Assessing Population Level Genetic Instability via Moving Average
- 47 Downloads
Tumoral tissues tend to generally exhibit aberrations in DNA copy number that are associated with the development and progression of cancer. Genotyping methods such as array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) provide means to identify copy number variation across the entire genome. To address some of the shortfalls of existing methods of DNA copy number data analysis, including strong model assumptions, lack of accounting for sampling variability of estimators, and the assumption that clones are independent, we propose a simple graphical approach to assess population-level genetic alterations over the entire genome based on moving average. Furthermore, existing methods primarily focus on segmentation and do not examine the association of covariates with genetic instability. In our methods, covariates are incorporated through a possibly mis-specified working model and sampling variabilities of estimators are approximated using a resampling method that is based on perturbing observed processes. Our proposal, which is applicable to partial, entire or multiple chromosomes, is illustrated through application to aCGH studies of two brain tumor types, meningioma and glioma.
KeywordsaCGH data Moving average Perturbation method Gaussian process Genomic data
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 9.Guha S, Li Y, Neuberg D (2006) Bayesian hidden Markov modeling of array CGH data. Harvard University Biostatistics Working Paper Series, vol 24 Google Scholar
- 10.Heiskanen MA, Bittner ML, Chen Y, Khan J, Adler KE, Trent JM, Meltzer PS (2000) Detection of gene amplification by genomic hybridization to cDNA microarrays. Cancer Res 60(4):799–802 Google Scholar
- 14.Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK (eds) (2007) World health organization histological classification of tumours of the central nervous system. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon Google Scholar
- 16.Mohapatra G, Betensky RA, Miller ER, Carey B, Gaumont LD, Engler DA, Louis DN (2006) Glioma test array for use with formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue: array comparative genomic hybridization correlates with loss of heterozygosity and fluorescence in situ hybridization. J Mol Diagnostics 8(2):268–76 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Okada Y, Hurwitz EE, Esposito JM, Brower MA, Nutt CL, Louis DN (2003) Selection pressures of TP53 mutation and microenvironmental location influence epidermal growth factor receptor gene amplication in human glioblastomas. Cancer Res 63:413–416 Google Scholar
- 24.Pollack JR, Sorlie T, Perou CM, Rees CA, Jeffrey SS, Lonning PE, Tibshirani R, Botstein D, Borresen-Dale A, Brown PO (2002) Microarray analysis reveals a major direct role of DNA copy number alternation in the transcriptional program of human breast tumors. PNAS 99:12963–12968 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Rueda OM, Diaz-Uriarte R (2006) A flexible statistical method for detecting genomic copy-number changes using Hidden Markov Models with reversible jump MCMC. COBRA preprint series Google Scholar
- 31.Veltman JA, Fridlyand J, Pejavar S, Olshen AB, JKorkola JE, DeVries S, Carroll P, Kuo WL, Pinkel D, Albertson D, Cordon-Cardo C, Jain AN, Waldman FM (2003) Array-based comparative genomic hybridization for genome-wide screening of DNA copy number in bladder tumors. Cancer Res 63(11):2872–2880 Google Scholar
- 33.Weiss MM, Snijders AM, Kuipers EJ, Ylstra B, Pinkel D, Meuwissen SGM, Van Diest PJ, Albertson DG, Meijer GA (2003) Determination of amplicon boundaries at 20q13.2 in tissue samples of human gastric adenocarcinomas by high-resolution microarray comparative genomic hybridization. J Pathol 200:320–326 CrossRefGoogle Scholar