGriffith UniversityNathanAustralia
  2. 2.eWater Cooperative Research Centre and Queensland Department of Environment and Resource ManagementDutton ParkAustralia
  3. 3.Environmental Futures CentreGriffith UniversityNathanAustralia

Personalised recommendations