Skip to main content

Comparison of HIV Prevalence Among Antenatal Clinic Attendees Estimated from Routine Testing and Unlinked Anonymous Testing

Abstract

In 2015, WHO and UNAIDS released new guidance recommending that countries transition from conducting antenatal clinic (ANC) unlinked anonymous testing (ANC-UAT) for tracking HIV prevalence trends among pregnant women to using ANC routine testing (ANC-RT) data, which are more consistent and economic to collect. This transition could pose challenges for distinguishing whether changes in observed prevalence are due to a change in underlying population prevalence or due to a change in the testing approach. We compared the HIV prevalence measured from ANC-UAT and ANC-RT in 15 countries that had both data sources in overlapping years. We used linear mixed-effects model (LMM) to estimate the RT-to-UAT calibration parameter as well as other unobserved quantities. We summarized the results at different levels of aggregation (e.g., country, urban, rural, and province). Based on our analysis, the HIV prevalence measured by ANC-UAT and ANC-RT data are consistent in most countries. Therefore, if large discrepancy is observed between ANC-UAT and ANC-RT at the same location, we recommend that people should be cautious and investigate the reason. For countries that lack information to estimate the calibration parameter, we propose an informative prior distribution of mean 0 and standard deviation 0.2 for the RT-to-UAT calibration parameter.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Alkema L, Raftery AE, Clark SJ (2007) Probabilistic projections of HIV prevalence using Bayesian melding. Ann Appl Stat 1(1):229–248

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bao L (2012) A new infectious disease model for estimating and projecting HIV/AIDS epidemics. Sex Transm Infect 88(Suppl 2):i58–i64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bao L, Raftery AE (2010) A stochastic infection rate model for estimating and projecting national HIV prevalence rates. Sex Transm Infect 86(Suppl 2):ii93–ii99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bao L, Salomon JA, Brown T, Raftery AE, Hogan DR (2012) Modelling national HIV/AIDS epidemics: revised approach in the UNAIDS Estimation and Projection Package 2011. Sex Transm Infect 88(Suppl 2):i3–i10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown T, Grassly NC, Garnett G, Stanecki K (2006) Improving projections at the country level: the UNAIDS Estimation and Projection Package 2005. Sex Transm Infect 82(suppl 3):iii34–iii40

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brown T, Bao L, Raftery AE, Salomon JA, Baggaley RF, Stover J, Gerland P (2010) Modelling HIV epidemics in the antiretroviral era: the UNAIDS Estimation and Projection package 2009. Sex Transm Infect 86(Suppl 2):ii3–ii10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown T, Bao L, Eaton JW, Hogan DR, Mahy M, Marsh K, Mathers BM, Puckett R (2014) Improvements in prevalence trend fitting and incidence estimation in EPP 2013. AIDS (Lond Engl) 28(4):S415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dee J, Calleja JMG, Marsh K, Zaidi I, Murrill C, Swaminathan M (2017) HIV surveillance among pregnant women attending antenatal clinics: evolution and current direction. JMIR Public Health Surveill 3(4):e85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ghys PD, Brown T, Grassly NC, Garnett G, Stanecki KA, Stover J, Walker N (2004) The UNAIDS Estimation and Projection Package: a software package to estimate and project national HIV epidemics. Sex Transm Infect 80(Suppl 1):i5–i9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gonese E, Mushavi A, Mungati M, Mhangara M, Dzangare J, Mugurungi O, Dee J, Kilmarx PH, Shambira G, Tshimanga MT, Hargrove J (2016) Is Zimbabwe ready to transition from anonymous unlinked sero-surveillance to using prevention of mother to child transmission of HIV (PMTCT) program data for HIV surveillance? Results of PMTCT utility study, 2012. BMC Infect Dis 16(1):97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gourlay A, Wringe A, Todd J, Michael D, Reniers G, Urassa M, Njau P, Kajoka D, Lema L, Zaba B (2015) Challenges with routine data sources for PMTCT programme monitoring in East Africa: insights from Tanzania. Glob Health Action 8(1):29987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hogan DR, Salomon JA (2012) Spline-based modelling of trends in the force of HIV infection, with application to the UNAIDS Estimation and Projection Package. Sex Transm Infect 88(Suppl 2):i52–i57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lehmann EL (2004) Elements of large-sample theory. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sheng B, Marsh K, Slavkovic AB, Gregson S, Eaton JW, Bao L (2017) Statistical models for incorporating data from routine HIV testing of pregnant women at antenatal clinics into HIV/AIDS epidemic estimates. AIDS (Lond Engl) 31(Suppl 1):S87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sirengo M, Rutherford GW, Otieno-Nyunya B, Kellogg TA, Kimanga D, Muraguri N, Umuro M, Mirjahangir J, Stein E, Ndisha M, Kim AA (2016) Evaluation of Kenya’s readiness to transition from sentinel surveillance to routine HIV testing for antenatal clinic-based HIV surveillance. BMC Infect Dis 16(1):113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Stover J, Brown T, Marston M (2012) Updates to the Spectrum/Estimation and Projection Package (EPP) model to estimate HIV trends for adults and children. Sex Transm Infect 88(Suppl 2):i11–i16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. UNAIDS/WHO Working Group on Global HIV/AIDS and STI Surveillance (2003) Guidelines for conducting HIV sentinel serosurveys among pregnant women and other groups. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) and World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), NIH/NIAID 5-R01-AI136664, NIH 5-R03-AI125001, NSF IGERT-DGE-1144860. The authors are also grateful to Kimberly Marsh and Kaiyi Wu.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Le Bao.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (pdf 1404 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sheng, B., Eaton, J.W., Mahy, M. et al. Comparison of HIV Prevalence Among Antenatal Clinic Attendees Estimated from Routine Testing and Unlinked Anonymous Testing. Stat Biosci 12, 279–294 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12561-020-09265-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12561-020-09265-4

Keywords

  • Antenatal clinic
  • HIV prevalence
  • Unlinked anonymous HIV testing
  • Routine HIV testing
  • Calibration parameter
  • Linear mixed-effects model