Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Deep Non-linear and Unbiased Deep Decisive Pooling Learning–Based Opinion Mining of Customer Review

  • Published:
Cognitive Computation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nowadays, opinion mining is becoming a trending research topic. The existing opinion mining detection schemes were used to determine the status of product’s performance, wherein information is disseminated (positive or negative), even though the existing methods did not provide high accuracy and also increase the computational complexity and computation time. To overcome these issues, a deep non-linear and unbiased deep decisive pooling (N-UDDP) learning is proposed in this paper for getting accurate opinion mining of customer review. Initially, the customer reviews are taken from Amazon dataset. Then, the customer reviews are given as input to N-UDDP learning for getting accurate opinion mining of customer review. The proposed N-UDDP learning contains skip-gram input layer, non-linear ReLU-enabled activation function layer, and unbiased decisive pooling layer. The skip-gram input layer is utilized to obtain the computationally efficient features from input customer review. The non-linear ReLU-enabled activation function layer is used to obtain the unique and relevant features through eigenvector generation. Finally, the mining accuracy can be improved via unbiased decisive pooling layer by explicitly incorporating their confidence over the pooling function through decisive rules. Initially, the customer reviews are taken from Amazon dataset. Then, the customer reviews are given as input to N-UDDP learning for getting accurate opinion mining of customer review. The proposed N-UDDP learning contains skip-gram input layer, non-linear ReLU-enabled activation function layer, and unbiased decisive pooling layer. The skip-gram input layer is utilized to obtain the computationally efficient features from input customer review. The non-linear ReLU-enabled activation function layer is used to obtain the unique and relevant features through eigenvector generation. Finally, the mining accuracy can be improved via unbiased decisive pooling layer by explicitly incorporating their confidence over the pooling function through decisive rules. The proposed N-UDDP method attains 10.99%, 44.83%, 17.53%, 11.93%, 11.19%, 53.96%, and 13.285% higher accuracy than the existing methods, like ontology-driven feature engineering, multi-task learning framework, CNN-RNN, NA-DLSTM, MLP, autoencoder, and MV-DNN. The proposed N-UDDP method shows better accuracy by reducing the computational time and overhead.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data is created or analyzed in this study.

References

  1. Luo J, Huang S, Wang R. A fine-grained sentiment analysis of online guest reviews of economy hotels in China. J Hosp Market Manag. 2021;30(1):71–95.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nazir A, Rao Y, Wu L, Sun L. Issues and challenges of aspect-based sentiment analysis: a comprehensive survey. IEEE Trans Affect Comput. 2020

  3. Kumar RS, Devaraj AFS, Rajeswari M, Julie EG, Robinson YH, Shanmuganathan V. Exploration of sentiment analysis and legitimate artistry for opinion mining. Multimed Tools Appl. 2021;1–16.

  4. Nandhini MDS, Pradeep G. A hybrid co-occurrence and ranking-based approach for detection of implicit aspects in aspect-based sentiment analysis. SN Computer Science. 2020;1(3):1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rhayem A, Mhiri MBA, Gargouri F. Semantic web technologies for the internet of things: systematic literature review. Internet of Things. 2020;100206.

  6. Wan C, Freitas AA. An empirical evaluation of hierarchical feature selection methods for classification in bioinformatics datasets with gene ontology-based features. Artif Intell Rev. 2018;50(2):201–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Siddiqui S, Rehman M, Muhammad Doudpota S, et al. Ontology driven feature engineering for opinion mining. IEEE Access. 2019;7:67392–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bankapur S, Patil N. An enhanced protein fold recognition for low similarity datasets using convolutional and skip-gram features with deep neural network. IEEE Trans Nanobiosci. 2020;20(1):42–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Prassanna J, Rahim R, Bagyalakshmi K, Manikandan R, Patan R. Effective use of deep learning and image processing for cancer diagnosis. In Deep Learning for Cancer Diagnosis; 2021. p. 147–168. Springer, Singapore.

  10. Yu J, Jiang J, Xia R. Global inference for aspect and opinion terms co-extraction based on multi-task neural networks. IEEE/ACM Trans Audio, Speech, Lang Process 2018;27(1).

  11. Ishaq A, Asghar S, Gillani SA. Aspect-based sentiment analysis using a hybridized approach based on CNN and GA. IEEE Access. 2020;8:135499–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Areed S, Alqaryouti O, Siyam B, Shaalan K. Aspect-based sentiment analysis for Arabic government reviews. In Recent Advances in NLP: The Case of Arabic Language; 2020. p. 143–162. Springer, Cham.

  13. Majumder N, Bhardwaj R, Poria S, Gelbukh A, Hussain A, Improving aspect-level sentiment analysis with aspect extraction. Neural Comput Appl. 2020;1–11.

  14. Li Z, Tian ZG, Wang JW, Wang WM. Extraction of affective responses from customer reviews: an opinion mining and machine learning approach. Int J Comput Integr Manuf. 2020;33(7):670–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Estrada MLB, Cabada RZ, Bustillos RO, Graff M. Opinion mining and emotion recognition applied to learning environments. Expert Syst Appl. 2020;150:113265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Abas AR, El-Henawy I, Mohamed H, Abdellatif A. Deep learning model for fine-grained aspect-based opinion mining. IEEE Access. 2020;8:128845–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zervoudakis S, Marakakis E, Kondylakis H, Goumas S. OpinionMine: a Bayesian-based framework for opinion mining using Twitter Data. Mach Learn Appli. 2021;3:100018.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Niknam M, Thulasiraman P. LPR: a bio-inspired intelligent learning path recommendation system based on meaningful learning theory. Educ Inf Technol. 2020;25(5):3797–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sharma A, Shekhar H. Intelligent learning based opinion mining model for governmental decision making. Procedia Compu Sci. 2020;173:216–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Da’u A, Salim N, Rabiu I, Osman A. Recommendation system exploiting aspect-based opinion mining with deep learning method. Inf Sci. 2020;512:1279–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Da’u A, Salim N, Rabiu I, Osman A. Weighted aspect-based opinion mining using deep learning for recommender system. Expert Syst Appl. 2020;140:112871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Srividya K, Sowjanya AM. NA-DLSTM–a neural attention based model for context aware Aspect-based sentiment analysis. Mater Today: Proceedings. 2021.

  23. Usama M, Ahmad B, Song E, Hossain MS, Alrashoud M, Muhammad G. Attention-based sentiment analysis using convolutional and recurrent neural network. Futur Gener Comput Syst. 2020;113:571–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Travaglino A, Raffone A, Gencarelli A, Saracinelli S, Riccardi C, Mollo A, Zullo F, Insabato L. Clinico-pathological features associated with mismatch repair deficiency in endometrial undifferentiated/dedifferentiated carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2021;160(2):579–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fahfouh A, Riffi J, Mahraz MA, Yahyaouy A, Tairi H. PV-DAE: a hybrid model for deceptive opinion spam based on neural network architectures. Expert Syst Appl. 2020;157:113517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Qian C, Zhang H, Li W, Shu B, Tang J, Li B, Chen Z, Liu H. A LiDAR aiding ambiguity resolution method using fuzzy one-to-many feature matching. J Geodesy. 2020;94(10):1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Natesan G, Arumugam R. Extracting sentiments by using fine-grained mining. Wireless Pers Commun. 2021;121(3):1879–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ke W, Gao J, Shen H, Cheng X. Incorporating explicit syntactic dependency for aspect level sentiment classification. Neurocomputing. 2021;456:394–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Naderalvojoud B, Sezer EA. Sentiment aware word embeddings using refinement and senti-contextualized learning approach. Neurocomputing. 2020;405:149–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Li X, Wang B, Li L, Gao Z, Liu Q, Xu H, Fang L. Deep2s: improving aspect extraction in opinion mining with deep semantic representation. IEEE Access. 2020;8:104026–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Misuraca M, Scepi G, Spano M. Using Opinion Mining as an educational analytic: an integrated strategy for the analysis of students’ feedback. Stud Educ Eval. 2021;68:100979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gupta N, Agrawal R. Application and techniques of opinion mining. In Hybrid Comput Intell; 2020. p. 1–23. Academic Press.

  33. Messaoudi C, Guessoum Z, Ben Romdhane L. Opinion mining in online social media: a survey. Soc Netw Anal Min. 2022;12(1):1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Serrano-Guerrero J, Romero FP, Olivas JA. Fuzzy logic applied to opinion mining: a review. Knowl-Based Syst. 2021;222:107018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Keyvanpour M, Karimi Zandian Z, Heidarypanah M. OMLML: a helpful opinion mining method based on lexicon and machine learning in social networks. Soc Netw Anal Min. 2020;10(1):1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Birjali M, Kasri M, Beni-Hssane A. A comprehensive survey on sentiment analysis: approaches, challenges and trends. Knowl-Based Syst. 2021;226: 107134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sears DR, Widmer G. Beneath (or beyond) the surface: Discovering voice-leading patterns with skip-grams. J Math Music. 2021;15(3):209–34.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Ombabi AH, Ouarda W, Alimi AM. Deep learning CNN–LSTM framework for Arabic sentiment analysis using textual information shared in social networks. Soc Netw Anal Min. 2020;10(1):1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Customer review dataset: https://www.cs.uic.edu/~liub/FBS/sentiment-analysis.html#datasets.

  40. Huang P, Xie X, Sun S. Multi-view opinion mining with deep learning. Neural Process Lett. 2019;50(2):1451–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Saraswathi K, Tamilarasi A. Ant colony optimization based feature selection for opinion mining classification. J Med Imaging Health Inform. 2016;6(7):1594–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Renukadevi T, Saraswathi K, Prabu P, Venkatachalam K. Brain Image Classification Using Time Frequency Extraction with Histogram Intensity Similarity. Comput Syst Sci Eng. 2022;41(2):645–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Brindha PG, Rajalaxmi R, Kabhilan S, Sangitkumar C, Sanjeevan L. Comparative study of SVM and CNN in identifying the types of skin cancer. J Crit Rev. 2020;7(11):640–3.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Assistant Professor (Senior Grade), Department of Computer Technology, Kongu Engineering College, Perundurai, Erode, Tamilnadu, India

    Saraswathi Kuppusamy & Renukadevi Thangavel

Authors
  1. Saraswathi Kuppusamy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Renukadevi Thangavel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saraswathi Kuppusamy.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuppusamy, S., Thangavel, R. Deep Non-linear and Unbiased Deep Decisive Pooling Learning–Based Opinion Mining of Customer Review. Cogn Comput 15, 765–777 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-022-10089-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-022-10089-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation