Similar Vague Concepts Selection Using Their Euclidean Distance at Different Granulation
- 52 Downloads
Recently, the calculus of fuzzy concept lattice is extensively studied with interval-valued and bipolar fuzzy set for the precise representation of vagueness in cognitive concept learning. In this process, selecting some of the semantic similar (or interesting) vague concept at user required granulation is addressed as one of the major issues. To conquer this problem, current paper aims at analyzing the cognitive concept learning based on the properties of vague graph, concept lattice and granular computing within (m × m) computational time. To mimic with the cognitive computing and its contextual data sets, two methods are proposed for the precise representation of human cognition based on the evidence to accept or reject the attributes using the calculus of vague set. The hierarchical order visualization among the extracted cognitive vague concept is shown through calculus of concept lattice for adequate description of their textual syntax analysis. In addition, another method is proposed to improve the quality of sentic (or cognitive) reasoning using semantics relationship among the discovered vague concepts at user defined information granulation. The obtained results from the proposed methods approve that the vague concept lattice and its reduction at user defined granulation provides an alternative way to analyze the cognitive contextual data set with an improved description of vague attributes “tall” and “young.” Euclidean distance provides a way to select some of the interesting vague concepts based on their semantic similarity. The obtained results from both of the proposed methods correspond to each other which validate the results. This paper establishes that cognitive contextual data set can be processed through the calculus of vague concept lattice, and granular computing. This gives an alternative and compact visualization of discovered patterns from the cognitive data set when compared to its numerical representation. In this way, the proposed method provides an adequate analysis for cognitive concept learning when compared to any of the available approaches. In addition, the proposed method provides various ways to select some of the interesting cognitive vague concepts at user defined granulation for their Euclidean distance within (m × m) computational time. However, the proposed method is unable to measure the fluctuation in uncertainty for the cognitive context at given phase of time. In the future, the author will focus on conquering this research problem with an illustrative example.
KeywordsCognitive learning Concept lattice Formal concept analysis Formal fuzzy concept Interesting pattern Vague graph
The author thanks the anonymous reviewers and Editor for their compliments to improve the quality of this paper.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals.
- 3.Akram M, Feng F, Sarwar S, Jun YB. Certain type of vague graphs. UPB Bull Sci Series 2014;76 (1):143–154.Google Scholar
- 8.Bělohlívek R, Vychodil V. What is fuzzy concept lattice. In: Proceedings of CLA Olomuc; 2005 Czech Republic. p. 34–45.Google Scholar
- 10.Bloch I. Geometry of spatial vague sets based on vague numbers and mathematical morphology. In: Fuzzy logic and applications, lecture notes in computer science; 2009, vol. 5571, p. 237–245.Google Scholar
- 11.Borzooei RA, Rashmanlou H. 2016. New concepts of vague graphs. Int J Mach Learn Cybern. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-015-0475-x.
- 12.Burusco A, Fuentes–Gonzalez R. The study of the L-fuzzy concept lattice. Matheware Soft Comput 1994; 1(3):209–218.Google Scholar
- 14.Cambria E, Fu J, Bisio F, Poria S. AffectiveSpace 2: enabling affective intuition for concept-level sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of 29th AAAI conference on artificial intelligence; 2015, p. 508–514.Google Scholar
- 18.Chunsheng C, Zhenchun Z, Feng L, Ying Q. Application of vague set in recommender systems. In: Proceedings of 2nd International conference on logistics, informatics and service science (LISS); 2012, p. 1353–1359 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32054-5-192.
- 19.Djouadi Y. Extended Galois derivation operators for information retrieval based on fuzzy formal concept lattice. SUM 2011. In: Benferhal S. and Goant J., editors. LNAI: Springer–Verlag; 2011. p. 346–358.Google Scholar
- 20.Djouadi Y, Prade H. Interval–valued fuzzy formal concept analysis. ISMIS 2009. In: Rauch et al., editors. LNAI: Springer–Verlag; 2009. p. 592–601.Google Scholar
- 21.Dubois D, Prade H. Formal concept analysis from the standpoint of possibility theory. Proceedings of ICFCA 2015. LNAI; 2015. p. 21–38.Google Scholar
- 25.Hu BQ. Three-way decision spaces based on partially ordered sets and three–way decisions based on hesitant fuzzy sets. Knowled–Based Syst 2016;91:16–31.Google Scholar
- 28.Khan S, Gani A, Wahab AW Ab, Singh PK. 2017. Feature selection of Denial-of-Service attacks using entropy and granular computing. Arab J Sci Eng, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-017-2634-8.
- 36.Liu H, Li Q, Zhou X. L–information systems and complete L–lattices. Neural Comput Applic. 2012;23 (3):1139–1147.Google Scholar
- 45.Ramakrishna N. Vague graphs. International Journal of Computational Cognition 2009;7:51–58.Google Scholar
- 46.Rosenfeld A. Fuzzy graphs. Fuzzy sets and their applications. In: Zadeh L A, Fu K S, and Shimura M, editors. New York: Academic Press; 1975. p. 77–95.Google Scholar
- 48.Singh PK, Aswani Kumar C. A note on computing crisp order context of a fuzzy formal context for knowledge reduction. J Inf Process Syst 2015;11(2):184–204.Google Scholar
- 52.Singh PK. Processing linked formal fuzzy context using non-commutative composition. Inst Integr Omics Appl Biotechnol (IIOAB) J 2016;7(5):21–32.Google Scholar
- 56.Singh PK. 2017. Concept learning using vague concept lattice. Neural Process Lett; 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-017-9699-y.
- 58.Skowron A. Rough sets and vague concepts. Fundam Inform. 2005;64(2005):417–431.Google Scholar
- 61.Wille R. Restructuring lattice theory: an approach based on hierarchies of concepts. Ordered sets. In: Rival I., editors. NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series; 1982. p. 445–470.Google Scholar
- 63.Yao YY. Concept lattices in rough set theory. Proceedings of 2004 Annual meeting of the North American fuzzy information processing society. Washington D.C.: IEEE Computer Society; 2004. p. 796–801.Google Scholar
- 65.Zeng W, Zhao Y, Gu Y. Similarity measure for vague sets based on implication functions. Knowl–Based Syst 2016;94:124–131.Google Scholar