Fisheries Science

, Volume 75, Issue 3, pp 805–810 | Cite as

Improvement of the extraction procedure for hyaluronan from fish eyeball and the molecular characterization

Original Article Food Science and Technology

Abstract

The object of this study was to improve the isolation procedure of hyaluronan and to compare characteristics of hyaluronan from the eyeball of bigeye tuna Thunnus obesus with other sources. General sources of hyaluronan are from Streptococcus zooepidemicus and rooster comb. Hyaluronan can be also obtained from the vitreous of fish eyes. Pure hyaluronan of higher molecular weight was obtained by the following improved extraction procedure: the frozen vitreous of a tuna eyeball was used to avoid contamination with blood, muscle tissue, and other factors; extracting was carried out over a long time period under cold conditions; cetylpyridinium chloride was used in order to separate mucopolysaccharides containing hyaluronan in the initial procedure without the process of removing fat and protein by reagents. The hyaluronan obtained was characterized by gel permeation chromatography, dynamic light scattering measurements, and viscometry. The characteristics of hyaluronan from tuna eyeballs were similar to those from other sources. However, the viscosity was lower. The possible reason could be ascribed to the wide distribution of molecular size in the vitreous humor of fish eye.

Keywords

Fish eyeball Hyaluronan Isolation Molecular size Molecular weight Viscosity Vitreous humor 

References

  1. 1.
    Boas NF (1949) Isolation of hyaluronic acid from the cock’s comb. J Biol Chem 181:573PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lago G, Oruna L, Cremata JA, Perez C, Coto G, Lauzan E, Kennedy JF (2005) Isolation, purification and characterization of hyaluronan from human umbilical cord residues. Carbohydr Polym 62:321–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sunwoo HH, Nakano T, Sim JS (1998) Isolation and characterization of proteoglycans from growing antlers of wapiti. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 124:437–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Devaraj N, Bhavanandan VP (1992) Purification of mucin glycoprotein by density gradient centrifugation in cesium trifluroacetate. Analy Biochem 206:142–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Meyer K, Palmer JW (1934) The polysaccharide of the vitreous humor. J Biol Chem 107:629–634Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Laurent TC (1970) Structure of hyaluronic acid. In: Balazs EA (ed) Chemistry and molecular biology of the intercellar matrix. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Meyer K (1958) Chemical structure of hyaluronic acid. Fed Proc 17:1075–1077PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Soltes L, Mendichi R, Kogan G, Schiller J, Stankovska M, Arnhold J (2006) Degradative action of reactive oxygen species on hyaluronan. Biomacromolecules 7:659–668PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Scott JE (1992) The chemical morphology of vitreous. EYE 6:553–555PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dittmar H (1998) Der aktuelle Stand der BSE-Verordmumgen: Verwendungsverbote fuer Risikomaterial in kosmetischen Mitteln. (The present state of BSE regulations: prohibition of use of hazardous material in cosmetics). Parfuem Kosmet 79:14–16 (in German)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rimpler M (1996) BSE-Rinderwahnsinn und seine Bedeutung fuer die Kosmetik. (BSE-bovine madness and its impact on cosmetics). Parfuem Kosmet 77:404–408 (in German)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shiedrin A, Bigelow R, Christopher W, Yang L, Miller RJ, Arbabi S, Maier RV (2004) Evaluation of hyaluronan from different sources: Streptococcus zooepidemicus, rooster comb, bovine vitreous, and human umbilical cord. Biomacromolecules 5:2122–2127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mizuno H, Iso N, Saito T, Ogawa H, Sawairi H, Saito M (1991) Characterization of hyaluronic acid of yellowfin tuna eyeball. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 57:517–519Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Matsumura G, Salegui MD, Herp A, Pigman W (1963) The preparation of hyaluronic acid from bovine synovial fluid. Biochimi Biophys Act 69:574–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bettelheim FA, Paunovic M (1979) Light scattering of normal human lens. I. Application of random density and orientation fluctuation theory. Biophys J 26:85–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kohn J (1957) A cellulose acetate supporting medium for zone electrophoresis. Clin Chem Acta 2:297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Swann DA (1968) Studies on hyaluronic acid: I. The preparation and properties of rooster comb hyaluronic acid. Biochim Biophys Acta 156:17–30PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Matsumura G (1971) Hyaluronic acid. Tanpakushitsu Kakusan Koso (Protein Nucleic Acid and Enzyme) 16:233–238 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ansari RR, Suh KI, Dunker S, kitaya N, Sebag J (2001) Quatitative molecular characterization of bovine vitreous and lens with non-invasive dynamic light scattering. Eye Res 73:859–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Balazs EA (1960) Physiology of the vitreous body. In: Schepens (ed) Importance of the vitreous body in retina surgery with special emphasis on reoperations. St Louis, MosbyGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Balazs EA, Denlinger JL (1984) The vitreous. In: Davson J (ed) The eye. Academic Press, New York, pp 535–589Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japanese Society of Fisheries Science 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Food Science and TechnologyTokyo University of Marine Science and TechnologyTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations