Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

What Languages Tell Us About the Structure of the Human Mind

  • Published:
Cognitive Computation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Languages seem to fall into three communicative types. They all talk about reality, but they do not understand it in the same way: (1) some (Russian, Chinese and Hindi) talk about the situation common to the speaker and the hearer, (2) others (Georgian, Turkish and Bulgarian) about the speaker’s experience of that situation and (3) still others (Danish, Swedish and English) also involve the hearer’s experience of it. The choice among a third-person, a first-person or a second-person perspective is a semiotic choice, but it appears that the same kind of choice is made at other areas relating to perception and cognition. If one collects the three linguistic descriptions of ‘our world’, one gets access to the way in which our mind is organized and how it functions: people seem to have two different kinds of vision, and visual stimuli are processed in three stages corresponding to input (experience), intake (understanding) and outcome (a combination of what was experienced and what was understood).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Atkinson RC, Shiffrin JC. Human memory: a proposed system and its control processes. In: Spence KW, Spence JT, editors. The psychology of learning and motivation. New York: Academic Press; 1968. p. 89–195.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barsalou LW. Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral Brain Sci. 1999;22:577–660.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Berlin B, Kay P. Basic color terms: their universality and evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boduroglu A, Shah P, Nisbett RE. Cultural differences in allocation of attention in visual information processing. J Cross-Cult Psychol. 2009;40(3):349–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Boland JE, Chua HF, Nisbett RE. How we see it: culturally different eye movement patterns over visual scenes. In: Rayner K, Shen D, Bai X, Yan G, editors. Cognitive and cultural influences on eye movements. Tianjin: Tianjin People’s Publishing House; 2008. p. 363–78.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Boroditsky L. Metaphoric structuring: understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition. 2000;75:1–28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Boroditsky L. ‘Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers’ conception of time. Cognit Psychol. 2001;43:1–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bühler K. Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer Verlag; 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bundesen C, Habekost T. Principles of visual attention. Linking mind and brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Carmichael L, Hogan HP, Walter AA. An experimental study of the effect of language on the reproduction of visually perceived forms. J Exp Psychol. 1932;15:73–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Castelhano MS, Rayner K. Eye movements during reading, visual search, and scene perception: an overview. In: Rayner K, Shen D, Bai X, Yan G, editors. Cognitive and cultural influences on eye movements. Tianjin: Tianjin People’s Publishing House; 2008. p. 3–33.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chiao JY, Li Z, Harada T. Cultural neuroscience of consciousness: from visual perception to self-awareness. In: Whitehead C, editor. The origin of consciousness in the social world. Exeter: Imprint Academic; 2008. p. 58–69.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chomsky N. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton; 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chomsky N. Cartesian linguistics. A chapter in the history of rationalist thought. New York: Harper & Row; 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chua HF, Boland JE, Nisbett RE. Cultural variation in eye movements during scene perception. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102(35):12629–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Davidoff J, Luzzatti C. Language impairment and colour categories. Behavioral Brain Sci. 2005;28(4):494–5.

    Google Scholar 

  17. de Saussure F. Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot; 1916.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Durst-Andersen P. The grammar of linguistic semiotics. Reading Peirce in a modern linguistic light. Cybern Human Knowing. 2009;18:33–76.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Durst-Andersen P. Language, cognition and mentality. In: Durst-Andersen P, Lange E, editors. Mentality and thought. North, South, East and West. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press; 2010. p. 29–49.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Durst-Andersen P. Linguistic supertypes. A cognitive-semiotic theory of human communication. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Evans K, Rotello CM, Li XS, Rayner K. Scene perception and memory revealed by eye movements and ROC analyses: does a cultural difference truly exist? Q J Exp Psychol. 2009;62(2):276–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gao DG, Kao HSR. Psycho-geometric analysis of commonly used Chinese characters. In: Kao HSR, Gao DG, editors. Cognitive neuroscience studies of the Chinese language. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press; 2002. p. 195–206.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gordon P. Numerical cognition without words: evidence from Amazonia. Science. 2004;306:496–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Harnad S. The symbol grounding problem. Physica D. 1990;42:335–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hedden T, Ketay S, Aron A, Markus HR, Gabrieli JDE. Cultural influences on neural substrates of attentional control. Psychol Sci. 2008;19(1):12–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hespos SJ, Spelke ES. Conceptual precursors to language. Nature. 2004;430:453–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Krampen M. Children’s drawings. Iconic coding of the environment. New York: Plenum Press; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lakoff G, Johnson M. Philosophy in the flesh. The embodied mind and its challenges to Western thought. New York: Basic Books; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Liu W, Inhoff AW, Ye Y, Wu C. Use of parafoveally visible characters during the reading of Chinese sentences. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2002;28:1213–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Masuda T, Gonzalez R, Kwan L, Nisbett RE. Culture and aesthetic preference: comparing the attention to context of East Asians and Americans. Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 2008;34(9):1260–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Masuda T, Nisbett RE. Attending holistically vs. analytically: comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. J Pers Social Psychol. 2001;81(5):922–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Masuda T, Nisbett RE. Culture and change blindness. Cognit Sci. 2006;30:381–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. McKone E, Davies AA, Fernando D, Aalders R, Leung H, Wickramariyaratne T, Platow MJ. Asia has the global advantage: race and visual attention. Vision Res. 2010;50:1540–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Nisbett RE. The geography of thought: how Asians and Westerners think differently … and why. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Nisbett RE, Masuda T. Culture and point of view. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100(19):11163–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Nisbett RE, Masuda T. The influence of culture: holistic versus analytic perception. Trends Cognit Sci. 2006;9(10):467–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Peirce CS. Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, I-VIII. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1932–1958.

  38. Pinker S. The language instinct: the new science of language and mind. London: Penguin; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Pinker S. The stuff of thought: language as a window to human nature. New York: Viking; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Rayner K, Li X, Williams CC, Cave KR, Well AR. Eye movements during information processing tasks: individual differences and cultural effects. Vis Res. 2007;47:2714–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Roberson D, Davidoff J, Davies IRL, Shapiro LR. Color categories: evidence for the cultural relativity hypothesis. Cognit Psychol. 2005;50:378–411.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ruthrof H. Justifications for a perceptually oriented theory of language. Signs. 2009;3:1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Sapir E. Language. An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc; 1921.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Slobin D. From thought and language to “thinking for speaking”. In: Gumperz JJ, Levinson SC, editors. Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996. p. 70–96.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Tsang YK, Chen HC. Eye movements in reading Chinese. In: Rayner K, Shen D, Bai X, Yan G, editors. Cognitive and cultural influences on eye movements. Tianjin: Tianjin People’s Publishing House; 2008. p. 237–54.

    Google Scholar 

  46. von Humboldt W. Gesammelte Schriften (GS), I-XXVII. Berlin: Behr; 1903–1936.

  47. von Wright GH. Causality and determinism. New York: Columbia University Press; 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Whorf BL. Language. Thought and reality. Selected writings. Cambridge: The M.I.T. Press; 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Wittgenstein LJJ. Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009 [1953].

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Language, Cognition and Mentality, Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Per Durst-Andersen

Authors
  1. Per Durst-Andersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Per Durst-Andersen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Durst-Andersen, P. What Languages Tell Us About the Structure of the Human Mind. Cogn Comput 4, 82–97 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-011-9109-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-011-9109-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation