Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On Findings of Category and Other Concept Cells in the Brain: Some Theoretical Perspectives on Mental Representation

  • Published:
Cognitive Computation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is substantial neurophysiological evidence from decades of single-cell studies that category and other concept cells exist in both human and animal brains. This indicates that the brain can generalize and create abstract concepts and encode and represent such abstractions using single cells. These single-cell findings cannot be accounted for and explained by the theory of distributed representation and population coding, the dominant theory in the brain sciences. In light of these findings, this paper reexamines the two contending mental representational schemes, localist and distributed, on the basis of computational efficiency, the ability to simultaneously process and activate many different concepts, and the structure for semantic cognition. The evidence for category and concept cells favors localist representation in the brain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Quian Quiroga R, Kraskov A, Koch C, Fried I. Explicit encoding of multimodal percepts by single neurons in the human brain. Curr Biol. 2009;19:1308–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Quian Quiroga R. Concept cells: the building blocks of declarative memory functions. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012;13(8):587–97.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Suthana N, Fried I. Percepts to recollections: insights from single neuron recordings in the human brain. Trends in cognitive sciences. 2012;16(8):427–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Roy A. A theory of the brain: localist representation is used widely in the brain. Front Psychol. 2012;3:551. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00551.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Roy A. An extension of the localist representation theory: grandmother cells are also widely used in the brain. Front Psychol. 2013;4:300. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00300.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fried I, McDonald K, Wilson C. Single neuron activity in human hippocampus and amygdala during recognition of faces and objects. Neuron. 1997;18:753–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kreiman G, Koch C, Fried I. Category-specific visual responses of single neurons in the human medial temporal lobe. Nat Neurosci. 2000;3:946–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kawasaki H, Adolphs R, Oya H, Kovach C, Damasio H, Kaufman O, Howard Iii M. Analysis of single-unit responses to emotional scenes in human ventromedial prefrontal cortex. J Cogn Neurosci. 2005;17(10):1509–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gross CG. How inferior temporal cortex became a visual area. Cereb Cortex. 1994;5:455–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Logothetis N, Sheinberg D. Visual object recognition. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1996;19:577–621.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Freedman D, Miller E. Neural mechanisms of visual categorization: insights from neurophysiology. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2008;32:311–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gothard KM, Battaglia FP, Erickson CA, Spitler KM, Amaral DG. Neural responses to facial expression and face identity in the monkey amygdala. J Neurophysiol. 2007;97:1671–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lin LN, Chen GF, Kuang H, Wang D, Tsien JZ. Neural encoding of the concept of nest in the mouse brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:6066–71.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yoshida I, Mori K. Odorant category profile selectivity of olfactory cortex neurons. J Neurosci. 2007;27(34):9105–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sugase Y, Yamane S, Ueno S, Kawano K. Global and fine information coded by single neurons in the temporal visual cortex. Nature. 1999;400(6747):869–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Collins A, Quillian M. Retrieval time from semantic memory. J Verba Learn Verbal Behav. 1969;8:240–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rumelhart D, Todd P. Learning and connectionist representations. In: Meyer Kornblum, editor. Attention and performance XIV: synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience. Massachusetts: MIT Press; 1993. p. 3–30.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rogers T, McClelland J. A parallel distributed processing approach. Semantic cognition: MIT Press; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rogers T, McClelland J. Precis of semantic cognition: a parallel distributed processing approach. Behav Brain Sci. 2008;31:689–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kootstra G, de Boer B, Schomaker LR. Predicting eye fixations on complex visua stimuli using local symmetry. Cogn Comput. 2011;3(1):223–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Foulsham T, Underwood G. If visual saliency predicts search, then why? Evidence fro normal and gaze-contingent search tasks in natural scenes. Cogn Comput. 2011;3(1):48–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wischnewski M, Belardinelli A, Schneider WX, Steil JJ. Where to look next? Combining static and dynamic proto-objects in a TVA-based model of visual attention. Cogn Comput. 2010;2(4):326–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Garagnani M, Wennekers T, Pulvermüller F. Recruitment and consolidation of cell assemblies for words by way of Hebbian learning and competition in a multi-layer neural network. Cogn Comput. 2009;1(2):160–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information Systems, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA

    Asim Roy

Authors
  1. Asim Roy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Asim Roy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roy, A. On Findings of Category and Other Concept Cells in the Brain: Some Theoretical Perspectives on Mental Representation. Cogn Comput 7, 279–284 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-014-9307-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-014-9307-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation